Weed management in agricultural systems is the single greatest input of labor and chemicals (Dayan et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2009). Weeds compete with the crops for moisture, nutrients, and light. Therefore, weeds, more so than any other pest, have the greatest adverse impact on crop yields (Dayan et al., 2011). Yield losses from 40% to 80% have been cited because of weed populations left unmanaged and outcompeting cash crops for resources (Akobundu, 1987; Karlen et al., 2002). The cost of weed control, along with the associated yield losses due to weed competition, has been estimated at more than $15 billion annually in developed nations (Buhler, 2003). Because of their highly effective mode of action and relative low cost, synthetic herbicides have been a reliable tool for weed control in conventional systems (Dayan et al., 2011; den Hollander et al., 2007). However, the increasing demand for organic food and concerns over the potential detrimental effects these herbicides have on human health and on the environment have driven demand for nonchemical alternatives for managing and controlling weed populations (Dayan et al., 2009; den Hollander et al., 2007; Webber et al., 2014).
In organic systems, herbicide options for weed control are limited (Peruzzi et al., 2007). This creates a challenge for organic farmers and is the largest obstacle for producers considering transitioning from conventional production systems (Barberi, 2002). Weeds are an even bigger problem in low-input systems and, in particular, with slow-growing vegetable crops such as pepper that are inferior competitors (den Hollander et al., 2007; Isik et al., 2009). This is especially problematic when it comes to managing perennial weeds (Wedryk et al., 2012). Organic farmers tend to rely on physical, cultural, and mechanical techniques such as mulching, smother cover crops, cultivation, and direct manual weeding to suppress weeds (Bilalis et al., 2010; Isik et al., 2009; Mulvaney et al., 2011).
Intercropping is a potentially effective cultural control strategy for weeds in organic production systems. Intercropping is the practice of growing two or more crops within the same area such that there is biological and agronomic interaction (Mohler and Stoner, 2009; Vandermeer, 1989). Often used as a way to introduce biodiversity into agroecosystems (Unlu et al., 2010), intercropping can also be used in conjunction with other practices such as soil solarization and cover cropping as a management strategy for reducing pest pressure and suppressing the spread of disease, particularly in organic and low-input farming systems.
The ability of the cash crop to outcompete weeds is enhanced in intercropping systems through an increase in resource capture by the desired species which reduces the availability of resources such as light, water, and nutrients to weeds (Barberi, 2002; Baumann et al., 2002; Saudy, 2015), as well as through allelopathic interactions (Iqbal et al., 2007). However, the extent of competitive interactions depend on factors such as crop geometry, canopy architecture, planting density, planting time, and crop growth rate (Isik et al., 2009; Keating and Carberry, 1993). Plants with different forms can be intercropped to create a more complex multilayer system that mimics natural ecosystems (Denevan, 1995). The ability of a multilayer intercropping system to suppress weed growth is typically owed to a reduction in light transmittance due to an increase in canopy density (Baumann et al., 2002). Aboveground plant biomass has been found to be positively correlated with the interception of solar radiation by the canopy (Kiniry et al., 2005). For example, Bilalis et al. (2010) found that a maize (Zea mays)–legume intercrop led to higher canopy cover and more efficient use of solar energy, thereby increasing weed suppression. Therefore, the ability of complex multilayered mixed cropping systems to maximize canopy density and increase radiation interception makes them a potentially useful tool for weed management in organic and low-input farming systems (Saudy, 2015).
We previously reported that an increase in plant functional diversity led to overyielding of harvestable fruit; i.e., increased overall production per unit land area (Franco et al., 2015). Although it is likely that several factors may have contributed to overyielding in mixed cropping systems, it is possible that weed suppression may have played a key role in our observations. In this article, we evaluate the ability of watermelon to reduce weed biomass and explore the relationships between weed suppression, yields, aboveground plant biomass, and LAI. The primary objective of this study was to test the ability of watermelon and diverse intercropping systems to suppress weeds in a low-input organic production system. We hypothesized that cropping systems consisting of watermelon and more architecturally complex multilayer canopies would reduce weed pressure as compared with monocultures; i.e., less complex systems. We also hypothesized that this reduction in weed biomass would be the result of increased leaf area and aboveground plant biomass intercepting solar radiation. The species used in this study were peanut, watermelon, okra, cowpea, and pepper.
Akobundu, I.O. 1987 Weed science in the tropics: Principles and practices. Wiley, New York, NY
Baughman, T., Dotray, P., Grichar, J., Black, M., Woodward, J., Trostle, C., Russell, S., Crumley, C., Porter, P., New, L., Baumann, P. & McFarland, M. 2007 Texas peanut production guide. Texas Coop. Ext. Serv., College Station, TX
Baumann, D.T., Bastiaans, L., Goudriaan, J., van Laar, H.H. & Kropff, M.J. 2002 Analysing crop yield and plant quality in an intercropping system using an eco-physiological model for interplant competition Agr. Syst. 73 173 203
Baumann, D.T., Bastiaans, L. & Kropff, M.J. 2001 Competition and crop performance in a leek-celery intercropping system Crop Sci. 41 764 774
Bilalis, D., Papastylianou, P., Konstantas, A., Patsiali, S., Karkanis, A. & Efthimiadou, A. 2010 Weed-suppressive effects of maize-legume intercropping in organic farming Intl. J. Pest Mgt. 56 173 181
Clark, M.S., Ferris, H., Klonsky, K., Lanini, W.T., van Bruggen, A.H.C. & Zalom, F.G. 1998 Agronomic, economic, and environmental comparison of pest management in conventional and alternative tomato and corn systems in northern California Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 68 51 71
Dayan, F.E., Howell, J.L., Marais, J.P., Ferreira, D. & Koivunen, M. 2011 Manuka oil: A natural herbicide with preemergence activity Weed Sci. 59 464 469
den Hollander, N.G., Bastiaans, L. & Kropff, M.J. 2007 Clover as a cover crop for weed suppression in an intercropping design: I. Characteristics of several clover species Eur. J. Agron. 26 92 103
Franco, J.G., King, S.R., Masabni, J.G. & Volder, A. 2015 Plant functional diversity improves short-term yields in a low-input intercropping system Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 203 1 10
Iqbal, J., Cheem, Z.A. & An, M. 2007 Intercropping of field crops in cotton for the management of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.) Plant Soil 300 163 171
Isik, D., Kaya, E., Ngouajio, M. & Mennan, H. 2009 Weed suppression in organic pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) with winter cover crops Crop Protection 28 356 363
Jeavons, J. 2006 How to grow more vegetables (and fruits, nuts, berries, grains, and other crops) than you ever thought possible on less land than you can imagine. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley, CA
Karlen, D.L., Buhler, D.D., Elisbury, M.M. & Andrews, S.S. 2002 Soil weed and insect management strategies for sustainable agriculture J. Biol. Sci. 2 58 62
Kiniry, J.R., Simpson, C.E., Schubert, A.M. & Reed, J.D. 2005 Peanut leaf area index, light interception, radiation use efficiency, and harvest index at three sites in Texas Field Crops Res. 91 297 306
Masabni, J.G. & Dainello, F.J. 2009 Texas vegetable growers handbook. Texas A&M AgriLife Ext. Serv., College Station, TX
Mohler, C.L. & Stoner, K.A. 2009 Guidelines for intercropping, p. 95–100. In: C.L. Mohler and S.E. Johnson (eds.). Crop rotation on organic farms: A planning manual. Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service NRAES-177
Morales-Payan, J.P., Santos, B.M., Stall, W.M. & Bewick, T.A. 1997 Effects of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and bell pepper (Capsicum annuum) vegetative growth and fruit yield Weed Technol. 11 672 676
Morales-Payan, J.P., Stall, W.M., Shilling, D.G., Charudattan, R., Dusky, J.A. & Bewick, T.A. 2003 Above- and belowground interference of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) with tomato Weed Sci. 51 181 185
Mulvaney, M.J., Price, A.J. & Wood, C.W. 2011 Cover crop residue and organic mulches provide weed control during limited-input no-till collard production J. Sustain. Agr. 35 312 328
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2018 Climate data online. 15 Feb. 2018. <https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/search?datasetid=GHCND>
Peruzzi, A., Ginanni, M., Fontanelli, M., Raffaelli, M. & Barberi, P. 2007 Innovative strategies for on-farm weed management in organic carrot Renew. Agr. Food Syst. 22 246 259
Saudy, H.S. 2015 Maize–cowpea intercropping as an ecological approach for nitrogen-use rationalization and weed suppression Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 61 1 14
Schieving, F. & Poorter, H. 1999 Carbon gain in a multispecies canopy: The role of specific leaf area and photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency in the tragedy of the commons New Phytol. 143 201 211
Schroeder, J., Thomas, S.H. & Murray, L.W. 1999 Yellow (Cyperus esculentus) and purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) are not injured by increasing root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) population density Weed Sci. 47 201 207
Singh, S., Ghosh, G. & Elamathi, S. 2010 Production potential and economics of baby corn (Zea mays) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) intercropping as influenced by different row ratios under organic farming condition Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 33 5
Steinmaus, S., Elmore, C.L., Smith, R.J., Donaldson, D., Webber, E.A., Roncoroni, J.A. & Miller, P.R.M. 2008 Mulched cover crops as an alternative to conventional weed management systems in vineyards Weed Res. 48 273 281
Unlu, H., Sari, N. & Solmaz, I. 2010 Intercropping effect of different vegetables on yield and some agronomic properties J. Food Agr. Environ. 8 723 727
Vandermeer, J.H. 1989 The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, NY
Wang, G., McGiffen, M.E., Ogbuchiekwe, E.J. & Butler, L. 2009 Economic return of purple and yellow nutsedge management in vegetable production of southern California Crop Protection 28 319 326
Weaver, S.E. & Tan, C.S. 1987 Critical period of weed interference in field-seeded tomatoes and its relation to water stress and shading Can. J. Plant Sci. 67 575 583
Webber, C.L. III, Taylor, M.J. & Shrefler, J.W. 2014 Weed control in yellow squash using sequential postdirected applications of pelargonic acid HortTechnology 24 25 29
Wedryk, S., Felix, J., Doohan, D. & Cardina, J. 2012 Strategies for weed suppression and improving soil fertility during transition to organic vegetable production HortTechnology 22 207 214
Zimdahl, R.L. 2004 Weed-crop competition: A review. 2nd ed. Blackwell Publ., Oxford, UK