Rain cracking is a problem for sweet cherry production in all countries where this very high-value crop is grown (Christensen, 1996). Despite considerable research effort the mechanistic basis of the phenomenon is still poorly understood. The fruit’s water relations are thought to play a critical role in cracking (Considine and Kriedemann, 1972; Measham et al., 2009; Sekse, 1995, 2008; Sekse et al., 2005). Recent investigations have established that stage III sweet cherry fruit have a surprisingly low turgor (Knoche et al., 2014; Schumann et al., 2014). The mechanism by which low turgor is maintained despite a massive accumulation of carbohydrates and, hence, a very negative osmotic potential is at present unknown. Barring the pit, a sweet cherry has a similar mechanical constitution as a grape (Vitis vinifera L., Vitis labrusca L.), which is also very vulnerable to rain cracking (Considine and Brown, 1981). As in sweet cherries, grape turgor is very low in postveraison fruit (Lang and Düring, 1990; Wada et al., 2008, 2009). The low turgor in grapes is accounted for by the accumulation in the apoplast of solutes at osmotic concentrations closely matching those in the symplast. The rough balance in the osmotic potentials in symplast and apoplast results in similar pressures in these two compartments and thus flaccidity (Wada et al., 2008). This conclusion is based on the following experimental evidence. First, at harvest maturity there is no significant difference in osmolarity between apoplastic fluid extracted from grapes via the stalk using a pressure bomb and that of the expressed juice of crushed fruit (almost totally symplastic in origin—very large, thin-walled flesh cells), whereas in immature grapes they are substantially different (Lang and Düring, 1991). This finding is interpreted as being the result of a loss of compartmentation during maturation (Lang and Düring, 1991). Second, Tilbrook and Tyerman (2008) observed significant cell death within an intact, mature grape berry using microscopy and vitality staining. The membrane’s loss of osmotic competence allows diffusion of symplastic solutes into the apoplast. Third, using tissue centrifugation (Wada et al., 2008) and a pressure plate apparatus (Wada et al., 2009) the grape apoplast was selectively sampled. The subsequent compositional analyses also revealed that symplastic solutes accumulate in the apoplast of mature grapes (Wada et al., 2008, 2009).
For sweet cherries, comparable, direct evidence for the presence of apoplastic solutes that would account for the lack of turgor is not yet available. However, grape berry and sweet cherry are morphologically and physiologically similar with respect to cracking and therefore the above explanation may also apply to sweet cherry. First, the bursting of cells as a consequence of excessive water uptake possibly through microcracks (Glenn and Poovaiah, 1989; Peschel and Knoche, 2005) and of significant cell-wall degradation during maturation (Kondo and Danjo, 2001) would result in solute leakage into the apoplast. Second, we observed macerated tissue surrounding the pit of many sweet cherry cultivars at maturity (M. Knoche, unpublished data). We interpret this observation as the loss of compartmentation in this region of the fruit.
The question arises what would be the consequences of such leakage? In the work we report here, we observe a surprising and dramatic increase in cracking when sweet cherry fruit are brought into direct contact with the expressed juice of sweet cherries.
The objectives of this study were to investigate what consequences the leakage of cell contents into the fruit’s apoplast might have. We were particularly interested in 1) quantifying cracking of sweet cherry fruit when incubated in different osmotica, including in artificial sweet cherry juice containing the same five dominant chemical moieties found in real cherry juice; 2) identifying any “active,” crack-promoting constituent in real cherry juice; and 3) establishing its mode of action in increasing cracking.
Beyer, M., Lau, S. & Knoche, M. 2005 Studies on water transport through the sweet cherry surface: IX. Comparing permeability in water uptake and transpiration Planta 220 474 485
Brüggenwirth, M., Fricke, H. & Knoche, M. 2014 Biaxial tensile tests identify epidermis and hypodermis as the main structural elements of sweet cherry skin Ann. Bot. Plants. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plu019.
Chun, J-P. & Huber, D.J. 1998 Polygalacturonase-mediated solubilization and depolymerization of pectic polymers in tomato fruit cell walls Plant Physiol. 117 1293 1299
Christensen, J.V. 1996 Rain-induced cracking of sweet cherries: Its causes and prevention, p. 297–327. In: A.D. Webster and N.E. Looney (eds.). Cherries: Crop physiology, production and uses. CAB Intl., Wallingford, UK
Considine, J. & Brown, K. 1981 Physical aspects of fruit growth—Theoretical analysis of distribution of surface growth forces in fruit in relation to cracking and splitting Plant Physiol. 68 371 376
Considine, J.A. & Kriedemann, P.E. 1972 Fruit splitting in grapes. Determination of the critical turgor pressure Austral. J. Agr. Res. 23 17 24
Glenn, G.M. & Poovaiah, B.W. 1989 Cuticular properties and postharvest calcium applications influence cracking of sweet cherries J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114 781 788
Herrmann, K. 2001 Inhaltsstoffe von Obst und Gemüse. Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany
Knoche, M. & Peschel, S. 2006 Water on the surface aggravates microscopic cracking of the sweet cherry fruit cuticle J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 131 192 200
Kondo, S. & Danjo, C. 2001 Cell wall polysaccharide metabolism during fruit development in sweet cherry ‘Satohnishiki’ as affected by gibberellic acid J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 70 178 184
Lang, A. & Düring, H. 1991 Partitioning control by water potential gradient—Evidence for compartmentation breakdown in grape berries J. Expt. Bot. 42 1117 1122
Lichter, A., Dvir, O., Fallik, E., Cohen, S., Golan, R., Shemer, Z. & Sagi, M. 2002 Cracking of cherry tomatoes in solution Postharvest Biol. Technol. 26 305 312
Measham, P.F., Bound, S.A., Gracie, A.J. & Wilson, S.J. 2009 Incidence and type of cracking in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) are affected by genotype and season Crop Pasture Sci. 60 1002 1008
Peschel, S. & Knoche, M. 2005 Characterization of microcracks in the cuticle of developing sweet cherry fruit J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 130 487 495
Schumann, C., Schlegel, H.J., Grimm, E., Knoche, M. & Lang, A. 2014 Water potential and its components in developing sweet cherry J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 139 349 355
Tilbrook, J. & Tyerman, S.D. 2008 Cell death in grape berries: Varietal differences linked to xylem pressure and berry weight loss Funct. Plant Biol. 35 173 184
Wada, H., Shackel, K.A. & Matthews, M.A. 2008 Fruit ripening in Vitis vinifera: Apoplastic solute accumulation accounts for pre-veraison turgor loss in berries Planta 227 1351 1361
Wada, H., Matthews, M.A. & Shackel, K.A. 2009 Seasonal pattern of apoplastic solute accumulation and loss of cell turgor during ripening of Vitis vinifera fruit under field conditions J. Expt. Bot. 60 1773 1781
Weichert, H., von Jagemann, C., Peschel, S., Knoche, M., Neumann, D. & Erfurth, W. 2004 Studies on water transport through the sweet cherry fruit surface: VIII. Effect of selected cations on water uptake and fruit cracking J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 129 781 788