Abstract
A field experiment was conducted over three growing seasons (2012–14) to study the effect of the foliar application of different potassium (K) fertilizers [potassium phosphate monobasic (KH2PO4), potassium nitrate (KNO3), and humic acid potassium (HAK)] on the fruit growth rate, yield, and quality of ‘Kousui’ japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifola) trees. Except the first year of study, foliar application of K fertilizers generally led to an increase in the concentration of fruit total soluble sugar, titratable acidity (TA) and sweetness, along with an elevated K accumulation in leaf and fruit at maturity. In 2013 and 2014, compared with the control, KNO3 treatment led to an average 16% higher yield, and HAK led to an average 15% higher soluble solid content (SSC). Furthermore, HAK resulted in 26% higher yield in 2014. KNO3 treatment showed 19% higher leaf K concentration, 38% leaf K accumulation, and 43% fruit K accumulation in maturity than the control in 2014. Different effects were found on the concentration of specific types of sugar and organic acid, of which fructose and malate were consistently increased by the K application. With regard to the amino acids, KNO3 and HAK treatments led to a significant increase in the concentration of aspartic acid, which was 12% and 22% higher than the control, respectively. In conclusion, foliar application of KNO3 is an efficient way to increase ‘Kousui’ japanese pear fruit yield, whereas spraying HAK is an effective way to improve the fruit quality.
Japanese pear is one of the leading cultivated fruit trees in temperate regions. After apple (Malus ×domestica) and citrus (Citrus sp.), it is the third largest fruit species in China, both in planting areas and fruit yield. As the top producing country, China grows more than 60% of the world pear (Pyrus sp.) production (Boyer et al., 1943; Wu et al., 2013). K is highly mobile in plants and constitutes up to 10% of plant dry weight (Adams and Shin, 2014; Shin, 2014; Walker et al., 1996). Regarding the total amount of mineral nutrients required by plants, potassium is required in the largest amount after nitrogen (N) (Zörb et al., 2014); moreover, it is the largest nutrient required by the fruit (Lester et al., 2006; Mpelasoka et al., 2003). K activates numerous enzymes, which are critical for various metabolic processes, such as biosynthesis, transport, and transformation of sugar and starch (Baraldi et al., 1991; Karley and White, 2009; Lester et al., 2010a; Niu et al., 2013; Römheld and Kirkby, 2010). Furthermore, K is an essential nutrient involved in the phloem translocation of assimilates, including sucrose movement from shoot to root and to sink tissues such as fruit (Lebaudy et al., 2007). It is generally considered as a quality element, which could increase fruit development with higher quality and longer shelf life by enhancing synthesis and translocation of carbohydrates in plants (Niu et al., 2008). For example, the fruit of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin (Citrus deliciosa × Citrus nobilis) became larger and harder with increasing K supply. In contrast, the number of fruit cells, fruit size, and the SSC were significantly reduced by K deficiency (Ashraf et al., 2010).
In our previous research, we found that fruit K concentration decreased sharply with the increase of fruit size during expansion stage to maturation, which suggested that strong K supply was demanded by fruit. Balanced fertilization is an efficient measure to increase the yield and quality of ‘Kousui’ japanese pear. However, compared with the amount of N and phosphorus (P) input to the ‘Kousui’ japanese pear orchard, the supply of K was found to be seriously insufficient. Foliar fertilization was proved to be an efficient way to supplement the nutrients that the plant needed. It is a well-established measure for timely supplement of K to increase yields, fruit size, fruit volume, SSC, and sugar/acid ratio of ‘Gala’ apple (Reuveni et al., 1998a), ‘Valencia’ sweet orange [Citrus sinensis (Calvert and Smith, 1972)], and ‘Williams’ european pear [Pyrus communis (Hudina and Stampar, 2002)]. KH2PO4 (Reuveni et al., 1998b), potassium sulphate [K2SO4 (Sing and McNeil, 1992)], KNO3 (Mukadam and Haldankar, 2012), potassium chloride [KCl (Gill et al., 2005)], and potassium-complex humic acid (Shahryari et al., 2009) have been commercially used in various crops, of which KH2PO4 is routinely used as a foliar fertilizer since it contains both P and K. KCl is the major source of K and usually cheaper than other K sources. However, since it involves chloride ion (Cl−), it is generally not recommended on fruit trees and Cl−-sensitive crop. KNO3 is full of ambiguity that, on one hand, it could supply K and nitrate (NO3−) simultaneously to plants which benefits the fruit development, and avoid NO3− leaching from soil compared with soil application of N (Dong et al., 2005); on the other hand, the foliar application of NO3− easily led to negative effects on fruit quality and even postharvest problems for some fruit, such as muskmelon (Cucumis melo), whose SSC and firmness were decreased by foliar application of KNO3 (Jifon and Lester, 2009). However, when applied to mango (Mangifera indica) trees, higher SSC, less TA, and less firmness was found (Rebolledo–Martínez et al., 2008). These inconsistent results might be related to the spraying time, application rate, and fruit species. Fructose, glucose, sorbitol, and sucrose are the main sugar types, and malate was the main organic acid produced in ‘Huanguan’ chinese white pear fruit [Pyrus bretschneideri (Song et al., 2012)]. Less attention was paid to the effects of K concentration and accumulation in ‘Kousui’ japanese pear leaf and fruit by the foliar application of different K sources, as well as the quality characteristics of ‘Kousui’ japanese pear fruit, such as various sugars, organic acids, and amino acids. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different foliar application strategies of K fertilizers so as to provide a recommendation to growers on how to efficiently increase yield and improve fruit quality.
Materials and methods
Plant material and treatment.
The trials were conducted over three successive growing seasons on 10-year-old scaffolding ‘Kousui’ japanese pear trees in an orchard from 2012 to 2014. The orchard was located in the town of Ersheng in the city of Jurong city, Jiangsu Province, China. Trees were on callery pear (Pyrus calleryana) seedling rootstock planted at 4 × 4 m. Soil samples were taken from the soil surface 0–30 cm in Fall 2011 and were determined with the following chemical characteristics (Wells, 2009): pH 5.76, 1.16% organic matter, 69.37 mg·kg−1 available N, 11.16 mg·kg−1 available P, and 151.93 mg·kg−1 available K. The soil fertility was comparatively low. Each tree around the drip line in the orchard was supplied by 40 kg commercial organic fertilizer (45% organic matter and 2N–0.4P–1.7K), 2 kg cooked soybean (Glycine max), 2 kg calcium magnesium phosphate, and 0.75 kg K2SO4 in the base fertilization, 0.25 kg K2SO4 after anthesis, and 0.25 kg urea after fruit harvest.
Four treatments were applied to the same set of trees for 3 years. Three uniform trees were selected as a replicate, for a total of three replicates per treatment. Three foliar K sources [KH2PO4, KNO3, and HAK (Foliwell®K; Omex, London, UK)], which contained 0.08% K were administered as follows: 0.3% KH2PO4, 0.22% KNO3, 0.27% HAK, and water as control. HAK was a new-style liquid K fertilizer made by special organic compounds chelating K and no hormone was included. The foliar fertilizers were applied three times (27 Apr., 19 June, and 11 July) on a sunny day between 1500 and 1700 hr. Each tree was sprayed 2 L liquid fertilizer with 0.1% surfactant with Tween® 20 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The phenology of ‘Kousui’ japanese pear in 2013 and 2014 were both as follows: full of blossom (3 Apr.), young fruit stage (27 Apr.), expansion phase I (3 June), expansion phase II (2 July), maturity (6 Aug.), 1 month after harvest (8 Sept.), 2 months after harvest (10 Oct.), and leaf abscission (4 Nov.). The phenology of ‘Kousui’ japanese pear in 2012 was 1 week later than that in 2013 and 2014.
Soil chemical parameters.
The pH was determined using 1:2.5 (w/v) soil:water extracts. Alkali-hydrolysable N was determined by the method used by Lu (1999). Available phosphorus was measured using extracts of hydrochloric acid–ammonium fluoride [HCl–NH4F (Horta and Torrent, 2007)]. Available potassium was determined by extracting the soil with 1 mol·L−1 ammonium acetate (CH3COONH4), and then measured by flame photometry (Allen et al., 1974). All extractions were performed in triplicate. The analysis values from the triplicate extractions were averaged before statistical analysis was performed.
Fruit sample.
In 2012–14, 30 ‘Kousui’ japanese pear fruit were collected per tree at maturity stage and weighed. Fruit firmness was assessed with a penetrometer (FT327; Effegi, Alfonsine, Italy) with an 11.3-mm probe. SSC was determined using a refractometer (PAL-1; Atago, Tokyo, Japan). Total soluble sugar was measured using the anthrone–sulphuric acid colorimetric method (Alexander and Edwards, 2003). TA was determined using standard acid–base titration (Sánchez, 2015).
In 2013 growing season, to evaluate the foliar K fertilizers on fruit growth rate and K concentration in fruit and leaves during the fruit development, eight fruits were randomly picked from four orientations on 27 Apr., 3 June, 2 July, and 6 Aug. At the same time, eight mature leaves from the midportion of the bearing branch of every tree were collected. In addition, leaves were also collected on 6 Sept., 6 Oct., and 4 Nov., respectively. After weighing the fruit, one quarter of these fruit were randomly selected, homogenized, and thoroughly dried. Leaves were rinsed twice with tap water and twice with deionized water, wiped with a paper towel, and thoroughly dried. Fruit and leaf samples were digested with a sulfuric acid–hydrogen peroxide (H2SO4–H2O2) assimilating method in a digestion furnace (280 °C, 2 kW, 1 h), and K concentration was determined by a flame photometer (AP1200; Aopu Analytical Instruments, Shanghai, China).
The determination of individual sugars and organic acids.
In 2013 growing season, a 2-g portion of the frozen fruit sample was ground with 20 mL of ultrapure water and then centrifuged at 20,000 gn for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was recovered and immediately filtered through a 0.45-mm filter (SepPak; Waters, Milford, MA) to eliminate large particles. The extraction was stored at −80 °C in a sealed tube for the high-performance liquid chromatography (1200; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) determination of individual sugar and organic acid concentration. Sweetness value = fructose × 1.75 + glucose × 0.70 + sorbitol × 0.40 + sucrose × 1.00 (Song et al., 2012).
The individual sugar concentration was determined using the following specific conditions as described by Colaric et al. (2007) with some modifications: 4.6 × 250–mm, 5-μm column (CapCell Pak NH2; Shiseido, Tokyo, Japan), constant temperature of 50 °C, and mobile phase of acetonitrile-water (80/20; v/v). An evaporative light scattering detector (Alltech 3300 ELSD; Grace, Deerfield, IL) was used with a flow rate of 1.0 mL·min−1, drift tube temperature of 80 °C, and nitrogen flow rate of 2.0 mL·min−1. The individual organic acid concentration was determined using the following specific conditions as described by Xu et al. (2012) with slight revisions as follows: 4.6 × 250-mm, 5-μm column (C18, Waters) with 1 mL·L−1 phosphoric acid aqueous solution, flow rate of 0.8 mL·min−1, column temperature of 45 °C, injection volume of 20 μL, and detection at 210 nm using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer.
The determination of amino acids.
According to Coimbra et al. (2011), each fresh fruit sample (2.5 g) was placed in a coated polytetrafluoroethylene test tube with a screw cap. To each sample, 10 mL of 6 m HCl was added. The tube was filled with nitrogen over a 15-min period and sealed. The hydrolysis reaction was performed for 24 h at 110 °C using a heating block. The tube was allowed to cool to room temperature, and the solution was filtered through wet filter paper and collected in a 50-mL volumetric flask. The residue was mixed with 20 mL of citrate buffer (pH 2.2) and the amino acid profile was determined using an automatic amino acid analyzer (Biochrom 30; Biochrom, Cambridge, UK). The 18 L-amino acid standards [i.e., glycine (Gly), alanine (Ala), serine (Ser), proline (Pro), valine (Val), threonine (Thr), cysteine (Cys), leucine (Leu), isoleucine (Ile), aspartic acid (Asp), glutamic acid (Glu), methionine (Met), histidine (His), lysine (Lys), phenylalanine (Phe), arginine (Arg), tyrosine (Tyr), and tryptophan (Trp)] were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
Other calculations.
Data analysis.
Data were analyzed by analysis of variance using SAS (version 9.3; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Means were compared for treatment effects using a Fisher’s protected least significant difference at P < 0.05.
Results
Effects on fruit yield and quality parameters in 2012–14.
On the whole, in the three growing seasons, foliar K fertilization resulted in an increasing trend in fruit weight (Fig. 1B). In the first growing season (2012), there were large differences in the number of fruit that the trees bore. The number of fruit in the KH2PO4 and HAK treatments was almost half of that in the KNO3 treatment (Fig. 1A), which led to great difference in yield (Fig. 1C). It was suggested that the fruit number was very essential and during the subsequent two seasons, the fruit number was hand controlled around 100. In 2013 and 2014, three foliar K sources led to an increasing trend in fruit yield, firmness (Fig. 1D), SSC (Fig. 1F), and TA (Fig. 1G). The application of KNO3 in these two seasons led to an average 16% higher yield than the control. The yield of HAK treatment was significantly lower than that of the KNO3 treatment in 2013, whereas HAK resulted in 26% higher yield than the control in 2014. No significant differences were found in the yield of KH2PO4 treatment either in 2013 or 2014. From 2013 to 2014, comparing with the control, SSC (Fig. 1E), total soluble sugar, and TA were increased by an average of 15%, 25%, and 21%, respectively, in HAK treatment.
Effect of different foliar potassium (K) fertilizers on yield and quality: (A) fruit number, (B) fruit weight, (C) yield, (D) firmness, (E) soluble solids, (F) soluble sugars, and (G) titratable acidity of ‘Kousui’ japanese pear in 2012–14 (KH2PO4 = potassium phosphate monobasic, KNO3 = potassium nitrate, HAK = humic acid potassium). Vertical bars indicate se; 1 g = 0.0353 oz, 1 t·ha−1 = 0.4461 ton/acre, 1 lb/cm2 = 6.4516 psi = 44.4822 kPa.
Citation: HortTechnology hortte 26, 3; 10.21273/HORTTECH.26.3.270
Fruit weight and daily weight gain.
As shown in Fig. 2A and 2B, the single fruit weight and daily weight gains of fruit in the control gradually increased with fruit growth. In maturity, the fruit weight of KNO3 treatment was significantly higher than that of the control and HAK. The daily weight gain from the expansion phase II to maturity (i.e., 2 July to 6 Aug.) was on average 10 times higher than that from the young fruit stage to the expansion phase I (i.e., 27 Apr. to 3 June), and was on average 0.7 times higher than that from expansion phase I to expansion phase II (3 June to 2 July). Upon foliar application of KH2PO4 and KNO3, the single fruit weights were 16% and 17% higher than the control at the expansion phase II (2 July) and maturity (6 Aug.), respectively. During expansion phase II (2 July) and maturity (6 Aug.), daily weight gains were 21% and 18% higher in plants treated with KNO3 than in the control.
Effect of different foliar potassium (K) fertilizers on ‘Kousui’ japanese pear (A) fruit weight and (B) daily weight gain in 2013 (KH2PO4 = potassium phosphate monobasic, KNO3 = potassium nitrate, HAK = humic acid potassium). Daily weight gain was calculated as the difference of weight between the two sampling dates divided by the days. Vertical bars indicate se; 1 g = 0.0353 oz.
Citation: HortTechnology hortte 26, 3; 10.21273/HORTTECH.26.3.270
Dynamic changes in K concentration and accumulation in leaves and fruit.
The leaf K concentration in the control plants was among the lowest during all developmental stages (Fig. 3A). From young fruit to maturity, K concentration was significantly increased by foliar KNO3 and HAK. From fruit harvest to leaf fall, leaf K concentration and accumulation was increased first and then decreased (Fig. 3A and 3C). During fruit development, the fruit K concentration decreased from 2.5% to 0.15%. There was no significant difference in the accumulation of K in leaves between plants treated with KNO3 and HAK at maturity (i.e., 6 Aug.; Fig. 3C). Furthermore, K accumulation was 38% and 14% higher in the leaves of samples sprayed with HAK (KNO3) and KH2PO4 than in those of the control, respectively (Fig. 3C). However, there was no significant difference between the fruit K accumulation in KNO3 and KH2PO4 (Fig. 3D), which was an average of 22% and 43% higher than that in HAK and the control, respectively. From expansion stage II to maturity, K accumulation in leaves and fruit accounted for 61% and 91% of the total K accumulation. Therefore, it could be concluded that expansion stage II is the critical stage of ‘Kousui’ japanese pear tree for K demand.
Effect of different foliar potassium (K) fertilizers on (A) leaf K concentration and (C) leaf K accumulation, and (B) fruit K concentration and (D) leaf K accumulation of ‘Kousui’ japanese pear in 2013. In Fig. 3C, shaded arrows indicate sampling time, I–III: Spraying time; IV: Fruit harvest; V: Leaf abscission (KH2PO4 = potassium phosphate monobasic, KNO3 = potassium nitrate, HAK = humic acid potassium). Vertical bars indicate se; 1 kg·ha−1 = 0.8922 lb/acre.
Citation: HortTechnology hortte 26, 3; 10.21273/HORTTECH.26.3.270
Fruit individual sugar concentration and sweetness.
Foliar application of K fertilizers resulted in a significant increase in the concentration of fructose, which was on average 22% higher than in the control (Fig. 4A). The sorbitol concentration of the KH2PO4 and HAK treatment groups were an average of 35% higher than in the control (Fig. 4B). The glucose concentration in the fruit of KH2PO4 treatment was the highest of all, followed by that of the KNO3 treatment (Fig. 4C). HAK and KNO3 treatment resulted in a significant increase in sucrose concentration compared with the control and KH2PO4 treatment (Fig. 4D). Total sugar and sweetness of fruit of each treatment were consistent with the fructose concentration, which were both 28% higher than the control (Fig. 4E and 4F).
Effect of different foliar potassium (K) fertilizers on fruit sugar concentration: (A) fructose, (B) sorbitol, (C) glucose, (D) sucrose, (E) total sugar, and (F) sweetness of ‘Kousui’ japanese pear in 2013 (KH2PO4= potassium phosphate monobasic, KNO3 = potassium nitrate, HAK = humic acid potassium). Total sugar = fructose + sorbitol + glucose + sucrose; sweetness value = fructose × 1.75 + glucose × 0.70 + sorbitol × 0.40 + sucrose × 1.00. Vertical bars indicate se; 1 mg·g−1 = 1000 ppm.
Citation: HortTechnology hortte 26, 3; 10.21273/HORTTECH.26.3.270
Fruit individual organic acid concentration.
Total acid concentration in fruit was significantly increased by the foliar application of K fertilizers (Fig. 5G). KH2PO4 treatment led to a 105%, 61%, 112%, and 59% increase in malate, succinic acid, shikimic acid, and citric acid, respectively (Fig. 5A–C and 5F). However, the concentration of malate and shikimic acid in HAK treatment was 43% and 142% higher than that of the control. Compared with the control, KNO3 treatment had no significant difference of acid concentration except for malate. Concerning oxaloacetic acid and tartaric acid of the fruit (Fig. 5D and 5E), it was observed that there were no significant differences with different treatments.
Effect of different foliar potassium (K) fertilizers on fruit acid concentration: (A) malate, (B) succinic acid, (C) shikimic acid, (D) tartaric acid, (E) oxaloacetic acid, (F) citric acid, and (G) total acid of ‘Kousui’ japanese pear in 2013 (KH2PO4 = potassium phosphate monobasic, KNO3 = potassium nitrate, HAK = humic acid potassium). Total acid = malate + succinic acid + shikimic acid + tartaric acid + oxaloacetic acid + citric acid. Vertical bars indicate se; 1 mg·kg−1 = 1 ppm.
Citation: HortTechnology hortte 26, 3; 10.21273/HORTTECH.26.3.270
Fruit individual amino acid concentration.
Except for the essential amino acid Trp, the concentration of the 17 amino acids was examined in the ‘Kousui’ japanese pear fruit (Table 1). A significant increase was found in the concentration of some nonessential amino acids, such as Asp, Ser, Glu, and Gly. Asp is in the highest level in nonessential amino acid group, accounting for 67% to 72% of the total nonessential amino acids, and 49% to 55% of total amino acids. Foliar application of KNO3 and HAK treatments led to 12% and 22% higher Asp, respectively, than in the control, whereas KNO3 treatment resulted in 25%, 49%, and 23% higher Ser, Glu, and Gly than in the control and in the KH2PO4 treatment. However, of all the seven essential amino acids presented in ‘Kousui’ japanese pear fruit, Val and Thr were the most abundant amino acids, representing 22% and 20% of the total essential amino acid concentration, respectively. Hardly any effect was observed on the essential amino acid concentration by the foliar application of the three K fertilizers, except for the concentration of Thr in HAK treatment, which was 13% higher than that in the control. With regard to the total amino acid concentration, foliar application of KNO3 and HAK led to 17% and 15% higher amounts than the control, respectively.
Effect of different foliar potassium (K) fertilizers on ‘Kousui’ japanese pear fruit nonessential amino acids (NEAA) and essential amino acids (EAA).
Discussion
Effects on fruit growth rate, yield, and K accumulation.
In the present study, two successive growing seasons (2013 and 2014) of foliar application of KNO3 fertilizer led to a significant increase in fruit weight and daily fruit weight gain, whereas spraying with KH2PO4 had no significant effect. Spraying with KNO3 was previously reported to increase fruit size in ‘Patharnakh’ japanese pear (Gill et al., 2012), and the increase was greatest at a dose of 1.5% KNO3. A study of plum trees [Prunus salicina (Southwick et al., 1996)] revealed that there was a correlation among the dry weight, size of fruit, and the K concentration of leaves, showing that a moderate fruit size required a higher K concentration in the leaves. This was consistent with our results of KNO3 treatment, which could efficiently increase K levels both in the leaves and the fruit (Fig. 3). From the expansion phase I to leaf abscission (i.e., 3 June to 4 Nov.), the K concentration of leaves significantly decreased in the control, but this reduction could be alleviated by foliar application of K fertilizers. Sufficient K level in the leaves during the expansion phase is critical for fruit development, since a large amount of photosynthetic production is required for fruit enlargement. It has been shown that leaf K concentration had a nutrient backflowing process after fruit harvest, which might be related to the nutrient reflux of K (Fig. 3A). Compared with the control, the foliar application of K fertilizers significantly increased K backflow efficiency in leaves. Proe et al. (2000) found that increasing the nutrient supply increased the amount of K remobilized from 49% to 57% of initial concentration in scots pine. This might reflect the contrasting physiological roles of N and K and the greater proportion of K available for remobilization. In the study, the leaf K concentration in the control was 22% lower than those treated with KNO3 at the expansion phase I, which was suggested that there might be some risks of K insufficiency if no additional K fertilizer was supplied at the start of expansion phase I.
Effect on fruit sugar and organic acid concentration.
K has been widely known as a “quality element” in fruit production, which can significantly improve fruit quality (Zörb et al., 2014). Sugar and acids concentration are regarded as two of the most important parameters of fruit quality. It was shown that in ‘Kousui’ japanese pear fruit, fructose and malate were dominant in the soluble sugars and organic acids, respectively (Figs. 4 and 5), consistent with the report by Chen et al. (2007) in the fruit of ‘Niitaka’ japanese pear. In the present study, fructose concentration was found to account for 28% to 31% of the total sugars (Fig. 4A and 4E), and malate 67% to 85% of the total organic acids concentration (Fig. 5A and 5G). It was found that foliar spraying with K fertilizers could increase fruit firmness and total soluble sugar, in agreement with a previous study (Lester et al., 2010b). HAK treatment strongly increased fruit firmness, SSC, and total soluble sugar in 2013 and 2014 (Fig. 1), which was suggested as an efficient measurement to improve fruit quality. The application of K fertilizers all increased the total concentration of organic acids (Fig. 5G), which agreed with Mukadam and Haldankar (2012) in karonda (Carissa carandas). It was clearly shown that different accompanied ions might result in a specific difference in the metabolism of various kinds of sugars and organic acids in the fruit (Figs. 4 and 5).
Effects on fruit amino acid concentration.
In the present study, foliar application of K fertilizers had no effect on the total concentration of fruit essential amino acids. However, the concentration of Asp, Ser, and Glu, which belong to the nonessential amino acids, increased to various degrees (Table 1). Asp had an important role in fruit flavor (Ardö, 2006), and was the most abundant amino acid in ‘Kousui’ japanese pear, accounting for a maximum of 75% of the total amino acid concentration. Asp was significantly increased upon spraying with KNO3 and HAK (Table 1). During NO3− assimilation, NO3− is first assimilated as ammonia in leaves and is then converted into Glu by the glutamine synthetase and glutamate synthase pathways (Rufty et al., 1981). When ammonia is assimilated into glutamate and glutamine, it can be converted into other amino acids by transamination, and this process is promoted by K (Mengel et al., 1981), since K functions as a cofactor that promotes the assimilation of amino acids. It was discovered by Armengaud et al. (2009) that regulation of enzymes at the level of transcripts and proteins was likely to play an important role in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) adaptation to K deficiency by decreasing negative metabolic charge, such as Glu, Asp, nitrate, and malate, whereas K supply could increase negative charge. Lin et al. (2004) reported that the taste, aroma, and Glu and Asp concentration of muskmelon could be improved when K was present at a level of 240 mg·L−1 in the nutrient solution, which was consistent with our present study.
Conclusion
Comparatively speaking, foliar application of KNO3 could significantly increase the K accumulation, the fructose and sucrose concentration, and some amino acids in the fruit, such as Asp, Ser, Glu, and Gly. Further, compared with KNO3, HAK was more helpful to improve the fruit quality by increasing fruit firmness, the total SSC, and sweetness. Farmers should adopt different strategies according to the aim of whether to increase the fruit yield or improve the fruit quality.
Units
Literature cited
Adams, E. & Shin, R. 2014 Transport, signaling, and homeostasis of potassium and sodium in plants J. Integr. Plant Biol. 56 231 249
Alexander, L. & Edwards, C.A. 2003 A microtiter modification of the anthrone–sulfuric acid colorimetric assay for glucose-based carbohydrates Anal. Biochem. 315 143 145
Allen, S.E., Grimshaw, H.M., Parkinson, J.A. & Quarmby, C.L. 1974 Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford/London, UK
Ashraf, M.Y., Attiya, G., Muhammad, A., Hussain, F. & Ebert, G. 2010 Improvement in yield and quality of kinnow (Citrus deliciosa x Citrus nobilis) by potassium fertilization J. Plant Nutr. 33 1625 1637
Ardö, Y. 2006 Flavour formation by amino acid catabolism. Biotechnol. Adv. 24:238–242
Armengaud, P., Sulpice, R., Miller, A.J., Stitt, M., Amtmann, A. & Gibon, Y. 2009 Multilevel analysis of primary metabolism provides new insights into the role of potassium nutrition for glycolysis and nitrogen assimilation in Arabidopsis roots Plant Physiol. 150 772 785
Baraldi, R., Malavasi, F.F.F., Predieri, S. & Castagneto, M. 1991 Effect of potassium humate on apple cv. ‘Golden Delicious’ cultured in vitro Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 24 187 191
Boyer, P.D., Lardy, H.A. & Phillips, P.H. 1943 Further studies on the role of potassium and other ions in the phosphorylation of the adenylic system J. Biol. Chem. 149 529 541
Calvert, D.V. & Smith, R.C. 1972 Correction of potassium deficiency of citrus with potassium nitrate sprays J. Agr. Food Chem. 20 659 661
Chen, J.L., Wang, Z.F., Wu, J.H., Wang, Q. & Hu, X.S. 2007 Chemical compositional characterization of eight pear cultivars grown in China Food Chem. 104 268 275
Coimbra, M.A., Nunes, C., Cunha, P.R. & Guiné, R. 2011 Amino acid profile and Maillard compounds of sun-dried pears. Relation with the reddish brown colour of the dried fruits Eur. Food Res. Technol. 233 637 646
Colaric, M., Stampar, F. & Hudina, M. 2007 Content levels of various fruit metabolites in the ‘Conference’ pear response to branch bending Scientia Hort. 113 261 266
Dong, S., Neilsen, D., Neilsen, G.H. & Fuchigami, L.H. 2005 Foliar N application reduces soil NO3 −-N leaching loss in apple orchards Plant Soil 268 357 366
Gill, P., Ganaie, M.Y., Dhillon, W.S. & Singh, N.P. 2012 Effect of foliar sprays of potassium on fruit size and quality of ‘Patharnakh’ pear Indian J. Hort. 69 512 516
Gill, P., Singh, S.N. & Dhatt, A.S. 2005 Effect of foliar application of K and N fertilizers on fruit quality of Kinnow mandarin Indian J. Hort. 62 282 284
Horta, M.D.C. & Torrent, J. 2007 The Olsen P method as an agronomic and environmental test for predicting phosphate release from acid soils Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 77 283 292
Hudina, M. & Stampar, F. 2002 Effect of phosphorus and potassium foliar fertilization on fruit quality of pears Acta Hort. 594 487 493
Jifon, J.L. & Lester, G.E. 2009 Foliar potassium fertilization improves fruit quality of field-grown muskmelon on calcareous soils in south Texas J. Sci. Food Agr. 89 2452 2460
Karley, A.J. & White, P.J. 2009 Moving cationic minerals to edible tissues: Potassium, magnesium, calcium Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12 291 298
Lebaudy, A., Véry, A.A. & Sentenac, H. 2007 K+ channel activity in plants: Genes, regulations and functions FEBS Lett. 581 2357 2366
Lester, G.E., Jifon, J.L. & Makus, D.J. 2006 Supplemental foliar potassium applications with or without a surfactant can enhance netted muskmelon quality HortScience 41 741 744
Lester, G.E., Jifon, J.L. & Makus, D.J. 2010a Impact of potassium nutrition on food quality of fruits and vegetables: A condensed and concise review of the literature Better Crops Plant Food 94 18 21
Lester, G.E., Jifon, J.L. & Makus, D.J. 2010b Impact of potassium nutrition on postharvest fruit quality: Melon (Cucumis melo L) case study Plant Soil 335 117 131
Lin, D., Huang, D.F. & Wang, S.P. 2004 Effects of potassium levels on fruit quality of muskmelon in soilless medium culture Scientia Hort. 102 53 60
Lu, R.K. 1999 Soil chemical analysis methods in agriculture. China Agr. Sci. Tech. Press, Beijing, China. (in Chinese)
Mengel, K., Secer, M. & Koch, K. 1981 Potassium effect on protein formation and amino acid turnover in developing wheat grain Agron. J. 73 74 78
Mpelasoka, B.S., Schachtman, D.P., Treeby, M.T. & Thomas, M.R. 2003 A review of potassium nutrition in grapevines with special emphasis on berry accumulation Austral. J. Grape Wine Res. 9 154 168
Mukadam, S.J. & Haldankar, P.M. 2012 Effect of paclobutrazol and post flowering foliar sprays of nutrients for accelerating harvesting of karonda (Carissa carandas Linn.) J. Plant Studies 2 145 147
Niu, J.F., Zhang, W.F., Ru, S.H., Chen, X.P., Xiao, K., Zhang, X.Y., Assaraf, M., Imas, P., Magen, H. & Zhang, F.S. 2013 Effects of potassium fertilization on winter wheat under different production practices in the North China Plain Field Crops Res. 140 69 76
Niu, Z.M., Xu, X.F., Wang, Y., Li, T.Z., Kong, J. & Han, Z.H. 2008 Effects of leaf-applied potassium, gibberellin and source-sink ratio on potassium absorption and distribution in grape fruits Scientia Hort. 115 164 167
Proe, M.F., Midwood, A.J. & Craig, J. 2000 Use of stable isotopes to quantify nitrogen, potassium and magnesium dynamics in young scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) New Phytol. 146 461 470
Rebolledo–Martínez, A., Lid-del-Ángel–Pérez, A. & Rey-Moreno, J. 2008 Effects of paclobutrazol and KNO3 over flowering and fruit quality in two cultivars of mango Manila Interciencia 33 518 522
Reuveni, M., Harpaz, M. & Reuveni, R. 1998a Integrated control of powdery mildew on apple trees by foliar sprays of mono-potassium phosphate fertilizer and sterol inhibiting fungicides and the strobilurin Kresoxim-methyl Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 104 853 860
Reuveni, R., Dor, G. & Reuveni, M. 1998b Local and systemic control of powdery mildew (Leveillula taurica) on pepper plants by foliar spray of mono-potassium phosphate Crop Prot. 17 703 709
Römheld, V. & Kirkby, E.A. 2010 Research on potassium in agriculture: Needs and prospects Plant Soil 335 155 180
Rufty, T.W., Jackson, W.A. & Raper, C.D. 1981 Nitrate reduction in roots as affected by the presence of potassium and by flux of nitrate through the roots Plant Physiol. 68 605 609
Sabbatini, P. & Flore, J. 2006 Effect of varying crop load on leaf photosynthesis and carbon isotope discrimination of ‘Imperial Gala’ apple tree HortScience 41 1010 (Abstr.).
Sánchez, C. 2015 Effect of chitosan coating on quality and nutritional value of fresh-cut ‘Rocha’ pear Emirates J. Food Agr. 27 206 214
Shahryari, R., Gadimov, A., Gurbanov, E. & Valizade, M. 2009 Application of potassium humate in wheat for organic agriculture in Iran Asian J. Food Agro–Ind. 2 164 168
Shin, R. 2014 Strategies for improving potassium use efficiency in plants Mol. Cells 37 575 584
Sing, J.L. & McNeil. R.J. 1992 The effectiveness of foliar potassium nitrate sprays on the ‘Hass’ avocado (Persea americana Mill.). In: C.J. Lovatt (ed.). World Avocado Congress II, Proceedings: “the shape of things to come.” 1 337 342
Song, X.H., Xie, K., Zhao, H.B., Li, Y.L., Dong, C.X., Xu, Y.C. & Shen, Q.R. 2012 Effects of different organic fertilizers on tree growth, yield, fruit quality, and soil microorganisms in a pear orchard Eur. J. Hort. Sci. 77 204 210
Southwick, S.M., Olson, W., Yeager, J. & Weis, K.G. 1996 Optimum timing of potassium nitrate spray applications to ‘French’ prune trees J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121 326 333
Walker, D.J., Leigh, R.A. & Miller, A.J. 1996 Potassium homeostasis in vacuolate plant cells Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 10510 10514
Wells, M.L. 2009 Pecan nutrient element status and orchard soil fertility in the southeastern coastal plain of the United States HortTechnology 19 432 438
Wu, J., Wang, Z., Shi, Z., Zhang, S., Ming, R., Zhu, S., Khan, M.A., Tao, S., Korban, S.S., Wang, H., Chen, N.J., Nishio, T., Xu, X., Cong, L., Qi, K.J., Huang, X.S., Wang, Y.T., Zhao, X., Wu, J.Y., Deng, C., Gou, C.Y., Zhou, W.L., Yin, H., Qin, G.H., Sha, Y.H., Tao, Y., Chen, H., Yang, Y.N., Song, Y., Zhan, D.L., Wang, J., Li, L.T., Dai, M.S., Gu, C., Wang, Y.Z., Shi, D.H., Wang, X.W., Zhang, H.P., Zeng, L., Zheng, D.M., Wang, C.L., Chen, M.S., Wang, G.B., Xie, L., Sovero, V., Sha, S.F., Huang, W.J., Zhang, S.J., Zhang, M.Y., Sun, J.M., Xu, L.L., Li, Y., Liu, X., Li, Q.S., Shen, J.H., Wang, J.Y., Paull, R.E., Bennetzen, J.L., Wang, J. & Zhang, S.L. 2013 The genome of the pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) Genome Res. 23 396 408
Xu, X.J., Li, Q.Y., Song, X.H., Shen, Q.R. & Dong, C.X. 2012 Dynamic regulation of nitrogen and organic acid metabolism of cherry tomato fruit as affected by different nitrogen forms Pedosphere 22 67 78
Zörb, C., Senbayram, M. & Peiter, E. 2014 Potassium in agriculture-status and perspectives J. Plant Physiol. 171 656 669