. The number of inflorescences was also recorded. At harvest, foliar salt damage was rated by giving a visual score based on a reference scale from 0 to 5: 0 = dead; 1 = severe (more than 90%) foliar damage (salt damage: leaf burn and necrosis); 2
giving a visual score based on a reference scale from 0 to 5, where 0 = dead; 1 = more than 90% foliar damage (salt damage: burning, necrosis, and discoloration); 2 = moderate (50% to 90%) foliar damage; 3 = slight (less than 50%) foliar damage; 4 = good
harvested and DW was determined after oven-drying at 70 °C for 4 d. Foliar salt damage evaluation. Foliar salt damage was rated by giving a visual score based on a reference scale from 0 to 5, where 0 = dead; 1 = over 90% foliar damage (salt damage: burning
-drying at 70 °C for 4 d. Leaf area of all living plants was determined using LI-3100C area meter (LI-COR ® Biosciences, Lincoln, NE). Foliar salt damage evaluation. Foliar salt damage was rated by giving a visual score based on a reference scale from 0 to 5
chosen for measurement. Leachate EC readings were averaged across cultivars. Foliar salt damage evaluation. Foliar salt damage was rated for all plants by giving a visual score based on a reference scale from 0 to 5, where 0 = dead, 1 = more than 90
as shoot length. Then, all leaves of the new shoots were separated from the stems. Both leaves and stems were oven-dried at 70 °C for 7 d, and the leaf and stem DW was determined. Foliar salt damage evaluation. One week before harvest, foliar salt
chlorophyll content and gas exchange were not taken for A. gramineus and F. glauca because of their narrow leaves. Visual score was assigned to each plant at each harvest date by giving a score from 0 to 5 where, 0 = dead; 1 = severe foliar salt damage
of recycled water may cause damage or even death to sensitive plants if not managed properly ( Niu et al., 2012b ). Salinity can reduce growth and cause foliar salt damage through physiological drought, ion toxicity, and nutrient deficiency ( Munns
all plants had no foliar salt damage. Greenhouse condition. All viburnum plants were grown in a research greenhouse at Utah State University in Logan, UT (lat. 41°45′28″N, long. 111°48′47″W, elevation 1409 m). From 28 Mar. to 14 May, the average air
, tillers were counted. In addition, roots were cleaned and dried in the oven at 70 °C for 3 d, and root DW was taken. Foliar salt damage evaluation. Foliar salt damage was rated by giving a visual score based on a reference scale from 0 to 5, where 0 = dead