Search Results

You are looking at 51 - 60 of 79 items for :

  • "conjoint analysis" x
  • Refine by Access: All x
Clear All
Free access

Hayk Khachatryan, Ben Campbell, Charles Hall, Bridget Behe, Chengyan Yue, and Jennifer Dennis

), mixed flowering annual containers ( Mason et al., 2008 ), and native plants ( Zagaden et al., 2008 ), to name only a few. The conjoint analysis approach allows investigating the preference for certain product attributes as well as the relationship

Open access

Ariana Torres

105 Costanigro, M. Thilmany, D. Kroll, S. Nurse, G. 2011 An in-store valuation of local and organic apples: The role of social desirability Agribusiness 27 4 1475 1481 Darby, K. Batte, M.T. Ernst, S. Roe, B. 2008 Decomposing local: A conjoint analysis

Full access

R. Karina Gallardo, Ines Hanrahan, Yeon A Hong, and James J. Luby

, J.L. Shogren, J.F. 2007 Experimental auctions methods and applications in marketing research. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK Manalo, A.B. 1990 Assessing the importance of apple attributes: An agricultural application of conjoint analysis

Free access

Dewayne L. Ingram and R. Thomas Fernandez

? Evidence from hypothetical conjoint analysis and nonhypothetical experimental auctions J. Agr. Appl. Econ. 42 4 757 772

Free access

Ruchen Zhou, Chengyan Yue, Shuoli Zhao, R. Karina Gallardo, Vicki McCracken, James J. Luby, and James R. McFerson

York State J. Food Distrib. Res. 36 1 177 184 van der Pol, M. Ryan, M. 1996 Using conjoint analysis to establish consumer preferences for fruit and vegetables Brit. Food J. 98 8 5 12

Full access

Roberto G. Lopez and Diane M. Camberato

.L. Dennis, J.H. Lopez, R.G. 2010 Are consumers willing to pay more for biodegradable containers than for plastic ones? Evidence from hypothetical conjoint analysis and non-hypothetical experimental auctions J. Agr. Appl. Econ. 42 757 772

Open access

Dewayne L. Ingram, Charles R. Hall, and Joshua Knight

Are consumers willing to pay more for biodegradable containers than for plastic ones? Evidence from hypothetical conjoint analysis and nonhypothetical experimental auctions J. Agr. Appl. Econ. 42 757 772

Open access

McKenzie Thomas, Kimberly Jensen, Margarita Velandia, Christopher Clark, Burton English, Dayton Lambert, and Forbes Walker

. Watkins, E. 2012 Consumer preferences for low-input turfgrasses: A conjoint analysis HortScience 47 1096 1101 Joreskog, K. Goldberger, A. 1975 Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable J. Amer. Stat

Free access

Dewayne L. Ingram and Charles R. Hall

, B.L. Dennis, J.H. Lopez, R.G. 2010 Are consumers willing to pay more for biodegradable containers than for plastic ones? Evidence from hypothetical conjoint analysis and nonhypothetical experimental auctions J. Agricultural and Applied Econ. 42 4 757

Free access

Chengyan Yue, R. Karina Gallardo, James J. Luby, Alicia L. Rihn, James R. McFerson, Vicki McCracken, Nnadozie Oraguzie, Cholani Weebadde, Audrey Sebolt, and Amy Iezzoni

Europe: Bottlenecks and new approaches in disease and pest control. Proc. XXVI Intl. Hort. Congr.: Sust. of Hort. Syst. in the 21st Century 638:333–339 Tano, K. Kamuanga, M. Faminow, M.D. Swallow, B. 2003 Using conjoint analysis to estimate farmer