Cut flowers are highly perishable and complex plant organs that need to be properly handled and stored to preserve their value and quality (Reid, 2002). In some species, quality may be lost due to foliage or petal abscission, leaf chlorosis, geotropic stem bending, excessive respiration/transpiration, or storage/handling at high temperatures (Joyce, 1988; Maxie et al., 1973; Reid, 2002). To slow down senescence, storage facilities must be available and storage methods well planned before harvest to preserve product quality during handling and transit and reduce transportation cost (Jones and Moody, 1993; Macnish et al., 2009a). Appropriate cut flower storage facilities also allow product to be accumulated for holidays and special events, when demand exceeds supply, to increase profitability.
Cut stems placed in water will develop a negative water balance when water uptake is less than water loss. This situation is often the result of xylem plugging at the stem base (van Meeteren et al., 2006); however, time to develop a negative water balance varies among species. In chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium), negative water balance can develop a few hours after putting stems in water. A negative balance can also develop rapidly in stems that are stored dry before placement in water because of air uptake by the cut stem end (van Doorn, 1990; van Meeteren, 1992). Although aspired air did not cause embolisms in dry-stored stems of some rose cultivars, cavitations in the xylem resulted in most of the rapid blockage observed in dry-stored stems (Loubaud and van Doorn, 2004; van Doorn, 1997). Water stress resulting from restricted water uptake in turn reduces the turgor-derived strength in cut stems (Burdett, 1970) leaving only structural strength to keep stems upright. Turgor loss can also be caused by physiological plugging (Durkin and Kuc, 1966), microbial stem occlusion (Aarts, 1957), or a general physiological decline (Rasmussen and Carpenter, 1974).
Both dry and wet storage have advantages and disadvantages for cut stem storage and longevity. Generally, for long term, stems should be stored dry, while for shorter periods (1–4 weeks), storage in water or a preservative solution is preferred (Reid, 2002; Sacalis, 1993). Dry storage saves space in coolers by allowing more stems to be stored in a small space; however, dry storage can be more labor intensive and costly because of packing and the need to recut stems after storage. Moreover, some species do not adapt well to dry storage; for example, dahlia (Dahlia hybrids), freesia (Freesia hybrida), gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii), and gypsophila (Gypsophila elegans) (Nowak and Rudnicki, 1990). Species prone to botrytis (Botrytis cinerea) should be properly treated with fungicide and tissue surfaces dried before storage. Sometimes, pulsing with sugars, antimicrobials, antiethylene substances, or both can maintain flower quality throughout the storage period (Arboleda, 1993; Halevy and Mayak, 1981).
Wet storage of cut flowers is also widely practiced as flowers do not need to be packed and stems maintain good turgor. On the other hand, more space is used by the storage buckets, stems can deplete food reserves rapidly, and buds can open more quickly. Finally, wet storage provides more opportunities for pathogenic contamination, resulting in plugged stem ends, blocked water uptake, accelerated wilting, and ultimately death of the stems (Macnish et al., 2009b; Nell and Reid, 2000). Many researchers feel that the negative effects of water storage are so great that stems should remain dry entirely from harvest until receipt by the retailer and that any hydration of the stems in the marketing chain accelerates bacterial contamination and stem plugging (de Witte and van Doorn, 1988; van Doorn and D’hont, 1994; Zagory and Reid, 1986). Few studies have been conducted to determine if this practice is commercially practical and improves postharvest performance. This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of wet vs. dry storage in maintaining quality and vase life extension of two of the most important U.S. field-grown specialty cut species (lisianthus and zinnia) and two of the most important Pakistan cut flower species (rose and marigold).
ArboledaP.J.A.1993Principios fundamentales de la postcosecha de flores p. 1–44. In: Tercer Seminario Técnico de Floricultura/EXPOFLOR 93. 11–14 June. Huixquilucan State of Mexico Mexico
BarrH.D.WeatherleyP.E.1962A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leavesAust. J. Biol. Sci.15413428
de WitteY.van DoornW.G.1988Identification of bacteria in the vase water of roses, and the effect of the isolated strains on water uptakeSci. Hort.35285291
EvansR.Y.ReidM.S.1988Changes in carbohydrates and osmotic potential during rhythmic expansion of rose petalsJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.113884888
JonesR.MoodyH.1993Caring for cut flowers. Agmedia St. Kilda Australia
LoubaudM.van DoornW.G.2004Wound-induced and bacteria induced xylem blockage in roses, Astilbe, and ViburnumPostharvest Biol. Technol.32281288
MacnishA.J.ReidM.S.JoyceD.C.2009aOrnamentals and cut flowers p. 491–506. In: E.M. Yahia (ed.). Modified and controlled atmospheres for the storage transportation and packaging of horticultural commodities. Taylor & Francis Group Boca Raton FL
MacnishA.J.de TheijeA.ReidM.S.JiangC.Z.2009bAn alternative postharvest handling strategy for cut flowers- Dry handling after harvestActa Hort.847215221
MaxieE.C.FarnhamD.S.MitchellF.G.SommerN.F.ParsonsR.A.SnyderR.G.RaeH.L.1973Temperature and ethylene effects on cut flowers of carnations (Dianthus caryophyllus)J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.98568572
NellT.A.ReidM.S.2000Flower and plant care: The 21st century approach. Society of American Florists Alexandria VA
NicholsR.HoL.C.1975aAn effect of ethylene on the distribution of 14C sucrose from the petals to other flower parts in the senescent cut inflorescence of Dianthus caryophyllusAnn. Bot.39433438
NicholsR.HoL.C.1975bEffects of ethylene and sucrose on translocation of dry matter and 14C sucrose in the cut flower of the glasshouse carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) during senescenceAnn. Bot.39287296
NowakJ.RudnickiR.M.1990Postharvest handling and storage of cut flowers florist greens and potted plants. Timber Press Portland OR
RasmussenH.P.CarpenterW.J.1974Changes in the vascular morphology of cut rose stems: A scanning electron microscopy studyJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.99454495
ReidM.S.2002Postharvest handling systems: Ornamental crops p. 315–325. In: A.A. Kader (ed.). Postharvest technology of horticultural crops. University of California Oakland
SacalisJ.N.1993Cut flowers: Prolonging freshness p. 52–54. In: J.L. Seals. (ed.). Post production care and handling. 2nd ed. Ball Publ. Batavia IL
TwumasiP.van IeperenW.WolteringE.J.EmonsA.M.C.SchelJ.H.N.SnelJ.F.H.van MeeterenU.van MarwijkD.2005Effects of water stress during growth on xylem anatomy, xylem functioning and vase life in three Zinnia elegans cultivarsActa Hort.669303312
van DoornW.G.D’hontK.1994Interaction between the effects of bacteria and dry storage on the opening and water relations of cut rose flowersJ. Appl. Bacteriol.77644649
van MeeterenU.van GelderA.Van IeperenW.2005Effect of growth conditions on postharvest rehydration ability of cut chrysanthemum flowersActa Hort.669287296
van MeeterenU.Arévalo-GalarzaL.van DoornW.G.2006Inhibition of water uptake after dry storage of cut flowers: Role of aspired air and wound-induced processes in ChrysanthemumPostharvest Biol. Technol.417077