Search Results

You are looking at 31 - 40 of 469 items for :

  • microsatellite x
  • All content x
Clear All
Free access

Jun-Bo Yang, Hong-Tao Li, De-Zhu Li, Jie Liu, Lian-Ming Gao, De-Zhu Li, Lian-Ming Gao, and Jie Liu

differentiation ( Nybom, 2004 ). This problem does not occur with microsatellite markers. Compared with other, random fingerprinting techniques such as RAPDs, ALFPs, and ISSRs, microsatellites show numerous advantages because they are locus-specific, codominant

Free access

Marie Pairon, Anne-Laure Jacquemart, and Daniel Potter

-scale spatial genetic structure, mating system, or gene flow among populations in both its native and introduced ranges are of interest to foresters and ecologists. Over previous decades, microsatellites have emerged as markers of choice in such analyses because

Free access

Zhiyong Wang, Paul Raymer, and Zhenbang Chen

and identified 30,895 contigs containing simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. In this study, microsatellite markers for S. helferi were identified and characterized using shotgun 454 pyrosequencing and used to analyze genetic diversity of other

Free access

Brooke C. Colburn, Shawn A. Mehlenbacher, Vidyasagar R. Sathuvalli, and David C. Smith

microsatellite, the latter also known as simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers ( Chen et al., 2005 ; Davis and Mehlenbacher, 1997 ; Mehlenbacher et al., 2004 ; Sathuvalli et al., 2011a , 2011b , 2012 ). The RAPD markers 152 800 and 268 580 are routinely

Free access

Josh A. Honig, Stacy A. Bonos, and William A. Meyer

., 2003 ). In this report, we describe the development of the first polymorphic microsatellite markers for ongoing molecular genetic research in kentucky bluegrass. Total genomic DNA was extracted from a single plant of the kentucky bluegrass cultivar

Free access

Deborah Dean, Phillip A. Wadl, Xinwang Wang, William E. Klingeman, Bonnie H. Ownley, Timothy A. Rinehart, Brian E. Scheffler, and Robert N. Trigiano

et al., 2008, 2009 ; Wang et al., 2010 ). Microsatellites are ubiquitous throughout genomes and codominant markers, often used in both interspecific and intraspecific diversity studies ( Gupta and Varshney, 2000 ). These genetic markers exhibit

Free access

Sheng-Xi Liao, Xian-Jie Mi, Ai-Zhong Liu, Kun Li, Zhen-Yin Yang, and Bo Tian

diversity for this species. Unfortunately, very few molecular markers are available to investigate the genetic diversity for Chinese Incense-cedar to date. In this report, we describe development of 13 polymorphic microsatellite loci for ongoing population

Free access

Valentina Scariot, Aziz Akkak, and Roberto Botta

(Wageningen, The Netherlands) for providing unpublished microsatellite loci primer sequences, Ben Vosman for the critical review of the manuscript, and Elena Costa for the help in morphological identification of rose accessions. We very much appreciated the

Free access

Paolo Boccacci, Roberto Botta, and Mercè Rovira

cultivars due to their high discriminating power at a relatively low cost. Among the available DNA markers, microsatellite or simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers appear to be best-suited to cultivar fingerprinting. They are generally codominant, highly

Free access

Samuel G. Obae, Mark H. Brand, Bryan A. Connolly, Rochelle R. Beasley, and Stacey L. Lance

have limited molecular variation due to apomictic seed production ( Brand, 2009 ; Persson Hovmalm et al., 2004 ). The success of molecular plant breeding hinges on availability of genome-specific molecular tools such as microsatellites or simple