It is estimated that 90% of trees that are established in the urban environment in the northeastern United States are produced in the nursery as a field-grown plant where they are dug, wrapped in burlap, and transported to the new planting site as a “BNB” tree (N.L. Bassuk, personal communication). In recent times, other nursery techniques have become increasingly popular, including PIP container-grown, IGF, and BR production systems. Though each method offers advantages and disadvantages, some researchers have speculated that nursery production methods may not significantly limit transplant survival and plant performance (Levinsson, 2013). Factors like tree species selection (Ferrini and Nicese, 2006), size (Struve et al., 2000), transplant timing (Richardson-Calfee et al., 2004), and post-transplant maintenance (Gilman, 2001; Watson and Himelick, 2013) may be more limiting relative to tree performance and inevitably, the successful long-term “greening” of a community. However, to the urban forester/tree warden charged with the day-to-day care of community trees, the most important limiting factor relative to successful tree planting and urban forest management are the resources required to acquire and plant street trees (Stobbart and Johnston, 2012).
With this in mind, the objectives of this study were to build on existing research pertaining to the costs associated with growing trees using different nursery production systems (Lass and Neal, 2014), by providing a more scientifically based understanding of the true costs associated with the planting of urban trees grown using four different nursery production systems (PIP, BNB, IGF, and BR).
Arnold, M.A., McDonald, G.V., Bryan, D.L., Denny, G.C., Watson, W.T. & Lombardini, L. 2007 Below-grade planting adversely affects survival and growth of tree species from five different families Arboricult. Urban For. 33 1 64 69
Ferrini, F. & Nicese, F.P. 2006 Effect of container type nursery techniques on growth and chlorophyll content of Acer platanoides L. and Liquidambar styraciflua L. plants J. Food Agr. Environ. 4 3/4 209 213
Gilman, E.F. 2001 Effect of nursery production method, irrigation, and inoculation with mycorrhizae-forming fungi on establishment of Quercus virginiana J. Arboricult. 27 1 30 38
Lass, D. & Neal, C. 2014 Getting to the roots: Costs of growing river birch in different production systems Amer. Nurseryman 214 8 12 18
Levinsson, A. 2013 Post-transplant shoot growth of trees from five different production methods is affected by site and species Arboricult. Urban For. 39 5 201 210
Richardson-Calfee, L., Harris, J.R., Jones, R.H. & Fanelli, J.K. 2004 Seasonal effects of transplanting on northern red oak and willow oak J. Environ. Hort. 22 2 75 79
Struve, D.K., Burchfield, L. & Maupin, C. 2000 Survival and growth of transplanted large-and small-caliper red oaks J. Arboricult. 26 3 162 169
Watson, G.W. & Himelick, E.B. 2013 The practical science of planting trees. Intl. Soc. Arboricult., Champaign, IL
Wells, C., Townsend, K., Caldwell, J., Ham, D., Smiley, E.T. & Sherwood, M. 2006 Effects of planting depth on landscape tree survival and girdling root formation Arboricult. Urban For. 32 6 305 311