. Statistical analyses Percent moisture. Analysis of variance (PROC GLM in SAS 9.3; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) was conducted on the seed moisture data to monitor for any significant changes in seed moisture during the experiment. Before analysis, percent
Search Results
Orville C. Baldos, Joseph DeFrank, Matthew Kramer, and Glenn S. Sakamoto
Maria Gannett, Natalie Bray, Joellen Lampman, Jennifer Lerner, Kathy Murray, Victoria Wallace, Tamson Yeh, Mark Slavens, Grant L. Thompson, and Jenny Kao-Kniffin
, and soil moisture were analyzed as the change in percent greenness, centimeters to 300 psi, torque value in Newton-meters, and percent moisture, respectively. All field data for the two sets of fields (CNY fields and Northeast fields) were analyzed
Ursula K. Schuch, H. Brent Pemberton, and Jack J. Kelly
. Percent moisture of five cultivars of bare-root roses exposed to ambient outdoor conditions. Values are the means of five replications, error bars = se . Number of flowering shoots from forced roses was affected by an interaction between cultivar
Jen A. Sembera, Tina M. Waliczek, and Erica J. Meier
measurements ( Dougherty, 1999 ). Therefore, curing piles for longer than 30 d would allow the compost time to become more acidic if considered necessary. Percent solids in the samples was normal to a little high (57.0% to 63.9%), whereas percent moisture was
Bernadine C. Strik, Amanda J. Davis, David R. Bryla, and Scott T. Orr
°C and weighed again to determine the percent moisture to calculate dry weight (DW). Subsamples of all other plant tissues, including senescent leaves, were sent to a commercial laboratory (Brookside Laboratories, New Bremen, OH) for analysis of the
Michael J. Costello
evaporation at that time. Table 3. Between-row average percent soil moisture (% w/v) ± se for nodding needlegrass and clean cultivated treatments, 1998 and 1999 seasons combined. z Pooling soil depths and dates, in-row percent moisture was 0
Emily K. Dixon, Bernadine C. Strik, and David R. Bryla
. 2014 values. Percent moisture content was used to estimate dry biomass of the primocanes. The relationship between primocane number and dry biomass was determined in Dec. 2014: [primocane dry biomass = 0.13 × (no. of primocanes per plant) − 0.043; r 2
Mark W. Farnham and Dean A. Kopsell
pigments are expressed on a DM basis ( Lefsrud et al., 2007 ) as they are in this study. In other trials conducted similar to this one, we have observed little variation in percent moisture of heads harvested from variable sets of broccoli genotypes. With
James E. Altland, James S. Owen Jr, and William C. Fonteno
extractor and positive air pressures were applied at 3.8, 10, 20, 40, 50, 75, 100, 200, and 300 cm H 2 O. Volume outflow was recorded for each increment of pressure and converted to percent moisture of the substrate volume. There were four replications for
Elena E. Lon Kan, Steven A. Sargent, Daniel J. Cantliffe, Adrian D. Berry, and Nicole L. Shaw
an aluminum pan, dried at 70 °C for about 2 d until a constant, final dry weight was obtained ( AOAC International, 2000 ); percent moisture content was calculated [fresh weight basis (FWB)]. Clamshell weight was tracked during storage and percent