Search Results

You are looking at 101 - 110 of 158 items for :

  • "canopy volume" x
  • Refine by Access: All x
Clear All
Free access

Ed Stover, Sharon Inch, Matthew L. Richardson, and David G. Hall

number, HLB phenotypic symptoms, and tree mortality were assessed monthly to quarterly beginning 20 months after planting. Tree canopy volume (TCV) was assessed using the assumption that tree shape was one-half a prolate spheroid (TCV = 4π/6 × H × W1 × W2

Free access

Giuseppe Reforgiato Recupero, Giuseppe Russo, Santo Recupero, Roberto Zurru, Bruno Deidda, and Maurizio Mulas

cumulative yield to canopy volume for the last year, calculated as V = 0.5238 × h × d 2 (h = plant height; d = plant lateral mean diameter). Table 2. Yield, tree size, and efficiency of ‘Tarocco’ TDV orange on 19 rootstocks planted at Palazzelli (SR). Table

Free access

Brian P. Pellerin, Deborah Buszard, Alex Georgallas, and Richard J. Nowakowski

year ( Fulford, 1966 ). ‘Wealthy’, a strongly biennial cultivar, requires a minimum distance of 15 to 25 cm between individual flower clusters, approximately equivalent to 40 flower clusters/m 3 of canopy volume, to maintain regular yields ( Bobb and

Full access

Joan Tous, Agustí Romero, Juan F. Hermoso, Antònia Ninot, Joan Plana, and Ignasi Batlle

the budding point, and the canopy volume), growth habit (erect, open, or weeping), precocity (first year after budding with a crop of over 1.5 kg/tree and the first six cumulated crops), annual and cumulative pod production and kernel yield (kilograms

Free access

Lorenzo León, Raúl de la Rosa, Diego Barranco, and Luis Rallo

genotypes according to vigor was very similar with the different vigor measurements evaluated (trunk cross-sectional area, canopy area, and canopy volume), because of the close relationship between these vigor measurements (correlation coefficients higher

Free access

Gerry H. Neilsen, Denise Neilsen, Frank Kappel, Peter Toivonen, and Linda Herbert

summer stomatal conductance readings and were sufficient to reduce TCSA (and by inference, canopy volume) of I2 trees to ≈60% of I1 trees by the end of 2008, 3 years after treatment imposition. It is therefore implied that on coarse-textured, rapidly

Free access

T. Gregory McCollum and C. Jack Hearn

.1 m wide with normal upright growth habit ( Fig. 2 ) yielding a canopy volume of 32.7 m 3 . Scion circumference for ‘US Early Pride’ 10 cm above the graft union on ‘Swingle’ rootstock was 55 cm; ‘Swingle’ rootstock circumference 10 cm below the graft

Full access

Bielinski M. Santos

status in certain crops ( Azia and Stewart, 2001 ; Himelrick et al., 1993 ; Ruiz-Espinoza et al., 2010 ). Growth index is an indirect measurement of plant biomass production and performance and uses either plant canopy volume or stem elongation as basis

Free access

Jeffrey G. Williamson and D. Scott NeSmith

treatment application. The number of flowers that developed on new growth (Expt. 1); canopy volume (Expt. 2); and leaf, stem, root, and total dry plant weights were determined at the end of one growing season. Completely random designs with five (Expt. 1) or

Free access

Alisson P. Kovaleski, Rebecca L. Darnell, Bruno Casamali, and Jeffrey G. Williamson

. This may be an effect of the decreased canopy volume in the heavy pruned plants compared with moderate and nonpruned plants ( Kovaleski et al., 2015a ). Although Salvo et al. (2012) concluded that the number of inflorescence buds per plant is the most