Search Results

.N. 1990 An interspecific cross between Allium roylei Stearn and Allium cepa L., and its backcross to A. cepa Euphytica 47 29 31 van Heusden, A.W. van Ooijen, J.W. Vrielink-van Ginkel, R. Verbeek, W

, stems, aculei from ovaries with an inferior opaque part and a superior hyaline part, and fruits. The morphology was evaluated on greenhouse growing plants. The good cross compatibility of these two interspecific crosses, along with the higher

observed when using C. lanatus as the female parent ( Sain and Joshi, 2003 ; Sain et al., 2002 ), indicating that pollen viability was influenced by the cytoplasm in the interspecific crosses ( Schwarzbach and Rieseberg, 2002 ). Breeders often prefer to

ribisnigri . 1. Transfer of resistance from L. virosa to L. sativa by interspecific crosses and selection of resistant breeding lines Euphytica 31 291 300 Eenink, A.H. Dieleman, F.L. Groenwold, R. 1982b Resistance of lettuce ( Lactuca ) to the leaf aphid

interspecific crosses in the genus Rhododendron Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 89 29 35 Gamborg, O.L. Miller, R.A. Ojima, K. 1968 Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells Expt. Cell Res. 50 151 158 Geng, X. Wu, Y. Zhao, H. 2014

. Materials and Methods Plant material and DNA extraction. Several segregating populations were used in this evaluation: 1) population named O3R5: 186 progeny from the interspecific cross between two apple rootstocks, ‘Ottawa 3’ ( Spangelo et al., 1974 ) and R

. Table 3. Inheritance of SSR markers in Prunus hybrids from controlled interspecific crosses showing expected Mendelian inheritance and nonparental bands (in bold) in the progeny. Only a partial data set is included for brevity. All species in this

the fruit tissue ( Chen et al., 1998 ; Park and Chung, 1998 ; Petreikov et al., 2006 ). A set of near isogenic tomato plants was developed from an interspecific cross between the cultivated Solanum lycopersicum (formerly Lycopersicon esculentum

open-pollinated cultivar GD was used as the female parent in interspecific crosses. Open-pollinated, vine cultivars of C. moschata , LIC and DF, were used as male parents. Interspecific C. maxima x C. moschata crosses were performed in the field

. Some of the research tools being used in this germplasm improvement program include embryo/ovule rescue from wide interspecific crosses, polyploid induction, and in vitro propagation. These studies depend on effective tissue culture protocols. There