There is a long history of problems associated with the overuse of specific plants in agricultural monocultures. The Irish potato famine of 1845 to 1850, which was caused partly by dependence on a single variety of potato (Solanum tuberosum), called “the lumper,” is a well-known example of this (Fraser, 2003). The term “monoculture” is also now used for large expanses of nonagricultural crops, such as street trees (Flemer, 1981; Frank et al., 2006). The extensive loss of trees in Europe and North America to dutch elm disease, which was first described in 1921, is a well-known example of a problem resulting from this type of monoculture (Wilson, 1975). This article presents further results from a study of the wholesale nursery industry (Polakowski et al., 2011) that noted some lack of awareness of the problems that arise from monocultures and the potential role of educators in overcoming this lack of awareness.
Risks associated with overplanting come from lack of genetic variation, which increases susceptibility to pest damage and environmental stresses. Genetic variation occurs across species and within species. “Biodiversity” is the term generally used for the range of diversity across different species in an area (Lankau and Strauss, 2007). “Genetic diversity” typically refers to the range of different genetic characteristics within a single species. Both, as explained below, play a role in reducing risks associated with monocultures.
There are many examples of pest problems that have spread through landscape plantings with low biodiversity. These pests, which attack more than one species within a commonly planted genus, include dogwood anthracnose (Discula destructiva), hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae), and ash decline disease (Chalara fraxinea or Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus) (Bakys et al., 2009; Daughtrey et al., 1996; Spaulding and Rieske, 2010). Another example is emerald ash borer, which attacks at least four different species of ash (Fraxinus sp.). In 2002, the borer was found in Michigan and Ontario (Poland and McCullough, 2006). Ash is widely used as a street tree. Only two years later, 15 million ash trees were estimated to be dead or dying from emerald ash borer injury in Michigan alone. Positive examples of efforts to reduce these potential problems can be found. For example, only three trees of the same species may be planted in a row in downtown Chicago (Heimlich et al., 2008). However, insufficient action has been taken to reduce the risks associated with low biodiversity (Muller and Bornstein, 2010).
Genetic diversity within individual species of landscape trees has unwittingly been reduced because of the use of clonal propagation for preferred clones (Iles and Vold, 2003). A recent study highlighted the issue (Morton and Gruszka, 2008). About 100 years ago, 200 seedlings of london plane tree (Platanus ×acerifolia) were planted in Schenley Park, Pittsburgh, PA. Since then, about half have died from sycamore anthracnose (Apiognomonia veneta) or canker stain (Ceratocystis platani). Researchers analyzed remaining park trees and trees from nurseries in Pennsylvania and Oregon. They found much greater genetic diversity in the park trees than in the nursery trees and concluded that this was because few seedling trees are sold today. Nurseries want disease-resistant london plane trees, so most clone ‘Bloodgood’. Park managers, who had wanted to replant with london plane trees with expanded genetic diversity, were unable to do so. Instead, the researchers provided local nurseries with propagation material from the remaining Schenley Park trees, which presumably are resistant to both sycamore anthracnose and canker stain (Morton and Gruszka, 2008).
Little has been published about what the green industry knows regarding this problem or how they are responding or could respond to the risks associated with low biodiversity and genetic diversity in landscapes. A survey of people making plant inventory decisions in wholesale nurseries in Washington State was conducted to determine current awareness of diversity issues, focusing primarily on biodiversity (Polakowski et al., 2011). Respondents indicated some awareness of the issues: 85% agreed that “increasing the number of different plant species used in an area is important for biodiversity.” Many appeared to lack an in-depth understanding of the issue; only 45% agreed that “planting more than 10% of the same plant species in a region greatly increases the risk of insect or disease outbreaks.” Most apparently did not feel that the nursery industry played a role in the problem, because 78% agreed that “most wholesale nurseries currently offer an adequate range of genetically different plants for their customers to choose from.” A majority of the respondents (60%) were educated about plants at higher educational institutions. The survey also found that education was an important factor in respondents’ knowledge of the issue: those who had learned about plant diversity issues in “school or college classes” scored significantly higher on a composite score of diversity knowledge than those who did not. To further investigate who the nursery industry thinks may be responsible for this issue and what role education could play in contributing to action on this issue, additional analyses were performed with the data from the study.
American Society for Horticultural Science 2010 ASHS Certified Horticulturist Program Certification Examination Study Outline. 14 Dec. 2012. <http://www.ashs.org/downloads/CHhandbook10110.pdf>
Bakys, R., Vasaitis, R., Barklund, O., Ihrmark, K. & Stenlid, J. 2009 Investigations concerning the role of Chalara fraxinea in declining Fraxinus excelsior Plant Pathol. 58 2 284 292
Basinger, A.R., McKenney, C.B. & Auld, D. 2009 Competencies for a United States horticulture undergraduate major: A national Delphi study HortTechnology 19 2 452 458
Daughtrey, M.L., Hibben, C.R., Britton, K.O., Windham, M.T. & Redlin, S.C. 1996 Dogwood anthracnose: Understanding a disease new to North America Plant Dis. 80 4 349 358
Dillman, D.A. 2000 Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, NY
Frank, S., Waters, G., Beer, R. & May, P. 2006 An analysis of the street tree population of greater Melbourne at the beginning of the 21st century Arboricult. Urban For. 32 4 155 163
Fraser, E.D.G. 2003 Social vulnerability and ecological fragility: Building bridges between social and natural sciences using the Irish potato famine as a case study. Conservation Ecol. 7(2):9. 30 Oct. 2012. <http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss2/art9>
Galvin, M.F. 1999 A methodology for assessing and managing biodiversity in street tree populations: A case study J. Arboricult. 25 3 124 128
Heimlich, J., Sydnor, T.D., Bumgardner, M. & O’Brien, P. 2008 Attitudes of residents toward street trees on four streets in Toledo, Ohio, U.S. before removal of ash trees (Fraxinus spp.) from emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) Arboricult. Urban For. 34 1 47 53
Lankau, R.A. & Strauss, S.Y. 2007 Mutual feedbacks maintain both genetic and species diversity in a plant community Science 317 5835 1561 1563
Lilja, A., Rytkönen, A., Hantula, J., Müller, M., Parikka, P. & Kurkela, T. 2011 Introduced pathogens found on ornamentals, strawberry and trees in Finland over the past 20 years Agr. Food Sci. 20 1 74 85
Morton, C.M. & Gruszka, P. 2008 AFLP assessment of genetic variability in old vs. new london plane trees (Platanus × acerfolia) J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 83 4 532 537
Polakowski, N.R., Lohr, V.I. & Cerny-Koenig, T. 2011 Survey of wholesale production nurseries indicates need for more education on the importance of plant species diversity Arboricult. Urban For. 37 6 259 264
Poland, T.M. & McCullough, D.G. 2006 Emerald ash borer: Invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource J. For. 104 3 118 124
Spaulding, H.L. & Rieske, L.K. 2010 The aftermath of an invasion: Structure and composition of Central Appalachian hemlock forests following establishment of the hemlock woolly adelgid, Adelges tsugae Biol. Invasions 12 9 3135 3143
Subburayalu, S. & Sydnor, T.D. 2012 Assessing street tree diversity in four Ohio communities using the weighted Simpson index Landsc. Urban Plan. 106 1 44 50
Sydnor, T.D., Subburayalu, S. & Bumgardner, M. 2010 Contrasting Ohio nursery stock availability with community planting needs Arboricult. Urban For. 36 1 47 54
Thomas, A.L. & Shrock, D. 2004 Performance of 67 native midwestern U.S. perennials in a low-maintenance landscape HortTechnology 14 3 381 388
Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kaźmierczak, A., Niemela, J. & James, P. 2007 Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: A literature review Landsc. Urban Plan. 81 3 167 178
Wittig, R. & Becker, U. 2010 The spontaneous flora around street trees in cities: A striking example for the worldwide homogenization of the flora of urban habitats Flora 205 10 704 709
Wright, A.N., Robbins, J.A. & Gu, M. 2010 Course content and attitudes toward instructional multimedia use in nursery management and production courses in the United States HortTechnology 20 3 646 651