Survivorship of high-quality landscape field-grown trees is a particular challenge as a result of differences in post-transplant recovery between species. During bare-root tree transplanting, a major part of the root system is severed, the tree is held in storage, and then replanted into a new location. Not surprisingly, the loss of a large proportion of biomass usually results in major physiological changes within the tree until an adequate root system is rebuilt. Meanwhile, poor root–soil contact resulting from the loss of a majority of fine roots (the sites of water and nutrient uptake) often results in water stress in newly transplanted trees (Grossnickle, 1988). This large loss of plant biomass coupled with exposure to dry conditions is referred to as “transplant shock,” in which a plant shows less shoot growth, smaller “scorched” new leaves, and a general lack of vigor (Watson and Himelick, 1983).
Root hydraulic conductance describes the ability of roots to take up water from a growing medium and transport the water to other parts of a tree. Water stress during transplant shock greatly disrupts normal water transport capacity of a tree. Under drought, reduced xylem water potential may cause embolisms, air-filled xylem conduits, leading to a reduction in hydraulic conductance [K (the mass flow rate through the segment divided by the pressure difference)] (Schultz and Matthews, 1988; Sperry and Saliendra, 1994) and thus transpiration (Sperry and Pockman, 1993). Root K, as a major component of whole-tree hydraulic architecture (Cruiziat et al., 2002), has been neglected in previous studies despite its reduction at transplanting and its probable influence on post-transplant recovery. Hydraulic conductance of the entire root system of Corylus colurna was reported to be reduced significantly after transplanting (Harris and Bassuk, 1995). Regarding trees, transpiration pulls water from soil to leaves and to the atmosphere and creates a variable gradient of water potential throughout the tree. Water potential distribution along the root system is thus very dependent on root architecture such as fine root and coarse root branching (Cruiziat et al., 2002). This makes it reasonable to assume fine roots and coarse roots may have different hydraulic responses during transplant shock and may play different roles in post-transplant recovery.
Transplant timing is important in post-transplant recovery. Spring and fall are usually considered to be the appropriate times for temperate tree transplanting, but the question about which season is optimal is highly disputable. The major advantage of fall transplanting is to allow root regeneration before shoot growth in the spring and provide more time for roots to acclimate to the new soil environment, whereas spring provides ample soil moisture and allows transplanted trees to avoid cold weather (Richardson-Calfee et al., 2004). However, species vary in their survival as a function of transplant seasons (Harris et al., 2002). Fine root traits, including physiology and morphology, largely determine maximum potential growth rate of tree seedlings (Comas et al., 2002). By understanding the physiological basis of root behavior during fall vs. spring transplanting, better decisions regarding transplant timing can be made.
Tree transplant size may affect post-transplant recovery. Although large-caliper trees are often more desired to produce an immediately mature landscape, it was often found that large-caliper trees have a slower growth rate than small-caliper trees (Gilman et al., 1998). After root pruning, the artificial imbalance in the proportion of roots to shoots reduces vigor for a period of time with small-caliper trees often returning to the original shoot-to-root ratio sooner and thus having higher survival rates (Watson, 1985). However, there are some factors that may affect the rate of post-transplant recovery of small- and large-caliper trees that when accounted for can increase large-caliper tree recovery to a similar rate as small-caliper trees. For example, genetic variation between small- and large-caliper trees has often been overlooked: the more vigorous trees tend to be harvested at smaller caliper sizes in nursery production practices because they are the first to reach salable size and thus the last ones harvested from a nursery block are usually slower-growing large-caliper trees, which may be genetically inferior to the earlier harvests (Struve, 2009; Struve et al., 2000).
In this study, we used two Quercus species that differ in their transplant ability, Q. bicolor and Q. macrocarpa. Although these species are closely related, Q. bicolor easily survives transplanting, whereas Q. macrocarpa often does not (Buckstrup and Bassuk, 2009). We transplanted both small- and large-caliper trees of the two species and examined K before and after transplanting in fine roots, coarse roots, and the entire root system of the trees. Additionally, we assessed how transplant timing affected post-transplant recovery in large-caliper trees. The objective of this study was to determine whether root K is related to post-transplant recovery of the two Quercus species and whether tree size and transplant timing may affect transplant recovery.
Buckstrup, M. & Bassuk, N. 2009 Creating the urban forest: The bare root method. Cornell Univ. Urban Hort. Inst., Ithaca, NY
Comas, L., Bouma, T. & Eissenstat, D. 2002 Linking root traits to potential growth rate in six temperate tree species Oecologia 132 34 43
Fitter, A.H. 1982 Morphometric analysis of root systems: Application of the technique and influence of soil fertility on root system development in two herbaceous species Plant Cell Environ. 5 313 322
Gilman, E.F., Black, R.J. & Dehgan, B. 1998 Irrigation volume and frequency and tree size affect establishment rate J. Arboricult. 24 1 9
Grossnickle, S.C. 1988 Planting stress in newly planted jack pine and white spruce. 1. Factors influencing water uptake Tree Physiol. 4 71 83
Guehl, J.M., Clement, A., Kaushal, P. & Aussenac, G. 1993 Planting stress, water status and non-structural carbohydrate concentrations in corsican pine seedlings Tree Physiol. 12 173 183
Harris, J.R. & Bassuk, N.L. 1995 Effect of drought and phenological stage at transplanting on root hydraulic conductivity, growth indices, and photosynthesis of turkish hazelnut J. Environ. Hort. 13 11 14
Harris, J.R., Fanelli, J. & Thrift, P. 2002 Transplant timing affects early root system regeneration of sugar maple and northern red oak HortScience 37 984 987
Kaushal, P. & Aussenac, G. 1989 Transplanting shock in corsican pine and cedar of atlas seedlings: Internal water deficits, growth and root regeneration For. Ecol. Mgt. 27 29 40
Kavanagh, K.L. & Zaerr, J.B. 1997 Xylem cavitation and loss of hydraulic conductance in western hemlock following planting Tree Physiol. 17 59 63
Lauderdale, D.M., Gilliam, C.H., Eakes, D.J., Keever, G. & Chappelka, A. 1995 Tree transplant size influences post-transplant growth, gas exchange, and leaf water potential of ‘October Glory’ red maple J. Environ. Hort. 13 178 181
Meinzer, F.C., Johnson, D.M., Lachenbruch, B., McCulloh, K.A. & Woodruff, D.R. 2009 Xylem hydraulic safety margins in woody plants: Coordination of stomatal control of xylem tension with hydraulic capacitance Funct. Ecol. 23 922 930
Ogasa, M., Miki, N.H., Murakami, Y. & Yoshikawa, K. 2013 Recovery performance in xylem hydraulic conductivity is correlated with cavitation resistance for temperate deciduous tree species Tree Physiol. 33 335 344
Pregitzer, K.S., DeForest, J.L., Burton, A.J., Allen, M.F., Ruess, R.W. & Hendrick, R.L. 2002 Fine root architecture of nine North American trees Ecol. Monogr. 72 293 309
Richardson-Calfee, L.E. & Harris, J.R. 2005 A review of the effects of transplant timing on landscape establishment of field-grown deciduous trees in temperate climates HortTechnology 15 132 135
Richardson-Calfee, L.E., Harris, J.R. & Fanelli, J.K. 2004 Seasonal effects of transplanting on northern red oak and willow oak J. Environ. Hort. 22 75 79
Ritchie, G.A. 2003 Root physiology and phenology: The key to transplanting success. National proceedings: Forest and conservation nursery associations 2002. U.S. Dept. Agr. For. Serv., Rocky Mountain Res. Sta., Ogden, UT Proc. RMRS-P-28:98-104
Schultz, H.R. & Matthews, M.A. 1988 Resistance to water transport in shoots of Vitis vinifera L. Relation to growth at low water potential Plant Physiol. 88 718 724
Sperry, J.S., Donnelly, J.R. & Tyree, M.T. 1988 A method for measuring hydraulic conductivity and embolism in xylem Plant Cell Environ. 11 35 40
Sperry, J.S. & Pockman, W.T. 1993 Limitation of transpiration by hydraulic conductance and xylem cavitation in Betula occidentalis Plant Cell Environ. 16 279 287
Sperry, J.S. & Saliendra, N.Z. 1994 Intra- and inter-plant variation in xylem cavitation in Betula occidentalis Plant Cell Environ. 17 1233 1241
Struve, D.K. 2009 Tree establishment: A review of some of the factors affecting transplant survival and establishment Arboricult. Urban Forest. 35 10 13
Struve, D.K., Burchfield, L. & Maupin, C. 2000 Survival and growth of transplanted large- and small-caliper red oaks J. Arboricult. 26 162 169
Trifilò, P., Raimondo, F., Nardini, A., Gullo, M.L. & Salleo, S. 2004 Drought resistance of Ailanthus altissima: Root hydraulics and water relations Tree Physiol. 24 107 114
Tyree, M.T., Patiño, S., Bennink, J. & Alexander, J. 1995 Dynamic measurements of roots hydraulic conductance using a high-pressure flowmeter in the laboratory and field J. Expt. Bot. 46 83 94