Search Results

You are looking at 81 - 90 of 1,133 items for :

  • differences among plant parts x
  • Refine by Access: All x
Clear All
Free access

Xinjuan Chen, Zhujun Zhu, Joska Gerendás, and Nadine Zimmermann

% to 75% for the indolic group, and 8% to 15% for the aromatic group. Some research reports that differences in GS levels among plant organs were related to the ability of synthesis and storage of each organ ( Clossais-Besnard and Larher, 1991 ; Rosa

Free access

Harmandeep Sharma, Manoj K. Shukla, Paul W. Bosland, and Robert L. Steiner

differences in g S values among control, deficit (both sides irrigated at 50% of field capacity), and PRD (alternate irrigation at field capacity) treatments for potatoes. To meet the peak water demand, chile plants under both PRD treatments seemed to

Open access

Xiaohui Lin, Hongbo Li, Shenggen He, Zhenpei Pang, Shuqin Lin, and Hongmei Li

epidermis. ( I ) Absence of stomata in adaxial bract epidermis. Scale bar = 100 μm; scale bar in inset = 10 μm. Stomatal density and morphological parameters. There were significant differences among the various parts of cut carnations in terms of SD ( Table

Free access

Bridget K. Behe, Benjamin Campbell, Jennifer Dennis, Charles Hall, Roberto Lopez, and Chengyan Yue

woody plant buyer segments relative to the low use segment. There were no differences among the segment members with regard to the MSA status or access to the Internet. The demographic characteristics of the three segments were different and consistent

Open access

Clydette Alsup-Egbers, Patrick Byers, Kelly McGowan, Pamela B. Trewatha, and William E. McClain

planted in Fall 2016 and lowest when planted in Spring 2017. The clove number was statistically lower for garlic planted in Spring 2017, with no significant differences among the clove numbers for garlic with fall planting dates. ‘Inchelium Red’ . The

Free access

Lívia Lopes Coelho, Amalia Fkiara, Kathryn Kuligowska Mackenzie, Renate Müller, and Henrik Lütken

flower tube began to shrink. The experimental setup consisted of two independent repetitions displaced in time, with eight plants per treatment in each. There was no significant difference between data obtained from the two repetitions; therefore, data

Free access

Creighton K. Thomas, Kwang Jin Kim, and Stanley J. Kays

formaldehyde removed by aerial plant parts vs. the root-zone was ≈1:1 during the day but declined to 1:11 at night when the stomata were closed ( Kim et al., 2009 ). Wolverton and Wolverton (1993) found that the aerial plant parts to media VOC removal ratio

Open access

Thomas E. Marler and Gil N. Cruz

reliable predictor among these three aboveground traits ( Day and Wiseman, 2009 ; Day et al., 2010 ), the differences among the species that have been studied to date indicate the scaling relationships may not be canonical, and data should be collected for

Free access

Ali Akbar Ghasemi Soloklui, Ahmad Ershadi, and Esmaeil Fallahi

toluene was used as a blank. Proline concentration was finally calculated through a calibration curve and expressed as micromole proline/gram fresh weight. Statistical analyses. Differences among cultivars in EL LT 50 , TST LT 50 , soluble carbohydrates

Free access

Yun Kong, Devdutt Kamath, and Youbin Zheng

-light-promoted elongation is a shade-avoidance response with varying sensitivity among species ( Kong et al., 2018 , 2019 ). Unfortunately, the conclusion was drawn from the studies on some bedding plants and microgreens under 24-h lighting, although the shade