Tomatoes were produced on 546 farms in Mississippi in 2012, with a total production of 339 acres. Greenhouse production of tomatoes accounts for a further 83 farms and 6.05 acres [U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2017]. Based on these data, 86% of tomato production in Mississippi is conducted in the field. Average tomato production area per farm is 0.57 acres. Of farms reporting tomato production, 47.3% were smaller than 0.49 acres, and only 8.8% of farms were larger than 0.99 acres (Posadas, 2018a). Tomatoes were produced on 40.4% of vegetable farms, with production constituting ≈0.9% of total vegetable production area (USDA, 2017).
Insect pests have a significant effect on crop yields and quality. In crops with extensive pesticide use and cultivars with resistance to insect and disease, losses have been estimated between 20% and 30% of total yield (Lucas, 2011). Information on degree of damage resulting from insect pressure in small-scale vegetable production is limited. Lack of access to restricted use pesticides and cultivars with limited resistance to insect and disease may result in extensive losses. Improved crop protection strategies may lead to significant increases in production efficiency (Lucas, 2011).
Due to difficulty in monitoring for pests for threshold-based approaches, applications of insecticides are frequently conducted on a calendar schedule. However, variability in pest populations leads to inaccuracy and ineffectiveness of applications. Improperly timed pesticide applications are both expensive and may worsen problems by affecting beneficial insect species without effectively controlling the target pest (Herms, 2004). Concern regarding impacts of pesticides on the environment and human health has led to development of integrated pest management (IPM) programs. These programs involve use of observation of pest populations in the field to direct timing of pesticide applications. Central to the concept of IPM is use of an economic threshold of a population level where application of a pesticide is advisable. IPM programs have been widely successful in reducing pesticide use while increasing profitability of crop production (Allen and Rajotte, 1990). Economic thresholds require an understanding of crop market value. Because of unpredictability and variability of markets, economic thresholds can be difficult to apply. As a result, action thresholds have been developed as levels of pest density that result in loss of crop quantity or quality (Schuster and Smith, 2015).
In comparison with average pesticide use in agriculture, applications of pesticides by fruit and vegetable producers was seven times greater (Fernandez-Cornejo, 1996). Vegetable producers are required to produce high yields as well as avoid losses in crop quality caused by pests because of a lack of tolerance for blemishes by consumers (Lamichhane et al., 2016). High investments in crops and high-quality standards have led to large numbers of pesticide applications and increased labor costs for fruit and vegetable production (Picanço et al., 2007). Adoption of IPM in these crops may lead to significant reductions in pesticide applications without damage to yield quantity or quality (Picanço et al., 2007). Because of its roots in entomology, the primary criterion used for adoption of IPM has been use of action thresholds and pest population monitoring in making decisions to apply pesticides (Kogan, 1998).
Organic vegetables represent an increasingly important segment of the vegetable production sector. The market for organic foods has increased at an annual rate of 20% to 30% in the United States and Europe (Barker and Sorenson, 2003). Consumers concerned with pesticide residues perceive organic products as offering a choice lower in or free from pesticide residues (DeLind, 2011). Efficacy for synthetic pesticides is often greater than organic controls. When management practices were investigated, type of pesticide used was the most important factor affecting insect populations (Hummel et al., 2002). A thorough understanding of crop and pest ecology and use of multiple control strategies is essential for effective control of insect pest populations under organic standards (Pujari et al., 2013). Buildup of insect pests is particularly problematic in organic production; however, use of synthetic pesticides may result in long-term problems, such as development of resistance in both insect pest and pathogen populations and elimination of natural enemies that may otherwise control pests (Hummel et al., 2002).
Morphological and physical characteristics of plants are associated with attraction, feeding, and oviposition of insect pests (Saberfar and Sheikhi, 2009). Thus, plant phenology may influence pest populations because of factors such as maturation date, which vary according to plant cultivar. In addition, pest population development is favored by high temperatures and plant cultivars that vary in their development time may experience differing levels of pest pressure (Yurk and Powell, 2010). Under field conditions, temperature and relative humidity have been shown to affect populations of tomato pests such as aphids (Aphidoidea) and whiteflies (Aleyrodidae) (Waluniba and Alemla Ao, 2014).
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of alternative insect pest management strategies on the economic return of small-scale tomato production. Strategies considered in this study were management based on a calendar spray schedule, conventional pesticide management based on action thresholds, and management based on action thresholds using organic controls.
Bureau of Labor Statistics2015Occupational employment statistics. 3 Dec. 2015. <https://www.bls.gov/oes/tables.htm>
BrumfieldR.RimalA.ReinersS.2000Comparative cost analysis of conventional, integrated crop management, and organic methodsHortTechnology10785793
BrustG.2013Insect pests of tomato. 12 Jan. 2016. <https://extension.umd.edu/learn/insect-pests-tomato>
CavigelliM.A.HimaB.HansonJ.TeasdaleJ.LuY.2009Long-term economic performance of organic and conventional field crops in the mid-Atlantic regionRenew. Agr. Food Syst.2426475
ClarkS.KlonskyK.LivingstonP.TempleS.1999Crop-yield and economic comparisons of organic, low-input, and conventional farming systems in California’s Sacramento ValleyAmer. J. Altern. Agr.1436475
DeLindL.B.2011Are local food and the local food movement taking us where we want to go? Or are we hitching our wagons to the wrong stars?Agr. Human Values2826475
DrinkwaterL.LetourneauD.WorknehF.van BruggenA.ShennanC.1995Fundamental differences between conventional and organic tomato agroecosystems in CaliforniaEcol. Appl.546475
Fernandez-CornejoJ.JansS.SmithM.1998Issues in the economics of pesticide use in agriculture: A review of the empirical evidenceRev. Agr. Econ.2026475
HermsD.A.2004Using degree-days and plant phenology to predict pest activity p. 59–59. In: V. Krischik and J. Davidson (eds.). IPM of Midwest landscapes. Univ. Minnesota St. Paul
HummelR.WalgenbachJ.HoytD.KennedyG.2002Effects of production system on vegetable arthropods and their natural enemiesAgr. Ecosyst. Environ.931-36475
JansS.Fernandez-CornejoJ.2001The economics of organic farming in the U.S.: The case of tomato production. Amer. Agr. Econ. Assn. Annu. Mtg. 5–8 Aug. 2001 Chicago IL
KelleyW.BoyhanG.2006UGA commercial tomato production handbook. 12 Jan. 2016. <http://extension.uga.edu/publications/detail.html?number=B1312>
KnissA.SavageS.JabbourR.2016Commercial crop yields reveal strengths and weaknesses for organic agriculture in the United StatesPLoS One1111e0165851
LamichhaneJ.Dachbrodt-SaaydehS.KudskP.MesséanA.2016Towards a reduced reliance on conventional pesticides in European agriculturePlant Dis.10016475
LetourneauD.GoldsteinB.2001Pest damage and arthropod community structure in organic vs. conventional tomato production in CaliforniaJ. Appl. Ecol.3836475
LaytonB.2016Insect pests of the home vegetable garden. Mississippi State Univ. Ext. Publ. P2347. 4 Mar. 2016. <https://extension.msstate.edu/sites/default/files/publications/publications/p2347_1.pdf>
LingP.1994Introduction: From mechanization to the information highway p. 5–8. In: NRAES greenhouse systems: Automation culture and environment Proc. Greenhouse Systems Intl. Conf. 20–22 July 1994 New Brunswick NJ
Lowe’s Companies Inc2014Pesticides. 12 Mar. 2014. <www.lowes.com/pl/Pesticides-Insect-pest-control-Outdoors>
MajumdarA.ChamblissA.KellyN.MilesJ.GrayG.BeckerC.McQueenG.ChapmanL.2014Tomato insect pests and scouting methods. Alabama Coop. Ext. System. Publ. ANR-2206
NagelD.LaytonB.HennA.BurnhamM.2014Garden tabloid. Mississippi State Univ. Ext. Publ. P1091. 4 May 2017. <http://extension.msstate.edu/sites/default/files/publications/publications/p1091.pdf>
NemesN.2009Comparative analysis of organic and non-organic farming systems: A critical assessment of farm profitability. FAO Rome Italy
PicançoM.C.BacciL.CrespoA.MirandaM.MartinsJ.2007Effect of integrated pest management practices on tomato production and conservation of natural enemiesAgr. For. Entomol.946475
PimentalD.HepperlyP.HansenJ.DoudsS.SeidelR.2005Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systemsBioscience5576475
PohroneznyK.1989The impact of integrated pest management on selected vegetable crops in Florida. Agr. Expt. Sta. Univ. Florida Inst. Food Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 875
PonisioL.M’GonigleL.MaceK.PalominoJ.de ValpineP.KremenC.2015Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gapProc. Biol. Sci.28220141396
PoudelD.HorwathW.LaniniW.TempleS.van BruggenA.2002Comparison of soil N availability and leaching potential, crop yields and weeds in organic, low-input and conventional farming systems in northern CaliforniaAgr. Ecosyst. Environ.9026475
PosadasB.2018aTomato growers in Mississippi. 26 Aug. 2018. <https://hortmarine.wordpress.com/2018/08/23/tomato-growers-in-mississippi/>
PosadasB.2018bSocioeconomic determinants of the level of mechanization of nurseries and greenhouses in the southern United StatesAIMS Agr. Food336475
QuarcooF.BonsiC.NiiD.TackieO.HillW.WallG.2017Economies of scale in integrated pest management in vegetable and fruit productionProfessional Agr. Workers J.576475
RiahiA.HdinerC.SanaaM.TarchounN.KhederM.GuezalN.2009Effect of conventional and organic production system on the yield and quality of field tomato cultivars grown in TunisiaJ. Sci. Food Agr.89136475
SaberfarF.SheikhiG.2009Influence of phenological and physical characters of tomato on fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infestationResistance Pest. Mgt. Nwsl.1916475
SchusterD.SmithH.A.2015Scouting for insects use of thresholds and conservation of beneficial insects on tomatoes. 2 Feb. 2014. <http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/in482>
SikoraE.2000Tomato insect management guide for Alabama. 9 Feb. 2016. <http://www.aces.edu/pubs/docs/A/ANR-1191/ANR-1191.pdf>
The Home Depot Inc2014Pest control at the Home Depot. 12 Mar. 2014. <www.homedepot.com/b/Outdoors-Garden-Center-Insect-Pest-Control>
ToscanoN.YoungmanR.OatmanE.PhillipsP.JimenezM.MufiozF.1987Implementation of an integrated pest management program for fresh market tomatoesAppl. Agr. Res.156475
TrumbleJ.Alvarado-RodriguezB.1993Development and economic evaluation of an IPM program for fresh market tomato production in MexicoAgr. Ecosyst. Environ.4336475
U.S. Department of Agriculture2016aMaterials for organic crop production. 2 Dec. 2016. <https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/NOP-5034-1.pdf>
U.S. Department of Agriculture2016bNational fruit and vegetable retail report. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.ams.usda.gov/mnreports/fvwretail.pdf>
U.S. Department of Agriculture20172017 Census of agriculture. Mississippi state and county data volume 1. Geographic area series: Part 24. 12 July 2019. <https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2017/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_2_US_State_Level/st99_2_0024_0024.pdf>
Walmart Inc2014Insecticides. 18 Mar. 2014 <www.walmart.com/c/kp/insecticides>
WalunibaAlemla AoA.2014Seasonal incidence of insect-pests in tomato (Lycopersicon esculantum M.) on different planting dates and its correlation with abiotic factors. IntlJ. Bio-resource Stress Mgt.526475
WynenE.2006Economic management in organic agriculture p. 231–241. In: P. Kristiansen A. Taji and J.P. Reganold (eds.). Organic agriculture—A global perspective. CSIRO Publ. Melbourne Australia