Providing residual fertilizer to containerized floriculture products to improve postproduction (consumer) performance is a means to add value and differentiate product quality. Water-soluble and controlled-release fertilizers are widely used for production of container crops. Using CRF instead of WSF is recommended to the landscape service industry as a best management practice to provide nutrients for an extended period (Andiru et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2011). CRF include urea, ammonium nitrate, potassium nitrate, or other soluble fertilizer materials coated with a polymer, resin, sulfur, or a hybrid of sulfur-coated urea coated with a polymer or resin. Polymer-coated materials release nutrients primarily based on the temperature and moisture status of the substrate (Sonneveld and Voogt, 2009). Many studies have demonstrated that CRF have potential to reduce N and phosphorus runoff as compared with fertigation (Wilson and Albano, 2011; Wu et al., 2008). The use of CRF alone does not provide a complete solution to the problem of nutrient leaching; however, appropriate fertilizer application methods, CRF types, and irrigation strategies must be calibrated to match crop needs and the local environment (Broschat and Moore, 2007).
Both growth chamber and greenhouse methods have been used to compare how CRF will act in a particular controlled environment (Broschat and Moore, 2007; Carson and Ozores-Hampton, 2012). Field methods are also used to measure N release in commercial vegetable soil conditions (Birrenkott et al., 2005; Simonne and Hutchinson, 2005). The CRF response profile under controlled laboratory conditions can be combined with substrate extraction methods in the field to quantify release characteristics of CRF for different crops and locations (Birrenkott et al., 2005).
A range of fertilizer strategies are available to provide nutrients during production and consumer phases. Containers may be produced with WSF and then top-dressed with CRF before sale. A CRF may alternatively be incorporated into the substrate or top-dressed at planting with a longevity that exceeds the production time, so that residual nutrient reserves remain for the consumer. In a commercially available technology [DCT (Protect™; Everris, Geldermalsen, The Netherlands)], a second outer coating is present over a conventional single-coated CRF prill (Osmocote Exact™; Everris), which according to the manufacturer delays the initial nutrient release for 1.5 to 2 months depending on temperature. For the purposes of clarity in this article, we will use OSM to refer to single-coated CRF technology (Osmocote™; Everris), to differentiate from DCT. A blended product of OSM and DCT (Osmocote Hi-End™; Everris) will be referred to as OSM + DCT, and both OSM and DCT will be referred to as types of CRF.
The objective of this study was to compare nutrient release, plant performance, and cost for strategies that potentially provide adequate nutrition during both the production and consumer phases for container-grown floricultural plants. Unless indicated as top-dressed, all CRF treatments were incorporated into the growing substrate before planting. Fertilizer strategies included WSF only, a combination of low rates of WSF during production plus OSM (WSF + OSM), WSF during production with DCT (WSF + DCT), and OSM or OSM + DCT without WSF. These strategies were used to encompass most approaches in use by floriculture producers. A greenhouse experiment was conducted with petunia grown in a peat/perlite substrate in containers for 42 d with WSF or CRF treatments to simulate the production phase. Plant growth and nutrient level were evaluated under simulated consumer conditions in a landscape planting and in containers for an additional 98 d. A simple financial budget for each fertilizer strategy was calculated. An additional experiment was conducted to generate nutrient release curves in growth chambers at 10, 21, and 32 °C with sand-filled columns, using a protocol based on Carson and Ozores-Hampton (2012).
Andiru, G.A., Pasian, C.C., Frantz, J.M. & Jourdan, P. 2013 Longevity of controlled-release fertilizer influences the growth of bedding impatiens HortTechnology 23 157 164
Birrenkott, B.A., Craig, J.L. & McVey, G.R. 2005 A leach collection system to track the release of nitrogen from controlled release fertilizer in container ornamentals HortScience 40 1887 1891
Broschat, T.K. & Moore, K.K. 2007 Release rates of ammonium-nitrogen, nitrate-nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, iron, and manganese from seven controlled-release fertilizers Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 38 843 850
Cabrera, R.I. 1997 Comparative evaluation of nitrogen release patterns from controlled-release fertilizer by nitrogen leaching analysis HortScience 32 669 673
Carson, L.C. & Ozores-Hampton, M. 2012 Methods for determining nitrogen release from controlled-release fertilizers used for vegetable production HortTechnology 22 20 24
Chen, Y., Bracy, R.P., Owings, A.D. & Quebedeaux, J.P. 2011 Controlled-release fertilizer type and rate affect landscape establishment of seven herbaceous perennials HortTechnology 21 336 342
Fan, X.H. & Li, Y.C. 2010 Nitrogen release from slow-release fertilizers as affected by soil type and temperature J. Soil Fert. Plant Nutr. 74 1635 1641
Fisher, P. 2003 Managing pH for container media, p. 39–45. In: D. Hamrick (ed.). Ball redbook: Crop production. 17th ed. Ball Publ., Batavia, IL
Fisher, P.R., Dickson, R.W., Mohammad-Pour, G.S. & Huang, J. 2014 Effect of solution electrical conductivity (EC) and pre-plant nutrient form on the pH of a peat perlite substrate Acta Hort. 1034 249 254
Florida Nursery Growers and Landscape Association 2015 Greenline, Orlando, FL. 14 Apr. 2015. <http://greenline.fngla.org>
Mattson, N. 2010 What’s your fertilizer cost? GrowerTalks. Ball Publ., Batavia, IL
Mills, H.A. & Jones, J.B. Jr 1996 Plant analysis handbook II: A practical sampling, preparation, analysis, and interpretation guide. MicroMacro Publ., Athens, GA
Mylavarapu, R.S., D’Angelo, W., Wilkinson, N. & Moon, D. 2014 UF/IFAS Extension Soil Testing Laboratory (ESTL) analytical procedures and training manual. 4 Oct. 2015. <http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ss312>
Shober, A.L., Denny, G.C. & Broschat, T.K. 2010 Management of fertilizers and water for ornamental plants in urban landscapes: Current practices and impacts on water resources in Florida HortTechnology 20 94 106
Simonne, E.H. & Hutchinson, C.M. 2005 Controlled-release fertilizers for vegetable production in the era of best management practices: Teaching new tricks to an old dog HortTechnology 15 36 46
Sonneveld, C. & Voogt, W. 2009 Plant nutrition of greenhouse crops. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Whipker, B.E., Cavins, T.J., Gibson, J.L., Dole, J.M., Nelson, P.V. & Fonteno, W. 2011 Water, media, and nutrition testing, p. 49–66. In: J. Nau (ed.). Ball redbook: Crop production. 18th ed. Ball Publ., Chicago, IL
Whipker, B.E., Cavins, T.J., Gibson, J.L., Dole, J.M., Nelson, P.V., Fonteno, W. & Bailey, D.A. 2003 Water, media, and nutrition testing, p. 47–62. In: D. Hamrick (ed.). Ball redbook: Crop production. 17th ed. Ball Publ., Chicago, IL
Wilson, P.C. & Albano, J.P. 2011 Impact of fertigation versus controlled-release fertilizer formulations on nitrate concentrations in nursery drainage water HortTechnology 21 176 180
Wu, L., Liu, M. & Liang, R. 2008 Preparation and properties of a double-coated slow-release NPK compound fertilizer with superabsorbent and water-retention Bioresour. Technol. 99 547 554