Packout Audits of Apples from Five Orchard Management Systems

in HortTechnology
Authors:
T. Auxt Baugher West Virginia University Experiment Farm, P.O. Box 609, Kearneysville, WV 25430.

Search for other papers by T. Auxt Baugher in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
H.W. Hogmire West Virginia University Experiment Farm, P.O. Box 609, Kearneysville, WV 25430.

Search for other papers by H.W. Hogmire in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A.R. Biggs West Virginia University Experiment Farm, P.O. Box 609, Kearneysville, WV 25430.

Search for other papers by A.R. Biggs in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S.I. Walter West Virginia University Experiment Farm, P.O. Box 609, Kearneysville, WV 25430.

Search for other papers by S.I. Walter in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D.W. Leach West Virginia University Experiment Farm, P.O. Box 609, Kearneysville, WV 25430.

Search for other papers by D.W. Leach in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
T. Winfield West Virginia University Experiment Farm, P.O. Box 609, Kearneysville, WV 25430.

Search for other papers by T. Winfield in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
G.W. Lightner USDA-ARS Appalachian Fruit Research Station, 45 Wiltshire Rd., Kearneysville, WV 25430.

Search for other papers by G.W. Lightner in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Apple packout audits were conducted during 1991 to 1993 to assess effects of five orchard systems (three cultivars, two age groups) on fruit packout and determine if relationships exist between light quality and productivity. Cultivar/rootstock combinations on 1979 T-trellis and central-leader systems had the lowest light levels and relative yields. Trees on either 1979 3-wire trellis, 1986 MIA, or 1985 West Virginia spindle had the highest light transmission, and trees on 1979 or 1985 West Virginia spindle systems had the highest yields. Extra fancy/fancy packouts across systems ranged from 40% to 85%. `Empire', regardless of system, had the highest packouts, and `Golden Delicious' on 1979 or 1986 central leader had the lowest packouts. A regression analysis comparing percentage packout in grades below fancy to percentage full sun indicated that reduced packouts were related to low light conditions. Orchard system influenced the number of fruit downgraded due to color, russet, bruises, bitter pit, cork spot, apple scab, rots, sooty blotch/fly speck, and tufted apple budmoth. Regression analyses comparing defects to field data indicated that bitter pit decreased as yield efficiency increased, and rot and sooty blotch/fly speck incidence were related to low canopy light penetration. Revenue losses were disproportionate to percentage of downgraded fruit because some defects had a greater impact on grade than others. The greatest revenue losses were for russet in `Golden Delicious' on 1986 central leader ($1656.60/acre) and for bitter pit in `Golden Delicious' on 1979 T-trellis ($1067.30/acre). Total losses in returns for individual systems ranged from $453.71/acre for `Empire' on 3-wire trellis to $3145.49/acre for `Golden Delicious' on 1986 central leader. The comparisons of young versus mature system yields and packouts indicate that medium- to high-density vertical or inclined canopy systems are superior to horizontal or low-density vertical freestanding systems. The cost-benefit analyses prescribe areas where management can be changed in existing systems to increase profitability.

  • Collapse
  • Expand