Search Results

You are looking at 41 - 50 of 75 items for :

  • "fruit evaluation" x
  • All content x
Clear All
Free access

Oscar Andrés Del Angel-Coronel, Juan Guillermo Cruz-Castillo, Javier De La Cruz-Medina, and Franco Famiani

the color and the firmness of the fruit evaluated by sight and squeezing the fruit with the hands. No quantitative (instrumental) color and firmness data are available that can be used as reference points to determine when to harvest. The ripeness for

Free access

Mark K. Ehlenfeldt, James J. Polashock, Allan W. Stretch, and Matthew Kramer

mummy berry pathogen. The incidence of mummy berry fruit infection was expressed as a percentage of the total number of fruit on each plant. The mean number of fruit evaluated per cultivar per year was 91 with a sd of 61. Cultivar ranking

Full access

John R. Stommel

( University of Maryland, 2018 ). Fruit evaluation. Seed counts were recorded for mature pepper fruit harvested from individual field grown plants (n = 24 for individual P 1 , P 2 , and F 1 generations; n = 99 to 100 for BCP 1 and BCP 2 ; n = 185 to 197 for

Free access

Hiroko Hamada, Keisuke Nonaka, Terutaka Yoshioka, and Masahiko Yamada

components for commercially important fruit traits (FW, EP, FSM, SSC, and acidity) in December, the main season for fruit evaluation in breeding program in Japan, using 20 mandarin and related cultivars that are used as cross-parents in citrus breeding at the

Free access

Chad E. Finn, Bernadine C. Strik, Brian M. Yorgey, Theodore A. Mackey, James F. Hancock, Jungmin Lee, and Robert R. Martin

significant difference. The cultivar × year interaction was significant for yield but not fruit weight. The means for the final harvest year and the overall means are presented and compared ( Table 1 ). Subjective fruit evaluations were made during the 2011

Free access

Marisa M. Wall and Shakil A. Khan

peel surface but was barely perceptible. For over 500 fruit evaluated, only four fruit had a peel injury rating of 2. Nevertheless, the possibility of irradiation scald at 800 Gy underscores the need for uniform application of the minimum effective

Free access

Chad E. Finn, Bernadine C. Strik, Brian M. Yorgey, Mary E. Peterson, Patrick A. Jones, and Robert R. Martin

replicated trial (three plots of three plants each) in 2012. Fruit evaluations were made during the 2014–16 fruiting seasons using a 1 to 9 scale (9 = the best expression of each trait). The subjective fruit ratings included sterility (rating of drupelet set

Free access

Chad E. Finn, Bernadine C. Strik, Brian M. Yorgey, Mary E. Peterson, Patrick A. Jones, Jungmin Lee, and Robert R. Martin

’ blackberries at Oregon State University’s North Willamette Research and Extension Center in replicated trial (three, three plant plots) planted in 2011. z Subjective fruit evaluations were made during the 2013–15 fruiting seasons using a 1 to 9 scale (9 = the

Free access

Dario J. Chavez and José X. Chaparro

the 2 years during fruit evaluations in 2009 and 2010 ( t test, P = 1.00). The number of seedless and seeded F 1 progeny was 43 and 48, respectively. The observed segregation ratio was not significantly different from the expected 1:1 segregation

Full access

David Obenland, Dennis Margosan, Joseph L. Smilanick, and Bruce Mackey

was reduced in intensity in comparison with fruit evaluated within the first 24 h (data not shown). Fig. 2. Examples of oranges with large areas of fluorescence (shown under ultraviolet illumination) that normally are not culled from the packing line