Annual Water Status, Development, and Flowering Patterns for Rosmarinus officinalis Plants Under Different Irrigation Conditions
Click on author name to view affiliation information
Click on author name to view affiliation information
The annual water status and phenological patterns of Rosmarinus officinalis plants in relation to irrigation were studied to improve the use of this species in gardening conditions. Rosmarinus officinalis seedlings were pot-grown for 4 months in the nursery. After this period, plants were transplanted to field conditions before three irrigation treatments were applied from Nov. 2000 to Dec. 2001 (control and deficit treatments: C, T-1 and T-2, respectively). The total amount of water applied by irrigation during the experimental period was 167 mm for control, 83.5 mm for T1 (50% of the control), and 50 mm for T-2 (30% to the control). Two main periods of vegetative growth (beginning of spring and fall) were observed in all treatments. At the end of the experimental period, deficit irrigation had altered the morphology of the R. officinalis plants, reducing plant height and shoot growth. Maximum flowering intensity occurred at the beginning of fall for all irrigation treatments. Deficit irrigation treatments induced a more intense flowering density, although of lower longevity than control plants. The annual pattern of shoot water potential at predawn reflected the irrigation regimes, although less difference resulting from irrigation effect was detected in this parameter at midday. Plants under deficit irrigation showed a conservative strategy in the use of water, reducing stomatal conductance. This finding may be of use for the successful gardening of Rosmarinus officinalis plants in semiarid conditions.
During recent years, research into new ornamental species has increased in parallel with the demand for native plants. This follows the increasing sensitivity of consumers toward the environment, which has resulted in an increase in the use of these species in xerogardening, landscaping, and restoration activities (Franco et al., 2006; Savé et al., 1999).
In the Mediterranean area, the scarcity of rainfall and the high evaporative demand of the atmosphere mean that the maintenance of mesic landscapes requires a substantial but rationalized amount of irrigation (Araújo-Alves et al., 2000). Also, the efficient use of water in urban gardens contributes substantially to the conservation of this resource. Therefore, in the last years, there has been increased interest in plants that have low water requirements. In this sense, the use of native species of wild flora may be an interesting practice because they usually are not water-wasters and their growth patterns are very well adapted to the Mediterranean environmental conditions (Morales et al., 1998; Savé et al., 1993). Although it is known that ornamental species differ in form and respond to water stress in different ways (Ludlow, 1989), little information about the water use of these species is found in the literature.
The use of wild Mediterranean plant species, including Rosmarinus officinalis, has increased and may be an interesting solution because of their good resistance to adverse environmental conditions (Clary et al., 2004; Franco et al., 2000; Sánchez-Blanco et al., 1998, 2004a, 2004b; Savé et al., 1993). Although studies in relation to cultivation techniques in R. officinalis have been realized (Silva and Pedras, 1999), the agronomic and physiological responses to irrigation are scarce.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different irrigation treatments on the response of Rosmarinus officinalis plants to maintain its ornamental value for use in Mediterranean gardening conditions. For that, changes in growth, water relations, and flowering characteristics were determined.
Rosmarinus officinalis L. (native of the province of Murcia, southeast Spain) seedlings were used. The most homogeneous selection of seedlings possible (10 to 12 cm in height) was made avoiding, to the greatest extent possible, variations resulting from sexual production. The plants were grown in 1863-cm3 plastic pots filled with a substrate of black peat, perlite, and a clay loam soil (1:1:2 by volume) for 4 months in nursery conditions (Mar. 2000 to July 2000). On 28 July, 54 plants were transplanted to an experimental site belonging to the local municipal council in Murcia (southeast Spain) and distributed in three plots per treatment (six plants/plot). Plant spacing was a 2 × 1.5-m square pattern. The soil has a clay loam texture with a 2.12% organic matter content. These plants were maintained in the field and well-irrigated conditions to achieve their adaptation to natural conditions until the experiment was started (Nov. 2000 until Dec. 2001).
The climate of the area is typical Mediterranean conditions with mild winters, low rainfall, and very hot, dry summers. During the experimental period, the mean minimum and maximum temperatures were 6.3 and 30 °C, respectively (Fig. 1A). Thus, the minimum temperature were registered in Feb. 2001 (2 °C) and maximum temperature in Aug. 2001 (41 °C). Global radiation and vapor pressure deficit averaged values varied from 100 and 0.5 (winter) to 300 W·m−2 and 2 kPa (summer), respectively (Fig. 1B). In the last 4 months of measurements (Sept. to Dec. 2001), rainfall was ≈80% of the total rain during the entire experimental period (298.4 mm).




Citation: HortScience horts 43, 5; 10.21273/HORTSCI.43.5.1580
From 28 July until 1 Nov. 2000, all plants were irrigated daily to maintain the soil around field capacity with an automated drip irrigation system. Thus, the irrigation was controlled automatically by a head unit programmer, which maintained the soil-matric potential at ≈ –30 kPa (monitored with tensiometers placed at 30 cm depth).
Afterward, from Nov. 2000 to Dec. 2001, three irrigation treatments were applied in a completely randomized design with three plots (18 plants) per treatment: control (C), with soil matric potential (Ψm) at ≈ –30 kPa, and two deficit irrigation (T-1 and T-2), corresponding to ≈50% (Ψm ≈ –60 kPa) and 30% (Ψm ≈ –80 kPa) of the water received by control plants, respectively.
One drip irrigation line was used for each row with two compensating drippers (qe = 2 L·h−1) for each plant (Netafim; Kibbutz Hatzerim, Hanegew, Israel). The irrigation water during the experimental period had an average electrical conductivity of 1.3 dS·m−1 for all treatments. Irrigation frequency was daily for all treatments, although differences in their duration of irrigation were imposed. The total water amount applied by irrigation throughout the experimental time was 167 mm for control, 83.5 mm for T-1, and 50 mm for T-2 (Fig. 2). The nutrient solution was 3.75 mmol·L−1 NH4NO3, 1.3 mmol·L−1 NH4PO4H2, 1.48 mmol·L−1 KNO3, 0.5 mmol·L−1 iron, and 0.2 mmol·L−1 zinc and manganese.




Citation: HortScience horts 43, 5; 10.21273/HORTSCI.43.5.1580
During the assay plant height, shoot elongation (lateral and terminal), ground coverage (Ferrández, 2002), and flowering intensity and longevity (Primack, 1985) were regularly evaluated (biweekly). The flowering was measured through periodical flower recounts. Each recount was conducted counting all the flowers with open corollas. The flowering pattern has been reported as the number of flower per plant and as the number of flowers per unit area (flowering intensity). Measurements of shoot growth (lateral and terminal) were made in two shoots of three plants per plot (nine plants per treatment). Height, ground coverage, and flowering measurements were made in all plants per plot (18 plants per treatment).
Shoot water potential (Ψl) was measured monthly at predawn and solar midday in three plants per plot (nine plants per treatment). Sampled shoots were enclosed in a plastic bag (Turner, 1988), which was immediately placed in a pressure chamber (Soil Moisture Equipment Co; Santa Barbara, CA) according to Scholander et al. (1965), raising the pressure at a rate of 0.03 MPa·s−1 using nitrogen gas. The relative water content (RWC) was also measured at predawn and solar midday according to Weatherley and Barrs (1965) and calculated from the following equation:
Stomatal conductance (g S) was determined in the same day and at the same plants as shoot water potential using a steady-state porometer in which a sensing head was fitted with a cylindrical chamber (LI-1600-07; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE) based on measuring the flow of dry air necessary to balance the water transpired by the shoots placed in the measuring tray. Measurements were made at solar midday on attached sun-exposed shoots.
Statistical differences between treatments were analyzed by analysis of variance using SPSS (11.0; SPSS, Chicago). Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.
In our conditions, the deficit irrigation treatments produced changes in vegetative growth of plants of Rosmarinus officinalis, which promoted shorter plants that were more compact. Thus, shoot growth was reduced 40% to 45% with respect to control treatment from April to August. Two main periods of vegetative growth were observed in all treatments; the most important corresponded to spring and another less important in the fall (October) (Fig. 3). Terminal shoot growth was greater than lateral shoot growth in all irrigation treatments at the end of the experimental period (Table 1). Deficit irrigation had a significant effect on the plant height at the end of the experimental period (Table 2). A reduction in plant height of 43% and 50% in T-1 and T-2, respectively, with respect to the control was observed. However, the irrigation treatments did not promote any significant differences in ground coverage (Table 2).




Citation: HortScience horts 43, 5; 10.21273/HORTSCI.43.5.1580
This behavior has been observed in ornamental species such as Sedum dasyphyllum (Bañón et al., 2006; García and Schwarzer, 2000), which showed a good response in terms of growth and appearance when grown under limited irrigation. Growth reduction as a result of water deficit has been widely reported (de Herralde et al., 1998; Sánchez-Blanco et al., 2004a, 2004b; Steinberg et al., 1990). These changes can be considered as a morphological adaptation of the plant to water and environmental stresses to reduce transpiration and to induce a lower consumption of water (Bañón et al., 2003; Stanhill and Albers, 1974). Also, at the same time, these morphological responses may be interesting to improve the ornamental value of plants, because a reduction in plant height has been suggested as a desirable ornamental characteristic by some authors (Han and Kim, 1999; Singh et al., 1999). The reduction in plant height was not accompanied by changes in ground coverage. This same behavior was observed by Araújo-Alves et al. (2000) in Arbutus unedo under different irrigation conditions.
In our assay, maximum flowering intensity coincided with the beginning of fall in all treatments and a low flowering intensity was noted in summer. A higher number of flowers per surface in the T-2 treatment were detected in the first months of the experiment (Nov. 2000 to Mar. 2001) (Fig. 4) and with a lower number of flowers per square meter than in natural rainfed conditions (Ferrández, 2002) (Fig. 4). T-1 treatment had a highest number of flowers per surface on Oct. 2001 (Fig. 4). However, the total number of flowers per plant was higher in the control treatment because these plants had greater growth. A more prolonged flowering process in control treatment was observed the flowering longevity ranged between 13 weeks for the control treatment and 11 weeks for the T-2 treatment.




Citation: HortScience horts 43, 5; 10.21273/HORTSCI.43.5.1580
According to numerous authors, water stress may affect the flowering process, resulting in a higher flowering intensity in ornamental plants (Morales, 1999; Sánchez-Blanco et al., 1998) and fruit trees (Boland et al., 1993; Dasberg et al., 1991). In our conditions, although the control plants presented a higher number of flowers per plant, at some times, the deficit irrigation treatments had more flowers per surface (Fig. 4), suggesting that the water deficit induced more intense flowering. According to Sardans et al. (2005), water addition did not increase the flowering effort of R. officinalis plants.
The results concerning to the plant water status of the plants show that in control treatment, shoot water potential at predawn (Ψpd) was very constant during the entire experimental period (ranging from –0.4 to –0.6 MPa). However, deficit irrigation caused a significant decrease in Ψpd from March to October, reaching the minimum values in June (–1.4 MPa) (Fig. 5). These reductions were similar in both deficit irrigation treatments (T-1 and T-2). The higher Ψpd values in the control treatment during the growing season show that leaf water potential at predawn reflects the availability of soil water to the plants and is a good indicator of soil moisture conditions (Aussenac and Valette, 1982; Domingo et al., 1996). Also, the constant values in this parameter during the growing season indicated that control plants were well irrigated during the entire experimental period. The values obtained in deficit-irrigated treatments coincided with those obtained by Munné-Bosch et al. (1999) in water-stressed R. officinalis plants.




Citation: HortScience horts 43, 5; 10.21273/HORTSCI.43.5.1580
Seasonal patterns of shoot potential at solar midday (Ψmd) showed a similar pattern of Ψpd, although the differences between control and deficit treatments were less important. A significantly marked decrease was noted in Ψmd values from April to August in water deficit treatments, after which Ψmd values progressively increased and were similar to the control plants (Fig. 5). The fact that in our assay, the differences among control and deficit treatments were greater for Ψpd than for Ψmd is in agreement with the idea that Ψpd is a more useful indicator of plant water status. In the fall and winter seasons, Ψmd values were high in the three treatments. This fact is in accordance with the idea that leaf water potential at midday decreases when the vapor pressure deficit of the atmosphere increases (Passioura, 1982) (see Fig. 1B). At this time, climatic factors have more influence than water soil condition, and no differences by irrigation effect were observed (Fig. 5).
Similar behavior as that observed for Ψpd and Ψmd was detected when the relative water content measured at predawn and midday (RWC) was considered (Fig. 5). Thus, RWC at predawn was significantly lower from April to September in the deficit treatments with respect to the control plants. However, these differences were less marked in the RWC values at midday in T-1 and T-2 plants and only significant differences with respect to the control plants were shown from April to June. These reductions were statistically similar in both deficit irrigation treatments (Fig. 5). The RWC reflects the plant water status, although the values at solar midday in all treatments were similar from July to the end of the season. This can be explained by the seasonal osmotic adjustment process that allows more changes in leaf water potential than in relative water content (Munné-Bosch et al., 1999; Sánchez-Blanco et al., 1998). The capacity of osmotic adjustment of R. officinalis plants under drought conditions has been reported by Sánchez-Blanco et al. (2004a, 2004b).
Stomatal conductance values ranged between 100 mmol·m−2·s−1 for the T-2 treatment to 300 mmol·m−2·s−1 for the control plants (Fig. 6). From March to September, the plants submitted to deficit irrigation conditions showed significantly lower values with respect to well-irrigated plants after which a recovery of g S values was detected and no differences among treatments were observed. Rosmarinus officinalis, like many other Mediterranean perennials, shows a conservative strategy in the use of water (Munné-Bosch et al., 1998, 1999; Sánchez-Blanco et al., 2004a, 2004b) based mainly on the avoidance of drought stress by reducing the transpiration rate, that is, reducing the g S, as was observed in water-stressed conditions (Fig. 6).




Citation: HortScience horts 43, 5; 10.21273/HORTSCI.43.5.1580
The responses of R. officinalis plant in terms of growth, water status, and flowering characteristics were similar for both deficit irrigation conditions. In general, the application of deficit irrigation was seen to substantially limit growth and the morphological parameters studied. Rosmarinus officinalis plants showed reduction in plant height and shoots growth, more intense flowering, and a more efficient stomatal regulation as has been observed in other Mediterranean species (Sachs and Shaw, 1992). This finding may be of use for the successful gardening of Rosmarinus officinalis plants in semiarid conditions, which could promote considerable savings in water while maintaining the ornamental value of the plants.






Contributor Notes
This research was supported by CICYT (AGL2005-05588-C02-1-2), CDTI (IDI-20070868), and Fundación Séneca (05660/PI/07) projects.
We thank the local municipal council from Murcia (Spain) for its assistance.
To whom reprint requests should be addressed; e-mail emilio@cebas.csic.es