A Novel Effect for Glycine on Root System Growth of Habanero Pepper
Click on author name to view affiliation information
Click on author name to view affiliation information
Amino acids, a major fraction of the low-molecular-weight organic nitrogen in soil, act as signaling molecules that indicate the presence of nutrient-rich patches to the roots. To characterize the effects of amino acids on root growth, we used seedlings of habanero pepper (Capsicum chinense), one of the most widely cultivated annual spice crops in the world. We tested the effect of L-glutamate, L-aspartate, and glycine on the primary root of seedlings grown aseptically under different conditions of pH and light. L-glutamate and L-aspartate did not inhibit the root growth of habanero pepper. In contrast, glycine inhibited the growth of roots, stimulated root hair growth, and induced a significant accumulation of starch grains in the root apex. The use of aminoethoxyvinylglycine, an inhibitor of ethylene biosynthesis, and the evaluation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase expression provided evidence of a role for ethylene in the root responses to glycine. We suggest that these changes in the root apex in response to exogenous glycine could be an important adaptive response that allows plants to efficiently access the fluctuating availability of nutrients in the soil.
It is known that low nutrient availability restricts plant growth in many environments, especially in places that are extremely poor in nutrients such as the tropics (Dakora and Phillips, 2002). Nutrient availability in soil fluctuates unpredictably and can change several orders of magnitude over a distance of centimeters or the course of hours (Hodge, 2004). In terrestrial plants, roots are the organs that sense and acquire nutrients in the soil.
In plants, nitrogen is the mineral nutrient that is required in the largest quantities and represents up to 2% of plant dry matter. As a result of its important role in metabolism, the availability of nitrogen (N) is one of the key factors that limits crop productivity (Masclaux-Daubresse et al., 2010). Nitrate is the major source of N for plants in agricultural soil; therefore, most studies of root plasticity in response to N have been performed using this inorganic N source (reviewed by Alvarez et al., 2012).
Amino acids represent a major fraction of the low-molecular-weight organic N that is dissolved in the soil (Jones et al., 2005). The presence and concentrations of different amino acids vary greatly from one ecosystem to another. In general, these compounds are found at low concentrations in the soil, ≈0.01 to 10 μM (Jones et al., 2005), but their levels reach millimolar levels in patches with decomposing organic matter (Öhlund and Näsholm, 2004). In these patches, glutamic acid, serine, glycine, alanine, and aspartic acid are the most abundant amino acids (Lipson and Näsholm, 2001).
In addition to their importance as a N source for some plants in low-N systems (Forsum et al., 2008), it has been recently suggested that amino acids may be sensed in the root tip by specific receptors and act as signaling molecules that indicate the presence of nutrient-rich patches in the soil (Walch-Liu et al., 2006b).
Excised root culture has been used to test amino acids as both potential growth factors and a source of N for root growth (Harris, 1959; Skinner and Street, 1954; Street et al., 1960). Skinner and Street (1954) reported both positive and negative effects of glycine, L-glutamate, and other amino acids on excised Senecio vulgaris roots. Arginine, but not valine or glycine, was found to be effective as a sole source of N for the growth of excised Trifolium pratense roots (Harris, 1959). In contrast, arginine supplied as a sole source of N had no detectable effect on the root growth of isolated oat (Avena sativa) embryos, although valine, serine, tyrosine, isoleucine, leucine, and threonine all reduced the growth of roots in length by more than two-thirds (Harris, 1956).
Recent studies of regulatory interactions between amino acids and root growth have been conducted in seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana (Walch-Liu and Forde, 2008; Walch-Liu et al., 2006a). However, the root response to amino acids is dependent on several factors such as the species, type of amino acid, and their concentration (Harris, 1959; Skinner and Street, 1954; Street et al., 1960; Walch-Liu and Forde, 2008; Walch-Liu et al., 2006a). For example, L-glutamate did not significantly change the primary root (PR) growth of Brassica napus, and under certain experimental conditions, it induced an exactly opposite response to that reported in A. thaliana (Leblanc et al., 2008).
The habanero pepper belongs to the genus Capsicum and is cultivated in Yucatan, Mexico, where more than 90% of these soils are lithosols and rendzinas. The soil in this area is mostly clay, shallow, and is characterized by a high organic matter content, alkaline pH, and low inorganic N (Borges-Gómez et al., 2008).
Peppers (Capsicum sp.) are a unique spice used as a basic flavoring and coloring ingredient in many cuisines worldwide that adds tanginess to otherwise bland dishes (Ravishankar et al., 2003). The genus Capsicum is one of the most cultivated annual and spice crops worldwide with a cultivated area of 1.65 million hectares with a global production of 24 million tonnes (Bosland and Votava, 2000).
Similar to any other crop of economic importance, pepper production is affected by abiotic factors such as water and nutrient availability, which diminish the yield and quality of the fruit (Ochoa-Alejo and Ramirez-Malagon, 2001). For example, N and potassium can directly affect the synthesis of capsaicinoids, the compounds that confer pungency to the pepper fruit (Medina-Lara et al., 2008). No genetic investigation of root response to soil N has been undertaken in pepper (Wang and Bosland, 2006).
Reports of amino acids affecting the root growth of Solanaceae family members, which include habanero pepper, are scarce and inconclusive, because they present limited data or contradictory effects (Kim et al., 2010; Street et al., 1960; Walch-Liu et al., 2006a).
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of amino acids on the PR growth of habanero pepper. We also characterized these effects under pH and light conditions similar to those previously tested for A. thaliana (Walch-Liu et al., 2006a) and extend this characterization using dark conditions, as roots grow in the soil, and pH conditions similar to those used for habanero pepper cultivation in Yucatan peninsula soils (Bautista et al., 2005; Borges-Gómez et al., 2008). Given that the glycine-induced phenotype of habanero pepper root was similar to the one observed in ethylene studies (Strader et al., 2010), we evaluated the effect of glycine on the expression levels of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) oxidase, a key enzyme in the ethylene biosynthesis pathway, which has been demonstrated to be a target of transcriptional regulation by nutritional stress and others abiotic deleterious conditions (Lynch and Brown, 1997; Morgan and Drew, 1997). Glycine inhibited cell elongation but not the cell number in the root apex. We suggest that the inhibitory effect of glycine on habanero pepper PR growth is likely the result of augmented ethylene production.
Capsicum chinense ‘Orange’ was sourced from Seminis Vegetable Seeds (Seminis Vegetable Seeds, St. Louis, MO). Seeds were surface-sterilized (Celis-Arámburo et al., 2011) and germinated by placing them in 9-cm petri dishes containing a thin layer of cotton covered with filter paper moistened with sterile distilled water. The dishes were placed in the dark at 25 ± 2 °C.
Once the radicle had protruded (after ≈5 d), the seeds were transferred to 9-cm petri dishes that were oriented vertically and placed in the dark at 25 ± 2 °C. The growth medium (25 mL per petri dish) contained 23 mm 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES) (pH 5.7), 0.5% (w/v) sucrose, 1% (w/v) agar-agar and B5 salts (Gamborg et al., 1968) (1:50 final dilution) in which KNO3 and (NH4)2SO4 were replaced with 1 mm KCl and 0.5 mm L-glutamine.
Once the roots had developed (4 to 5 d), seedlings with a 22 ± 2 mm-long PR were transferred to treatment dishes (three seedlings per dish) containing the same growth medium, except that amino acids were added. The superior segment of the medium in the dishes was removed so that the aerial portion of the seedling did not contact the medium; only the root was placed on the treatment medium.
To determine the effect of amino acids on root growth, aqueous stock solutions (100 mm) of D-glutamate, L-glutamate, L-aspartate, and glycine were prepared and filtered for sterilization. Aliquots of each solution were separately added to the growth medium (pH 5.7) after autoclaving, adjusting the concentration of each amino acid to 1 mm in the medium. In the control group, 1 mm KCl was added to the medium (2 mm KCl total in the medium) instead of amino acids. Another control for the experiment was performed in which L-glutamine was eliminated from the growth medium, and the seedlings were only treated with 1 mm L-glutamate. Each petri dish was positioned vertically and stored at 25 ± 2 °C with a 16-h light (123 µmol·m−2·s−1) and 8-h dark photoperiod for 4 d. PR growth was recorded at Day 4, and PR length was measured directly on the petri dish with a ruler. This experiment was repeated three times using five petri dishes for each treatment (n = 15 seedling per treatment). We applied a one-way experimental design using six treatments and one measurement time (PR growth at Day 4 of treatment).
For dose–response experiments, L-glutamate concentrations in the medium were adjusted to 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1, and 5 mm. In all cases, the amount of potassium (K) in the medium was adjusted to 5 mm by adding KCl, and the control treatment contained 5 mm KCl in the medium (6 mm KCl total) instead of L-glutamate. The experiment was carried out in similar conditions as described for the previous experiment (pH 5.7, 16/8 h light/dark), and PR growth was evaluated on Day 4 of treatment. This experiment was repeated two times using 15 seedlings for each concentration treatment (90 seedlings total). Similar to the previous experiment, we applied a one-way experimental design using six concentrations of L-glutamate and one measurement time.
To test the effect of pH and light conditions on root growth in the presence of amino acids, L-glutamate and glycine treatments were performed at pH 7.5, and the 23 mm MES in the medium was replaced with 23 mm 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid. Each petri dish (five per treatment; n = 15 seedlings for each treatment) was positioned vertically to permit root growth, and the dishes were stored at 25 ± 2 °C with either a continuously dark or 16/8 h light/dark, depending on the experiment.
Daily PR growth was recorded from Days 0 to 4 at the same hour in which the seedlings were treated. PR length was measured directly on the petri dish with a ruler, and the roots were observed and photographed using a stereoscopic microscope (Leica MZ FLIII; Leica Microsystems, Tokyo, Japan) at the end of the experiment. The data are presented as daily growth rate (centimeters per day) over 4 d of treatment or the growth accumulated between Days 0 and 4 (centimeters). This experiment was repeated three times with 15 seedlings per treatment. The experimental design was one-way with three treatments (KCl, L-glutamate, and glycine) and one time (daily growth or accumulated growth) at each pH condition (5.7 or 7.5) or light condition (dark or photoperiod condition).
Seedlings were cultured under the following treatment conditions (15 seedlings for each treatment): 1 mm KCl (control), 1 mm L-glutamate, or 1 mm glycine for 3 d under similar conditions to the previously described experiments (pH 5.7 and dark conditions). For detailed anatomical studies, we selected three roots from the 15 seedlings in each treatment group that showed average PR growth, taking into account the daily growth results under the same conditions from the previous experiment that were performed in triplicate. Roots were fixed in formalin/acetic acid/ethanol/water [10:5:50:35 (by volume)]. After 48 h of fixation, the specimens were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series from 30% to 100% (v/v), infiltrated, and embedded in plastic resin (JB-4 glycol methacrylate; Polysciences, Los Angeles, CA).
Longitudinal sections 3 µm thick were cut using a microtome (Microm HM 325; Thermo Scientific, Walldorf, Germany) from the root tip. Sections were stained with Schiff reagent as described by McManus (1961) and 7% (w/v) Naphthol blue black mounted in Permount (SPI5-500; Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ), analyzed, and photographed using a microscope (Primo Star; Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany). Images were assembled using Adobe Photoshop CS5 software (Adobe System, San Jose, CA) and these images were used to quantify the length of the root cap and meristematic, transitions, and elongation zones. The cell number and mean cell lengths in the epidermal cell files from each zone and the distance from the root tip to the first root hair were determined using National Institutes of Health (NIH) ImageJ software (Schneider et al., 2012). Three PRs per treatment were processed and these data were confirmed by the images from the cleared roots (five roots per treatment) using the method reported by Dubrovsky et al. (2006).
Serial transverse sections of 3 µm were made through ≈2330 µm of tissue starting from the root tip (three PRs per treatment, selected as described previously for longitudinal sections). Transverse sections were processed in a similar manner to the longitudinal sections, and the radial root diameter was quantified from these images using NIH ImageJ software. We applied a one-way experimental design using three treatments with three repetitions (anatomic sections from three roots).
Transverse sections also were stained with 0.5% (w/v) I2-KI (Lugol’s iodine staining) for visualization of starch grains by light microscopy as reported by Ponce et al. (2005).
To determine the level of starch, we sampled 8 mm from the root apex of seedlings (30 seedlings per treatment) treated for 3 d under a dark condition on pH 5.7 media with 1 mm glycine or 1 mm KCl (control). The extraction and determination of starch were performed as described previously (Rodas-Garcia and Collazo-Ortega, 2006). The experiment was repeated twice. We applied a one-way experimental design using two treatments with two samples (two repetitions) replicated three times (n = 6).
We used seedlings grown for 3 d in the presence of 1 mm KCl (control), 1 mm glycine, or 1 mm glycine + 1 µM aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) in dark conditions and pH 5.7 to evaluate the levels of ACC oxidase gene expression. Total RNA was isolated from 15 PR apices (8 mm from the root apex) from each treatment using an RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Gaithersburg, MD) and quantified with a spectrophotometer (Nanodrop 2000; Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE). For the cDNA synthesis, 400 ng of total RNA was reverse-transcribed using oligo-dT and SuperScriptTM reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Then, 100 ng of cDNA was used in the subsequent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The reactions were performed in a real-time PCR system (StepOne; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix-UDG (Invitrogen). The PCR conditions were as follows: 1 cycle at 95 °C for 5 min, 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 22 s. We used specific primers for an ACC oxidase gene cloned from habanero peppers (AJ879117), which previously were used to evaluate the transcript levels of ACC oxidase (Núñez-Pastrana et al., 2011). The specific primers used for PCR were forward (F): CATTACGGCCGGGGACATT and reverse (R): TGCTTTCCCAGTCTGTGTTG. Tubulin served as an internal control with primer F: GACCTTGAATCGGCTTATGG and R: TATCCTGGGTGAACGCTTTG. The results were reported as an average of two biological repeats (two experiments each from 15 seedlings), each replicated three times per plate. mRNA abundance was calculated as fold change = 2^(ΔΔCt) = 2^[ΔCt(treatment) – ΔCt(control)], where ΔΔCt = ΔCt(ACC oxidase treatment – tubulin treatment) – ΔCt(ACC oxidase control – tubulin control). ΔCt represents the difference in cycle numbers at which amplification first exceeds the threshold fluorescence level. We applied a one-way experimental design using two treatments.
We treated the seedlings in a manner similar to that described for the ACC oxidase gene expression analysis, although 1 µM AVG was added to the KCl and glycine (Gly) treatments. Control experiments were performed adding only 1 mm KCl or 1 mm Gly to the medium without AVG. The PR length was measured after 3 d of treatments using a ruler. Fifteen seedlings were used for each treatment, and the experiments were performed twice. We applied a one-way experimental design using four treatments (KCl, KCl + AVG, Gly, Gly + AVG) and one measurement time (PR growth at Day 3 of treatment).
The experimental design used was specified for each experiment. The results are representative of two (dose-response experiment and AVG experiments) or three (amino acids effect experiment and pH or light conditions experiments) independent experiments. The results of two independent experiments were shown together for starch analysis and ACC oxidase expression. The results were compared using Tukey’s adjusted test for multiple comparisons (P < 0.05) after a one-way analysis of variance (Proc GLM, SAS Version 9.1; SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was conducted. Real-time PCR data were analyzed in Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and subjected to Student’s t test.
Previous studies have shown that only L-glutamate had a significant effect on the root growth of A. thaliana (Walch-Liu et al., 2006b). To determine whether this amino acid could affect the PR growth of the habanero pepper, we initially tested the effect of 1 mm L-glutamate on the PR of aseptically grown seedlings under conditions that were similar to those that were tested for A. thaliana (i.e., photoperiod conditions and pH 5.7) (Walch-Liu et al., 2006b). L-glutamate did not alter the root growth of the habanero pepper when compared with control with KCl (Fig. 1A), which contrasts with what was previously reported for A. thaliana (Kim et al., 2010; Walch-Liu and Forde, 2008; Walch-Liu et al., 2006b).
Citation: Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 138, 6; 10.21273/JASHS.138.6.433
The dose–response curve demonstrated that a range between 0.25 and 5 mm of L-glutamate had no effect on root growth. The root growth (mean ± se, n = 15 seedlings) on Day 4 was 3.82 ± 0.20, 4.01 ± 0.19, 4.09 ± 0.18, 3.84 ± 0.20, 3.78 ± 0.10, and 3.76 ± 0.13 cm for 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1, and 5 mm of L-glutamate, respectively.
Root growth in the presence of 1 mm D-glutamate (3.92 ± 0.15 cm) was similar to the control with 1 mm KCl (3.75 ± 0.21 cm) after 4 d of treatment. The presence of 0.5 mm L-glutamine did not change the root response to L-glutamate (3.91 ± 0.22 and 3.82 ± 0.16 cm without or with L-glutamine, respectively), which demonstrates that there is no interaction between L-glutamine and L-glutamate on the PR growth of the habanero pepper.
We also examined the effect of other abundant amino acids in the soil such as L-aspartate and glycine. Using similar conditions to those that were described, L-aspartate did not affect root growth, which was 3.50 ± 0.10 cm on Day 4 of treatment, but the same concentration of glycine significantly inhibited root growth by 20% (Fig. 1A).
pH and light conditions play an important role in the plant response to signals (Brenner et al., 2000; Hu et al., 2011; Thornton, 2001). The habanero pepper is typically grown in soil at pH 7.5 in the Yucatán (Borges-Gómez et al., 2008). In this study, we tested the effects of L-glutamate and glycine on seedling root growth at pH 7.5 under normal photoperiod conditions and at pH 5.7 and 7.5 on seedlings grown in the dark. The inhibitory effect of glycine was lost at pH 7.5 in normal photoperiod conditions (Fig. 1A). However, when the experiment was conducted under dark conditions, the inhibition of root growth by glycine was ≈30% after 4 d of treatment, independent of the pH conditions of the medium (Fig. 1B). The habanero pepper root was insensitive to L-glutamate under all test conditions (Fig. 1A–B).
When the effects of amino acid were evaluated over time, no significant differences in PR growth were observed between treatments on the first day of treatment (Fig. 2). However, glycine-treated roots that were exposed to normal photoperiod conditions at pH 5.7 consistently exhibited a PR growth rate that was significantly lower (0.75 cm·d−1) at all time points when compared with roots that were grown in the presence of KCl (≈1 cm·d−1 at 3 d) (Fig. 2A). The PR growth rate for roots grown in 1 mm KCl in the dark, at either of the two pH conditions, was ≈1.2 cm·d−1, whereas in roots that were treated with 1 mm glycine, a lower growth rate (≈0.55 cm·d−1) was observed after 4 d (Fig. 2C–D). No effect was observed when the roots were exposed to any of the amino acids in normal photoperiod conditions at pH 7.5 (Fig. 2B). Based on the results presented, L-glutamate-treated roots did not significantly grow slower than roots that were treated with KCl in the dark (Fig. 2C–D).
Citation: Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 138, 6; 10.21273/JASHS.138.6.433
The effects of glycine shown here are novel and do not seem to be caused by an alteration in the N content applied to the root, because applying the same concentration of other amino acids such as L-glutamate, L-aspartate, and L-glutamine did not significantly modify root growth. Our results regarding glycine and root growth contrast with those that were reported previously for L-glutamate. Walch-Liu et al. (2006b) reported that A. thaliana roots from ecotype C24 were more susceptible to lose the ability to resume root growth after 3 d of treatment with micromolar concentrations of L-glutamate, which suggested a loss of the meristem. The inhibitory effect of glycine on the habanero pepper PR was dependent on the pH of the medium, especially when the plants were grown under normal photoperiod conditions but not when they were grown in the dark. This result suggests that glycine induces specific events in different light conditions, and these events are differentiated by their pH sensitivities.
Reportedly, the inhibitory effect of L-glutamate on the A. thaliana root could result from low pH toxicity because this effect was also caused by other acidic amino acids such as L-aspartate (Kim et al., 2010). We eliminated this possibility because glycine is a neutral amino acid and acidic amino acids did not affect habanero pepper growth.
However, the pH of the medium may interfere with glycine uptake. The uptake of many amino acids by plants is pH dependent, ranging between pH 4 and pH 6 (van Bel et al., 1981). Glycine uptake in Hordeum vulgare occurs at an optimal pH of 5.8 (Lien and Rognes, 1997); a pH increase from 3.5 to 9.2 causes a reduction in glycine uptake in Lolium perenne (Thornton, 2001), and glycine uptake by Pisum sativum shows little change between pH 2 to 9 (Dureja et al., 1984).
Because glycine had a greater effect on the root growth of seedlings grown in dark conditions at pH 5.7, we selected this treatment to further analyze the response of the habanero pepper root to amino acids. Figure 3A shows images of the root tips of amino acid-treated seedlings after 4 d, in which drastic effects were observed in glycine-treated roots. The glycine treatment produced longer root hairs than the KCl-treated and L-glutamate-treated seedlings (Fig. 3A), and the distance from the root apex to the first root hair was markedly reduced in this treatment (35%; Fig. 3B), which indicated a decrease in the size of the meristem and/or elongation zone. The habanero pepper seedlings did not produce visible lateral roots after 4 d in any of the tested treatments.
Citation: Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 138, 6; 10.21273/JASHS.138.6.433
To determine the zone affected on the root apex by glycine, we measured the lengths of the meristematic, transition (low elongation rate), and elongation zones (fast elongation) from longitudinal sections of roots treated for 3 d with 1 mm glycine, 1 mm L-glutamate, or 1 mm KCl (control) in seedlings grown in the dark at pH 5.7. As illustrated in Table 1, when treated with 1 mm glycine, the meristematic and elongation zones of seedlings decreased in length by ≈36% and 53%, respectively, but the transition zone length was not significantly affected when compared with a control that was not treated with glycine (Table 1). L-glutamate did not affect the lengths of root zones (Table 1).
Because cell division and cell elongation contribute to root length, we quantified the total cell number and mean cell length in a single file of epidermal cells by using a longitudinal section through the root apex. The beginning and end of the meristematic zone was considered to be the epidermal cell above the T-division and the first visible change in epidermal cell size, respectively (Fig. 4). We considered the transition zone to begin at the end of the meristematic zone and to continue into the drastically increased longitudinal cell expansion of the epidermis cell (Fig. 4). Additionally, we designated this region as the starting point of the elongation zone. The end of the elongation zone was marked as the epidermal cell that formed the first hair root (Fig. 4).
Citation: Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 138, 6; 10.21273/JASHS.138.6.433
The addition of 1 mm glycine to the growth medium of habanero pepper roots did not significantly change the longitudinal cell number in the root apex zones, although these values were slightly lower in the meristematic and elongation zones when compared with those that were observed in KCl-treated roots, as illustrated in Table 1. However, the mean cell length was lower in all of the apex zones of glycine-treated roots and the maximum glycine inhibitory effect on cell expansion was observed in the fast elongation zone, which was 51% lower (Table 1). This observation was consistent with the inhibition that was found in the elongation zone. L-glutamate had no effect on these parameters (Table 1).
Under our conditions, the root cells of KCl-, L-glutamate-, and glycine-treated roots entered the transition zone stage with an average cell length of 10, 10, or 9 μm, respectively, and increased their length to 126 μm (a 13-fold increase), 101 μm (a 10-fold increase), or 61.4 μm (a 7-fold increase), respectively, when they arrived at the differentiation zone stage (Table 1). Subsequently, glycine inhibition on cellular elongation was ≈35%, which was similar to the inhibition of root growth by this amino acid. We conclude that glycine inhibits habanero pepper PR growth by reducing cell elongation. Additionally, a significant increase in root width was observed in seedlings that were grown in the presence of glycine for 3 d (Table 2). L-glutamate did not affect the root width (Table 2).
The glycine-induced phenotype in our work is consistent with the results observed in ethylene studies: cell elongation inhibition, stimulation in radial expansion, and root hair elongation (Hu et al., 2011; Leblanc et al., 2008; Strader et al., 2010). It is known that ethylene controls root cell expansion through auxin (Strader et al., 2010) by inhibiting plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity (Staal et al., 2011). It has been reported that amino acids, particularly L-glutamate, could act upstream of ethylene to induce changes in root elongation and act as an endogenous signal (Leblanc et al., 2008).
To determine whether the inhibitory effect of glycine on PR growth is a result of ethylene production, we then investigated the effect of AVG, which is an antagonist of aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid synthase (Satoh and Yang, 1989), on PR growth in the presence of glycine and KCl (control) for 3 d. The presence of 1 µM AVG did not affect root growth in the control with KCl (3.1 ± 0.2 and 3.3 ± 0.3 cm without or with AVG, respectively). AVG effectively reversed the glycine-mediated reduction in habanero pepper PR growth (Fig. 5A–B), indicating that ethylene may be responsible for the inhibition of PR growth in the presence of glycine.
Citation: Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 138, 6; 10.21273/JASHS.138.6.433
ACC oxidase plays a role in regulating plant ethylene levels (Kende, 1993; Tian et al., 2009). We evaluated the expression levels of ACC oxidase from the root apex (8 mm) of habanero pepper seedlings grown for 3 d in the dark at pH 5.7 in the presence of KCl, glycine, or glycine + AVG. As illustrated in Figure 5C, glycine treatment increased the expression of ACC oxidase 4-fold in the root apex compared with KCl-treated roots. However, AVG does not have an effect at the transcript level of ACC oxidase (Fig. 5C) as was previously reported for Nicotiana tabacum (Avni et al., 1994).
Together, the results of our pharmacological and molecular approaches suggest that the inhibitory effect of glycine on habanero pepper PR growth is likely the result of elevated ethylene production.
We detected substantial differences in the appearance and distribution of starch grains between the KCl- and glycine-treated roots. In the KCl-treated roots, the starch grains were never detected in the transition and elongation zones, whereas a few starch grains were observed in the more apical region of the meristematic zone (Fig. 6A–B). However, in the glycine-treated roots, the starch grains were highly abundant in all of the meristematic zones and although less abundant, these grains were still visible in the transition zone but disappeared at the end of the elongation zone (Fig. 6C–D).
Citation: Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 138, 6; 10.21273/JASHS.138.6.433
Interestingly, the accumulation of starch grains by glycine treatment occurred specifically in the internal cortical layers with a minor portion in the endodermal layer as illustrated in Figure 6D. Although very rare, some starch grains were also noted in the outer cortical layer and pericycle of glycine-treated roots. Starch grains were absent in the epidermal cells and vascular tissue in roots from both treatments (Fig. 6C–D). These data also were confirmed by Lugol’s iodine staining (Fig. 6E).
The starch content was higher in the root tip of seedlings growing in the presence of glycine [2.91 ± 0.96 mg·g−1 fresh weight (FW)] compared with the seedlings treated with KCl (0.73 ± 0.10 mg·g−1 FW) (n = 6, two samples replicated three times, P = 0.05). Together with the anatomical analysis, these results confirm that glycine induced an accumulation of starch in habanero pepper root tips.
Carbon (C) and N metabolism inherently depend on each other because C skeletons are required for N assimilation. Interestingly, ethylene can induce accumulation of starch granules through the ETR2 receptor. This receptor inhibits the expression of α-amylase, which is an enzyme that is involved in the degradation of starch, and a monosaccharide transporter, which leads to inhibition of sugar translocation (Wuriyanghan et al., 2009). However, the iGLR-type receptors (ionotropic glutamate receptor) also can be important in C/N integration and the activation of these receptors by glycine may lead to starch biosynthesis (Dubos et al., 2005).
Soil acid hydrolysis produces between 20% and 50% of the total N as amino acids (Lipson and Näsholm, 2001). Glycine is one of the most abundant amino acids in soil, and the largest source of this amino acid for plants is most likely through the hydrolysis of protein and peptides by extracellular enzymes (Lipson and Näsholm, 2001). Glycine is more available to plants because it is a poor C source for microbes compared with other amino acids (Lipson et al., 1999). Additionally, it has been reported that the endogenous glycine concentration may exhibit large diurnal fluctuations in response to altered carbon dioxide levels, which is in contrast to L-glutamate, whose endogenous levels changed very little (Geiger et al., 1998). This observation suggests that glycine could function as a signaling molecule.
Our work describes a role for glycine in the habanero pepper root apex that has not been previously reported. The suppression of root growth by decreasing cellular elongation, stimulating root hair elongation, and increasing the starch content in root tips could be a glycine-induced adaptive response of some plants when they are growing in soils with high contents of organic matter. Recently, it has been reported that a similar root phenotype, which was induced by ethylene through auxin, is required for Solanum lycopersicum root penetration into the soil (Santisree et al., 2011).
The presence of exogenous glycine may arrest habanero pepper root growth to allow the roots to remain longer in nutrient-enriched niches found near decaying organic matter. Glycine promotes root hair growth that allows access to a greater surface area and volume of soil, which can favor both the acquisition of water and nutrients in these niches. In particular, roots hairs may be very important for the acquisition of soil resources that move only small distances by diffusion such as phosphorus, K, and micronutrient metals (Marschner, 1995). Given that the response to glycine could be advantageous to increase growth and nutrient acquisition for habanero pepper, field trials should include applying this amino acid to plants either directly or included in a fertilizer’s formulation. Our results suggest that ethylene regulates root hair elongation and the arrest of habanero pepper root growth in response to the presence of glycine in the soil.
Contributor Notes
This work was supported by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, CONACYT (Project 169041), and CONACYT fellowships to Angel V. Domínguez-May (213547) and Rosa Y. Us-Camas (300631).
We thank Miriam Monforte González for their kind contribution in work with images processing in Adobe Photoshop CS5 program. We thank Jose Juan Zúñiga for specific primers to amplify ACC oxidase.
The first two authors (A.V.D.-M. and M.C.-P.) contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.
These authors are in Unidad de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular de Plantas at CICY.
This author is in Unidad de Biotecnología at CICY.
Corresponding author. E-mail: ileana@cicy.mx.