Search Results
landscape establishment of slash pine differences among three production methods J. Arboriculture 18 281 287 Broschat, T.K. Meerow, A.W. 1996 Betrock's reference guide to Florida landscape plants Betrock Information Systems Hollywood, FL Cathey, H.M. 1990
, central, and apical cuttings. We further analyzed the effects of cutting positions on the rooting ability. The RPs of the basal, central, and apical parts of the cutting fluctuated widely among cultivars. For ‘O’Neal’, there were no significant differences
screen is valuable in not only identifying taxon-specific variation for pathogen resistance, but also for further evaluation of the plant's genetic structure. Among the 32 Daphne taxa evaluated, significant differences were present for resistance to T
species reaching 0% VMC in as little as 1 d ( VanWoert et al., 2005 ). The dissimilarity between studies is most likely the result of differences among species, differences in developmental stages of plants, differences in substrate depth, solar radiation
. Yield loss due to anthrac-nose on fruits. There were no significant differences in percentage yield loss caused by anthracnose fruit rot among all the treatments in each of the three plantings (data not shown). Yield loss ranged from 3% to 16% in Summer
Rodriguez (2009) suggested that frequent measurements of ψ are necessary to identify the critical SMC to detect differences among plants in leaf ψ responses to substrate drying. Decreased g S resulting from drought stress was reported to aid in
little or no differences in the height of the treated plants although all are considerably shorter than control plants. Main effects for plant height, SPAD, and shoot dry weight were significant among application rates ( Table 1 ). For plant height, 2
among the four plant parts in 0, 25, or 50 m m mannitol. However, as the stress level increased (75 m m mannitol), more potassium was allocated to leaves (leaf and petiole) compared with roots and stems. Fig. 7. Distribution of potassium in different
among species within the ferns as indicated by the high se values. There were no significant differences between the woody and herbaceous foliage plants and the Korean native plants classes in the removal of formaldehyde. Figure 4 illustrates
titers were recorded for grapefruit compared with sweet orange ( F = 17.49; df = 1, 30, P = 0.0002) and juvenile tissues (not sampled from sweet orange), no significant differences were observed for other plant parts between the two host plants