Enhanced efficiency fertilizers (EEF) are a group of fertilizers that reduce the risk of nutrient loss to the environment and subsequently increase fertilizer use efficiency (Slater, 2010). This increase may be accomplished through maintaining nutrients in the root zone by physical barriers (coating), reduced solubility, or retaining nutrients in a less leachable form (Trenkel, 2010). There are three subgroups of EEFs with different characteristics for horticultural production systems. Slow-release fertilizers (SRFs) contain N in a less-soluble, plant-unavailable form that usually need to be microbially degraded into plant available N. Stabilized fertilizers are a group of fertilizers that have a chemical inhibitor to either stop the oxidation of ammonium (NH4+) to nitrate (NO3−) by bacteria or to slow the enzymatic transformation of urea to NH4+ (Trenkel, 1997). Controlled-release fertilizers, the last subgroup of EEFs, are urea, ammonium nitrate, potassium nitrate, or other soluble fertilizer materials coated with a polymer (polyethylene and ethylene-vinyl-acetate or thermoplastics), resin (a subgroup of polymers and refers as alkyd-type resins and polyurethane-like coatings), sulfur, or a hybrid of sulfur-coated urea (SCU) coated with a polymer or resin. These coated materials release nutrients in water at a predictable rate when used at the manufacturer specified temperature (e.g., 25 °C) (Trenkel, 2010). The European Committee for Standardization's (2002) method determines nutrient release time based on 75% nutrient release from CRFs.
The European Union has developed both standard and accelerated laboratory procedures for measuring N release from CRFs; however, researchers in the United States are still developing a universal test for CRFs and SRFs for commerce purposes (European Committee for Standardization, 2002; Sartain et al., 2004). Growth chamber and greenhouse methods are used to evaluate or compare how CRFs will act in a particular controlled environment (Broschat and Moore, 2007; Huett and Gogel, 2000). Lastly, field methods are used to measure N release in commercial vegetable field conditions (Simonne and Hutchinson, 2005). Each research method has its own advantages and disadvantages (Engelsjord et al., 1996; Sartain et al., 2004; Simonne and Hutchinson, 2005). Therefore, the objective of this publication is to describe and summarize laboratory, growth chamber, greenhouse, and field methods currently used to measure CRF-N release on vegetable production using the research literature.
AbrahamJ.Rajasekharan PillaiV.N.1996Membrane-encapsulated controlled-release urea fertilizers based on acrylamide copolymersJ. Appl. Polym. Sci.6023472351
BroschatT.K.2005Rates of ammonium-nitrogen, nitrate-nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from two controlled-release fertilizers under different substrate environmentsHortTechnology15332335
BroschatT.K.MooreK.K.2007Release rates of ammonium-nitrogen, nitrate-nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, iron, and manganese from seven controlled-release fertilizersCommun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.38843850
DaiJ.FanX.YuJ.LiuF.ZhangQ.2008Study on the rapid method to predict longevity of controlled release fertilizer coated by water soluble resinAgr. Sci. China711271132
DuC.ZhouJ.ShavivA.2006Release characteristics of nutrients from polymer-coated compound controlled release fertilizersJ. Polymers Environ.14223230
European Committee for Standardization2002Slow-release fertilizers: Determination of the of the nutrients-method for coated fertilizers. EN 13266:2001. European Committee for Standardization Brussels Belgium.
FraisseC.W.HuZ.SimonneE.H.2010Effect of El Nino-southern oscillation on the number of leaching rain events in Florida and implications on nutrient management for tomatoHortTechnology20120132
GandezaA.T.ShojiS.YamadaI.1991Simulation of crop response to polyolefin-coated urea: I. Field dissolutionSoil Sci. Soc. Amer. J.5514621467
GreenbergA.E.TrussellR.R.ClersceriL.S.1985Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 16th ed. Amer. Public Health Assn. Washington DC.
GuilbaultG.G.SmithR.K.MontalvoJ.G.1969Use of ion selective electrodes in enzymic analysis. Cation electrodes for deaminase enzyme systemsAnal. Chem.41600605
HaaseD.L.AlzugarayP.RoseR.JacobsD.F.2007Nutrient-release rates of controlled-release fertilizers in forest soilCommun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.38739750
HuettD.O.GogelB.J.2000Longevities and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium release patterns of polymer-coated controlled-release fertilizers at 30°C and 40°CCommun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.31959973
JacobsD.F.RoseR.HaaseD.L.2003Development of douglas-fir seedling root architecture in response to localized nutrient supplyCan. J. For. Res.33118125
LammelJ.2005Cost of the different options available to farmers: Current situation and prospects. Intl. Wkshp Enhanced-Efficiency Fert. Frankfurt Germany 28–30 June 2005. Intl. Fert. Assn. Paris.
LamontG.P.WorrallR.J.O'ConnellM.A.1987The effects of temperature and time on the solubility of resin-coated controlled-release fertilizers under laboratory and field conditionsSci. Hort.32265273
LatimerG.2010Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. AOAC Intl. Gaitherburg MD.
MedinaC.2006Nutrient release patterns of coated fertilizers used for citrus production and their effect on fruit yield and foliar nutrition. Univ. Florida Gainesville MS Thesis.
MedinaL.C.ObrezaT.A.SartainJ.B.RouseR.E.2008Nitrogen release patterns of a mixed controlled-release fertilizer and its componentsHortTechnology18475480
PackJ.E.HutchinsonC.M.SimonneE.H.2006Evaluation of controlled-release fertilizers for northeast Florida chip potato productionJ. Plant Nutr.2913011313
Perez-GarciaS.Fernandez-PerezM.Villafranca-SanchezM.Gonzalez-PradasE.Flores-CespedesF.2007Controlled release of ammonium nitrate from ethylcellulose coated formulationsInd. Eng. Chem. Res.4633043311
SalmanO.A.HovakeemianG.KhraishiN.1989Polyethylene-coated urea. 2. Urea release as affected by coating material, soil type and temperatureInd. Eng. Chem. Res.28633638
SartainJ.B.HallW.L.LittellR.C.HopwoodE.W.2004New tools for the analysis and characterization of slow-release fertilizers p. 180–195. In: W.L. Hall and W.P. Robarge (eds.). Environmental impact of fertilizer on soil and water. Amer. Chem. Soc. Washington DC.
SatoS.MorganK.T.2008Nitrogen recovery and transformation from a surface or sub-surface application of controlled-release fertilizer on a sandy soilJ. Plant Nutr.3122142231
SavantN.K.ClemmonsJ.R.JamesA.F.1982A technique for predicting urea release from coated urea in wetland soilCommun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.13793802
SimonneE.H.HutchinsonC.M.2005Controlled-release fertilizers for vegetable production in the era of best management practices: Teaching new tricks to an old dogHortTechnology153646
SlaterJ.V.2010Official publication AAPFCO. Assn. Amer. Plant Food Control Officials West Lafayette IN.
TrenkelM.E.1997Controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers in agriculture. Intl. Fert. Ind. Assn. Paris.
TrenkelM.E.2010Slow- and controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers: An option for enhancing nutrient use efficiency in agriculture. 2nd ed. Intl. Fert. Ind. Assn. Paris.
WilsonM.L.RosenC.J.MoncriefJ.F.2009A comparison of techniques for determining nitrogen release from polymer-coated urea in the fieldHortScience44492494
ZvomuyaF.RosenC.J.RusselleM.P.GuptaS.C.2003Nitrate leaching and nitrogen recovery following application of polyolefin-coated urea to potatoJ. Environ. Qual.32480489