Search Results

The lowest flower in the pear (Pyrus communis L.) cluster usually develops and blooms first and also has a greater sink potential. For this reason, resources are preferentially utilized by the lowest fruit, and this is also one of the reasons why most thinning practices tend to favor their set. However, it is not always possible to perform selective thinning. This study was undertaken to determine if hindering pollination in the most developed flowers in the cluster influences yield or quality compared to that obtained in a whole open-pollinated cluster. The treatments were made in `Blanquilla' (Spadona, Agua de Aranjuez) and `Conference' pear within a wide range of flower densities for each cultivar. Pollination was hindered by cutting off the flower styles. The factor tested was style removal intensity (SRI). Treatments consisted in removing the styles of two, four(always the most developed), or all flowers in each cluster. Flower density was used as a covariate in an analysis of covariance to account for differences in flower densities in response to SRI treatments. In all experiments the covariate was not significant; therefore, SRI effect was not affected by flower density. `Blanquilla' and `Conference' had similar responses to treatments, so that when at least three flowers are susceptible to be openly pollinated, fruit set, seed content, and cluster yield were similar to control clusters, therefore the growth potential of fruit from partially damaged clusters in their most developed flowers is similar to undamaged open pollinated clusters. The reduced set of parthenocarpic clusters implies yield reductions ranging between 40% and 60% in `Conference', and up to about 60% in `Blanquilla'.

The apical or king (K) flower in the apple (Malus ×domestica L. Borkh.) cluster usually develops and blooms first and also has a greater sink potential. For this reason, resources are primarily used by the K fruit, and this is also one of the reasons why most thinning practices tend to favor K fruit set. However, it is not always possible to retain the K flower and remove the lateral ones. This study was undertaken to determine if the removal of the most developed flowers in the cluster influences yield or quality compared to that obtained in a whole cluster. The treatments were made in `Golden Delicious' and `Royal Gala' apple cultivars, within a wide range of flower densities for each cultivar. The factor tested was the intensity of flower removal (FRI); the treatments consisted in removing one, two, or three flowers in each cluster. Flower density was used as a covariate in an analysis of covariance to account for differences in flower densities in response to FRI treatments. In all experiments the covariate was not significant; therefore FRI effect was not affected by flower density. `Golden Delicious' and `Royal Gala' had similar responses to flower removal, so that when at least three flowers in a cluster remained, fruit set and cluster yield were similar to whole clusters. Only when two or fewer poorly developed flowers remained after FRI treatments, yield was reduced by as much as 25%. Fruit from FRI clusters were even heavier than those from whole clusters, due to reduced competition among the fruit, so that the growth potential of fruit from the first and second lateral flowers was similar to clusters with K fruit, in clusters where the K flower had been removed.

The influence of the species in spring frost sensibility was determined for the Prunus species peach (P. persica (L.) Batsch), sweet cherry (P. avium L.), almond (P. dulcis (Mill.) Webb/P. amygdalus Batsch), japanese plum (P. salicina Lindl.), and blackthorn (P. spinosa L.). The confidence intervals for lethal temperatures of 10% (LT₁₀) and 90% (LT₉₀) bud injury were also determined. In 2000 and 2001, seven frost treatments were made for each one of the phenological stages comprised between B (first swell) and I (jacket split) in two cultivars per each species. The relationships between frost temperature and the proportion of frost damaged buds for each cultivar, year, and phenological stage were adjusted to linear regression models. The 95% confidence intervals were also calculated. The spring frost hardiness order of the species, from the least to most hardy, was as follows: sweet cherry, almond, peach, japanese plum, and blackthorn. Despite the highly homogeneous nature of the frost and bud characteristics, the temperature range for a given injury degree was quite broad, since the confidence interval's breadth for LT₁₀ was as high as about 3 °C and as high as about 6 °C for LT₉₀. Consequently, when critical temperatures are used in making decisions as to when to begin active frost protection, a prudent measure would be to take the temperature references from the upper limits in the confidence intervals.