Production of young plants, such as seedlings and cuttings, under sole-source lighting is an alternative to greenhouse production where the natural daily light integral (DLI) in winter may be too low for the production of high-quality young plants (Randall and Lopez, 2015). Because the electrical cost associated with lighting are high, it is important that young plants use the provided light as efficiently as possible. Young seedlings intercept little of the light available to them in a production space because their leaves are small relative to the size of the production space. For example, ‘Goldsturm’ black-eyed susan (Rudbeckia fulgida var. sullivantii) seedlings sown in a 72-cell plug tray (20 × 10 inches) had a total canopy size of ≈15 cm2 after 10 d, which represented ≈1% of the surface area of the tray (Elkins, 2020). Plants this small may benefit from larger leaves to increase light interception and presumably canopy photosynthesis and growth. This has the potential to shorten cropping cycles of ornamental plants grown in controlled environments. One approach to enhancing growth is to include far-red light (λ = 700–800 nm) in the spectrum because 1) far-red light can trigger a shade-avoidance and/or acclimation response (Franklin, 2008; Keuskamp et al., 2010; Possart et al., 2014) and 2) it is photosynthetically active (Zhen and Bugbee, 2020; Zhen and van Iersel, 2017).
Shade-avoidance/acclimation responses are mediated by phytochrome, a pigment-protein photoreceptor that detects light intensity and quality. Phytochrome has two photo-interconvertible forms, the inactive red (Pr) and the active far-red (Pfr) forms. These allow plants to detect the red to far-red (R:FR) ratio of incident light that mediates a response in plants (Franklin and Whitelam, 2005; Possart et al., 2014; Ruberti et al., 2012). Red light is strongly absorbed, whereas far-red light is poorly absorbed and thus transmitted through leaves. Under-canopy plants are thus exposed to a low R:FR ratio, triggering shade responses (Casal, 2013; Franklin and Whitelam, 2005; Gommers et al., 2013). In response to shade, plants may respond morphologically, such as via elongated stems and petioles (shade-avoidance) (Franklin, 2008; Franklin and Whitelam, 2005) or may acclimate with traits such as increased specific leaf area (SLA) (shade-tolerance) (Evans and Poorter, 2001; Gommers et al., 2013; Gong et al., 2015). Excessive elongation is undesirable in seedling production and a potential drawback to providing high levels of far-red light. Compared with the PPFD, sunlight has about 19% far-red photons [701–750 nm, the range most responsible for phytochrome responses (Zhen and Bugbee, 2020)], so plants are accustomed to receiving a substantial amount of far-red light.
For decades, far-red light has been considered outside of the range of photosynthetically active radiation [PAR (400–700 nm)], as established by Hoover (1937), McCree (1971), and Inada (1976), even though they demonstrated that far-red light had at least some photosynthetic activity. Recently, Zhen and van Iersel (2017) found a synergistic interaction between far-red light and PAR, specifically an increase in net photosynthesis of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) in response to added far-red light. Zhen and Bugbee (2020) found that adding far-red light (up to 40% of PAR) increased canopy photosynthesis of 14 diverse agronomic and horticultural crop species as much as adding the same photon flux of PAR.
Previous studies examining the effect of far-red light on plant growth (Hurt et al., 2019; Li and Kubota, 2009; Meng and Runkle, 2019; Meng et al., 2019; Park and Runkle, 2016, 2017; Zou et al., 2019) and photosynthesis (Zhen and Bugbee, 2020; Zhen and van Iersel, 2017) have evaluated several intensities of far-red light, ranging from 0 to 160 µmol·m−2·s−1. Saturation levels have been determined for leaf and whole-plant photosynthesis (Zhen and Bugbee, 2020; Zhen and van Iersel, 2017), but not for growth responses. Our objective was to evaluate 18 intensities of supplemental far-red light, ranging from 4.0 to 68.8 µmol·m−2·s−1, on the growth and morphology of ‘Dalmatian Peach’ foxglove (Digitalis purpurea) seedlings. Foxglove was selected because it is a popular garden plant and one of the few perennials propagated from seed. It can grow well under a wide range of light conditions, and thus it appears to have the ability to acclimate to a range of light environments. We hypothesized that providing supplemental far-red light would result in leaf expansion, increased photosynthesis, and therefore more growth, but that above a certain photon flux, plant morphology and growth would no longer respond to further increases in far-red light.
Elkins, C.A. 2020 Evaluation of different lighting strategies used to improve efficiencies in plant growth for controlled environment agriculture. MS Thesis, Univ. Georgia, Athens
Evans, J.R. & Poorter, H. 2001 Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: The relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain Plant Cell Environ. 24 755 767
Gommers, C.M., Visser, E.J., St Onge, K.R., Voesenek, L.A. & Pierik, R. 2013 Shade tolerance: When growing tall is not an option Trends Plant Sci. 18 65 71
Gong, W.Z., Jiang, C.D., Wu, Y.S., Chen, H.H., Liu, W.Y. & Yang, W.Y. 2015 Tolerance vs. avoidance: Two strategies of soybean (Glycine max) seedlings in response to shade in intercropping Photosynthetica 53 259 268
Hoover, W.H. 1937 The dependence of carbon dioxide assimilation in a higher plant on wave length of radiation Smithson. Misc. Collect. 95 21 564 569
Hurt, A., Lopez, R.G. & Craver, J.K. 2019 Supplemental but not photoperiodic lighting increased seedling quality and reduced production time of annual bedding plants HortScience 54 289 296
Keuskamp, D.H., Sasidharan, R. & Pierik, R. 2010 Physiological regulation and functional significance of shade avoidance responses to neighbors Plant Signal. Behav. 5 655 662
Mah, J.J., Llewellyn, D. & Zheng, Y. 2018 Morphology and flowering responses of four bedding plant species to a range of red to far red ratios HortScience 53 472 478
Meng, Q.W., Kelly, N. & Runkle, E.S. 2019 Substituting green or far-red radiation for blue radiation induces shade avoidance and promotes growth in lettuce and kale Environ. Expt. Bot. 162 383 391
Meng, Q.W. & Runkle, E.S. 2019 Far-red radiation interacts with relative and absolute blue and red photon flux densities to regulate growth, morphology, and pigmentation of lettuce and basil seedlings Scientia Hort. 255 269 280
Morgan, D. & Smith, H. 1981 Control of development of Chenopodium album L. by shadelight: The effect of light quality (total fluence rate) and light quality (red:far-red ratio) New Phytol. 88 239 248
Park, Y. & Runkle, E.S. 2016 Investigating the merit of including far-red radiation in the production of ornamental seedlings grown under sole-source lighting Acta Hort. 1134 259 266
Park, Y. & Runkle, E.S. 2017 Far-red radiation promotes growth of seedlings by increasing leaf expansion and whole-plant net assimilation Environ. Expt. Bot. 136 41 49
Possart, A., Fleck, C. & Hiltbrunner, A. 2014 Shedding (far-red) light on phytochrome mechanisms and responses in land plants Plant Sci. 217 36 46
Purdue University 1997 Foxglove. 9 July 2020. <https://hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/med-aro/factsheets/FOXGLOVE.html>
Randall, W.C. & Lopez, R.G. 2015 Comparison of bedding plant seedlings grown under sole-source light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and greenhouse supplemental lighting from LEDs and high-pressure sodium lamps HortScience 50 705 713
Ruberti, I., Sessa, G., Ciolfi, A., Possenti, M., Carabelli, M. & Morelli, G. 2012 Plant adaptation to dynamically changing environment: The shade avoidance response Biotechnol. Adv. 30 1047 1058
Runkle, E.S. & Heins, R.D. 2002 Stem extension and subsequent flowering of seedlings grown under a film creating a far-red deficient environment Scientia Hort. 96 257 265
Sager, J., Smith, W., Edwards, J. & Cyr, K. 1988 Photosynthetic efficiency and phytochrome photoequilibria determination using spectral data Trans. Amer. Soc. Agr. Eng. 31 1882 1889
Stutte, G.W., Edney, S. & Skerritt, T. 2009 Photoregulation of bioprotectant content of red leaf lettuce with light-emitting diodes HortScience 44 79 82
Valladares, F., Laanisto, L., Niinemets, U. & Zavala, M.A. 2016 Shedding light on shade: Ecological perspectives of understorey plant life Plant Ecol. Divers. 9 237 251
Yang, Z.-C., Kubota, C., Chia, P.-L. & Kacira, M. 2012 Effect of end-of-day far-red light from a movable LED fixture on squash rootstock hypocotyl elongation Scientia Hort. 136 81 86
Zhen, S. & Bugbee, B. 2020 Far-red photons have equivalent efficiency to traditional photosynthetic photons: Implications for re-defining photosynthetically active radiation Plant Cell Environ. 2020 1 14
Zhen, S., Haidekker, M. & van Iersel, M.W. 2019 Far-red light enhances photochemical efficiency in a wavelength-dependent manner Physiol. Plant. 167 21 33
Zou, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Bian, Z., Fanourakis, D., Yang, Q. & Li, T. 2019 Morphological and physiological properties of indoor cultivated lettuce in response to additional far-red light Scientia Hort. 257 108725