Cation exchange capacity is a commonly used soil chemical property that describes the maximum quantity of cations a soil or substrate can hold while being exchangeable with the soil solution. Cation exchange capacity is often associated with a soil
James E. Altland, James C. Locke, and Charles R. Krause
Janet F.M. Rippy and Paul V. Nelson
be neutralized and in the buffering capacity of moss peats. Two factors that may affect the neutralization requirement and buffering capacity of moss peat among batches are cation exchange capacity (CEC) and base saturation [fractional calcium (Ca 2
Janet F. M. Rippy, Paul V. Nelson, and Ted Bilderback
Problems of inconsistent initial pH in peat moss-based substrates that are created using standard formulas for limestone additions, and pH drift from the target in those substrates may be due to variations in the CEC and BS of peat moss. This study was conducted to determine whether such variation exists. Sixty-four peat moss samples were obtained from several bogs across Alberta, Canada. Adsorbed cations on each peat moss sample were displaced with hydrochloric acid (HCl), and flushed out with three deionized water washes. The displacing/flushing solution was collected and later analyzed for concentration of bases (Ca, Mg, K, and Na) using atomic absorption spectrometry. After cations were removed, the peat moss exchange sites were saturated with barium acetate [Ba(OAc)2] to displace the H+, which were then collected by a second flushing with deionized water. This second displacing/flushing solution was titrated with measured amounts of NaOH to a phenolphthalein end point. Base saturation and CEC were calculated. There were significant variations in CEC (ranging from 108.12 to 162.25 cmol·kg-1) and BS (ranging from 13.52% to 63.97% of CEC) among the peat moss samples. Ca accounted for 78.08% of the BS. For a given peat moss, the higher the BS, the lower the neutralization requirement to achieve a target pH. Also, high CEC peat mosses may have greater buffering capacity than those with low CEC, which may result in less pH drift.
Wei Qiang Yang and Barbara L. Goulart
Aluminum (Al) uptake by and root cation exchange capacity (CEC) of mycorrhizal (M) and nonmycorrhizal (NM) blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) plants were studied. Root CEC was higher in M plants than in NM plants, but total and root Al contents were higher in NM plants. Leaf Al content was higher in NM than in M plants after 1 and 5 hours of exposure. The aurintriboxylic acid stain for Al indicated the presence of Al in the M symbiont. Despite a larger root system and higher root CEC, regression analysis indicated roots of M plants absorbed less Al in the first 5 hours, suggesting that Al sequestration in the M symbiont is responsible for reduced total Al uptake. Differences in dry matter partitioning between M and NM plants were also observed.
Wei Qiang Yang and Barbara L. Goulart
Aluminum (Al) uptake and root cation exchange capacity (CEC) of mycorrhizal (M) and non-mycorrhizal (NM) blueberry plants (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) were studied. Mycorrhizal roots took up more Al than non-mycorrhizal roots over a 48-h period. Different patterns of Al uptake occurred between M and NM roots. The M roots contained more Al at hour 1, followed by a deep decrease at hour 3, and then increased gradually. However, Al uptake in NM roots increased with time. Foliar Al analysis indicated that Al concentration increased with time in both M and NM plants, but a significant increase of foliar Al concentration during the first 3-h period was not observed in M plants. The results suggested that the rate of Al transport and the redistribution of foliar Al were different in M and NM plants. The higher Al concentration in M roots may be due to the higher CEC in M roots and vice versa. Further, the CEC of M roots was decreased by the respiration inhibitor (CN-) treatment while the CEC of NM roots was not, suggesting that CEC in M roots is related to respiration.
Ty A. McClellan, Roch E. Gaussoin, Robert C. Shearman, Charles S. Wortmann, Martha Mamo, Garald L. Horst, and David B. Marx
Proper nutrient management in the root zone is important for maintaining a healthy turf ( Happ, 1995 ). Chemical properties such as pH and cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the root zone influence availability of essential nutrients and impact
Linda L. Taylor, Alexander X. Niemiera, Robert D. Wright, and J. Roger Harris
lamps from 0600 hr to 2000 hr daily. Cation exchange capacity, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, particle size distribution, and bulk density. Cation exchange capacity, C:N ratio, particle size distribution, and BD were determined for five treatments: non
Timothy K. Hartz, Paul R. Johnstone, Richard F. Smith, and Michael D. Cahn
, representing 44% to 71% of cations in soil solution on a charge basis; the soils averaged 34 mmolc·L −1 Ca, representing 57% of cation charges. Soil solution Ca was highly correlated with saturated paste Ca ( r 2 = 0.70) but not exchangeable Ca ( r 2 = 0
Yuru Chang, Lorenzo Rossi, Lincoln Zotarelli, Bin Gao, and Ali Sarkhosh
retention ( Githinji, 2014 ), and cation exchange capacity (CEC) ( Marx et al., 1996 ; Reichert et al., 2016 ). Rapid drainage leads to nutrient leaching through sand-based root zones ( Bigelow et al., 2001 ; Mohamed et al., 2016 ; Petri and Petrovic
J.L. NUS and S.E. Brauen
In a field experiment, clinoptilolitic zeolite was compared to sphagnum peat and sawdust as sand amendments at 5%, 10%, and 209” (v/v) to enhance `Penncross' creeping bentgrass (Agrostis palustris Huds.) establishment and to compare their gravimetric and volumetric cation exchange capacities and their effects on moisture retention and cation exchange capacities of the resultant mixes. In addition, cation exchange capacities and exchangeable K+ and