Water management is a key production practice in sweet cherry. Impact and MS are the major orchard irrigation systems in the United States (Fereres et al., 2003). These sprinkler irrigation systems wet the entire ground surface by providing water to both the tree row areas and between-row grass alleys at a relatively high rate. Because of increasing energy prices in recent years, higher production costs and lower grower profitability have been observed with these systems (Bryla et al., 2005). Furthermore, the traditional irrigation systems are not favorable for fruit storability (Bryla et al., 2003). Increased water shortages likely occur in many arid areas where orchards exist or will be planted. Thus, alternate irrigation systems with higher water use efficiency potentials are needed for orchard crops.
Drip irrigation systems are potential alternative irrigation systems to the traditional sprinkler irrigation systems (Shock et al., 2007). Drip irrigation is usually more efficient in water use than sprinkler irrigation since it provides water to only the tree row areas with no water applied to the between-row grass alleys and irrigates at a much lower rate of flow and pressure (Afolayan et al., 2007). However, limited information is available about the transitional influences of switching from sprinkler irrigation to drip irrigation on water use, growth, and productivity of sweet cherry or other orchard trees. Instead, irrigation studies have primarily focused on newly planted orchards developed using one irrigation system (Neilsen et al., 2001).
It has been documented that wetting only 20% to 50% of the root zone volume of producing mango trees (Mangifera indica) is adequate to optimize yield, assuming sufficient water is available to meet the evapotranspiration requirements during critical periods of fruit development (Spreer et al., 2009). Water use efficiency of sweet cherry may also be enhanced with increased water stress. Dehghanisanij et al. (2007) found no significant yield reductions of cherry trees associated with lowering crop evapotranspiration from 100% to 75%.
Additionally, water management is found to be linked to fruit quality and storability. For instance, physiological disorders including fruit cracking and fruit quality of sweet cherries are affected by irrigation regime (Engin et al., 2009). Excessive water application can cause sweet cherry surface pitting (Patten et al., 1983), which heavily influences fruit storage, marketing, and pricing.
Ground management is another key production practice in tree fruit production affecting water use efficiency. Effective ground management can control weeds, conserve soil moisture, improve soil water infiltration and nutrient retention, enhance fruit quality, improve soil structure, and prevent soil erosion (Merwin et al., 1996; Sirrine et al., 2008). For decades, herbicide application in tree row areas along with grass alleys between tree rows has been used as the standard ground management practice in the United States (Shribbs and Skroch, 1986). This system provides a vegetation-free zone within the tree rows to minimize weed competition with trees for water and nutrients while maintaining soil structure in the alleys (Parker and Hull, 1993). Although in-row herbicide application in orchards is effective for weed control and reducing water use, it may adversely affect soil ecosystems and the environment, such as reducing soil microbial activities and elevating water contamination (Merwin et al., 1996). Furthermore, soil organic matter and organisms in orchard row areas may decrease because of lack of actively growing cover in these middle areas. All these suggest that alternate in-row ground management systems need to be developed.
Using crop straw to cover these middle row areas beneath orchard trees is emerging as a possible water-saving alternative to the traditional practice of herbicide-controlled bare middles (Forge et al., 2003; Merwin et al., 1994). A long-term field experiment on apple (Malus ×domestica) concluded that trunk cross-sectional area and fruit yield of apple were enhanced because of in-row organic mulching compared with bare middles (Forge et al., 2003). Water availability, organic matter, water infiltration, saturated hydraulic conductivity, and temperatures of soil are also improved by organic mulching (Merwin et al., 1994). In addition, the leaching and runoff of nitrate–N and benomyl fungicide have been shown to be reduced because of organic mulching (Merwin et al., 1996). All these results imply that orchard productivity and soil quality can be improved with organic mulching.
Soil microbial communities in orchard soils have so far been poorly documented although they are crucial to various soil processes including organic matter decomposition, nitrogen transformation, etc. Soil microbial communities differed significantly depending on ground management practices in a 10-year apple trial (Laurent et al., 2008). Soil treated with preemergence residual herbicides had the fewest culturable bacteria, while soil under mowed-sod treatment had the largest population of culturable fungi; at the same time, some pests such as root-lesion nematode (Pratylenchus sp.) were greater in mowed-sod than other ground management practices (Laurent et al., 2008).
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impacts of switching from MS to DD and shifting from NC to ST on soil quality, irrigation water consumption, leaf nutrition, fruit yield, quality, and storability of sweet cherries.
Anderson, R.V. & Coleman, D.C. 1977 The use of glass microbeads in ecological experiments with bacteriophagic nematodes J. Nematol. 9 319 322
Afolayan, S.O., Ewemoje, T.A., Lateef, S.A. & Ayayil, E. 2007 Performance evaluation of drip irrigation and fertigation system for sweet maize and Telfairia occidentalis Adv. Materials Res. 18 177 185
Babiuk, L.A. & Paul, E.A. 1970 The use of fluorescein isothiocyanate in the determination of the bacterial biomass of a grassland soil Can. J. Microbiol. 16 57 62
Bryla, D.R., Gartung, J., Trout, T., Johnson, R.S. & Ayars, J.E. 2005 Drip irrigation improves potential profits for growing peach. Proc. California Chapter Amer. Soc. Agron., Modesto, CA, 1–2 Feb. 2005
Bryla, D.R., Trout, T.J., Ayars, J.E. & Johnson, R.S. 2003 Growth and production of young peach trees irrigated by furrow, microspray, surface drip, or subsurface drip systems HortScience 38 1112 1116
Combs, S.M. & Nathan, M.V. 1998 Soil organic matter, p. 53–58. In: Brown, J.R. (ed.). Recommended chemical soil test procedures for the north central region, North Central Region Res. Publ. No. 221. Univ. of Missouri, Columbia
Darbyshire, J.F., Wheatley, R.E., Greaves, M.P. & Inkson, R.H.E. 1974 A rapid micromethod for estimating bacterial and protozoan populations in soil Ecology 61 764 771
Dehghanisanij, H., Naseri, A., Anyoji, H. & Eneji, A.E. 2007 Effects of deficit irrigation and fertilizer use on vegetative growth of drip irrigated cherry trees J. Plant Nutr. 30 411 425
Engin, H., Sen, F., Pamuk, G. & Gokbayrak, Z. 2009 Investigation of physiological disorders and fruit quality of sweet cherry European J. Hort. Sci. 74 118 123
Forge, T.A., Hogue, E., Neilsen, G. & Neilsen, D. 2003 Effects of organic mulches on soil microfauna in the root zone of apple: Implications for nutrient fluxes and functional diversity of the soil food web Appl. Soil Ecol. 22 39 54
Gavlak, R.G., Horneck, D.A. & Miller, R.O. 1994 Plant, soil and water reference methods for the western region. Univ. of Alaska, Fairbanks
Ingham, E.R. & Klein, D.A. 1984 Soil fungi: Relationships between hyphal activity and staining with fluorescein diacetate Soil Biol. Biochem. 16 273 278
Khan, S.A., Mulvaney, R.L. & Hoeft, R.G. 2001 A simple soil test for detecting sites that are nonresponsive to nitrogen fertilization Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 65 1751 1760
Jensen, M.E., Wright, J.L. & Pratt, B.J. 1971 Estimating soil moisture depletion from climate, crop, and soil data Trans. Amer. Soc. Agr. Eng. 14 954 959
Jury, W.A., Gardner, W.R. & Gardner, W.H. 1991 Soil physics. 5th ed. Wiley, New York
Kuehl, R.O. 1994 Statistical principles of research design and analysis. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA
Laurent, A.S., Merwin, I.A. & Thies, J.E. 2008 Long-term orchard groundcover management systems affect soil microbial communities and apple replant disease severity Plant Soil 304 209 225
Leece, D.R. 1976 Diagnosis of nutritional disorders of fruit trees by leaf and soil analyses and biochemical indices J. Austral. Inst. Agr. Sci. 42 3 19
Lodge, D.J. & Ingham, E.R. 1991 A comparison of agar film techniques for estimating fungal biovolumes in litter and soil Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 34 131 144
Merwin, I.A., Ray, J.A., Steenhuis, T.S. & Boll, J. 1996 Groundcover management systems influence fungicide and nitrate-N concentrations in leachate and runoff from a New York apple orchard J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121 249 257
Merwin, I.A., Stiles, W.C. & Vanes, H.M. 1994 Orchard groundcover management impacts on soil physical properties J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119 216 222
Nakamoto, T. & Tsukamoto, M. 2006 Abundance and activity of soil organisms in fields of maize grown with a white clover living mulch Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 115 34 42
Neilsen, D., Millard, P., Herbert, L.C., Neilsen, G.H., Hogue, E.J., Parchomchuk, P. & Zebarth, B.J. 2001 Remobilization and uptake of N by newly planted apple (Malus domestica) trees in response to irrigation method and timing of N application Tree Physiol. 21 513 521
Patten, K.D., Patterson, M.E. & Kupferman, E. 1983 Reducing surface pitting in sweet cherries. Post Harvest Pomol. Nwsl. Vol. 1. Washington State Univ., Tree Fruit Res. Ext. Ctr., Pullman
Patten, K.D., Patterson, M.E. & Kupferman, E. 2006 Reduction of surface pitting in sweet cherries. 19 Sept. 2010. <http://postharvest.tfrec.wsu.edu/pgDisplay.php?article=N1I2C>
Paul, E.A. & Clark, F.E. 1988 Soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego
Sapers, G.M. 1994 Color characteristics and stability of nonbleeding cocktail cherries dyed with carotenoid pigments J. Food Sci. 59 135 138
Shock, C.C., Feibert, E.B.G., Saunders, L.D. & Klauzer, J. 2007 Deficit irrigation for optimum alfalfa seed yield and quality Agron. J. 99 992 998
Shribbs, J.M. & Skroch, W.A. 1986 Influence of 12 ground cover systems on young ‘Smoothee Golden Delicious’ apple trees: I. Growth J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111 525 528
Sirrine, J.R., Letourneau, D.K., Shennan, C., Sirrine, D., Fouch, R., Jackson, L. & Mages, A. 2008 Impacts of groundcover management systems on yield, leaf nutrients, weeds, and arthropods of tart cherry in Michigan, USA Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 125 239 245
Spreer, W., Ongprasert, S., Hegele, M., Wunsche, J. & Muller, J. 2009 Yield and fruit development in mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. Chok Anan) under different irrigation regimes Agr. Water Mgt. 96 574 584
U.S. Department of Agriculture 1975 Soil survey of Wasco County, Oregon Northern Part. Natl. Coop. Soil Survey, Washington DC
Watson, M.E. & Brown, J.R. 1998 pH and lime requirement, p. 13–16. In: J.R. Brown (ed.). Recommended chemical soil test procedures for the north central region. North Central Region Res. Publ. No. 221. Univ. of Missouri, Columbia
Weather Underground 2012 Local weather. 27 May 2012. <http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KDLS/2008/7/1/MonthlyHistory.html>