Abstract
Paclobutrazol (PBZ) was applied to 6-year-old pecan (Carya illinoinensis) trees as a basal trunk drench (0, 30, 90, and 150 mg·cm−2 trunk cross-sectional area) in Dec. 2012. Terminal shoot growth was retarded for 1 year after a single application of PBZ. The total number of current season shoots showed a significant increase with 30- and 90-mg·cm−2 PBZ treatments. After PBZ application at 30, 60, and 90 mg·cm−2, the percentage of very short shoots (<5 cm) was 32.3%, 36.3%, and 32.3%, respectively, compared with 22.4% on control trees; the percentage of short shoots (5–15 cm) increased to 36.0%, 38.1%, and 43.5%, respectively. The percent of long shoots (>30 cm) was decreased to 7.4%, 5.1%, and 7.6%, respectively, after PBZ application, compared with 18.7% with control. Shoots varying from 5 to 30 cm in length accounted for at least 63.3% of all pistillate inflorescences the following spring.
Due to the strong vegetative nature of relatively young pecan trees and the absence of dwarfing rootstocks or cultivars, controlling tree size is a major problem in high-density pecan orchards. Paclobutrazol, an effective inhibitor of gibberellin biosynthesis, offers a superior method of tree size control of pecan compared with traditional and generally unsuccessful pruning or hedging methods (Sparks, 1979). Previous research indicated the strong effect of PBZ on pecan seedlings grown in a greenhouse (Marquard, 1985; Wood, 1984), young trees in the field (Andersen and Aldrich, 1987; Gash and David, 1989; Wood, 1986, 1988a), and large pecan trees (Wood, 1988b; Worley et al., 1996). However, there are differential cultivar responses depending on tree size and age and on the balance between vegetative and reproductive growth (Gash and David, 1989; Wood, 1988a; Worley et al., 1996).
A well-maintained carbohydrate and nitrogen balance within certain levels is essential for pecan flower formation (Gourley and Howlett, 1941). Terminal growth is related to the amount of stored carbohydrates and is an outward expression of the nutritional and physiological condition of the tree (Crane, 1930; Gossard, 1954; Sparks and Brack, 1970). It is also the most common characteristic observed by growers, who associate it with tree vigor and nutrition. There can be a large variation in shoot growth on the same tree or different trees. Old trees tend to produce short shoots while young trees produce longer shoots (Crane, 1930). In mature trees, longer shoots produce more leaf area and carbohydrates (Sparks, 1969), but excess vegetative growth resulted in little or no blossoming and nut production (Gossard, 1954). Trees with short and weak shoots were less likely to fruit the following year than shoots within the optimal growth range for fruiting. Heavy nut production is associated with shoots of medium length (Isbell, 1928).
Different cultivars have a wide shoot-length range for optimal fruit production (Amling, 1959; Isbell, 1928). The optimal shoot length ranges for fruiting in ‘Western Schley’, ‘Burkett’, ‘Stuart’, and ‘Success’ were on shoots 4 to 15, 4 to 18, 4 to 9, and 2.5 to 8 inches, respectively (Taylor, 1959). Gossard (1954) suggested that the best range for terminal growth was 4 to 8 inches. The general recommendation for pecan fertilization is to keep annual terminal growth on mature bearing pecan trees to 4 to 8 inches long. A significant positive relationship was found between yield and percentage of fruiting shoots (Sparks and Heath, 1972; Sparks, 1975). Young pecan trees usually produce few lateral branches due to aggressive vegetative growth, which contributes to relatively low yields (Thompson, 1981). Increased lateral branching may increase the potential number of sites for nut initiation (Andersen and Aldrich, 1987). Chemical applications (Malstrom and McMeans, 1977, 1978) and pruning (Kuykendall and Tate, 1970) may be potential methods to promote lateral shoots.
This experiment was carried out to 1) evaluate the effects of paclobutrazol on inhibiting pecan vegetative growth and increasing the number of different shoot lengths and 2) investigate the relationship between shoot length and number of pistillate inflorescences.
Materials and methods
Six-year-old ‘Mahan’ trees (Lulang Pecan Ranch, Nanjing, China; lat. 31.78°N, long. 118.62°E) spaced 5 × 7.5 m were used in this study. The site has a freeze-free growing period of 230 d with annual precipitation of 1053 mm. Trees appeared to be crowding as limbs began to intermesh within rows.
Paclobutrazol was applied to trees via soil drench (rates of 0, 30, 90, and 150 mg·cm−2 trunk cross-sectional area) in Dec. 2012. The four treatments were initially applied in a randomized complete block design with three-single tree replications. Four types of shoots were defined for this study: 1) very short shoots (<5 cm), 2) short shoots (5–15 cm), 3) medium shoots (15–30 cm), and 4) long shoots (>30 cm) (Zhang, 1979). Number of shoots of different lengths and pistillate inflorescences were counted in Apr. and May 2014, respectively. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and Duncan’s multiple range tests at 5% level using SPSS statistical software (Grad Pack 16; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).
Results and discussion
The total number of current season shoots per tree in 2013 showed a significant increase with 30- and 150-mg·cm−2 PBZ treatments, but no difference with 90 mg·cm−2 PBZ compared with the control (Table 1). Trees treated with 30, 90, and 150 mg·cm−2 PBZ produced 405, 285, and 367 shoots, respectively, whereas the average number of shoots arising from control trees without PBZ was 306. Similarly, enhanced lateral branching was reported for PBZ-treated apple (Malus ×domestica) seedlings (Swietlik and Miller, 1983) and pecan (Andersen and Aldrich, 1987). Yield of pecan orchards is related to percentage of fruiting shoots (Sparks, 1975), and the number of shoots, especially fruiting shoots, is an important indicator of future nut production potential.
Number of shoots in different length categories in 6-year-old pecan tree canopies after a single application of paclobutrazol (PBZ) at 30, 90, and 150 mg·cm−2 trunk cross-sectional area.
Reducing vegetative growth of shoots can lead to their transformation into fruiting shoots. In this study, terminal growth was retarded during the first year after a single PBZ treatment. The percent of expanding shoots decreased to 7.4%, 5.1%, and 7.6% for 30, 90, and 150 mg·cm−2, respectively, after PBZ application compared with 18.7% with control. This is because young ‘Mahan’ trees have naturally high vigor and mainly produce long and expanding shoots. Also, PBZ increased the proportion of short and very short shoots. Percent of very short shoots with PBZ application at 30, 90, and 150 mg·cm−2 was 32.3%, 36.3%, and 32.3%, which was significantly higher than 22.4% very short shoots produced on control trees. Percent of short shoots increased with increasing PBZ rate at 30 and 150 mg·cm−2 but not at the 60-mg·cm−2 PBZ rate.
PBZ treatments also influenced pistillate inflorescences formed the following spring. The number of pistillate inflorescences formed on shoots under 30 cm increased significantly for all PBZ treatments (Table 2). For shoots under 30 cm, lower rate PBZ treatments produced more pistillate inflorescences than PBZ at 150 mg·cm−2 and the control. It appears that the pistillate flowers that initiated from different shoots in length have different responses to PBZ applications.
Pistillate inflorescences of 6-year-old pecan tree formed the following spring after a single application of paclobutrazol (PBZ) at 30, 90, and 150 mg·cm−2 trunk cross-sectional area.
Table 2 shows that the length of shoots was related to pistillate flowering. A large percentage of pistillate inflorescences initiated on shoots varying from 5 to 15 cm in length. This result is consistent with previous research (Gossard, 1954; Taylor, 1959). Shoot growth is related to the amount of carbohydrates stored (Sparks and Brack, 1970). Longer shoots produce more leaf area and carbohydrates (Sparks, 1969), as well as more pistillate flowers on a shoot (Sparks, 1975). However, shoots greater than 30 cm in our study formed few pistillate flowers. Therefore, carbohydrate storage does not appear to explain the few pistillate flowers arising from longer shoots. Other researchers noted that carbohydrates appeared to be an important factor determining the ability to flower (Smith et al., 1986), rather than controlling flower induction on individual shoots (Rohla et al., 2005). A similar mechanism might explain why shoot lengths were negatively related to pistillate inflorescences in this study. Shoot growth potential and number of female blossoms are reduced with the diminishing rate of carbohydrate storage (Arreola-Avila et al., 2006). This is consistent with results from shoots under 5 cm in length that formed few pistillate inflorescences.
As is demonstrated in previous studies (Wood, 1987, 1988a), nonuniform control of tree growth from PBZ applications was still noted in the field. These escaped lammas shoots, greater than 100 cm long, especially on upper parts of the tree canopy, may have been due to either nonuniform uptake of PBZ by trees or the high vigor nature of ‘Mahan’. Further work is needed to refine the optimal rate of PBZ and to address suitable methods to avoid overtreatment.
Conclusions
Because of the early production and quicker returns, many growers in China prefer high-density planting systems that have the potential to break even in 6 to 7 years compared with 10 to 12 years for traditional systems (Zhu, 2018). PBZ application appears to be a method to control pecan tree size and is superior to pruning methods that require a significant amount of labor resources and also results in temporary loss of production. The yield is expected to increase as more pistillate inflorescences produced. Unfortunately, we were not able to collect the yield data because of the owner’s preharvesting. As is shown in this study, greater than 35% pistillate inflorescences were produced on shoots 15 to 30 cm long. Thus, maintaining ‘Mahan’ tree shoot growth within this range tends to be optimal shoot length range for young tree management.
Units
Literature cited
Amling, H.J. 1959 Shoot growth and pecan fruiting Proc. Southeastern Pecan Growers Assn. 52 45 48
Andersen, P.C. & Aldrich, J.H. 1987 Effect of soil-applied paclobutrazol on ‘Cheyenne’ pecans HortScience 22 79 82
Arreola-Avila, J., Herrera-Aguirre, E., Trejo-Calzada, R., Flores-Hernández, A., Parra-Quezada, R. & Borja-de la Rosa, A. 2006 Sunlight availability and nut production after thinning of pecan trees Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hort. 12 177 181
Crane, H.L. 1930 Terminal growth in relation to fruiting in the pecan Natl. Pecan Assn. Bul. 29 24 32
Gash, D. & David, I. 1989 Paclobutrazol effect on growth and cropping of pecan trees Acta Hort. 239 301 304
Gossard, A.C. 1954 Growth and fertilization of pecan trees in relation to regularity of bearing. Proc. Oklahoma Pecan Growers Assn. 24 14 22
Gourley, J.H. & Howlett, F.S. 1941 Modern Fruit Production. Macmillan, New York, NY
Isbell, C.L. 1928 Growth studies of the pecan Alabama Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 226
Kuykendall, J.R. & Tate, H.F. 1970 Pecan pruning experiments in Arizona Proc. Southeastern Pecan Growers Assn. 63 42
Malstrom, H.L. & McMeans, J.L. 1977 A chemical method of pruning young pecan trees HortScience 12 68 69
Malstrom, H.L. & McMeans, J.L. 1978 Chemical pruning young pecan trees Pecan Qrtly 12 1 23 24 , 26, 28
Marquard, R.D. 1985 Chemical growth regulation of pecan seedlings HortScience 20 919 921
Rohla, C.T., Smith, M.W. & Maness, N.O. 2005 Effects of cluster size and shoot type on characteristics of pecan nuts HortScience 40 1300 1303
Smith, M.W., McNew, R.W., Ager, P.L. & Cotton, B.C. 1986 Seasonal changes in the carbohydrate concentration in pecan shoots and their relationship to flowering J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111 558 561
Sparks, D. 1969 Some characteristics of shoot growth of pecan trees and their implications to yields Proc. Southeastern Pecan Growers Assn. 62 55 75
Sparks, D. 1975 The alternate fruit bearing problem in pecans Proc. Northern Nut Growers Assn 65 145 157
Sparks, D. 1979 Physiology-site, growth, flowering, fruiting, and nutrition, p. 211–239. In: R.A. Jaynes (ed.). Nut tree culture in North America. Northern Nut Growers Assn., Hamden, CT
Sparks, D. & Brack, C.E. 1970 Effect of removing leaves and fruit on return bloom and fruit set on the Stuart pecan Proc. Southeastern Pecan Growers Assn. 63 69 71
Sparks, D. & Heath, J.L. 1972 Pistillate flower and fruit drop of pecan as a function of time and shoot length HortScience 7 402 404
Swietlik, D. & Miller, S.S. 1983 The effect of paclobutrazol on growth response to water stress of apple seedlings J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108 1076 1080
Taylor, G.G. 1959 The relation of terminal growth to fruiting in pecans. MS Thesis, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater
Thompson, T.E. 1981 Pecan breeding prospects Pecan Qrtly 15 4 11
Wood, B.W. 1984 Influence of paclobutrazol on selected growth and chemical characteristics of young pecan seedlings HortScience 19 837 839
Wood, B.W. 1986 Influence of paclobutrazol (PP-333), Flurprimidol (EL-500) and Ortho XE-1019 (Chevron) growth retardants on growth and selected chemical and yield characteristics of Carya illinoinensis Acta Hort. 179 287 288
Wood, B.W. 1987 Control of pecan tree size by bioregulating chemicals Proc. Southeastern Pecan Growers Assn. 80 40 45
Wood, B.W. 1988a Paclobutrazol suppresses shoot growth and influences nut quality and yield of young pecan trees J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 113 374 377
Wood, B.W. 1988b Paclobutrazol suppresses vegetative growth of large pecan trees HortScience 23 341 343
Worley, R.E., Mullinix, B.G. & Daniel, J.W. 1996 Selective limb pruning, tree removal, and paclobutrazol growth retardant for crowding pecan trees Scientia Hort. 67 79 85
Zhang, W.C. 1979 Research methodology in pomology. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, China.
Zhu, H.J. 2018 Challenges for the expanding pecan industry in China Pecan South 51 9 16 23