Search Results

You are looking at 11 - 20 of 33 items for :

  • "infrared thermometer" x
  • Refine by Access: All x
Clear All
Full access

Kamal Aberkani, Xiuming Hao, Damien de Halleux, Martine Dorais, Stephen Vineberg, and André Gosselin

parameters were continuously measured at three points inside each greenhouse (center, northeast, and southwest). Leaf temperature was measured using an infrared thermometer [± 0.5 at 25 °C (Raynger ST Pro; Raytek, Santa Cruz, CA)] and was obtained from the

Free access

Brian Makeredza, Michael Schmeisser, Elmi Lötze, and Willem J. Steyn

potential. Still in the bags, the leaves were cut and water potential measured using a pressure bomb (Model 600; PMS Instrument Co., Albany, OR). FST was measured on Day 0 and Day 15 between 1300 hr and 1400 hr using a handheld infrared thermometer

Free access

Yiwei Jiang, Huifen Liu, and Van Cline

150 to 200 reflectance data points were taken from each plot and the values were averaged. The canopy and air temperature differential (ΔT) was taken using a handheld infrared thermometer (Everest InterScience Inc., Tucson, AZ) in full sun, and at

Full access

Ross Braun, Jack Fry, Megan Kennelly, Dale Bremer, and Jason Griffin

.), canopy temperatures at both sites were measured, and averaged, from three locations per plot between 1300 and 1500 hr on cloudless days using a handheld infrared thermometer at a 4-ft height above the canopy (model 100.3ZL; Everest Interscience, Tucson

Free access

Robert C. Morrow

45 min, leaf temperature was measured on three leaves nearest the LED arrays using an infrared thermometer. Maximum leaf temperature under the powered array was 1.5 °C warmer than that for the tomato under the unpowered array. Operating close to the

Free access

Reagan W. Hejl, Benjamin G. Wherley, James C. Thomas, and Richard H. White

) and end (week 10) of the study using an EC probe (Spectrum Technologies, Aurora, IL). Canopy temperature readings were also recorded on a biweekly basis during cloudless afternoon periods using a handheld infrared thermometer (Model 2956; Spectrum

Free access

Dalong Zhang, Yuping Liu, Yang Li, Lijie Qin, Jun Li, and Fei Xu

–air temperature difference (T c – T a ) vs. VPD under nonstressed and fully stressed conditions, respectively, as described in detail in a previous study ( Zhang et al., 2017 ). Leaf temperature was determined with a digital infrared thermometer (model GM320

Full access

Thiago Vieira da Costa, João Alexio Scarpare Filho, and Matthew W. Fidelibus

clusters by the number of passes. Canopy leaf temperature was measured daily for 14 d with a handheld infrared (IR) thermometer (model 39650-04; Cole-Parmer, Chicago, IL). Infrared thermometer measurements were made by directing the instrument at the

Free access

Juan Carlos Díaz-Pérez

1500 hr ), on clear days, using a ceptometer (Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA) taking two readings per plot. Leaf temperature (T leaf ) was measured in each plot with an infrared thermometer gun (Spectrum Technologies, Plainfield, IL). PAR and T

Free access

Yingmei Ma and Emily Merewitz

temperatures were measured using an infrared thermometer (Davis Instruments, Vernon Hills, IL). The temperature depression was calculated by subtracting ambient temperature in the growth chamber from the plant canopy temperature. Mineral nutrient determination