The green industry, also known as environmental horticulture, refers to a wide variety of suppliers, producers, distributors, installers, firms, and businesses involved in horticulture in the United States. It is usually divided into nursery and floriculture crops and is the number one agricultural commodity in five northeastern U.S. states. Nationally, the number of producers continues to decline and profit margins are typically low, leaving little room for growers to absorb significant increases in costs or decreases in revenues. Unlike farmers who produce field crops, nursery and greenhouse firms bear the entire price, market, and production risks because these crops have had no government support programs (Brumfield, 2010). The importance of knowing carbon emissions from the green industry is escalating as climate change data continue to emerge. Such emission could come from a variety of sources related to horticultural production including nurseries, greenhouses, wholesale distribution firms, transportation, landscape and design services, and retail operations (Hall, 2010). In addition, efforts are underway to reduce the use of petroleum-based inputs in crop production systems because of the high waste streams involved. Growers will have an incentive to conserve resources in the future to ensure the longevity of their operations. Promoting environmental sustainability throughout their operations may also be crucial in maintaining a customer base that is increasingly aware of environmental issues (Hall et al., 2010). Additionally, researchers have found that consumers in the midwestern United States are willing to pay more for plants that were produced in biodegradable, compostable, or recyclable pots (Yue et al., 2011).
A reduction of certain inputs could reduce the environmental impacts of horticultural businesses. One such resource is plastic, used for a variety of purposes in ornamental crop production systems including propagation, production, packaging, transportation, as a marketing vehicle, and as a covering for production structures. For example, recent research found that 16% of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of petunia (Petunia ×hybrida) production are linked to the traditional plastic containers used to grow the plants (Koeser et al., 2014). Both the manufacturing and disposal of agricultural plastics exhibit large environmental burdens. Plastics used in agricultural practices are challenging to recycle due to contamination problems or ultraviolet light degradation (Hall et al., 2010). Consequently, replacing plastic pots with alternative materials can reduce the environmental impact of crop production (Garthe and Kowal, 1993).
The available alternative containers are made from a variety of animal and plant materials, including feathers, manure, rice hulls, and straw. Some decompose quickly and are biodegradable, often referred to as biocontainers (Nambuthiri et al., 2015). Using alternative containers increases the sustainability of an operation by reducing reliance on petroleum and minimizing disposal issues. Alternative containers, except the one made from recycled plastic-fiber mix, have greater compression strength than plastic containers although they may not be “compostable” by ASTM standards (Wang, 2013). This characteristic would decrease landfill space and supports other research citing that alternative containers decompose more quickly than traditional plastic (Candido et al., 2008; Evans and Karcher, 2004).
Research to date suggests that alternative containers can produce plants with similar or better performance than plants grown in plastic containers in the greenhouse when water supply is sufficient (Evans and Hensley, 2004; Lopez and Camberato, 2011; Nambuthiri and Ingram, 2014). However, the durability of alternative containers can be an issue for certain crops with production times longer than 1 year (Li et al., 2015).
If alternative containers are acceptable substitutes for traditional plastic containers from a production standpoint, it is necessary to look at the use of alternative containers from an economic perspective to encourage their use. Specifically, useful information could be gleaned from a comparison of the costs associated with alternative containers relative to that of industry-standard plastic containers.
This study translates horticultural production data into a cost analysis applicable to commercial nursery and greenhouse operations. We estimated the COP for two types of ornamental crops grown in four types of biodegradable containers in above-ground nursery systems. These COP budgets are a useful tool for growers in that they provide an information base to assist with choices involving risk, crop selection, type of inputs, expansion, and pricing (Hinson et al., 2007).
Brumfield, R.G. 2010 Strategies producers in the northeastern United States are using to reduce costs and increase profits in tough economic times HortTechnology 20 836 843
Candido, V., Miccolis, V., Castronuovo, D. & Manera, C. 2008 Poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima) cultivation in biodegradable pots: Mechanical and agronomical behaviour of pots and plants traits Acta Hort. 801 1563 1570
Circle of Blue 2014 Water pricing 2014. 30 June 2014. <http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/WaterPricing2014TableInteractive.pdf>
DeVincentis, A.J., Brumfield, R.G., Gottlieb, P. & Johnson, J. 2014 Cost analysis of recycling water in greenhouses in southern New Jersey. Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, Scholars Thesis
Evans, M.R. & Hensley, D.L. 2004 Plant growth in plastic, peat, and processed poultry feather fiber growing containers HortScience 39 1012 1014
Evans, M.R. & Karcher, D. 2004 Properties of plastic, peat, and processed poultry feather fiber growing containers HortScience 39 1008 1011
Garthe, J.W. & Kowal, P.D. 1993 Recycling used agricultural plastics. Penn State Fact Sheet C-8. 28 Aug. 2014. <http://pubs.cas.psu.edu/freepubs/pdfs/C8.pdf>
Halcomb, M. & Fare, D. 2009 Conventional container production. 1 Aug. 2014. <http://www.utextension.utk.edu/mtnpi/handouts/Container%20Production/Container_Production_Handout-rev%208-09.pdf>
Hall, C.R., Campbell, B.J., Behe, B.K., Yue, C., Lopez, R.G. & Dennis, J.H. 2010 The appeal of biodegradable packaging to floral consumers HortScience 45 583 591
Hall, C.R. & Ingram, D. 2014 Production costs of field-grown Cercis canadensis L. ‘Forest Pansy’ identified during life cycle assessment analysis HortScience 49 622 627
Hinson, R.A., Owings, A., Black, J. & Harkess, R. 2007 Enterprise budget for plants in plant hardiness zones 8 and 9. 12 Aug. 2014. <http://www.agecon.msstate.edu/whatwedo/budgets/docs/08/Orn08.pdf>
Khachatryan, H., Campbell, B., Hall, C., Behe, B., Yue, C. & Dennis, J. 2014 The effects of individual environmental concerns on willingness to pay for sustainable plant attributes HortScience 49 69 75
Koeser, A.K., Lovell, S.T., Petri, A.C., Brumfield, R.G. & Stewart, J.R. 2014 Biocontainer use in a Petunia ×hybrid greenhouse production system: A cradle-to-gate carbon footprint assessment of secondary impacts HortScience 49 265 271
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J. & Barbaro-Forleo, G. 2001 Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products J. Consumer Mktg. 18 503 520
Lopez, R.G. & Camberato, D.M. 2011 Growth and development of ‘Eckespoint Classic Red’ poinsettia in biodegradable and compostable containers HortTechnology 21 419 423
Li, T., Bi, G., Niu, G., Nambuthiri, S., Geneve, R.L., Wang, X., Fernandez, R.T., Sun, Y. & Zhao, X. 2015 Feasibility of using biocontainers in a pot-in-pot system for nursery production of river birch HortTechnology 25 57 62
Nambuthiri, S., Fulcher, A., Koeser, A.K., Geneve, R. & Niu, G. 2015 Moving toward sustainability with alternative containers for greenhouse and nursery crop production: A review and research update HortTechnology 25 8 16
Nambuthiri, S. & Ingram, D. 2014 Evaluation of plantable containers for groundcover plant production and their establishment in a landscape HortTechnology 24 48 52
U.S. Department of Labor 2014 Adverse effect wage rates 2014. 15 July 2014. <http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/adverse.cfm>
Wang, X. 2013 Irrigation management and alternative containers for more sustainable nursery production. Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MS Thesis
Wang, X., Fernandez, R.T., Cregg, B.M., Auras, R., Fulcher, A., Cochran, D.R., Niu, G., Sun, Y., Bi, G., Nambuthiri, S. & Geneve, R.L. 2015 Multistate evaluation of plant growth and water use in plastic containers and alternative nursery containers HortTechnology 25 42 49
Yue, C., Dennis, J.H., Behe, B.K., Hall, C.R., Campbell, B.L. & Lopez, R.G. 2011 Investigating consumer preference for organic, local, or sustainable plants HortScience 46 610 615
Yue, C., Hall, C.R., Behe, B.K., Campbell, B.L. & Dennis, J.H. 2010 Are consumers willing to pay more for biodegradable containers than for plastic ones? Evidence from hypothetical conjoint analysis and nonhypothetical experimental auctions J. Agr. Appl. Econ. 42 757 772