In production of greenhouse crops, including most all bedding, green/foliage, and potted flowering plants, managing container substrate pH is a major nutritional challenge (Argo and Fisher, 2002; Nelson, 2012). Recent increases in the production of controlled environment container crops, including vegetables, leafy greens, soft fruits, and cannabis (Cannabis sativa), have furthered the need for soilless substrates (Caplan, 2018; Jackson, 2018; Kingston et al., 2017). Incorporating limestone into horticultural substrates is common practice of substrate manufacturers and growers to adjust substrate pH to the recommended pH 5.4 to 6.4, for most all bedding plants (Nelson, 2012). When determining how much limestone to incorporate into substrates, other variables, including chemical composition, particle size, and hardness (Argo and Fisher, 2002), should be considered.
Increased interest in using substrates containing pine wood components has led to many unanswered questions about their performance during crop production. Among these unknown issues are those relating to the requirements of limestone addition to substrates for pH adjustment for optimal plant growth. In previous studies, substrates containing wood components were evaluated; however, no indication of initial (pre-plant) substrate pH testing or changes to lime applications to the substrates were reported (Bohne, 2004; Starr et al., 2011). Boyer et al. (2008) incorporated 5 lb/yard3 dolomitic limestone to substrates produced from clean chip residuals (forestry materials left over from in-field chipping operations) and reported substrate pH of 6.7 (34 d after planting) to be above the optimal pH range (5.5 to 6.0) for ‘Blue Hawaii’ ageratum (Ageratum houstonianum).
In other studies, initial testing of substrates indicated the need to amend substrates with limestone; however, the rates of limestone addition resulted in pH of substrates above the recommended range for greenhouse crops. Fain et al. (2008a) processed loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), slash pine (Pinus elliottii), and longleaf pine trees (Pinus palustris) to produce three pine wood substrates (one from each species) and reported initial substrate pH of 5.3, 4.5, and 4.6, respectively. Substrates were amended with 3 lb/yard3 dolomitic limestone to adjust the pH. Substrate testing (30 d after planting) indicated pH of substrates were 7.1, 6.9, and 7.2, respectively, above the recommended pH range (5.4 to 6.2) for growing annual vinca (Catharanthus roseus). In addition, Fain et al. (2008b) amended a pine wood substrate [WholeTree, containing bark, wood, limbs, and needles (Fain et al., 2006)] with dolomitic limestone at a rate of 1.78 kg·m−3 and reported pH of all substrates to be higher than the recommended pH range (5.4 to 6.2) for petunia (Petunia ×hybrida), with the exception of the peat-lite (control), which was at the upper limit of the recommended pH range.
Some authors have reported that no lime addition was needed for 100% wood substrates because substrate pH was inherently within the range of 5.5 to 6.4 (Gruda and Schnitzler, 2006). Saunders et al. (2005) reported no advantage of amending 100% pine tree substrate (PTS) with limestone for african marigold (Tagetes erecta) growth. They found the addition of peatmoss or pine bark to PTS would require limestone incorporation as a result of the acidic nature of those materials.
Jackson et al. (2009) evaluated the effect of limestone addition of 0, 1.78, 3.56, 5.35, or 7.12 kg·m−3 on substrate pH and growth of ‘Inca Gold’ african marigold and ‘Rocky Mountain White’ zonal geranium (Pelargonium ×hortorum), two pH-sensitive greenhouse crops grown in 100% PTS and PTS amended with 25% or 50% peatmoss. They reported substrate pH of marigold and geranium to be highest for 100% PTS and pH generally decreased as the amount of peatmoss increased, regardless of lime rate. They also reported that pH increased with limestone additions, but the increase in pH was less responsive as the amount of peatmoss in the substrate increased from 25% to 50% (Jackson et al., 2009). In the study, 100% PTS did not require limestone for growth of marigold (pH 5.1), but they found as the percentage of peatmoss amended to PTS increased, there was an increased need for limestone to increase substrate pH and optimize plant growth. For zonal geranium, there were no growth differences when plants were grown in any substrate amended with 0 kg·m−3; however, the addition of lime increased plant dry weight when plants were grown in substrates amended with peatmoss compared with 100% PTS.
No information is available regarding lime requirements for sphagnum peat-based substrates amended with PWC aggregates as an alternative for perlite. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to determine lime requirements for pre-plant substrate pH modification and optimal plant growth in sphagnum peat-based substrates amended with aggregates of PWC or perlite.
Argo, W.R. & Fisher, P.R. 2002 Understanding pH management for container-grown crops. Meister Publ., Willoughby, OH
Boyer, C.R., Fain, G.B., Gilliam, C.H., Gallagher, T.V., Torbert, H.A. & Sibley, J.L. 2008 Clean chip residual: A substrate component for growing annuals HortTechnology 18 423 432
Caplan, D.M. 2018 Propagation and root zone management for controlled environment Cannabis production. Univ. Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, Master’s Thesis
Evans, M.R. 2011 Physical properties of and plant growth in peat-based root substrates containing class-based aggregate, perlite, and parboiled fresh rice hulls HortTechnology 21 30 34
Evans, M.R. & Gachukia, M. 2007 Physical properties of sphagnum peat-based root substrates amended with perlite or parboiled fresh rice hulls HortTechnology 17 312 315
Evans, M.R. & Gachukia, M. 2008 Root substrate pH, electrical conductivity, and macroelement concentration of sphagnum peat-based substrates amended with parboiled fresh rice hulls or perlite HortTechnology 18 644 649
Fain, G.B., Gilliam, C.H., Sibley, J.L. & Boyer, C.R. 2006 Evaluation of an alternative, sustainable substrate for use in greenhouse crops Southern Nursery Assn. Res. Conf. 51 59 61
Fain, G.B., Gilliam, C.H., Sibley, J.L. & Boyer, C.R. 2008a Wholetree substrates derived from three species of pine in production of annual vinca HortTechnology 18 13 17
Fain, G.B., Gilliam, C.H., Witcher, A.L., Sibley, J.L. & Boyer, C.R. 2008b WholeTree substrate and fertilizer rate in production of greenhouse-grown petunia (Petunia ×hybrida) and marigold (Tagetes patula) HortScience 43 700 705
Fonteno, W.C., Harden, C.T. & Brewster, J.P. 1995 Procedures for determining physical properties of horticultural substrates using the North Carolina State University porometer. North Carolina State Univ., Horticultural Substrates Lab., Raleigh
Gillman, J.H., Dirr, M.A. & Braman, S.K. 1998 Effects of dolomitic lime on growth and nutrient uptake of Buddleia davidii ‘Royal Red’ grown in pine bark J. Environ. Hort. 16 111 113
Jackson, B.E., Wright, R.D. & Barnes, M.C. 2008 Pine tree substrate, nitrogen rate, particle size, and peat amendment affects poinsettia growth and substrate physical properties HortScience 43 2155 2161
Jackson, B.E., Wright, R.D. & Gruda, N. 2009 Container medium pH in a pine tree substrate amended with peatmoss and dolomitic limestone affects plant growth HortScience 44 1983 1987
Kingston, P.H., Scagel, C.F. & Bryla, D.R. 2017 Suitability of sphagnum moss, coir, and douglas fir bark as soilless substrates for container production of highbush blueberry HortScience 52 1692 1699
Morel, P. & Guillemain, G. 2004 Assessment of possible phytotoxicity of a substrate using an easy representative biotest Acta Hort. 664 417 423
Nelson, P.V. 2012 Greenhouse operation and management. 7th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Ortega, M.C., Moreno, M.T., Ordovas, J. & Agudo, M.T. 1996 Behavior of different horticultural species in phytotoxicity bioassays of bark substrates HortScience 66 125 132
Saunders, T.N., Wright, R.D. & Browder, J.F. 2005 Chipped pine logs: A potential substrate for nursery and greenhouse crops Proc. Southern Nursery Assn. Res. Conf. 50 112 114
Smith, J.T. 2018 Paclobutrazol drench efficacy in soilless substrates containing wood and pine bark, and vegetative hemp growth in peat and coir-based substrates. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, MS Thesis
Starr, Z., Boyer, C. & Griffin, J. 2011 Cedar substrate particle size affects growth of container-grown Rudbeckia Proc. Southern Nursery Assn. Res. Conf. 56 292 296
Tisdale, S.L., Nelson, W.L., Beaton, J.D. & Havlin, J.L. 1993 Soil fertility and fertilizers. 5th ed. Macmillan, New York, NY
Whipker, B.E., Dole, J.M., Cavins, T.J., Gibson, J.L., Fonteno, W.C., Nelson, P.V., Pitchey, D.S. & Bailey, D.A. 2000 Plant root zone management. North Carolina Comm. Flower Growers’ Assn., Raleigh, NC
Wright, R.D., Jackson, B.E., Browder, J.F. & Latimer, J.G. 2008 Growth of chrysanthemum in a pine tree substrate requires additional fertilizer HortTechnology 18 111 115