Synthetic pesticides are often used across the United States on public athletic fields and park areas to control weeds and various other pests. On these public recreational areas, the public is frequently unaware where a pesticide application has been made or which pesticide has been applied. Although some state laws require posting of a pesticide application, the allowable reentry period after an application varies with the product used.
There is a general increase in concern about the use of pesticides on landscapes and athletic fields. This concern has come about due to research showing pesticide exposure having a positive association with some forms of cancer (Bassil et al., 2007; Parrón et al., 2014); however, there is contrasting research that shows no linkage between pesticide exposure and cancer incidence in varying situations (De Roos et al., 2005; Niehoff et al., 2016). Furthermore, public concern has increased as lawsuits against pesticide manufacturers have made headlines. Perhaps the most well-known lawsuit is against Bayer AG (Pittsburgh, PA) and its product Roundup, whereby a lawsuit alleges that Roundup’s active ingredient glyphosate is a carcinogen (Bellon, 2019).
Furthermore, the use of pesticides for the maintenance of school grounds has become a mounting point of concern because of the potential health impacts on citizens, particularly children, who may be exposed to the pesticides (Alarcon et al., 2005; Gilden et al., 2012). Currently, there is no evidence linking childhood cancer to pesticide exposure on school grounds or athletic fields (Chen et al., 2015; Gilden et al., 2012; Morgan et al., 2005; Niehoff et al., 2016). Notably, Chen et al. (2015) found no association between outdoor pesticide exposure and cancer, but increased cancer incidence with increased indoor pesticide exposure.
Although the linkage between pesticide exposure and health risks is not definitive, the rising public concern has led administrators and public policymakers to change public policy, whether warranted or not (Millington and Wilson, 2014). Notably, some state and local governments have severely restricted or banned pesticide use on school grounds, public areas, and even home lawns (Bachand and Gue, 2011; Hall, 2015; Hurley et al., 2014; Kowalewski et al., 2016; Owens, 2009; Sissell, 2005). In 2009, Ontario, Canada, passed the Cosmetic Pesticides Ban Act, which outlawed the use of pesticides for cosmetic purposes on lawns, gardens, hardscape surfaces, cemeteries, schools, and parks (Ontario Ministry of the Environment, 2009). Two U.S. states, Connecticut and New York, have completely banned pesticide usage on kindergarten to eighth grade school grounds (the New York ban is for grades kindergarten to 12), and at least 38 additional states have bans or limitations on the use of pesticides on school grounds (Hurley et al., 2014). The Connecticut ban took effect 1 July 2010 and applies to both public and private schools where kindergarten to eighth grades are present, as well as daycare centers (Connecticut General Assembly, 2009). On 1 Oct. 2015, the ban was extended to municipal playgrounds (Connecticut General Assembly, 2015).
As states put pesticide prohibitions in place, it is essential to gauge public awareness about pesticide bans, as well as to understand residents’ feelings and beliefs about the laws and other potential pesticide bans. Therefore, this research attempts to assess Connecticut residents’ awareness of the current pesticide ban. It also identifies these residents’ sentiments about the ban and the extent to which it should be applied. This study hypothesizes that residents currently have little awareness about the enacted pesticide ban; however, there would likely be wide support for a ban if the primary location was often frequented by children. This study takes a cursory look at which locations survey respondents believe a pesticide ban should be implemented.
AlarconW.A.CalvertG.M.BlondellJ.M.MehlerL.N.SievertJ.PropeckM.TibbettsD.S.BeckerA.LackovicM.SoileauS.B.DasR.BeckmanJ.MaleD.P.ThomsenC.L.StanburyM.2005Acute illnesses associated with pesticide exposure at schoolsJ. Amer. Med. Assn.294455465
BachandN.GueL.2011Pesticide free? Oui! 2011 progress report: A comparison of provincial cosmetic pesticide bans. 28 July 2019. <https://davidsuzuki.org/science-learning-centre-article/pesticide-free-oui-2011-progress-report-comparison-provincial-cosmetic-pesticide-bans/>
BartholomewC.CampbellB.L.WallaceV.2015Factors affecting athletic field quality after pesticide bans: The case of ConnecticutHortScience5099103
BassilK.L.VakilC.SanbornM.ColeD.C.KaurJ.S.KerrK.J.2007Cancer health effects of pesticides: Systematic reviewCan. Fam. Physician5317051711
BellonT.2019Explainer: What are the obstacles to Bayer settling Roundup lawsuits? 10 Nov. 2019. <https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bayer-glyphosate-lawsuit-explainer/explainer-what-are-the-obstacles-to-bayer-settling-roundup-lawsuits-idUSKCN1VC11E>
CampbellJ.H.HendersonJ.J.WallaceV.H.2018Comparison of presentation method effectiveness for dissemination of pesticide-free turfgrass management informationHortTechnology28536542
ChenM.ChangC.TaoL.LuC.2015Residential exposure to pesticide during childhood and childhood cancers: A meta-analysisPediatrics136719729
Connecticut General Assembly2009Public Act 09-56. 2 Aug. 2019. <https://www.ct.gov/DEep/cwp/view.asp?A=2708&Q=468812>
Connecticut General Assembly2015Substitute Bill 1063. 2 Aug. 2019. <https://www.cga.ct.gov/2015/TOB/S/2015SB-01063-R01-SB.htm>
De RoosA.J.BlairA.RusieckiJ.A.HoppinJ.A.SvecM.DosemeciM.SandlerD.P.AlavanjaM.C.2005Cancer incidence among glyphosate-exposed pesticide applicators in the agricultural health studyEnviron. Health Perspect.1134954
GildenR.FriedmannE.SattlerB.SquibbK.McPhaulK.2012Potential health effects related to pesticide use on athletic fieldsPublic Health Nurs.29198207
GreeneW.H.2012Econometric analysis. 7th ed. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ
HallR.2015Anti-lawn care ban in Maryland leaves industry seeking answers. 31 July 2019. <https://www.turfmagazine.com/lawn-care/anti-lawn-care-ban-in-maryland-leaves-industry-seeking-answers/>
HendersonJ.WallaceV.CampbellJ.2013Best management practices for pesticide free cool season athletic fields. 31 July 2019. <http://www.turf.uconn.edu/pdf/research/factsheets/OrganicFields_BMP_2013.pdf?llr=kaiit7cab&oeidk=a07e81i48ky01bfed07&oseq=a017dfxgjiuci>
HurleyJ.A.GreenT.A.GougeD.H.BrunsZ.T.StockT.BrabandL.MurrayK.WestinghouseC.RatcliffeS.T.PehlmanD.CraneL.2014Regulating pesticide use in United States schoolsAmer. Entomologist60105114
KowalewskiA.R.StockT.W.McDonaldB.W.MattoxC.M.DaviscourtB.L.2016Developing and delivering a needs-based integrated pest management program for public school grounds employees. Natural Sciences Educ. 45:15-08-0017-ora. doi:10.4195/nse2015.0017
MillingtonB.WilsonB.2014An unexceptional exception: Golf, pesticides, and environmental regulation in CanadaIntl. Rev. Sociol. Sport51446467
MorganM.K.SheldonL.S.CroghanC.W.JonesP.A.RobertsonG.L.ChuangJ.C.WilsonN.K.LyuC.W.2005Exposures of preschool children to chlorpyrifos and its degradation product 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol in their everyday environmentsJ. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol.15297309
NiehoffN.M.NicholsH.B.WhiteA.J.ParksC.G.D’AloisioA.A.SandlerD.P.2016Childhood and adolescent pesticide exposure and breast cancer riskEpidemiology27326333
Ontario Ministry of the Environment2009Ontario’s cosmetic pesticides ban. 29 July 2019. <http://news.ontario.ca/ene/en/2009/03/ontarios-cosmetic-pesticides-ban.html>
ParrónT.RequenaM.HernándezA.F.AlarcónR.2014Environmental exposure to pesticides and cancer risk in multiple human organ systemsToxicol. Lett.230157165
SissellK.2005New York city bans some pesticides on city property. Chemical Week 167:29. 1 Aug. 2019. <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswsc&AN=000229201900024&site=eds-live>
U.S. Census Bureau. 2019American fact finder U.S. Census Bureau 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. <https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml?src=bkmk>