Immunohistochemical Localization of Indole-3-Acetic Acid During Induction of Adventitious Root Formation from Cotyledon Explants of Walnut
Click on author name to view affiliation information
Click on author name to view affiliation information
Cotyledon explants of walnut (Juglans regia) have been shown to generate adventitious roots on growth regulator-free medium. The spatial distribution of endogenous indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and its dynamic changes during adventitious root formation were investigated using an in situ immunohistochemical approach. Before root induction, IAA signal was distributed throughout the freshly excised cotyledon explants. During provascular bundle differentiation, the IAA signal was mainly located in the provascular bundles. At the stage of annular meristematic zones formation, the IAA signal was mainly distributed in the meristematic zones and decreased in the vascular bundles and cotyledonous parenchyma. As primordia formed, the IAA signal became localized in the root primordia and gradually disappeared in the meristematic zones. In emerging roots, the IAA signal was mainly localized in the root cap and root meristem. These results suggest that accumulation of IAA in the provascular bundles may induce vascular differentiation and the increase in IAA through meristematic zones may be responsible for the adventitious root formation from walnut cotyledons. The direct evidence presented here indicates that IAA accumulated in the meristematic zones is not the sole signal needed to induce adventitious root.
The relationship between auxin and adventitious root formation has been studied for many years. Indole-3-acetic acid plays a central role in adventitious rooting and was the first plant hormone used to stimulate the rooting of cuttings (Cooper, 1935). To date, several studies have addressed the role of auxin in adventitious root formation of plants such as arabidopsis [Arabidopsis thaliana (Ludwig-Muller et al., 2005)], red pepper [Capsicum annuum (Ahmad et al., 2006)], eucalyptus [Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis (Nourissier and Monteuuis, 2008)], and zephyr lily [Zephyranthes grandiflora (Gangopadhyay et al., 2010)]. Most of these studies focused on quantitative analysis of auxin using various analytical methods and on biological characteristics of adventitious roots after application of exogenous auxin. Although these studies have provided important information concerning the action of this hormone, the mechanism of auxin in adventitious root induction has not been clearly established. Results obtained from these studies were generally complicated by the absorption or transportation of exogenously applied auxin. Additionally, the concentration of auxin at the target site, rather than throughout the entire tissue, should more accurately reflect its active level.
With the application of immunology in botany, it has become possible to detect in situ auxin in plant tissues. Immunohistochemical localization techniques have been used previously in maize [Zea mays (Shi et al., 1993)], peanut [Arachis hypogaea (Moctezuma, 1999; Moctezuma and Feldman, 1999)], embryos of sunflower [Helianthus annuus (Thomas et al., 2002)], arabidopsis (Aloni et al., 2003; Avsian-Kretchmer et al., 2002), the shoot apices of strawberry [Fragaria ×ananassa (Hou and Huang, 2005)], and tobacco [Nicotiana tatacum (Chen et al., 2010)]. However, many aspects of IAA distribution and its action mechanism in adventitious root formation remain unknown.
In walnut, cotyledon explants from the region of attachment to the embryonic axis have been shown to generate adventitious roots in the absence of exogenous growth regulators (Ermel et al., 2000; Gutmann et al., 1996; Jay-Allemand et al., 1991). This system is very suitable for the study of the internal dynamics of endogenous IAA because no exogenous auxin is required for the induction of adventitious roots. Because no exogenous auxin is added, we hypothesized that culture in vitro leads to redistribution, production, or release of endogenous auxin from inactive forms within the cotyledon explants. This hypothesis is impossible to verify by the use of conventional hormone quantification (e.g., enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or mass spectrometry), because spatial information is lost during the extraction step. In the present study, the spatial distribution of endogenous IAA and its dynamic changes during adventitious root formation in walnut cotyledons were investigated using an immunohistochemical approach. This study provides a substantial base to understand the IAA mechanism at the cellular level during rhizogenesis.
Mature seeds of walnut cultivar Jinlong 2 were obtained from the walnut germplasm repository of the Shanxi Academy of Forestry. Cotyledon explants from the region of attachment to the embryonic axis (Fig. 1) were dissected under axenic conditions as previously described (Jay-Allemand et al., 1991). These explants were induced to root in a growth regulator-free medium in the dark at 26 °C for periods of over 6 d as described by Jay-Allemand et al. (1991) and were collected at different times of culture.
Citation: Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 136, 5; 10.21273/JASHS.136.5.315
Cotyledon explants from the region of attachment to the embryonic axis (Fig. 1) were collected at different times of development (0, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 144 h of in vitro culture). The explants were prefixed immediately in a 2% (w/v) aqueous solution of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide [EDC (Sigma, St. Louis, MO)] and post-fixed overnight in a solution containing 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde and 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde at 4 °C. The fixed tissues were then dehydrated through a graded ethanol series, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 8 μm, and submitted to the immunolocalization procedure.
The immunolocalization of IAA was performed as described in Holgate et al. (1983) with slight modifications. Briefly, sections were incubated for 45 min in blocking solution [0.05 M Tris buffer (TBS), pH 7.6, 0.3% (v/v) Triton X-100, 10% (v/v) normal goat serum, and 5% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA)] and incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-IAA antibodies (Agdia, Elkhart, IN) diluted 1:200 in a TBS/BSA solution. Subsequently, the sections were incubated for 4 h at room temperature with gold-labeled goat antimouse IgG (15 nm in diameter) diluted 1:50 in TBS/BSA. After washing, the sections were stained with a silver staining solution [0.1 M citrate buffer, pH 3.5, 1.7% (w/v) hydroquinone, and 0.1% (w/v) silver nitrate]. As the color developed (15 min) in the sections, they were rinsed with water, dehydrated, mounted, observed, and photographed.
To verify the reliability of the immunolocalization technique and specificity of the anti-IAA antibodies, three negative controls were included: no EDC prefixation, no anti-IAA antibodies, and the substitution of normal mouse serum for the anti-IAA antibodies.
The distribution of IAA during adventitious root formation in walnut cotyledons was revealed by reddish brown silver particles in stained sections (such as Fig. 2A1). For each tissue, the number of silver particles in each of 30 visual fields in a section was counted under an oil lens (100× objective lens, 10× ocular lens). The labeling density is presented as the number of silver particles per 100 μm2. All treatments were repeated at least three times, and all samples were analyzed three times. Analysis of variance was performed, and significant differences between means were determined using a multiple-range test. Significance was assumed at P < 0.05.
Citation: Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 136, 5; 10.21273/JASHS.136.5.315
The process of adventitious root formation in the cotyledon explants showed the same time course of morphological and histological changes as previously described (Ermel et al., 2000; Gutmann et al., 1996; Jay-Allemand et al., 1991). The distribution of IAA in the walnut cotyledon was revealed by reddish brown silver particles. The immunological and statistical results are shown in Figs. 2 through 5.
IAA signal was detected throughout freshly excised cotyledon explants before culture (Figs. 2A, 2A1, and 2A2). The IAA level in the provascular cells was slightly higher than in cotyledonous parenchyma, but this difference was not statistically significant at P > 0.05 (Fig. 5).
As the differentiation of provascular bundles progressed, the IAA signal gradually concentrated in the provascular bundles (Fig. 2B). The density of silver particles in the provascular bundles was 206.9/100 μm2, higher than in cotyledonous parenchyma (P < 0.01) (Fig. 5).
After 48 h of culture, annular meristematic zones were formed around the fully differentiated vascular bundles. At that time, the IAA signal was mainly distributed in the meristematic zones and decreased in vascular bundles and cotyledonous parenchyma (Figs. 3 and 5). In the fully differentiated vascular bundles, the IAA was mainly localized on the periphery of the cells (Fig. 3A3).
Citation: Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 136, 5; 10.21273/JASHS.136.5.315
After 72 h of induction, adventitious root primordia were initiated within the annular meristematic zones around vascular bundles. Here, IAA was detected in the meristematic zones and root primordia (Fig. 4A). The signal was stronger in the root primordia than in the meristematic zones (P < 0.01) (Fig. 5).
Citation: Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 136, 5; 10.21273/JASHS.136.5.315
After 96 h of culture, the root primordia were fully developed. At that time, the IAA signal became more localized in the fully developed root primordia (Fig. 4B). The density of silver particles in the root primordia was 284.7/100 μm2, higher than in other tissues (P < 0.01) (Fig. 5).
Citation: Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 136, 5; 10.21273/JASHS.136.5.315
Adventitious roots were visible after 144 h of culture. In adventitious roots, IAA signal was mainly localized in the root cap and root meristem (Fig. 4C).
In cotyledonous parenchyma, the IAA level showed a dramatic decrease from 0 to 24 h (P < 0.01), then remained stable from 24 to 72 h (P > 0.05), and decreased sharply at 96 h (P < 0.01) (Fig. 6). In the vascular bundle, the IAA level showed a significant increase from 0 to 24 h (P < 0.01), and decreased sharply at 48 h (P < 0.01), then remained stable from 48 to 96 h (P > 0.05) (Fig. 6). The IAA level in meristematic zones showed an increase from 48 to 72 h, but the change was not statistically significant (P > 0.05) (Fig. 6). The IAA level in root primordia was stable from 24 to 48 h (P > 0.05) (Fig. 6).
Citation: Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 136, 5; 10.21273/JASHS.136.5.315
The sections of the root primordia and adventitious roots were used as controls. Little IAA signal was detected when primary antibody was omitted (Fig. 7A), EDC pre-fixation was omitted (Fig. 7B), or the primary antibody was substituted with normal mouse serum (Fig. 7C). These results indicated that the immunohistochemical localization technique is reliable and the antibody is highly specific.
Citation: Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 136, 5; 10.21273/JASHS.136.5.315
The primary antibodies obtained from Agdia were raised against IAA-BSA conjugated (IAA-17-II-A) and have been used previously to localize endogenous IAA in many studies (Hou and Huang, 2004, 2005; Thomas et al., 2002) and its crossreactivity against 34 IAA-related compounds has been analyzed (Mertens et al., 1985). The crossreaction of the antibodies with IAA analogs such as indole-3-butyric acid and indole-3-acetyl-myo-inositol ester was only 1.3% and 0.2%, respectively, and with IAA precursors such as tryptophan was also only slightly reactive (less than 0.1%). Furthermore, all of the control stainings tested showed little or no signal (Fig. 7). Therefore, the antibodies used in this study were highly specific for IAA.
Vascular differentiation is related to auxin flux (Aloni, 1995, 2001). Canalization of auxin flow has been proposed to explain the pattern of vascular differentiation (Sachs, 1981). The canalization hypothesis proposes a positive feedback mechanism: a proposed gradual restriction of IAA flow from a general field to specialized files of cells, resulting in provascular and later vascular differentiation. Many studies on the relationship between IAA and vascular differentiation have been carried out on leaves, stems, and embryos of plants (Aloni, 1995, 2001; Avsian-Kretchmer et al., 2002; Basu et al., 2002; Sieburth, 1999), but there are few reports on that from fresh cotyledon. In the present study, the IAA signal was distributed throughout the freshly excised cotyledons (Fig. 2A). As the differentiation of provascular bundles progressed, the IAA signal was gradually concentrated in the provascular bundles of the cotyledons (Fig. 2B). These results suggest the accumulation of IAA in the provascular bundles induces provascular, and later vascular differentiation, which is in agreement with the canalization hypothesis (Sachs, 1981). When the provascular bundles were fully differentiated, IAA signal in the vascular bundles decreased and became localized mainly on the periphery of the cells (Fig. 3A3). This distribution pattern in the fully differentiated vascular bundles is interesting and requires further study to reveal the cause.
Figure 4A shows that initiation of the root primordia takes place within the annular meristematic zones. Our observation that IAA accumulates strongly in the annular meristematic zones (Figs. 3 and 4A) implies that IAA is responsible for the formation of root primordia within the annular meristematic zones. In contrast to the radially symmetrical distribution of IAA in the annular meristematic zone (Figs. 3 and 4A), radially asymmetrical adventitious root primordia were formed exclusively at the side of the meristematic zone (Fig. 4A–B). These findings suggest that factors other than the IAA are involved in adventitious root formation from cotyledon explants of walnut, which is consistent with the hypothesis that auxin is not the sole signal for lateral root formation (Celenza et al., 1995). When some cells of meristematic zones dedifferentiate into visible root primordia, a strong IAA signal became localized in the root primordia (Fig. 4B). This result differs from previous studies, which reported transient increases in IAA concentration followed by decreases before rooting (Blakesley et al., 1991; De Klerk et al., 1999). In adventitious roots, IAA signal was mainly distributed in the root meristem and root cap (Fig. 4F), which corroborates the results of Ljung et al. (2005) who identified an important auxin source in the meristematic region of the primary root tip. More recently, Petersson et al. (2009) revealed the presence of IAA concentration gradients within the arabidopsis root tip with a distinct maximum in the organizing quiescent center of the root apex.
In conclusion, this study shows for the first time the precise distribution of IAA during the formation of adventitious roots from walnut cotyledon explants. Our observation that IAA accumulates in specific areas under culture conditions favorable to the induction of cell division and subsequent adventitious root formation suggests a correlation between accumulation of IAA and the induction of either cellular proliferation or determination of developmental fate. The results presented here provide supporting evidence for the concept that signals other than IAA are involved in adventitious root formation. This study also provides a substantial base for further research on specific sites of IAA production and its route of transport during adventitious root formation.
Contributor Notes
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31171933) and the Commonweal Special Foundation of State Forestry Administration of China (No. 201004048).
We sincerely thank Dr Zhixia Hou (College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, China) for their kind help with experiment methods and the equipment.
Corresponding author. E-mail: peidonggu@163.com.