Search Results

You are looking at 81 - 90 of 103 items for :

  • "plant evaluation" x
Clear All
Free access

Sanalkumar Krishnan, Yingmei Ma and Emily Merewitz

‘Penncross’ in Expt. 1. Within Expt. 2 for ‘Penn-G2’, SA levels where significantly greater for the untrimmed treatment compared with the other treatments on all dates. Plants evaluated for time point–based changes in phytohormones at 0, 15, and 30 min did

Free access

Robert M. Pyne, Adolfina R. Koroch, Christian A. Wyenandt and James E. Simon

vegetative propagation, with one clone per genotype represented at each of the two locations to provide a measure of genotype by environment interaction. Clones were transplanted in single rows with 1-m spacing at both locations to allow for single plant

Full access

Emily B. Merewitz and Sha Liu

be determined. Of the three chemicals exerting antioxidant responses in plants evaluated here, Si is the most studied in turfgrass species and related grasses for promoting abiotic stress tolerance. For instance, it has been shown to reduce oxidative

Free access

Yan-Chang Wang, Lei Zhang, Yu-Ping Man, Zuo-Zhou Li and Rui Qin

accessions in the repository and used as controls for plant evaluation and microsatellite analysis. The origins of the materials are listed in Table 1 . Table 1. Accessions origins used in this study. Evaluation of fruit characteristics. Fruit shape, hairs

Free access

Alicia Rihn, Hayk Khachatryan, Benjamin Campbell, Charles Hall and Bridget Behe

review of research in conjoint analysis: Recent developments and directions for future research. Cust. Needs and Solut. 1–22 Anella, L.B. Schnelle, M.A. Maronek, D.M. 2001 Oklahoma Proven: A plant evaluation and marketing program HortTechnology 11 381 384

Free access

Maren E. Veatch-Blohm, Douglas Sawch, Nicole Elia and Dominic Pinciotti

irrigation (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 300 m m NaCl) for 88 d preemergence and 35 d post-emergence (n = 3 for each run of the experiment). Plant evaluation. At planting the initial bulb weight was recorded. The mean bulb weight ± se was 52.24 ± 1.67 g for

Full access

Sheri Dorn, Milton G. Newberry III, Ellen M. Bauske and Svoboda V. Pennisi

, N. 2007 Education through cooperative extension. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH Sellmer, J.C. Berghage, R.D. Michael, A.H. Bilik, T. 2003 Pennsylvania gardener selects plant evaluation program. J. Ext. 41(1):1IAW4. 5 July 2018. < https

Full access

Erin Schroll, John G. Lambrinos and David Sandrock

management, energy savings, or aesthetics. Designers should identify the project's specific functional goals and constraints, as well as explicitly incorporate management requirements and planning into the design. Coupling this approach with plant evaluations

Free access

Chandrasekar S. Kousik, Amnon Levi, Kai-Shu Ling and W. Patrick Wechter

observed to be susceptible in the second cotyledon disk test and in the replicated whole plant evaluation. However, in all these tests, we identified a few moderately resistant plants within PI 273662 and selected them for seed increase and future testing

Free access

John M. Capik, Megan Muehlbauer, Ari Novy, Josh A. Honig and Thomas J. Molnar

Research and Extension Center and the Rutgers Vegetable Research and Extension Farm. Disease pressure increased as the study progressed and EFB spread among the susceptible plants, which later constituted a large majority of the overall plantings