Blueberry has lower nutrient requirements than most crops and thrives in acidic soils (pH of 4.5–5.5) with limited availability of essential nutrients such as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg) (Korcak, 1988). However, despite the plant’s ability to subsist with little to no fertilizer, a good fertilization program is necessary for rapid plant growth and high-quality fruit production (Hanson and Hancock, 1996; Hart et al., 2006). Nitrogen is the primary nutrient applied to blueberry and is required each year. Unlike most crops, blueberry acquires primarily the ammonium (NH4) form of N over NO3-N, due to low nitrate reductase activity in the roots and leaves (Merhaut and Darnell, 1995; Peterson et al., 1988). When the plants are low in N, shoot growth is poor, and the leaves turn pale green or yellow (chlorotic) and often develop a reddish tinge. Other nutrients that are often applied to blueberry include P, K, Ca, Mg, elemental sulfur [S (which is used to lower soil pH)], iron (Fe), boron (B), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn) (Hanson and Hancock, 1996; Hart et al., 2006). Manganese (Mn) is also required by the plants but is typically available in abundance under acidic soil conditions (Korcak, 1988). See Caruso and Ramsdell (1995) for useful illustrations of nutrient deficiencies and toxicities in northern highbush blueberry.
Traditionally, northern highbush blueberry fields have been fertilized using granular fertilizers. The current recommendation for Oregon is to split granular N fertilizers into thirds, with the first application in late April, the second in mid-May, and the third in mid-June, at rates varying from 50 to 165 lb/acre N in plantings mulched with sawdust, depending on the age of the planting (Hart et al., 2006). These recommendations are practiced by northern highbush blueberry growers throughout the United States and elsewhere and are applicable to fields irrigated by sprinklers. However, many new fields are irrigated through drip systems. In addition to using less water, a major advantage of drip irrigation is the ability to fertigate. Fertigation is the practice of applying soluble fertilizers to the plants directly through the irrigation system (Kafkafi and Tarchitsky, 2011). Most of the roots of a drip-irrigated plant are located near the drip emitters, and, therefore, nutrient application through the drip system is a very efficient way to apply the fertilizer (Bryla, 2011). Several advantages of fertigation include reduced delivery costs (no need for tractors or spreaders), greater control of where and when the fertilizers are placed, the ability to target application of specific nutrients during particular stages of crop development, and the potential to reduce fertilizer losses by supplying only small amounts of fertilizer to the plants as needed. However, disadvantages include the costs associated with the need for higher fertilizer quality (i.e., purity and solubility) and the capital costs of the equipment required to inject the fertilizer through the irrigation system. System costs are even higher when injection of corrosive materials such as sulfuric acid and acidified fertilizers are needed (see “Fertilizer products available for fertigation”).
Recently, Vargas and Bryla (2015) compared the differences between fertigation and granular fertilizer using different sources of N fertilizer during the first 5 years of fruit production in ‘Bluecrop’ northern highbush blueberry. Soil pH was slightly lower with granular fertilizers than with fertigation; however, leaf N was also lower with granular fertilizer, whereas yield was greatest when plants were fertigated using ammonium sulfate or urea sulfuric acid (Table 1). Ehret et al. (2014) found similar results with ‘Duke’ northern highbush blueberry in British Columbia and concluded that fertigation produced greater yields with less N than broadcast applications of the fertilizer. In both cases, the results indicated that northern highbush blueberry was well suited to fertigation. Higher rates of N fertilizer likewise increased plant growth in both of these studies but did not improve yield in any year and reduced berry size during the first few years of fruit production. Whether N was applied by fertigation or as granular fertilizer, only 67–93 kg·ha−1 N or less was needed per year to optimize fruit production.
Comparison of granular and liquid nitrogen (N) fertilizers on soil pH, leaf N, and yield of ‘Bluecrop’ northern highbush blueberry in western Oregon (adapted from Vargas and Bryla, 2015).
The purpose of this article is to review recent information on nutrient requirements in northern highbush blueberry and discuss the latest options for fertigation by drip in commercial production systems. The article also contains updated standards for leaf tissue testing of northern highbush blueberry that were developed from a recent evaluation of nutrients in common cultivars growing in conventional and certified organic fields in western Oregon.
Abbott, J.D. & Gough, R.E. 1987 Seasonal development of highbush blueberry roots under sawdust mulch J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 112 60 62
Bañados, M.P., Strik, B.C., Bryla, D.R. & Righetti, T.L. 2012 Response of highbush blueberry to nitrogen fertilizer during field establishment. I: Accumulation and allocation of fertilizer nitrogen and biomass HortScience 47 648 655
Barber, S.A. 1995 Soil nutrient bioavailability. 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, NY
British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture 2014 2014 Berry production guide—Beneficial management practices for berry growers in British Columbia. British Columbia Ministry Agr., Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Bryla, D.R. 2011 Application of the “4R” nutrient stewardship concept to horticultural crops: Getting nutrients in the “right” place HortTechnology 21 674 682
Bryla, D.R. & Strik, B.C. 2007 Effects of cultivar and plant spacing on the seasonal water requirements of highbush blueberry J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 132 270 277
Bryla, D.R., Strik, B.C., Bañados, M.P. & Righetti, T.L. 2012 Response of highbush blueberry to nitrogen fertilizer during field establishment. II. Plant nutrient requirements in relation to nitrogen fertilizer supply HortScience 47 917 926
Bryla, D.R. & Vargas, O. 2014 Nitrogen fertilizer practices for rapid establishment of highbush blueberry: A review of six years of research Acta Hort. 1017 415 421
Bryla, D.R. & Machado, R.M.A. 2011 Comparative effects of nitrogen fertigation and granular fertilizer application on growth and availability of soil nitrogen during establishment of highbush blueberry Front. Plant Sci. 2 46, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2011.00046.
Caruso, F.L. & Ramsdell, D.C. 1995 Compendium of blueberry and cranberry diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, MN
Chen, Y., Clapp, C.E. & Magen, H. 2004a Mechanisms of plant growth stimulation by humic substances: The role of organo-iron complexes Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 50 1089 1095
Chen, Y., De Nobili, M. & Aviad, T. 2004b Stimulatory effects of humic substances on plant growth, p. 103–129. In: F. Magdoff and R.R. Weil (eds.). Soil organic matter in sustainable agriculture. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Ehret, D.L., Frey, B., Forge, T., Helmer, T. & Bryla, D.R. 2012 Effects of drip irrigation configuration and rate on yield and fruit quality of young highbush blueberry plants HortScience 47 414 421
Ehret, D.L., Frey, B., Forge, T., Helmer, T., Bryla, D.R. & Zebarth, B.J. 2014 Effects of nitrogen rate and application method on early production and fruit quality in highbush blueberry Can. J. Plant Sci. 94 1165 1179
Fernandez-Salvador, J., Strik, B.C. & Bryla, D.R. 2015 Liquid corn and fish fertilizers are good options for fertigation in blackberry cultivars grown in an organic production system HortScience 50 225 233
Hanson, E.J. & Hancock, J.B. 1996 Managing the nutrition of highbush blueberries. Michigan State Univ. Ext. Bul. Publ. E-2011
Hart, J., Strik, B., White, L. & Yang, W. 2006 Nutrient management for blueberries in Oregon. Oregon State Univ. Ext. Serv. Publ. EM 8918
Haynes, R.J. 1990 Movement and transformations of fertigated nitrogen below trickle emitters and their effects on pH in the wetted soil volume Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 23 105 112
Kafkafi, U. & Tarchitsky, J. 2011 Fertigation. A tool for efficient fertilizer and water management. Intl. Fert. Ind. Assn., Paris, France/Intl. Potash Inst., Horgen, Switzerland
Larco, H., Strik, B.C., Bryla, D.R. & Sullivan, D.M. 2013a Mulch and fertilizer management practices for organic production of highbush blueberry. I: Plant growth and allocation of biomass during establishment HortScience 48 1250 1261
Larco, H., Strik, B.C., Bryla, D.R. & Sullivan, D.M. 2013b Mulch and fertilizer management practices for organic production of highbush blueberry. II: Impact on plant and soil nutrients during establishment HortScience 48 1484 1495
Machado, R.M.A., Bryla, D.R. & Vargas, O. 2014 Effects of salinity induced by ammonium sulfate fertilizer on root and shoot growth in highbush blueberry Acta Hort. 1017 407 414
Merhaut, D. & Darnell, R. 1995 Ammonium and nitrate accumulation in containerized southern highbush blueberry plants HortScience 30 1378 1381
Miles, C., Roozen, J., Maynard, E. & Coolong, T. 2010 Fertigation in Organic Vegetable Production Systems. eOrganic and eXtension. 4 May 2015. <http://www.extension.org/pages/29712/fertigation-in-organic-vegetable-production-systems>
Morard, P., Eyheraguibel, B., Morard, M. & Silvestre, J. 2011 Direct effects of humic-like substance on growth, water, and mineral nutrition of various species J. Plant Nutr. 34 46 59
Muscolo, A., Sidari, M. & Nardi, S. 2013 Humic substance: Relationship between structure and activity. Deeper information suggests univocal findings J. Geochem. Explor. 129 57 63
Nardi, S., Pizzeghello, D., Muscolo, A. & Vianello, A. 2002 Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants Soil Biol. Biochem. 34 1527 1536
Pritts, M.P. & Hancock, J.F. 1992 Commercial blueberry production guide. Northeast Regional Coop. Eng. Serv., Ithaca, NY, NRAES-55
Rose, M.T., Patti, A.F., Little, K.R., Brown, A.L., Jackson, W.R. & Cavagnaro, T.R. 2014 A meta-analysis and review of plant-growth response to humic substances: Practical implications for agriculture Adv. Agron. 124 37 89
Strik, B.C., Finn, C.E. & Moore, P.P. 2014 Blueberry cultivars for the Pacific Northwest. Pacific Northwest Ext. Publ. PNW 656
Strik, B.C. & Buller, G. 2005 The impact of early cropping on subsequent growth and yield of highbush blueberry in the establishment years at two planting densities is cultivar dependent HortScience 40 1998 2001
Valenzuela-Estrada, L.R., Vera-Caraballo, V., Ruth, L.E. & Eissenstat, D.M. 2008 Root anatomy, morphology, and longevity among root orders in Vaccinium corymbosum (Ericaceae) Amer. J. Bot. 95 1506 1514
Varanini, Z. & Pinton, R. 2001 Direct versus indirect effects of soil humic substances on plant growth and nutrition, p. 141–158. In: R. Pinton, Z. Varanini, and P. Nannipieri (eds.). The rhizosphere. Biochemistry and organic substances at the soil-plant interface. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY
Vargas, O.L. & Bryla, D.R. 2015 Growth and fruit production of highbush blueberry fertilized with ammonium sulfate and urea applied by fertigation or as granular fertilizer HortScience 50 479 485
Vargas, O.L., Bryla, D.R., Weiland, J.E., Strik, B.C. & Sun, L. 2015 Irrigation and fertigation with drip and alternative micro irrigation systems in northern highbush blueberry HortScience 50 897 903