Plant material.

In C. moschata, fruits from four F₅ (2007) and F₆ (2008 and 2009) breeding lines and three related, open-pollinated cultivars of butternut squash were used in this study. The open-pollinated cultivars were Waltham Butternut (WBN), Puritan Butternut (PBN), and New Hampshire Baby Butternut (NHBBN). Seed of these cultivars were obtained from two generations of self-pollinations to improve uniformity. NHBBN was derived from the original Butternut cultivar crossed to Tsurukubi, a Korean cultivar, to eliminate the problem of crook-necking in butternut squash (Mutschler and Pearson, 1987; Yeager and Meader, 1957). Waltham Butternut, a widely grown cultivar, was derived from a cross between NHBBN and an African C. moschata accession, and PBN was a selection out of WBN, but with slightly smaller fruit (Mutschler and Pearson, 1987). Four University of New Hampshire (UNH) breeding lines, NH.Mo421, NH.Mo851, NH.Mo910, and NH.Mo2521, were derived from a cross of ‘Bugle’, a butternut release from Cornell University with intermediate powdery mildew resistance, to a breeding line [NH.(PxB)-118-24-21] with oblate fruit shape. The breeding line was derived from an heirloom strain from Maine with oblate fruit, crossed to a breeding line derived from an open-pollinated Peruvian accession with high carotenoid concentration.

In C. maxima, four kabocha UNH breeding lines bred for intense flesh color, NH.Max33-12, NH.Max6331, NH264, and NH.Max5273, were evaluated for total carotenoid concentrations. Carotenoid profiles were examined in four commercial kabocha hybrids, ‘Eclipse’, ‘Thunder’, ‘Space Station’ (Rupp Seeds, Waseon, OH), and ‘Sunshine’ (Johnny’s Selected Seeds, Albion, ME). Fruit of the NH kabocha hybrids are dark green at maturity and similar in appearance to the original Buttercup cultivar, but with small blossom scars and more rounded shoulders. The parents of ‘Eclipse’ are a bush inbred line, NH.Max6331, with a complex pedigree, and NH.Max5273, a vining inbred line derived from the F₁ hybrid Kurijiman (Kyowa Seed Company, Japan). The parents of ‘Thunder’ are NH.Max5273 and a bush line, NH.Max2-12-11, developed before 1995. NH.Max6331 is one of the parents of ‘Space Station’, the other being a semibush line, NH.81110-2, developed from a complex pedigree. Three of the cultigens, NH.Max33-12 (F₇), NH.Max264 (F₅), and ‘Sunshine’, have orange rinds and carry the B^max gene (Paris and Brown, 2005) for precocious orange pigmentation of the fruit.

Plant culture.

Plots were established at the Woodman Research Farm in Durham, NH (lat. 43°N), or at the nearby Kingman Research Farm in Madbury, NH, in 2007, 2008, and 2009, using randomized complete block designs with three (2007 and 2009) or four (2008) replications and eight plants per plot. In 2008, the C. moschata cultigens and C. maxima breeding lines were grown in adjacent plots, and the C. maxima hybrids were grown in a separate field, and included additional hybrids not used in the present study. Plants were started from seed in 50-plug trays with Promix media (Premier Tech Horticulture, Quakertown, PA) and transplanted at the two true-leaf stage during the first week in June. Plants were grown on raised beds (≈15 cm high × 60 cm wide) covered with 31.8 µm black polyethylene mulch, and with drip tape (203.2 µm T-tape with 30 cm emitter spacing; T-Systems International, San Diego, CA) laid at a depth of ≈3 cm slightly off the bed center. Bed centers were 2.1 m apart. Before bed formation, fertilizer was applied broadcast at the rate of 56 kg·ha⁻¹ of N (calcium ammonium nitrate) and K (potassium chloride). Beginning ≈10 d before flowering, 5.6 kg·ha⁻¹ of N and 4.7 kg·ha⁻¹ of K were applied weekly through the drip tape for four or five consecutive weeks. Insect and disease control followed the recommendations given in the 2006–07 New England Vegetable Management Guide (Howell et al., 2007).

Harvesting and storage.

Fruits were tagged at anthesis (opening of the flower) and harvested at either 40 or 60 DAP. Squash is considered mature when seed development is complete in terms of seed fill (Loy, 2004), typically ≈55 DAP in temperate climates (Vining and Loy, 1998). One tagged fruit was harvested from each of four replications at 40 DAP for sampling, and 12 tagged fruits were harvested at 60 DAP for sampling at 0, 30, and 60 d of storage at 14 °C. Extra tagged fruit were harvested at 60 DAP to account for possible fruit loss during storage. Fruits were weighed at harvest and after removal from storage to determine weight loss.

Sampling methods.

Samples of C. moschata butternut squash were taken from the solid flesh in the neck region ≈2 cm proximal to the seed cavity. A 2 cm thick × 10 cm wide cross section of flesh was prepared by removing skin and cutting into eight smaller triangular samples. Samples of C. maxima kabocha and C. moschata with round to oblate fruits were taken from the shoulder of the squash, about midway between the peduncle and equatorial region of the fruit opposite to the ground spot. The fibrous inner tissue was removed from the interior of the cross section. Two 10 g sections of squash were cut transversely into 20 rectangular cuboidal sections (lengthwise from outer to inner) and stored in poly bags and frozen immediately (−80 °C). Preliminary analyses determined that samples prepared in this manner were uniform and representative of the carotenoid concentration in fruit mesocarp tissue (Bonina-Noseworthy, 2012).

Quantitative determination of total carotenoids.

Because light can degrade carotenoids, ultraviolet-blocking film (Gila Film Products, Martinsville, VA) was used to cover laboratory windows and ultraviolet-blocking, clear plastic tubes were used to cover the fluorescent lights. Either amber glassware or glassware covered in aluminum foil was used during analyses to block light. Carotenoids were extracted from frozen (−80 °C) squash, using 1.0 g samples homogenized with 40 mL of HPLC grade acetone (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for 4 min in an Omni-mixer (Sorvall Inc., Newtown, CT). The extracts were recovered by filtering through 0.5-mm Whatman No. 1 filters (Fisher Scientific) using a Buchner funnel under vacuum. Carotenoids were extracted two more times (40 mL fresh acetone per extraction) from the same tissue sample (110 mL final volume) until the tissue was colorless, resulting in 96% to 98% recovery of carotenoid pigments. The extracts were combined and absorbance at 450 nm determined in a Genesys 6, double-beam spectrophotometer (ThermoScientific, Pittsburgh, PA). For determining carotenoid concentrations, we used the following equations (Rodriguez-Amaya, 2001):where x is the weight or concentration of carotenoid, y is the volume of solution that gives an absorbance value at the specified wavelength, and A^1%_{1 cm} is the absorption coefficient of the carotenoid(s) in the solvent solution. An absorption coefficient (A^1%_{1 cm}) of 2500 was used for the mixed carotenoid solutions (Britton, 1985).

High-performance liquid chromatography.

Methodology similar to that described by Rodriguez-Amaya (2001) was used to prepare samples for HPLC analysis. Thirty mL aliquots were taken from the 110 mL carotenoid extracts used for the spectrophotometric total carotenoid determination. An internal standard, 50 μL transβ-apo-8-carotenoate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), was added to the 30 mL aliquots to estimate carotenoid losses during extraction and saponification. The 30-mL samples were partitioned into 10 mL of petroleum ether in a separatory funnel and water was added slowly until the two phases separated. The lower aqueous/acetone layer was discarded and the upper layer was reserved. Water (15 mL aliquots) was added to the separatory funnel four to five times until the petroleum ether layer was bright yellow and the lower layer was colorless. To ensure all of the carotenoids were transferred to the petroleum ether layer, absorbance of the aqueous layer at 450 nm was measured spectrophotometrically. The samples were transferred to screw cap, 25-mL glass tubes (Fisher Scientific). Samples were evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen using a nitrogen evaporator (Organomation Inc, Berlin, MA) in a water bath at 35 °C, as described by Toomey and McGraw (2007).

Both saponified and unsaponified samples were analyzed by HPLC to obtain information on degree of esterification of xanthophylls. Samples were saponified by adding 10 mL of 5.6% methanolic KOH to glass tubes containing the dried carotenoids, capped, and allowed to stand overnight (16 h) at room temperature in darkness (Toomey and McGraw, 2007). A saturated sodium chloride solution was added to samples, followed by vigorous agitation by hand for 30 s. Samples were then transferred to a separatory funnel containing 10 mL petroleum ether. Water was added slowly until the two phases separated. The upper organic layer was bright yellow and contained concentrated carotenoids. The lower aqueous layer also contained carotenoids but was faint yellow. The lower layer was collected and washed with water and 5 mL aliquots of petroleum ether until colorless (three to four times). All of the aliquots of carotenoids in petroleum ether were combined and evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen. Samples were reconstituted in 3 mL acetone, to provide enough sample volume for both spectrophotometric determinations and HPLC analyses. To help solubilize carotenoids into acetone, samples were placed in vortex mixer (VWR Scientific Industry Inc., Bohemia, NY) for 30 s and then sonicated in an ultrasonic cleaner (Smith Kline Co., Shelton, CT) for 30 s. One mL samples were transferred to 1.5 mL-amber glass vials for storage before injection of a 20 μL sample onto the HPLC column.

Carotenoid samples were analyzed using a Hewlett Packard/Agilent Technologies 1100 series HPLC system with a photodiode array detector (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). A 5-μm, 200 Å polymeric C₃₀ reverse-phase column (Pronto-SIL; MAC-MOD Analytical Inc, Chadds Ford, PA) was used to separate the analytes. The HPLC mobile phase solvent A consisted of methanol/methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)/water (83:15:2, v/v/v, with 1.5% ammonium acetate in the water); solvent B was methanol/MTBE/water (8:90:2, v/v/v, with 1% ammonium acetate in the water). The samples were processed by Agilent Chemstation software (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Concentrations were determined by comparison with a standard curve using pure carotenoid standards (Carotenature, Lupsingen, Switzerland).

Mass spectrometry analysis.

Saponified samples of ‘Sunshine’ and ‘Waltham Butternut’ were sent to the Carotenoids and Health Laboratory at the Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University (Boston, MA) for analysis to identify major unknown peaks in the HPLC chromatograms using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS). LC-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-MS analysis was performed with an Agilent LC-MS (Agilent Technologies) equipped with an Agilent HPLC autosampler, ultraviolet detector, HP1100, MSD with APCI interface, and a C₃₀ column [3 mm, 150 mm × 4.6 mm (Bischoff Chromatography, Leonberg, Germany)]. The HPLC mobile phase A contained methanol, MTBE, and 1.5% ammonium acetate in water (83:15:2, v/v/v); and phase B contained methanol, MTBE, and 1.0% ammonium acetate in water (8:90:2, v/v/v). Gradient procedures (flow rate 1 mL/min) were changed as follows: 0% B isocratic (0–2 min), 0% B–5% B linear gradient (2–10 min), 5% B–55% B linear gradient (10–18 min), 55% B–95% B linear gradient (18–20 min), 95% B–0% B linear gradient (20–21 min), and 0% B isocratic (21–40 min). The injection volume was 20 µL and the total run time was 40 min. The ultraviolet–visible spectra of peaks were recorded in the range of 250–600 nm and the mass spectra were recorded using the following parameters: polarity, positive; mass range, m/z 530–630; fragmentor, 90; gain, 20.00; threshold, 150; and stepsize, 0.1. Data acquisition and processing were performed using ChemStations software (Agilent Technologies).

Saponified samples of ‘Sunshine’ and ‘Waltham Butternut’ were also sent to the carotenoid laboratory of Dr. Dean Kopsell, University of Tennessee, for separation on a C₃₀ column that employed different mobile phase solvents and gradients for separating carotenoid pigments than used at UNH (Kopsell et al., 2007). This permitted analysis of peak carotenoid retention times (RT) of samples and known carotenoids under different conditions of separation. Separations in Kopsell’s laboratory were achieved isocratically using a binary mobile phase of 11%MTBE, 88.9 MeOH, and 0.1% triethylamine (v/v). The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, with a run time of 53 min, followed by a 10 min equilibration before the next injection (Kopsell et al., 2007).

Statistical analysis.

Analysis of variance and Tukey’s honestly significant difference multiple means test were used to compare main effects of cultigen, storage length, and year on carotenoid concentrations, using either JMP, Version 9 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) or Microsoft Excel statistical tools (Microsoft Corporation, Redman, WA).

Carotenoids and squash maturity at harvest.

In the present study, kabocha (C. maxima) fruit appeared mature at 40 DAP in terms of skin color; however, the carotenoid concentration of intact fruit increased by 81% in the C. maxima inbred line NH.Max6331 between 40 and 60 DAP (Table 1). The range of carotenoid concentrations in four inbred lines of C. maxima squash was 177 to 214 μg·g⁻¹ FW at 40 DAP, and increased to 222 to 320 μg·g⁻¹ FW by 60 DAP (Table 1). Differences in mean carotenoid concentration among the four inbred lines at the two harvest dates were not statistically significant. In a New Zealand study, the carotenoid concentrations in three kabocha hybrids sampled at 49 d after fruit set ranged from 91 to 152 μg·g⁻¹ FW, with a value of 115 μg·g⁻¹ FW for the widely grown kabocha hybrid ‘Delica’ (Hurst et al., 1995).

Table 1.Comparison of total carotenoid concentrations determined spectrophotometrically in fruit samples of Cucurbita maxima inbred lines and Cucurbita moschata cultivars and inbred lines, harvested either at 40 or 60 DAP in 2008.

View Fullscreen

‘Sunshine’ and the inbred lines NH.Max33-12 and NH.Max264 are homozygous for the “B^max” gene for precocious orange rind color. In C. pepo, the “B” gene elevates carotenoid concentrations of fruit in some genetic backgrounds by as much as 6-fold (Schaffer et al., 1986; Tadmoor et al., 2005). In our study, the C. maxima cultigens with the “B^max” gene did not display higher carotenoid concentrations than the other inbred lines and hybrids (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 2.Comparison of total carotenoid concentrations determined spectrophotometrically in fruit samples of Cucurbita maxima and Cucurbita moschata cultigens harvested 60 d after pollination in 2008 and stored for either 0, 30 or 60 d at 14 °C.

View Fullscreen

In C. moschata, mean carotenoid concentrations in fruit of all cultigens harvested at 60 DAP were 30% to 100% higher than in fruit harvested at 40 DAP (Table 1). It was difficult to discern differences in fruit maturity in the tan butternuts harvested at 40 and 60 DAP based on fruit color. However, in a study by Zaccari and Galietta (2015), three maturity dates in the butternut F₁ hybrid ‘Cosmo’ could be discerned, based on changes in green pigmentation of peduncles and peeled skin color, and they reported progressive increases in α-carotene and β-carotene at the three maturity periods from immature to very mature.

There were significant differences in carotenoid concentration among the C. moschata cultigens, and the differences were more accentuated in fruit harvested at 60 DAP than in fruit harvested at 40 DAP. Concentrations varied from a low value of 42 μg·g⁻¹ FW in NHBBN to 145 μg·g⁻¹ FW in NH.Mo851, a small, round-fruited, breeding line with green skin (Table 1).

Carotenoids and storage.

Total carotenoids increased linearly between 0 and 60 d of storage in two (NH.Max6331 and NH.Max33-12) of the four C. maxima inbreds, but the magnitude of change was different between the two cultigens (Table 2). In NH.Max6331, carotenoid concentration doubled from 320 μg·g⁻¹ FW at 0 d to 639 μg·g⁻¹ FW after 60 d of storage; whereas, in NH.Max33-12 the carotenoid concentration increased by ≈50%. NH.Max5273 did not show a statistically significant increase. Although there was an apparent reduction in total carotenoids in NH.Max264 between 30 and 60 d of storage, there was considerable variability among replications and the differences were not statistically significant.

Among the C. moschata cultigens, either most increases in carotenoid concentration occurred during storage of fruit for the first 30 d or carotenoid concentration increased more or less linearly to a maximum at 60 DAP (Table 2). The three C. moschata cultigens with the highest carotenoid concentrations at harvest also had the highest concentrations after 60 d of storage. The largest increase occurred in NH.Mo421, from 133 μg·g⁻¹ FW at 0 d storage to 239 μg·g⁻¹ FW after 60-d storage. Our results are consistent with those of previous investigators showing that carotenoid concentration increases during storage in most squash and pumpkin cultigens, but that the magnitude of change differs among cultigens, as does the length of storage time required for maximizing carotenoid concentration (Arvayo-Ortiz et al., 1994; Harvey et al., 1997; Hopp et al., 1960). From a nutritional viewpoint, it would be important in plant improvement to search for genotypes which exhibit substantial postharvest increases in carotenoid concentration.

We compared carotenoid concentrations in our study on a FW basis, but the relative differences in carotenoid contents among cultigens and the changes with storage time within species were similar whether based on dry weight (DW) or FW (data not shown; see Bonina-Noseworthy, 2012). However, because the average DW of mesocarp tissue for kabocha cultivars was 29% as compared with 19% for the seven C. moschata cultigens in fruit harvested at 60 DAP, carotenoid concentrations of C. moschata cultigens were elevated relative to those of C. maxima when expressed on a DW basis (Bonina-Noseworthy, 2012). For nutritional comparisons, carotenoids are generally compared on a FW basis because such values can be related directly to food consumption (Britton and Khachik, 2009; Khachik, 2009). Storage of squash results in an appreciable reduction in FW, both because of water loss and conversion of sugars to CO₂ during respiration (Bonina-Noseworthy, 2012; Corrigan et al., 2001; Irving et al., 1997). The average FW loss in the four C. maxima inbred lines and the hybrid ‘Sunshine’ during 60-d storage was 8.6%; the average FW loss in the seven C. moschata cultigens was appreciably higher (15.1%). We did not determine the degree to which weight loss was accompanied by a reduction in fruit volume. Carotenoid concentrations in several cultigens did not change significantly between 30 and 60 d of storage, suggesting that changes in fruit weight had minimal impact on carotenoid concentrations.

Characterization of carotenoid profiles.

Along with knowledge of carotenoids previously identified in squash and pumpkin (Azevedo-Meleiro and Rodriguez-Amaya, 2007; Khachik et al., 1988; Khachik and Beecher, 1988), the major peaks in the HPLC chromatograms were identified by comparing peak RT with RT of known standards, comparing RT with HPLC obtained on a C₃₀ column at the UNH with those obtained on a C₃₀ column at the University of Tennessee, and obtaining the molecular ion mass (M⁺) for unknown major peaks by HPLC coupled with mass spectrometry (Carotenoids and Health Laboratory at the Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition).

Nonesterified carotenoids exhibited RT between 5 and 21 min (Figs. 1A and 2B), but in unsaponified samples (Figs. 1B and 2B), there were numerous minor peaks mostly with RT greater than 21 min, representing esterified carotenoids. In saponified samples of C. maxima, there were five major carotenoid peaks tentatively identified, listed according to their order with HPLC (Fig. 1A): 1) neoxanthin, 2) flavoxanthin, 4) lutein, 5) zeaxanthin, and 8) β-carotene. Peak 6 was the internal standard, β-apo-8-carotenoate. Peaks 4, 5, and 8 were coincident, respectively, with peaks for the known standards, lutein, zeaxanthin, and β-carotene. Peak 1 was suspected to be neoxanthin, based on its short RT and previous identification in both C. maxima and C. moschata (Azevedo-Meleiro and Rodriguez-Amaya, 2007). In a carotenoid extract of ‘Sunshine’ analyzed at University of Tennessee, the putative neoxanthin peak had the same RT (5.4) as a known neoxanthin sample. Mass spectrometry also showed a peak molecular mass ion of 601/602 for peak 1, corresponding to that expected for neoxanthin (Moss and Weedon, 1976; de Rosso and Mercandante, 2007). The molecular ion peak (M⁺) of 585/586 for peak 2 corresponded to the molecular ion peak (M + H)⁺ of 585 for flavoxanthin (lutein 5,8-epoxide), previously identified in a processing cultigen of C. maxima by Khachik and Beecher (1988). The designation of flavoxanthin is tentative because lutein 5,6-epoxide has the same mass as flavoxanthin (de Rosso and Mercandante, 2007; Moss and Weedon, 1976), but is most often associated with leafy tissue (Kopsell and Kopsell, 2006). Peak 5 was tentatively labeled as zeaxanthin based on RT correspondence with a known zeaxanthin sample. Likewise, a carotenoid extract of ‘Sunshine’ analyzed by HPLC at University of Tennessee exhibited the same RT (10.9) as a known sample of zeaxanthin.

View Figure

• Download as Powerpoint
• Download Figure

View Figure

• Download as Powerpoint
• Download Figure

In saponified samples of C. moschata, five major carotenoid peaks were typically present in all cultigens (Fig. 2A): 1) neoxanthin, 3) violaxanthin, 4) lutein, 7) α-carotene, and 8) β-carotene. Peak 1 was tentatively identified as neoxanthin as discussed above. Peak 3 (RT 7.4) is likely violaxanthin, based on a M⁺ peak of 600/601 corresponding to values obtained by Khachik et al. (1988) and de Rosso and Mercandante (2007). In addition, the RT (4.9) for the putative violaxanthin peak in a sample of ‘Waltham Butternut’ analyzed on a C₃₀ column at the University of Tennessee corresponded to the RT for a known sample of violaxanthin. The RT for peaks 7 (RT 19.0) and 8 (RT 20.7) in Fig. 2A corresponded, respectively, with those of known samples of α-carotene and β-carotene.

HPLC was performed on both unsaponified and saponified samples to allow for comparison of the degree of esterification of hydroxyl carotenoids as well as for determining the extent of carotenoid loss resulting from saponification. There was considerable variability in the degree of esterification between species and among cultigens (Table 3). In general, the degree of esterification was higher in cultigens of C. moschata than those of C. maxima, and in three of the four C. moschata cultigens, the proportion of esterified carotenoids among the three xanthophylls was usually greater than 0.9. However, in NH.Mo851 only a relatively small proportion (0.22) of lutein was esterified. High proportions of free, nonesterified, lutein have not been previously reported in C. moschata, and cultigens with this trait may be a promising source for pharmaceutical firms producing supplements as an alternative to the main source of lutein is currently obtained from saponified extracts of marigold flowers (Amala-Sujith et al., 2010).

Table 3.Proportion of esterified xanthophyll carotenoids in cultigens of Cucurbita maxima and Cucurbita moschata winter squash harvested at 60 d after pollination in 2008, based on comparison of carotenoid concentrations of saponified and unsaponified samples separated by high-performance liquid chromatography.

View Fullscreen

In C. maxima, variability in proportion of esterification among the four xanthophylls ranged from low values of 0.05 for zeaxanthin and 0.21 for flavoxanthin in ‘Sunshine’ to a high value of 0.69 for flavoxanthin in ‘Space Station’ (Table 3). The proportion of esterified lutein in C. maxima varied from a low of 0.12 in ‘Sunshine’ to a high of 0.42 in ‘Space Station’. Esterification of hydroxyl carotenoids in the different species of squash have been previously well documented, and xanthophylls shown to be esterified to lauric, myristic, and palmitic fatty acids (Khachik et al., 1988; Khachik and Beecher, 1988).

Carotenoid esters are largely absent in human plasma and organs (Canene-Adams and Erdman, 2009; Khachik, 2009). Because esterified carotenoids lutein and zeaxanthin must be hydrolyzed to the free form before absorption, the degree of esterification in carotenoid sources could impact their nutritional status. Studies to date, however, indicate that esterified forms of lutein and zeaxanthin are as bioavailable as the free form (Bowen et al., 2002; Breithaupt et al., 2004).

Variability in α-carotene and β-carotene among cultigens.

β-Carotene concentrations were moderately high in C. maxima (Table 4), and although mean concentrations varied from 26.0 to 44.1 μg·g⁻¹ FW among the hybrids, the differences were not statistically significant. Comparatively low concentrations of β-carotene (3.0 to 8.7 μg·g⁻¹ FW) were reported in two baby food cultivars of C maxima (Khachik and Beecher, 1988); whereas, a considerably broader range of concentrations, from 14 to 74 μg·g⁻¹ FW, were reported for 12 cultivars of C. maxima (Murkovic et al., 2002). α-Carotene was detected in only trace amounts in C. maxima hybrids (Fig. 1B), but has been found in moderate amounts in some cultivars (Murkovic et al., 2002).

Table 4.Carotenoid profiles of saponified extracts of Cucurbita maxima F₁ hybrids and Cucurbita moschata inbred lines and the cultivar Waltham Butternut (WBN) harvested at 60 d after pollination in 2008, with separation and quantification by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis.

View Fullscreen

α-Carotene was detected in some C. moschata cultigens, but in low amounts, 6.1 μg·g⁻¹ FW or lower (Table 4). Although α-carotene concentrations are generally low in C. moschata cultigens, in a Brazilian cultivar, Brasileirinha, selected for high carotenoid content, α-carotene concentrations averaged 82 μg·g⁻¹ FW in mature squash (Boiteux et al., 2007), and 73 μg·g⁻¹ FW was reported in a Brazilian landrace (de Carvalho et al., 2012). In our study, there was wide variability in β-carotene concentrations in C. moschata, ranging from 17.6 μg·g⁻¹ FW in ‘Waltham Butternut’ to 114.2 μg·g⁻¹ FW in the inbred line NH.Mo421 at 60 DAP. Exceedingly high concentrations of β-carotene concentrations have been reported in Brazilian pumpkin cultigens with values of 244 μg·g⁻¹ FW reported in a landrace (de Carvalho et al., 2012) and 161 μg·g⁻¹ FW in the cultivar Brasileirinha mentioned above (Boiteux et al., 2007). Among three North American butternut cultivars grown in Florida, Itle and Kabelka (2009) reported low concentrations of β-carotene, ranging from 2.1 μg·g⁻¹ FW in ‘Ponca’ to 15.3 μg·g⁻¹ FW for ‘Butterbush’. However, our value of 17.3 μg·g⁻¹ FW for ‘Waltham Butternut’ at DAP was considerably higher than that reported in Florida (3.8 μg·g⁻¹ FW). NH.Mo421 not only had a high concentration of β-carotene (114 μg·g⁻¹ FW), but also the proportion of β-carotene to total carotenoids (67%) was higher than in the other cultigens evaluated, and the proportion of nutritionally important to total carotenoids was also high (83%; Table 4).

Lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations among cultigens.

Although the C. maxima squash evaluated for carotenoid profiles in this study were F₁ hybrids that had genetically diverse parentage, lutein concentrations among hybrids were fairly uniform and averaged 46.1 μg·g⁻¹ FW (Table 4). In contrast, Murkovic et al. (2002) reported a wide range of lutein concentrations in 12 C. maxima cultivars, from as low as 8 μg·g⁻¹ FW to as high as 170 μg·g⁻¹ FW in the cultivar Hyvita. Extracts were not saponified in the study by Murkovic et al. (2002), and as such, the high value for lutein in ‘Hyvita’ suggests that the proportion of esterified lutein may have been low in that cultivar.

In C. moschata, there was a relatively broad range of lutein concentrations among the four cultigens analyzed (Table 4). Concentrations at 60 DAP were highest in the breeding line NH.Mo 851 (59.9 μg·g⁻¹ FW), intermediate in NH.Mo910 (37 μg·g⁻¹ FW), and lowest in ‘Waltham Butternut’ (27.3 μg·g⁻¹ FW) and NH.Mo 421 (22.3 μg·g⁻¹ FW). In the three butternut cultivars analyzed by Itle and Kabelka (2009), lutein concentrations ranged from a low of 8.7 μg·g⁻¹ FW in ‘Ponca’ butternut to 17.3 μg·g⁻¹ FW in WBN. In the study by Murkovic et al. (2002), concentrations of lutein + zeaxanthin were only 0.8 μg·g⁻¹ FW for ‘Butterbush’ and 1.4 μg·g⁻¹ FW for Long Island Cheese, the low values probably reflecting a high degree of esterification in the unsaponified samples. Neither of the preceding cultivars is widely grown in North America.

The carotenoid identified as zeaxanthin (peak 5; Fig. 1A) was detected in all C. maxima hybrids, with substantial amounts, 22 μg·g⁻¹ FW and 25.2 μg·g⁻¹ FW, respectively, in ‘Sunshine’ and ‘Thunder’ (Table 4). Only minor amounts of zeaxanthin have been reported previously in C. maxima (Arima and Rodriguez-Amaya, 1988; Provesi, et al., 2011). Although we did not detect zeaxanthin in the C. moschata cultigens we analyzed, Humphries and Khachik (2003) reported the detection of appreciable amounts of zeaxanthin in an unknown butternut cultivar.

Concentrations of carotenoids not known to have nutritional benefits.

Neoxanthin and flavoxanthin comprised between 38% and 59% of the total carotenoid profile in the C. maxima hybrids at 60 DAP (Table 4). Neoxanthin concentrations varied from a low of 16.8 μg·g⁻¹ FW in ‘Sunshine’ to as high as 57.6 μg·g⁻¹ FW in ‘Space Station’. The range of flavoxanthin was even greater, varying from 50 μg·g⁻¹ FW in ‘Sunshine’ to 102 μg·g⁻¹ FW in ‘Space Station’. Neither of the above carotenoids are found in blood plasma (Khachik, 2009) or other organs (Canene-Adams and Erdman, 2009), and are currently not known to play a role in human nutrition. Neoxanthin was previously shown to comprise 20% of the total carotenoid concentration in a Brazilian C. maxima squash cultivar (Azevedo-Meleiro and Rodriguez-Amaya, 2007). The abundance of flavoxanthin in C. maxima kabocha hybrids appreciably lowered the ratio of nutritionally important carotenoids (β-carotene, lutein, and zeaxanthin) to total carotenoids (Table 4).

In the C. moschata cultigens, neoxanthin comprised between 6% and 21% of total carotenoid profiles; whereas, violaxanthin was low (9 to 11 μg·g⁻¹ FW) among all four cultigens (Table 4). Neoxanthin was significantly higher in NH.Mo851 (27.5 μg·g⁻¹ FW) and NH.Mo421 (21.7 μg·g⁻¹ FW) than in NH.Mo910 (5.9 μg·g⁻¹ FW) and ‘Waltham Butternut’ (7.4 μg·g⁻¹ FW). Neoxanthin and violaxanthin were previously identified in C. moschata squash (Azevedo-Meleiro and Rodriguez-Amaya, 2007; González et al., 2001). Even though the contribution of neoxanthin and violaxanthin to human nutrition remains unknown, these two carotenoids have an important connection to plant hormone physiology. Neoxanthin and violoxanthin are cleaved to form abscisic acid (ABA), which plays roles in fruit ripening and seed development (Milborrow, 2001). A recent study showed that expression of a 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene (responsible for cleavage of neoxanthin and violaxanthin) is key to ABA biosynthesis, and regulation of this gene influences ripening and fruit coloring in strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) (Jia et al., 2011). Thus, knowledge of neoxanthin and violaxanthin biosynthesis and accumulation could be important for squash plant breeding programs.

In comparing concentrations of the nutritionally important carotenoids to total carotenoid concentrations, a higher proportion were found in C. moschata, ranging from 65% to 86%, compared with 41% to 63% in C. maxima kabocha squash at 60 DAP (Table 4). Therefore, even though C. maxima hybrids had significantly higher total carotenoid concentrations than C. moschata cultigens, the average concentration of carotenoids with known health benefits in the four cultigens of C. moschata was only slightly lower (91.6 μg·g⁻¹ FW) than in the four hybrid cultigens of C. maxima (99.9 μg·g⁻¹ FW).

In many studies employing HPLC analysis, carotenoid profiles include only lutein and carotenes, rather than total carotenoid profiles (Arima and Rodriguez-Amaya, 1988; Gonzalez et al., 2001; Itle and Kabelka, 2009; Murkovic et al., 2002). However, in a breeding program initially relying only on visual selection for carotenoid content, knowledge of the concentrations of other carotenoids such as neoxanthin, violaxanthin, and flavoxanthin in the carotenoid profile is important. Furthermore, for breeding processing squash, a higher proportion of carotenes vs. hydroxy carotenoids is desirable because carotenes are more stable to high temperatures during steam cooking (Provesi et al., 2011).

Yearly changes in carotenoid profiles.

Carotenoid profiles for the C. maxima hybrid, ‘Sunshine’ were obtained over three growing seasons, 2007, 2008, and 2009 (Table 5). Total carotenoid concentrations across years were not statistically significant, and the higher total concentration in 2007 could be attributed to a later average harvest period (70 DAP) than in 2008 and 2009 (60 DAP). The major beneficial carotenoids, β-carotene and lutein, did not differ significantly across years, but neoxanthin and zeaxanthin exhibited significant year to year variability.

Table 5.Yearly comparison of carotenoid profiles of saponified extracts of ‘Sunshine’ (Cucurbita maxima) and three Cucurbita moschata cultigens, breeding lines NH.Mo851 and NH.Mo421, and the cultivar Waltham Butternut (WBN) harvested at 60 d after pollination. Separation and quantification by high-performance liquid chromatography on a C₃₀ column.

View Fullscreen

In C. moschata, total carotenoid and lutein concentrations were similar across years for the three cultigens analyzed (Table 5). In ‘Waltham Butternut’, there were significant differences among the carotenoids in 2008 as compared with 2009, but the differences were small. In NH.Mo851, β-carotene was 67% higher in 2007 than in 2008. Carotenoid profiles for the inbred line NH.Mo421 were similar for fruit harvested in 2007 and 2008, and lutein and β-carotene comprised a high proportion (0.81–0.82) of the total carotenoid profiles during both years (Table 5). In the inbred line NH.Mo851, the proportion of lutein was higher and β-carotene lower in 2008 as compared with 2007. We are not aware of other studies that have compared yearly differences in carotenoid profiles, but our limited results suggest that overall, carotenoid profiles are fairly consistent from one season to the next, at least in the same locality with similar cultural conditions.

Changes in carotenoid profiles during storage at 14 °C were compared among two cultivars, Sunshine in C. maxima and Waltham Butternut in C. moschata (Table 6). In ‘Sunshine’, the total carotenoid concentration more than doubled between 0- and 60-d storage, but the degree of change varied among the different carotenoids. β-carotene increased 4-fold, lutein increased by only 32%, and zeaxanthin did not increase. Neoxanthin doubled during 60-d storage and flavoxanthin exhibited nearly a 3-fold increase. The proportion of β-carotene to total carotenoids was 0.19, 0.38, and 0.58, respectively, at 0 d, 30 d, and 60-d storage. In contrast, the proportion of lutein to total carotenoids decreased from 27.3 at 0 d to 15.9 at 60-d storage. The proportion of neoxanthin + flavoxanthin to total carotenoids decreased from 0.37 at 0-d storage to 0.27 at 30 d, but increased to 0.42 at 60-d storage because of the increased accumulation of flavoxanthin.

Table 6.Changes in carotenoid profiles of ‘Sunshine’ (Cucurbita maxima) and ‘Waltham Butternut’ (WBN) (Cucurbita moschata) winter squash harvested at 60 d after pollination in 2008 and stored for 0, 30, or 60 d at 14 °C.

View Fullscreen

In ‘Waltham Butternut’, the total carotenoid concentration doubled between 0 and 60 d of storage, however, β-carotene increased 3-fold, whereas, lutein increased by only 63%. The neoxanthin concentration doubled between 0 and 60-d storage and violaxanthin increased by 73%. As a result, the proportion of β-carotene to total carotenoids increased from 0.25 at 0 d to 0.48 at 30 d and then decreased to 0.35 at 60-d storage. The proportion of lutein, on the other hand, decreased from 0.39 at 0 d to 0.32 at 60-d storage.

Previous studies of changes in carotenoid profiles during storage are limited; however, our results indicate that carotenoid profiles can change appreciably during storage, and suggest that β-carotene may increase more during storage than the xanthophylls. In a kabocha variety of C. maxima, Kon and Shimba (1988) reported that total carotenids doubled after 2 months of storage. Lutein comprised 0.64 of the total carotenoid profile before storage and the proportion changed only slightly after 60-d storage at 10 (0.65) and 25 °C (0.71). In contrast, the percentage of α-carotene changed from 0.11 at harvest to nondetectible after storage, and the proportion of β-carotene increased from 0.08 of total carotenoids at harvest to 0.13 at 10 °C and 0.22 at 25 °C after storage. Although the proportional changes in β-carotene were greater than lutein in the above study, incremental increases in lutein at 25 °C (88 μg·g⁻¹ FW) were greater than that for β-carotene (22 μg·g⁻¹ FW). In the butternut cultivar Bugle, Zhang et al. (2014) found a 3-fold increase in total carotenoid concentration in squash stored for 2 months at room temperature; however, there was greater accumulation of β-carotene than lutein. The proportion of β-carotene to total carotenoids increased from 0.51 to 0.58 during 2 months of storage; whereas, the proportion of lutein to total carotenoids decreased from 0.36 to 0.21, and the proportion of violaxanthin increased from 0.13 to 0.21 during the same storage period.

The large increases in β-carotene during storage has important nutritional implications. For example, storage of butternut squash for 1 to 2 months is generally recommended to attain sufficient soluble solids for acceptable eating quality (Noseworthy and Loy, 2008). In ‘Waltham Butternut’, β-carotene concentrations averaged only 17 μg·g⁻¹ FW at harvest (60 DAP), but increased to 58 μg·g⁻¹ FW after 30-d storage (Table 6), equal to 5800 µg in a 100 g serving of squash. Using the current value for conversion of β-carotene to retinoic acid of 12 µg of β-carotene equaling 1 µg of retinoic acid (Britton, 2009; Tang and Russell, 2009), a 100 g serving would represent 483 µg of retinoic acid, or ≈54% of the recommended daily allowance (RDA) for adult males (900 µg) and 69% of the RDA for adult females (700 µg) as reported by the Institute for Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board (National Academy of Sciences, 2001). Furthermore, the more intense orange flesh color associated with higher β-carotene concentrations after storage of fruit is an important aspect of consumer appeal for the expanding retail marketing of peeled and halved butternut squash.