The genus Hydrangea comprises ≈30 species that are widely distributed in America and Asia (McClintock, 1957). Famous for their large inflorescences surrounded by showy sepals, several Hydrangea species have been cultivated and are now some of the most popular ornamental flowering shrubs worldwide (Dirr and Dirr, 2004). Hydrangeas are one of the most economically important nursery crops in the United States, with sales exceeding $120 million in 2014 (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2014). Five species of Hydrangea (H. macrophylla, H. paniculata, H. quercifolia, H. arborescens, and H. anomala ssp. petiolaris) are widely cultivated in the United States as landscape plants (Dirr, 2009). Among them, H. macrophylla, also known as bigleaf hydrangea, is the most commonly cultivated species. One of the remarkable traits of bigleaf hydrangea is the aluminum (Al)-dependent flower color; plants may have pink or blue flowers in the presence of Al and a favorable substrate pH (Ma et al., 1997). Bigleaf hydrangeas are popular for their utility as landscape plants, potted plants, and cut flowers; therefore, traits such as flower and foliage color, sepal size and shape, and leaf characteristics have been enhanced through conventional breeding efforts that have led to more than 1000 named cultivars (van Gelderen and van Gelderen, 2004). These breeding efforts have focused largely on novel floral traits rather than disease resistance or environmental tolerance, and much room for improvement exists for a number of environmental and ornamental traits.
Improvements in environmental tolerance and combinations of desirable traits can be achieved through breeding approaches such as crosses within H. macrophylla or interspecific hybridization between H. macrophylla and closely related species (Rinehart et al., 2006). Limitations to hybrid breeding of H. macrophylla include lack of precise germplasm classification, difficulty recovering favorable trait combinations, and a long juvenile period before selection can occur. The taxonomy classification of the two most important H. macrophylla subspecies, ssp. macrophylla and ssp. serrata, has been disputed due to the lack of strong classification tools and convincing results (Reed and Rinehart, 2007). Most Hydrangea species are diploid, with a chromosome number of 2n = 36 and genome size of 2.0 Gb (Cerbah et al., 2001); however, different ploidy levels among hydrangea species and within bigleaf hydrangea have been reported (Alexander, 2017; Jones et al., 2007; Sax, 1931; Schoennagel, 1931). Cultivars of H. macrophylla that are resistant to powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygonii) infection have been identified and include ‘Veitchii’, which has been widely used as a parent in crosses (Li et al., 2009; Windham et al., 2011). However, ‘Veitchii’ is not completely resistant to powdery mildew; it has lacecap flowers and ordinary foliage, which often make seedlings undesirable as new cultivars. Hybrids between Dichroa febrifuga, which is semi-evergreen and tropical, and H. macrophylla showed improved drought and sun tolerance but lacked the showy sepals that appeal to consumers (Jones and Reed, 2006; Reed et al., 2008). Closely related species with ploidy differences have produced fertile interspecific hybrids with H. macrophylla, suggesting that this breeding strategy could significantly expand hydrangea genetics over the long term, even when just using the species identified by Rinehart et al. (2006). Hybridizations between H. macrophylla and hydrangea species outside the group of closely related taxa have only been accomplished with embryo rescue, and offspring were not vigorous or fertile (Kudo and Niimi, 1999; Kudo et al., 2002; Reed, 2004; Reed et al., 2001).
Releasing hydrangea cultivars requires screening of hundreds or thousands of seedlings over multiple generations to breed cultivars with the combination of desirable floral traits that consumers expect. As an obligate out-crossing species, H. macrophylla has high heterozygosity, and breeding is further hampered by long generation times typical of woody plants (Rinehart et al., 2016). Modern breeding methods that use molecular markers to identify desirable traits during the plant seedling stage could effectively reduce the breeding time, investment, and effort of cultivar release. However, unlike agronomic crops, little is known about the H. macrophylla genetic background because prior breeding efforts were mostly based on open-pollinated hybridizations rather than marker development. Simple sequence repeats markers (SSRs) have been developed and used to describe germplasm resources, parentage/pedigree, and intraspecific and interspecific hybrids (Rinehart et al., 2006, 2010). A phylogenetic tree of Hydrangea species was established to study the possibility of interspecific hybridization by using 13 highly polymorphic chloroplast markers (Mendoza et al., 2013). Recently, Waki et al. (2018) screened 768 SSR primer pairs in 93 F2 progeny to identify markers linked to double-flower and hortensia (mophead) traits in H. macrophylla; they found that both traits are each controlled by a single recessive gene. Many SSRs were developed through transcriptome sequencing and used for genetic mapping of powdery mildew resistance, remontancy, and flower type in hydrangea, but they were insufficient for linkage mapping due to the lack of marker density (Rinehart et al., 2018).
Accelerated breeding of new H. macrophylla cultivars directly helps the nursery industry because consumer interest is driven, in part, by the release of new and novel plants. Conventional breeding can be vastly improved by investigating genetic availability in germplasm collections and increasing breeding accuracy and efficiency using molecular markers. In this regard, genotyping-by-sequencing can be used because of its utility for detecting large numbers of single-nucleotide polymorphism loci and rapidly genotyping diverse accessions. The goals of this research were to apply genotyping-by-sequencing to discover SNPs for bigleaf hydrangea cultivars, investigate the genetic diversity and population structure of H. macrophylla cultivars, and determine the disputed taxonomic classification of H. macrophylla ssp. serrata.
CaiM.WangK.LuoL.PanH.T.ZhangQ.X.YangY.Y.2015Production of interspecific hybrids between Hydrangea macrophylla and Hydrangea arborescens via ovary cultureHortScience5017651769
CerbahM.MortreauE.BrownS.Siljak-YakovlevS.BertrandH.LambertC.. 2001. Genome size variation and species relationships in the genus HydrangeaTheor. Appl. Genet. 103(145–51.
DirrM.A.DirrB.L.2004Hydrangeas for American gardens. Timber Press Portland OR
DirrM.A.2009Manual of woody landscape plants: Their identification ornamental characteristics culture propagation and uses. Stipes Publ. Champaign IL
EarlD.A.2012STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno methodConserv. Genet. Resour.4359361
ElshireR.J.GlaubitzJ.C.SunQ.PolandJ.A.KawamotoK.BucklerE.S.MitchellS.E.2011A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity speciesPLoS One65e19379
EvannoG.RegnautS.GoudetJ.2005Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation studyMol. Ecol.1426112620
ExcoffierL.LischerH.E.2010Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and WindowsMol. Ecol. Resour.10564567
GlaubitzJ.C.CasstevensT.M.LuF.HarrimanJ.ElshireR.J.SunQ.BucklerE.S.2014TASSEL-GBS: A high capacity genotyping-by-sequencing analysis pipelinePLoS One9e90346
HeJ.ZhaoX.LarocheA.LuZ.X.LiuH.LiZ.2014Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), an ultimate marker-assisted selection (MAS) tool to accelerate plant breedingFront. Plant Sci.5484
JakobssonM.RosenbergN.A.2007CLUMPP: A cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structureBioinformatics2318011806
JonesK.D.ReedS.M.RinehartT.A.2007Analysis of ploidy level and its effects on guard cell length, pollen diameter, and fertility in Hydrangea macrophyllaHortScience42483488
KardosJ.H.RobackerC.D.DirrM.A.RinehartT.A.2009Production and verification of Hydrangea macrophylla × H. angustipetala hybridsHortScience4415341537
KudoN.KimuraY.NiimiY.2002Production of interspecific hybrid plants by crossing Hydrangea macrophylla f. hortensia (Lam.) Rehd. and H. quercifolia Bartr. through ovule cultureEngeigaku Kenkyuu1912
KudoN.NiimiY.1999Production of interspecific hybrid plants through cotyledonary segment culture of embryos derived from crosses between Hydrangea macrophylla f. hortensia (Lam.) Rehd. and H. arborescens LJ. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci.68803809
LiY.WindhamM.T.TrigianoR.N.ReedS.M.SpiersJ.M.RinehartT.A.2009Bright-field and fluorescence microscopic study of development of Erysiphe polygoni in susceptible and resistant bigleaf hydrangeaPlant Dis.93130134
MaJ.F.HiradateS.NomotoK.IwashitaT.MatsumotoH.1997Internal detoxification mechanism of Al in hydrangea (identification of Al form in the leaves)Plant Physiol.11310331039
MendozaC.G.WankeS.GoetghebeurP.SamainM.S.2013Facilitating wide hybridization in hydrangea cultivars: A phylogenetic and marker-assisted breeding approachMol. Breed.32233239
ReedS.RiedelG.PoolerM.2001Verification and establishment of Hydrangea macrophylla ‘Kardinal’ x H. paniculata ‘Brussels Lace’ interspecific hybridsJ. Environ. Hort.198588
ReedS.M.JonesK.D.RinehartT.A.2008Production and characterization of intergeneric hybrids between Dichroa febrifuga and Hydrangea macrophyllaJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.1338491
ReedS.M.RinehartT.A.2007Simple sequence repeat marker analysis of genetic relationships within Hydrangea macrophyllaJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.132341351
RinehartT.A.SchefflerB.E.ReedS.M.2006Genetic diversity estimates for the genus Hydrangea and development of a molecular key based on SSRsJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.131787797
U.S. Department of Agriculture2014Census of horticulture specialties. 18 July 2018. <http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012>
van GelderenC.J.van GelderanD.M.2004Encyclopedia of hydrangeas. Timber Press Portland OR
WakiT.KodamaM.AkutsuM.NamaiK.LigoM.KurokuraT.YamamotoT.NashimaK.NakayamaM.YagiM.2018Development of DNA markers linked to double-flower and hortensia traits in Hydrangea macrophylla (Thunb.)Ser. Hort. J.87264273
WindhamM.T.ReedS.M.MmbagaM.T.WindhamA.S.LiY.RinehartT.A.2011Evaluation of powdery mildew resistance in Hydrangea macrophyllaJ. Environ. Hort.296064
YamamotoT.2000The Japanese hydrangeas color guide book. Association Shamrock Varengeville-sur-Mer France
YoshidaK.Toyama-KatoY.KamedaK.KondoT.2003Sepal color variation of Hydrangea macrophylla and vacuolar pH measured with a proton-selective microelectrodePlant Cell Physiol.44262268
ZonneveldB.J.M.2004Genome size in Hydrangea p. 245–251. In: C.J. van Gelderen and D.M. van Gelderen (eds.). Encyclopedia of hydrangeas. Timber Press Portland OR