The U.S. environmental horticulture industry, or green industry, comprises production and wholesale nurseries and wholesale/retail distribution centers, as well as marketing intermediaries (Hall et al., 2005). Although the green industry historically was one of the fastest growing sectors of the U.S. economy (Hall et al., 2005), Hall (2010) and Barton and Behe (2017) reported that some segments have become stagnant or declined. When industry markets decline, specialized industries that rely on niche markets often increase marketing expenditures to remain viable (Li et al., 2019). Palma et al. (2012) showed that most promotion and advertising expenditures were effective in increasing green industry sales. Six years later, Li et al. (2019) found the response function to be dependent on firm size with advertising expenditures increasing sales within a range of expenditures in small firms only. Yet managerial decisions regarding the decisions to invest in advertising, either conventional or electronic, have not been thoroughly investigated.
More people use technology in their daily lives, and therefore, technology-based marketing has become a more viable avenue for businesses to reach consumers. A recent study showed that 81% of American adults used the Internet; more than half of them were using two or more social media sites (Duggan et al., 2015). Nearly two-thirds of American adults use social media (Perrin, 2015). The Neilson Co. (2013) reported social networks and blogs were the top online destinations, accounting for most of the time online and reaching 80% or more of active Internet users. Additionally, consumers use multiple media simultaneously between 24% and 65% of the time they are using media (Foehr, 2006; Pilotta et al., 2004). Behe et al. (2013) showed that women were more likely to search online for both gardening and nongardening information, but men were more likely to make online gardening purchases. They also showed that having searched online for nongardening information increased the likelihood of an online purchase by 16%.
Social media marketing is broadly defined as any online service through which users can create and share a variety of content. Although social media sites have existed since 1981, they were most widely adopted after 2003 (Boyd and Ellison, 2008). Americans born between 1980 and 1990, or Generation Y, use of social media is already changing the marketplace, workplace and society (Bolton et al., 2013). Interaction through social media sites is a way for organizations to build relationships (Waters et al., 2009), particularly among digital natives. Social media activity leads consumers to engage with other online formats such as businesses’ websites, online purchases, and online newsletters (Pookulangara and Koesler, 2011). We defined online advertising as the allocation of resources to Internet-based advertising for promoting products and services through the Internet (Sridhar et al., 2016). Online advertising includes investments for websites, social media, e-newsletters, or paid advertisements.
The Internet has facilitated the growth of online advertising over the past decade, and online advertising has moved from being a peripheral to a central advertising medium because of its unique targeting capabilities (Doctorow et al., 2009). Reasonable costs and compatibility with traditional advertising have been important to increased online advertising in many industries (Peterson et al., 2018). Yet green industry firms struggle to integrate online advertising into their traditional advertising strategy (Danaher and Dagger, 2013).
Using online advertising strategies requires a change in traditional advertising processes (Burt and Sparks, 2003). First, business owners should integrate the use of computers and Internet in farm management, followed by adoption of online marketing tools such as advertisement of products and services through Facebook (Menlo Park, CA) and other social media. The 2017 Farm Computer Usage and Ownership report showed that more than 70% of U.S. farms had Internet access, but only 47% of the operations used it for farm business (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2017). Given the tremendous potential influence of online marketing, several extension programs and industry conferences include the use of online tools in their training and educational efforts. For example, MS Bricks to Clicks was developed by extension specialists to train agricultural-based businesses on the adoption of online advertising activities (Barnes et al., 2014).
Some studies reported on the use of online tools in agricultural firms. Baer and Brown (2007) found while firm size increased the likelihood of website adoption for direct marketing, not all direct-market farms were interested in using the Internet as a marketing tool. Baer and Brown (2007) also found the number of advertising methods used, presence of high-speed Internet, and farm sales were positively related to website adoption while having an on-farm stand or store, selling produce or baked goods, and renting some land were negatively related to website use. Small farmers surveyed in 2000 used the Internet as a promotional tool to advertise their products (Ball and Duval, 2001). They reported findings that firms spent on average $565 for online direct marketing in 1997 with 65% reporting their online advertising efforts were somewhat or very successful.
Despite the opportunities online marketing can bring to green industry operations, little is known about the drivers of adopting online advertising and how those factors influence the amount invested in online advertising. In the context of Internet adoption, most studies are relatively outdated, and new research on drivers of online advertising adopted among businesses is needed. Reinartz (1996) found that nurseries/garden centers and florists employed few interactive and content features on their websites, although this is a main strength of the Internet. Only a few studies published recently have focused on the online advertising tools used by green industry businesses. Huang and Chen (2018) investigated the use of Facebook posts by florists in Taiwan. They showed florists were increasingly adopting social media advertising to engage with customers by advertising products and expressing gratitude. Peterson et al. (2018) found that most business owners used Facebook (91.4%) to engage with customers, followed by websites (81.5%), e-newsletters (60.3%), Twitter (San Francisco, CA) (29.8%), and blogs (23.2%). Most businesses advertising through these online tools used them once per week.
The aim of this article is to investigate the business and managerial characteristics that influence the decision to adopt online strategies among green industry firms. The objectives of this paper are to evaluate the business and owner characteristics most closely associated with investing in online advertising, and business and owner characteristics most closely associated with the amount invested in online advertising by green industry firms. We used a double-hurdle model to separate these decisions in two stages and estimate online advertising investing and the investment-associated amount.
Aramyan, L.H., Lansink, A.G.O. & Verstegen, J.A. 2007 Factors underlying the investment decision in energy-saving systems in Dutch horticulture Agr. Syst. 94 520 527
Ball, T. & Duval, Y.L. 2001 Direct marketing of farm products via the Internet: A survey of smallfarms.com members. 14 Dec. 2018. <https://www.informatique-agricole.org/download/efita-conference/Congres_EFITA_2001/Ball_96.pdf>
Barnes, J.N., Hood, K. & Gallardo, R. 2014 The economic impact of social media on small businesses: Evidence from three Mississippi extension programs. 2014 Ann. Mtg. Southern Agr. Econ. Assn., 1–4 Feb. 2014, Dallas, TX. No. 162500
Barton, S.S. & Behe, B.K. 2017 Retail promotion and advertising in the green industry: An overview and exploration of the use of digital advertising HortTechnology 27 99 107
Behe, B.K., Campbell, B.L., Hall, C.R., Khachatryan, H., Dennis, J.H. & Yue, C. 2013 Smartphone use and online search and purchase behavior of North Americans: Gardening and non-gardening information and products HortScience 48 200 208
Bolton, R.A., Parasuraman, A., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Kabadayi, S., Gruber, T., Loureiro, Y.K. & Solnet, D. 2013 Understanding generation Y and their use of social media: A review and research agenda J. Serv. Mgt. 24 245 267
Cameron, A.C. & Trivedi, P.K. 2009 Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, NY
Danaher, P.J. & Dagger, T.S. 2013 Comparing the relative effectiveness of advertising channels: A case study of a multimedia blitz campaign J. Mkt. Res. 50 517 534
Detre, J.D., Mark, T.B., Mishra, A.K. & Adhikari, A. 2011 Linkage between direct marketing and farm income: A double-hurdle approach Agribusiness 27 1 374 381
Doctorow, D., Hoblit, R. & Sekhar, A. 2009 Measuring marketing: McKinsey global survey results. 3 Mar. 2019. <https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/marketing-and-sales/our-insights/measuring-marketing-mckinsey-global-survey-results>
Duan, N., Manning, W.G., Morris, C.N. & Newhouse, J.P. 1983 A comparison of alternative models for the demand of medical care J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 1 114 126
Duggan, M., Ellison, N., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A. & Madden, M. 2015 Social media update 2014. Pew Res. Ctr., Washington, DC
Foehr, U.G. 2006 Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors and pairings. 2 Jan. 2019. <https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED527858.pdf>
Hall, C.R., Haydu, J.J. & Hodges, A.W. 2005 Economic impacts of the green industry in the United States: Final report to the National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Committee. 3 Mar. 2019. <https://ufei.calpoly.edu/files/pubs/EconomicImpactsoftheUSGreen%20Industr(NUCFACfinalreport).pdf>
Hodges, A.W., Hall, C.R., Palma, M.A. & Khachatryan, H. 2015 Economic contributions of the green industry in the U.S. in 2013 HortTechnology 25 805 814
Hooker, N.H., Heilig, J. & Ernst, S. 2001 What is unique about E-agribusiness? 2 Jan. 2019. <https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c21f/9d05364f3117e4c2119c83266d317afa0148.pdf>
Huang, L.C. & Chen, L.C. 2018 Message strategies and media formats of florists’ Facebook posts and their effects on users’ engagement behaviors HortScience 53 1647 1654
Li, Y., Palma, M.A., Hall, C.R., Khachatryan, H. & Capps, O. Jr 2019 Measuring the effects of advertising on green industry sales: A generalized propensity score approach Appl. Econ. 51 1303 1318
The Nielsen Co 2013 The paid social media advertising report. 25 Aug. 2016. <http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2013/the-paid-social-media-advertising-report-2013.html>
Palma, M.A., Hall, C.R., Campbell, B., Khachatryan, H., Behe, B. & Barton, S. 2012 Measuring the effects of firm promotion expenditures on green industry sales J. Environ. Hort. 30 83 88
Perrin, A. 2015 Social media usage. 4 Mar. 2019. <http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/2015/Social-Networking-Usage-2005-2015>
Peterson, H., Boyer, C., Baker, L. & Yao, B. 2018 Trends in the use of new-media marketing in U.S. ornamental horticulture industries Horticulturae 4 4 32
Pilotta, J.J., Schultz, D.E., Drenik, G. & Rist, P. 2004 Simultaneous media usage: A critical consumer orientation to media planning J. Consum. Behav. 3 285 292
Pookulangara, S. & Koesler, K. 2011 Cultural influence on consumers’ usage of social networks and its’ impact on online purchase intentions J. Retailing Consum. Serv. 18 348 354
Strauss, J. 2016 E-marketing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Techopedia 2018 Online marketing. 13 Mar. 2018. <https://www.techopedia.com/definition/26363/online-marketing>
U.S. Department of Agriculture 2017 Farm computer usage and ownership. 26 Dec. 2017. <http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/FarmComp/FarmComp-08-18-2017_correction.pdf>
Waters, R.D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A. & Lucas, J. 2009 Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook Public Relat. Rev. 35 2 374 381
Yao, B., Shanoyan, A., Peterson, H.H., Boyer, C. & Baker, L. 2018 The use of new-media marketing in the green industry: Analysis of social media use and impact on sales. 2 Feb. 2019. <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/agr.21581>