Search Results

You are looking at 61 - 70 of 911 items for :

  • stomatal conductance x
  • All content x
Clear All
Free access

Kirsten L. Lloyd, Donald D. Davis, Richard P. Marini, and Dennis R. Decoteau

crop quality and nutritive value ( USEPA, 2015 ). Sensitivity to O 3 varies both within and among species. In general, plants that have higher stomatal conductance ( g s ), which allows a greater flux of O 3 into the leaf ( Reich and Amundson, 1985

Free access

Majken Pagter, Karen K. Petersen, Fulai Liu, and Christian R. Jensen

. Stomatal conductance and plant-water relations measurements. Stomatal conductance to water vapor ( g s ) of one of the third youngest fully expanded leaves was measured after ≈6 weeks of treatment with a CIRAS-2 IR gas analyzer (IRGA) equipped with a

Free access

Nauja Lisa Jensen, Christian R. Jensen, Fulai Liu, and Karen K. Petersen

potentials ( Liu et al., 2007 ). To optimize irrigation strategies for strawberries, it is important to know how different irrigation strategies influence physiological reactions (i.e., plant–water relations), stomatal conductance ( g s ), and chemical

Free access

Carolyn F. Scagel, Guihong Bi, Leslie H. Fuchigami, and Richard P. Regan

screen, and analyzed for nutrient composition. Stomatal conductance measurements. A steady-state porometer (LI-1600; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE) was used to measure water loss from transpiring leaves. All leaves were completely dry before any readings were taken

Free access

Vincent Pelletier, Steeve Pepin, Thomas Laurent, Jacques Gallichand, and Jean Caron

. Changes in ( A ) photosynthesis (P n ) and ( B ) stomatal conductance ( g S ) as a function of the number of days with saturated soil conditions at the stage of bud elongation, flowering, and fruit development. Sixteen experimental units were saturated for

Full access

Ana Centeno, Pilar Baeza, and José Ramón Lissarrague

; Paranychianakis et al., 2004 ), stomatal conductance ( g S ) ( Cuevas et al., 2006 ; Dry and Loveys, 1999 ; Grimes and Williams, 1990 ), photosynthesis ( Iacono and Sommer, 1996 ), and reproductive growth and yield ( Dry et al., 2001 ; Escalona et al., 2003

Free access

Aidan D. Farrell, Sarah Evelyn, Adrian M. Lennon, and Pathmanathan Umaharan

determination of RWC using the method outlined previously. Water uptake and stomatal conductance. Water uptake was estimated by observing water loss from the graduated cylinder expressed as water uptake per bloom. g S was measured using a porometer, measuring

Free access

Tessa M. Mills, Jianming Li, and M. Hossein Behboudian

Chartzoulakis et al. (1993) reported that A. deliciosa seedlings showed poor control of transpiration even though there was a reduction in stomatal conductance (g s ) and suggested that this species has poor epidermal control of water loss through leaky

Free access

Krishna S. Nemali and Marc W van Iersel

adjustment, and stomatal and non-stomatal conductance to CO 2 among species also could have contributed to the lack of differences in A at θ levels of 0.15, 0.22, and 0.32 m 3 ·m −3 . Our results are in line with reports available from diverse groups of

Open access

Hardeep Singh, Megha R. Poudel, Bruce Dunn, Charles Fontanier, and Gopal Kakani

supplemental CO 2 . Morison and Gifford (1983) reported that the stomatal conductance ( g S ) of plants decreases under elevated CO 2 , whereas the internal concentration of CO 2 increases and net assimilation rate is either unaffected or increased ( Mott