Crops obtain required S from diverse sources including soil, crop residues, manures, irrigation water, rainfall, atmosphere, and soil amendments and fertilizers (Tabatabai, 1984). In the past, the primary sources of S for crops were from atmospheric deposition, soil, and fertilizers. A reduction of atmospheric S deposition in conjunction with increased use of high-analysis fertilizer has caused S deficiencies to become more common in crops (Ceccotti et al., 1998; Scherer, 2001). Other than fertilizer sources, soil and water could act as primary S sources for crop production. It is unclear if either one can meet crop requirements for S.
At the plant level, S is indirectly involved in photosynthesis and chlorophyll production (Ahmad and Abdin, 2000), which may be perceived as an increase in greenness in a crop plant. Similarly, improvement in vegetable crop yield and growth occurs when S was included in the fertilizer regime. In potato (Solanum tuberosum), Pavlista (2005) found that an application of 28 kg·ha−1 S improved tuber quality and yield compared with no added S. Rhoads and Olson (2000) found highest yields for cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) were consistently produced with 22 kg·ha−1 S. Similarly, Susila (2001) found that tomato and cabbage both responded to the addition of S to the fertilizer regime with rates ranging from 0 to 102 kg·ha−1 S. This response occurred regardless of S source and application method (preplant, drip injection, or a combination of both). Both Rhoads and Olson (2000) and Susila (2001) found S sources to be similar and yields were improved across all the studies with S applications within the recommended range for Florida [30 to 40 lb/acre S (Simonne and Hochmuth, 2009)]. None of these studies considered irrigation water SO4 concentrations as an S source for crop production.
Tomato production in Florida often occurs on deep Spodosols (fine sandy soils) with low organic matter (<2%), which are inherently low in both organic and inorganic S. Previous studies on tomato have found that some S sources such as ammonium sulfate [(NH4)2SO4], ammonium thiosulfate (NH4S2O3), ammonium nitrate [(NH4NO3) + (NH4)2SO4], and potassium sulfate (K2SO4) affected tomato yields similarly (Santos et al., 2007; Susila, 2001). Elemental S is a less expensive S fertilizer source when compared with other S sources that contain nitrogen (N). Elemental S can be an ideal S source for crop growth and yield because it is high in S analysis, insoluble in water, stable in damp and humid conditions, and has to be oxidized to SO4–S for plant uptake (Solberg et al., 2003). During the process of elemental S fertilizer oxidation by soil microbes, soil pH is lowered. The rate of elemental S oxidation by soil microbes is dependent upon several factors such as carbon substrate, N source, soil temperature, and moisture.
The concentration of S in the irrigation water used throughout North America varies widely. Little research is available about the relationship between S content of irrigation water and S requirement in a fertilization program (Olson and Rehm, 1986). Field sites without mineral-bound S sources may have insufficient S dissolved in soil water to move available S to plant roots (Eriksen et al., 1998). Studies on high SO4 irrigation water used water with 175, 646, 862, and 1743 mg·L−1 SO4 (Drost et al., 1997) and 15.0 and 38.8 mol·L−1 SO4 (Papadopoulos, 1986) have found mixed results in improving yield of broccoli (B. oleracea var. italica) and tomato. In Florida, S concentrations in drinking water wells can range from 0.07 to 460 mg·L−1 S (in the form of SO4) with higher concentrations coming from deeper wells (Sacks, 1996). Although these values cover drinking water, the concentration of S within irrigation water drawn from deep wells in Florida is unknown. It has been suggested that water pumped from the Florida aquifer and surface waters may contain appreciable amounts of S for crop production because of the S-like smell commonly associated with hydrogen sulfide volatilization. This often leads to the belief that S in the irrigation water is an S source for crop production (Hochmuth and Hanlon, 2000). Since S concentrations in irrigation water vary widely and current fertilizer practices use high-analysis fertilizer that often lacks S, the objectives of this study were to 1) investigate the effect of S fertilization rates on tomato growth and yield and 2) assess whether irrigation water could provide the necessary S for tomato production.
Ahmad, A. & Abdin, M.Z. 2000 Photosynthesis and its related physiological variables in the leaves of Brassica genotypes as influenced by sulphur fertilization Physiol. Plant. 110 144 149
American Society for Testing and Materials 2006 ASTM D 516-02: Standard test method for sulfate ion in water. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. Vol. 19, Section 5. ASTM Intl., West Conshohocken, PA
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2000 Chapter 11-Water and salt: AOAC Official Method 973.57 Sulfate in water. Turbidimetric method, p. 23. In: W. Horwitz (ed.). Official methods of analysis. Assn. Offic. Anal. Chemists, Arlington, VA
Barbieri, G., Bottino, A., Orsini, F. & De Pascale, S. 2009 Sulfur fertilization and light exposure during storage are critical determinants of the nutritional value of ready-to-eat friariello campano (Brassica rapa L. subsp. sylvestris) J. Sci. Food Agr. 89 2261 2266
Blunden, G., Jenkins, T. & Liu, Y. 1997 Enhanced leaf chlorophyll levels in plants treated with seaweed extract J. Appl. Phycol. 8 535 543
Brown, R.L. 2011 Florida Tomato Committee: Regulatory Bulletin No.1. 20 Nov. 2011. <http://www.floridatomatoes.org/Regulations/Domestic-Markets.aspx>
Ceccotti, S.P., Morris, R.J. & Messick, D.L. 1998 A global overview of the sulphur situation: Industry’s background, market trends, and commercial aspects of sulphur fertilizers. p. 175–202. In: E. Schnug (ed.). Sulphur in agroecosystems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA
Csizinszky, A.A., Schuster, D.J., Jones, J.B. & van Lenteren, J.C. 2005 Crop production, p. 237–256. In: E. Heuvelink (ed.) Tomatoes. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, MA
Drost, D.T., MacAdam, J.W., Dudley, L.M. & Soltani, N. 1997 Response of bean and broccoli to high-sulfate irrigation water HortTechnology 7 429 434
Eriksen, J., Murphy, M.D. & Schnug, E. 1998 The soil sulphur cycle, p. 39–73. In: Schnug (ed.). Sulphur in agroecosystems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA
Hochmuth, G.J. & Hanlon, A.E. 2000 Commercial vegetable fertilization principles. 20 Nov. 2011. <http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/CV/CV00900.pdf>
Ling, Q., Huang, W. & Jarvis, P. 2011 Use of a SPAD-502 meter to measure leaf chlorophyll concentration in Arabidopsis thaliana Photosyn. Res. 107 209 214
Mills, H.A. & Jones, J.B. 1996 Plant analysis handbook II. MicroMacro Publishing, Athens, GA
Olson, R.A. & Rehm, G.W. 1986 Sulfur in precipitation and irrigation waters and its effects on soils and plants, p. 279–293. In: M.A. Tabatabai. (ed.). Sulfur in agriculture. Amer. Soc. Agron., Crop Sci. Soc. Amer., Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, WI
Olson, S.M., Stall, W.M., Vallad, G.E., Webb, S.E., Smith, S.A., Simonne, E.H., McAvoy, E., Santos, B.M. & Ozores-Hampton, M. 2011 Tomato production in Florida, p. 309–332. In: S.M. Olson and B.M. Santos (eds.). Vegetable production handbook for Florida, 2010-2011. Vance Publishing, Lenexa, KS
Sacks, L.A. 1996 Geochemical and isotopic composition of ground water with emphasis on sources of sulfate in the upper Floridian aquifer in parts of Marion, Sumter, and Citrus counties, Florida. Water-Resources Investigations Rpt. 95-4251. 20 Nov. 2011. <http://fl.water.usgs.gov/publications/Abstracts/wri95_4251_sacks.html>
Santos, B.M., Esmel, C.E., Rechcigl, J.E. & Moratinos, H. 2007 Effects of sulfur fertilization on tomato production Proc. Florida State Hort. Soc. 120 189 190
Simonne, E.H. & Hochmuth, G.J. 2009 Soil and fertilizer management for vegetable production in Florida, p. 3–15. In: S.M. Olson and E.H. Simonne (eds.). Vegetable production handbook for Florida. Vance Publishing, Lenexa, KS
Simonne, E.H., Dukes, M.D. & Haman, D.Z. 2009 Principles and practices of irrigation management for vegetables, p. 33–39. In: S.M. Olson and E.H. Simonne (eds.). Vegetable production handbook for Florida. Vance Publishing, Lenexa, KS
Solberg, E.D., Malhi, S.S., Nyborg, M. & Gill, K.S. 2003 Fertilizer type, tillage, and application time effects on recovery of SO4-S from elemental sulfur fertilizers in fallow field soils Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 34 815 830
Susila, A.D. 2001 Sulfur nutrition requirement for drip irrigated tomato, pepper and cabbage. Univ. Florida, Gainesville, PhD Diss