Abstract
This study investigated the impact of the heavy oil fly ash landfill at Rabigh governorate, Saudi Arabia, on the growth and heavy metal accumulation in the indigenous plants Zygophyllum coccineum L. and Leptadenia pyrotechnica L. Samples of these two plant species together with the soil were collected from inside the landfill and at distances of 250, 500, and 1000 m away from the landfill in the north, east, west, and south locations. Data of the fresh and dry weights of the plant samples (aerial parts and roots) were collected and elemental analyses of the plant samples were conducted. The results showed that vegetation within the landfill exhibited the lowest overall fresh and dry biomass values of aerial and root parts. However, growth progressively improved with the increasing distance, with maximum growth reached at 1000 m from the landfill. Metal concentrations were highest in the samples collected from inside the landfill, and they diminished with increasing distance away from it. Plants located in the south exhibited the greatest metal deposition. Roots consistently surpassed aerial parts in terms of metal accumulation, both proximally and distally. Sulfur, aluminum, and iron were the predominant elements accumulated in Z. coccineum and L. pyrotechnica plants across all sites and distances from the landfill. The sequence of heavy metal concentrations from highest to lowest in the roots and shoots was as follows: sulfur > aluminum > iron > zinc > manganese > nickel > chromium > vanadium > copper > cobalt. The plants exhibited elevated chromium levels that surpassed the European Union (2002) requirements; however, they remained below Indian regulations. Zinc concentrations, however, exceeded both the European Union and World Health Organization (WHO)/Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) guidelines. All other heavy metals were within the permissible levels established by the WHO/FAO, European Union, and Indian regulations. The translocation factor for heavy metals from roots to shoots was less than one for all 10 metals, signifying metal build-up in roots relative to the shoots. It could be concluded that there is a significant relationship between the plant growth rate and magnitude of metal accumulation. Plants with the lowest growth rate exhibited the highest heavy metals accumulation, as seen at the southern location, whereas plants with the highest growth rate (those at the northern location) had the least metal accumulation. This phenomenon highlights the potential of these plants for phytoremediation and phytostabilization to extract deleterious heavy metals from contaminated landfill soils.
Saudi Arabia is a country that consumes large quantities of heavy oil in water desalination operations and power plants, with over 40 million metric tons of oil consumed every year, resulting in the production of large quantities of heavy oil fly ash (HOFA) (Al-Malack et al. 2013). Increasing industrialization and urbanization have posed a serious threat to the environment (Amen et al. 2020). In Saudi Arabia, power stations and water desalination plants generate large amounts of HOFA, which is acidic and contains highly toxic elements, by using heavy oil as fuel (Al-Solaimani et al. 2024; Bakkar et al. 2023). Because HOFA is typically disposed of in landfills, it may pose significant risks to the surrounding environment and have adverse effects on plants as well as ground and surface waters (Al-Malack et al. 2016).
Because HOFA contains significant amounts of heavy metals, which are mostly disposed of in landfills, it is considered hazardous waste (Bakkar et al. 2023). Rainwater percolates through HOFA deposited in the landfill, leading to the decomposition of the moist waste, which results in the formation of liquid effluent known as landfill leachate (Costa et al. 2019). Consequently, the growth of resident plants is reduced by these leachates (Attalage et al. 2023). This statement has been confirmed by several previous studies, including one by the current authors in which it was evident that planting common sage plants and lemongrass plants in HOFA soil significantly decreased the growth and biomass of both plant species and common sage accumulated more elements than lemongrass (Al-Solaimani et al. 2024). Reduction in the growth of landfill-growing plants in Korea has been reported by Wong (1995), and reductions in alder, willow, and poplar trees planted in four landfill sites in Merseyside that showed inhibition and reduction in growth have been reported by Dobson and Moffat (1999). In their recent publication, Al-Solaimani et al. (2022) confirmed that all heavy metals (excluding cadmium) were concentrated in the fine roots of mangrove plants.
Several methods are used to clean environments polluted by these contaminants. One of these methods is phytoremediation, whereby plants are used to remediate landfill-polluted soils from toxic heavy metals. Phytoremediation has become an effective and affordable technological solution for extracting or removing metal pollutants from polluted soils. Phytoremediation involves the use of plant species as extractors and translocators of heavy metals, as well as other toxic substances, from contaminated soil. Several plant species possess genetic capabilities to remove, degrade, metabolize, or immobilize a wide range of contaminants through natural biochemical processes, including adsorption, transport and translocation, hyperaccumulation, transformation, and mineralization. These processes remediate pollutant materials, thus making the soil more favorable for plant growth (Islam et al. 2007; Meagher 2000). Some plants withstand high concentrations of heavy metals, absorb these toxic metals, and help clean polluted sites (Mudgal et al. 2010). Highly accumulating plants are known as plants that can withstand and accumulate large concentrations of minerals in their vegetative parts (Kamnev and Van der Lelie 2000; Macnair 2003). Ideal plants for these processes must exhibit rapid growth rates, dense and deep roots, substantial biomass production, and ease of harvesting (Alkorta et al. 2004). Several treatments can alleviate the adverse effects of metal toxicity on plant growth, such as amending contaminated soil with EDTA or treating plants with jasmonic acid (Ibrahim et al. 2022). Thus, plants’ abilities to extract heavy metals from soil can be enhanced.
Many plant species have succeeded in absorbing heavy metals from polluted soils (Atkinson et al. 2010). Nevertheless, the search for more efficient phytoremediator species continues, with a focus on evaluating native plants. In the current study, two plant species naturally growing in the study site were targeted. Zygophyllum coccineum is commonly found in limestone “wadis” and plains of the Eastern desert in Saudi Arabia and demonstrates high salinity tolerance (Al-Salihi and Al-Rammahi 2014). Morphologically, Z. coccineum is a small shrub, perennial herb, or desert succulent undershrub that can reach up to 75 cm in height and is characterized by erect multistemmed green branches (Reed 1997). It is not used for grazing or as a fuel source (Al-Salihi and Al-Rammahi 2014). Z. coccineum is rich in saponins, with the major secondary metabolites being a class of quinovic acid compounds that belong to the ursane-type triterpene saponins (Ahmad et al. 2012). The other species is Leptadenia pyrotechnica, which belongs to the Asclepiadaceae family (Ram et al. 2008). Being highly drought-resistant, this herb thrives in areas that receive 100 to 450 mm of annual rainfall. This herb is a strong soil binder and serves as a pioneer species for stabilizing sand dunes (Choudhary et al. 2014). It grows on sand dunes, coastal dunes, and temporary riverbeds and thrives on well-drained sandy soils at altitudes ranging from sea level to 1000 m. It inhibits acacia grassland, deciduous bushland, and grassland in semiarid areas. Additionally, it can tolerate high pH and elevated sodium and potassium levels (Ram 2008).
Accordingly, the current study aimed to investigate the impact of the HOFA landfill at Rabigh governate, Saudi Arabia, on the growth of the indigenous shrubs Z. coccineum and L. pyrotechnica and their accumulation of heavy metals. The study also evaluated the spatial distribution of heavy metals around the landfill and assessed the phytoremediation potential of the two shrubs in terms of metal uptake and translocation.
Materials and Methods
Two plant species, Z. coccineum (Fig. 1A) and Leptadenia pyrotechnica (Fig. 1B), naturally growing at the Rabigh landfill were selected, and their efficiency as phytoremediators for removing toxic heavy metals from the landfill site was evaluated.
Zygophyllum coccineum L. (A) and Leptadenia pyrotechnica (B) naturally growing in the landfill experimental site that were studied for their phytoremediation ability.
Citation: HortScience 60, 3; 10.21273/HORTSCI18357-24
Study area
The landfill selected for the study is located in the Rabigh governorate, Saudi Arabia, which covers an area of 222 m × 1054 m (lat. 20°37′23′′N, long. 39°56′4.52′′E) (Fig. 2).
Map of the study area at the Rabigh landfill located in the Rabigh governorate, Saudi Arabia.
Citation: HortScience 60, 3; 10.21273/HORTSCI18357-24
Collection and analysis of plant samples
For each plant species, 36 samples (plants) were collected from both inside and outside the landfill at distances of 250, 500, and 1000 m away from the landfill at the north, east, west, and south locations. Sampling locations at the inside and outside of the landfill are illustrated in Figs. 3 and 4, respectively. Plant samples were separated into roots and shoots (aerial parts), and their fresh weights were recorded. The samples were washed with distilled water and dried in an oven at 70 °C. After 48 h, the dried samples were weighed, finely ground, and passed through a 2-mm sieve. Subsequently, 0.5 g of the plant material from each treatment was dry-ashed for 5 h at 550 °C and extracted with 20% HCl in triplicate (Jones et al. 1991). Elemental analyses were conducted for silver (Ag), aluminum (Al), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), sulfur (S), antimony (Sb), selenium (Se), tin (Sn), thallium (Tl), vanadium (V), and zinc (Zn) in the plant extracts using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (Ultima 2; Horiba Jobin Yvon, Unterhaching, Germany).
Sampling locations inside the landfill site. The green numbered circles represent the samples collected from various locations inside the landfill site.
Citation: HortScience 60, 3; 10.21273/HORTSCI18357-24
Sampling locations outside the landfill site. The green numbered circles represent the samples collected from various locations inside the landfill site.
Citation: HortScience 60, 3; 10.21273/HORTSCI18357-24
Collection and analysis of soil samples
Soil samples were collected from the same locations illustrated in Figs. 3 and 4 at two depths, 0 to 15 cm and 15 to 30 cm, resulting in a total of 72 soil samples. The collected samples were stored in polyethylene bags for further analysis. Collected soil samples were subjected to the measurements of electrical conductivity (EC; ds·m−1) and pH.
Statistical analysis.
Data were subjected to analysis of variance, and the revised least significant difference test was also performed to quantify the level of significance among treatments (P > 0.05) (SPSS version 22; IBM, Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Soil analysis
Table 1 shows that the soil at the southern location had the highest pH, followed by the soil in the eastern, western, and northern locations, respectively. Regarding soil EC, the highest EC was at the southern location, followed by the eastern, western, and northern locations. According to the distance from the landfill, the highest pH and EC were found in the soil inside the landfill, and then it decreased with an increase in distance from 0, 250, 500, and 1000 m away from the landfill.
Means of pH and electrical conductivity (EC) of soil samples collected from different locations (north, south, west, east), distances (250, 500, and 1000 m), and soil depths (0–15 cm and 15–30 cm) across the landfill site.
Plants growth
Effect of location.
The growth of the two species was significantly affected by the different locations at which the plant species were growing and attained different growth rates at different locations (Tables 2 and 3). Plant species growing in the northern direction of the landfill attained the highest values of fresh and dry weights of shoots, roots, and total biomass compared with those of the other plants growing in the other locations (east, west, and south). In the northern location, fresh and dry weights, respectively, of Z. coccineum were as follows: shoots, 2034.69 and 905.34 g; roots, 98.38 and 69.02 g; and total biomass, 2133.08 and 974.36 g. Those for L. pyrotechnica were as follows: shoots, 2533.5 and 1662 g; roots, 354.5 and 235.5 g; and total biomass, 2888.5 and 2147.5 g. Plants growing in the southern area had the lowest mean fresh and dry weights, respectively, of shoots (936.82 and 572.66 g), roots (52.56 and 31.11 g), and total biomass (989.38 and 603.78 g) for Z. coccineum, and of shoots (1461.25 and 1100.5 g), roots (135 and 82.25 g), and total biomass (1621.5 and 1193.25 g) for L. pyrotechnica.
Means of the total fresh weight and dry weight of Zygophyllum coccineum under the effects of location (north, south, west, east) and distance (250, 500, and 1000 m) across the landfill site.
Means of the total fresh weight and dry weight of L. pyrotechnica under the effects of location (north, south, west, east) and distance (250, 500, and 1000 m) across the landfill area.
Effect of distance from the landfill.
The growth of the two naturally occurring plant species was significantly affected by their distance from the landfill. Their growth rates differed as the distance from the landfill increased. The results presented in Table 2 indicate that the plants growing inside the landfill had the least growth parameters, with Z. coccineum attaining fresh and dry biomass of 231.13 and 109.72 g for shoots, 25.35 and 11.9 g for roots, and 256.79 and 121.71 g for total biomass, respectively. Likewise, L. pyrotechnica had fresh and dry biomass values of 336.5 and 261.5 g for shoots, 90 and 65 g for roots, and 458.75 and 327.5 g for total biomass, respectively (Table 3). However, the highest growth metrics were attained by plants located 1000 m from the landfill. The fresh and dry biomass values of Z. coccineum reached 2237.07 and 1046.1 g for shoots, 122.73 and 75.23 g for roots, and 2359 and 1121.23 g for total biomass, respectively. A similar trend was recorded for L. pyrotechnica, with fresh and dry biomass values of 3125.5 and 2092.5 g for shoots, 365.5 and 261.5 g for roots, and 3491 and 2354 g for total biomass, respectively.
Effect of the combination of location and distance from the landfill.
There was a gradual increase in the total biomass growth of the two plant species with the increase in distance from 0 to 1000 m away from the landfill at all four locations. Plants located north of the landfill attained the best growth regardless of the distance from the landfill area, while those growing south of the landfill attained the lowest growth compared with that at the other sites (Fig. 5).
Plant total biomass under the effect of the combination of location and distance from the landfill: (A) Zygophyllum coccineum and (B) Leptadenia pyrotechnica. Values are represented as the mean ± standard error indicated by the vertical bars.
Citation: HortScience 60, 3; 10.21273/HORTSCI18357-24
Heavy metals accumulated by the two naturally growing plant species: Z. coccineum and L. pyrotechnica
Effect of location.
Tables 4 and 5 list the accumulation of heavy metals (S, Zn, Mn, Cu, Al, Co, Cr, Ni, and V) in the tissues of the two naturally growing plant species across all growth locations. The highest metal accumulation rates were observed in plants growing in the southern location, followed by those growing in the east. Plants growing in the north accumulated the least amount of heavy metals compared with those growing at the other locations. Among all heavy metals, S showed the highest accumulation level (7722.30 and 6265.5 mg/km), followed by Al (1197.60 and 371.71 mg/kg), and Fe (816.68 and 312.40 mg/km) for Z. coccineum and L. pyrotechnica, respectively. However, the elements with the lowest content in the plants included Zn, Mn, Ni, V, Cr, Cu, and Co.
Accumulation of heavy metals in shoots and roots of Z. coccineum.
Accumulation of heavy metals in shoots and roots of L. pyrotechnica.
Effect of distance from the landfill.
There was also a significant difference in the accumulated heavy metals content of both plant species growing at different distances from the landfill area (Tables 4 and 5). The amount of accumulated heavy metals in plants decreased with increasing distance from the landfill. A greater concentration of heavy metals was observed in plant species growing inside the landfill, and they gradually decreased in plants growing outside the landfill at distances of 250, 500, and 1000 m. The accumulation of metals was significantly higher in the roots compared with that in the shoots of both Z. coccineum and L. pyrotechnica at all locations and distances away from the landfill. Notably, the concentration of Ni exceeded the permissible limits specified in the Indian standards (Awashthi 2000).
Accumulation of heavy metals in shoots and roots of plants.
The results indicated that the two plant species studied accumulated 10 types of heavy metals at a significantly higher rate in their roots than that in their shoots (Tables 4 and 5). Additionally, S was accumulated at rates of 11,238.21 mg/kg in roots and 3149.27 mg/km in shoots of Z. coccineum, and at rates of 5775.50 mg/km in roots and 2862.62 mg/km in shoots of L. pyrotechnica.
Combined effect of location and distance from the landfill.
When the combined effect of the two factors, location and distance, was considered, it was clear that the accumulation of 10 heavy metals was significantly higher in Z. coccineum L. and L. pyrotechnica L. plants growing inside the landfill site at all locations (south, east, west, and north), and then it gradually decreased with increasing distance from the landfill (250, 500, and 1000 m). The highest metal concentrations were found in plants growing at the southern location at all distances, followed by accumulation in plants growing at the eastern, western, and northern locations, which represent the locations with the lowest accumulation (Figs. 6–15).
Concentrations of sulfur (A) and zinc (B) in tissues of Z. coccineum under the effects of the interaction between location and distance across the landfill site. Values are represented as the mean ± standard error indicated by the vertical bars.
Citation: HortScience 60, 3; 10.21273/HORTSCI18357-24
Concentrations of iron (A) and copper (B) in tissues of Z. coccineum under the effects of the interaction between location and distance across the landfill site. Values are represented as the mean ± standard error indicated by the vertical bars.
Citation: HortScience 60, 3; 10.21273/HORTSCI18357-24
Concentrations of manganese (A) and aluminum (B) in tissues of Z. coccineum under the effects of the interaction between location and distance across the landfill site. Values are represented as the mean ± standard error indicated by the vertical bars.
Citation: HortScience 60, 3; 10.21273/HORTSCI18357-24
Concentrations of cobalt (A) and chromium (B) in tissues of Z. coccineum under the effects of the interaction between location and distance across the landfill site. Values are represented as the mean ± standard error indicated by the vertical bars.
Citation: HortScience 60, 3; 10.21273/HORTSCI18357-24
Concentrations of nickel (A) and vanadium (B) in tissues of Z. coccineum under the effects of the interaction between location and distance across the landfill site. Values are represented as the mean ± standard error indicated by the vertical bars.
Citation: HortScience 60, 3; 10.21273/HORTSCI18357-24
Concentrations of sulfur (A) and iron (B) in tissues of L. pyrotechnica under the effects of the interaction between location and distance across the landfill site. Values are represented as the mean ± standard error indicated by the vertical bars.
Citation: HortScience 60, 3; 10.21273/HORTSCI18357-24
Concentrations of zinc (A) and manganese (B) in tissues of L. pyrotechnica under the effects of the interaction between location and distance across the landfill site. Values are represented as the mean ± standard error indicated by the vertical bars.
Citation: HortScience 60, 3; 10.21273/HORTSCI18357-24
Concentrations of copper (A) and nickel (B) in tissues of L. pyrotechnica under the effects of the interaction between location and distance across the landfill site. Values are represented as the mean ± standard error indicated by the vertical bars.
Citation: HortScience 60, 3; 10.21273/HORTSCI18357-24
Concentrations of vanadium (A) and chromium (B) in tissues of L. pyrotechnica under the effects of the interaction between location and distance across the landfill site. Values are represented as the mean ± standard error indicated by the vertical bars.
Citation: HortScience 60, 3; 10.21273/HORTSCI18357-24
Concentrations of cobalt (A) and aluminum (B) in tissues of L. pyrotechnica under the effects of the interaction between location and distance across the landfill site. Values are represented as the mean ± standard error indicated by the vertical bars.
Citation: HortScience 60, 3; 10.21273/HORTSCI18357-24
Discussion
This study was conducted to investigate the distribution of heavy metal contents in a HOFA-deposited landfill at Rabigh governorate, Saudi Arabia, and its impact on plant growth inside and outside the landfill area. Two naturally growing indigenous plant species, Z. coccineum and L. pyrotechnica, were selected for this study, and their phytoremediation capabilities were evaluated.
There was a negative impact of proximity to a landfill on plant growth, with the healthiest plants found at a distance of 1000 m from the landfill. Northern locations showed the strongest growth, while southern locations showed the weakest growth. Overall, growth improved as the distance from the landfill increased in all directions. These results are consistent with those of Attalage et al. (2023), who reported that landfill leachate reduced plant growth. Dobson and Moffat (1999) observed growth inhibition of alder trees, willows, and poplars when planted in four landfill sites in Merseyside. Wong (1995) reported reduced plant growth of plants growing in landfills in Korea. Because it contains considerable amounts of heavy metals and is mostly deposited in landfills, HOFA is considered hazardous waste (Bakkar et al. 2023). Rainwater percolates through the HOFA deposited in the landfill, and the waste becomes moist and undergoes decomposition, resulting in the formation of a liquid effluent called landfill leachate (Costa et al. 2019). Many contaminants have been identified in landfill leachate, including organic carbon, fatty acids, inorganic compounds, chlorides, ammonium, phosphates, nitrates, heavy metals, benzene, phenols, and phthalates (Kumari et al. 2016). Attalage et al. (2023) reported that HOFA landfill methane displaces oxygen in plant root zones, resulting in stunted plant growth because oxygen is below the required levels for healthy plant growth. Methane produced in the HOFA landfill reduces dissolved oxygen, thus hampering plant growth (Bhalla et al. 2013). Wong and Yu (1989) reported plant toxicity of landfill leachate caused by high nitrogen concentrations, various trace metals, and reduced oxygen. Accordingly, it is more likely that the concentration of these contaminants decreases with increasing distance from the landfill; therefore, plant growth is less affected by these contaminants. The percolation of rainwater through landfill wastes results in leaching, which extends and moves out of the landfill, mostly toward the southern location, resulting in lower growth of the two naturally growing plant species Z. coccineum and L. pyrotechnica at the southern location compared with those at the northern, eastern, and western locations.
Plants near the landfill area showed higher heavy metal accumulation, particularly in the roots, with levels decreasing as the distance from the landfill increased. The southern area had the highest metal accumulation and lowest plant growth, while the northern area had the opposite trend. The most commonly accumulated metals were S, Al, and Fe, but all levels remained below harmful thresholds set by the European Union. The wind direction likely contributes to higher metal levels in the south and east, indicating greater toxic hazards in these areas. The results obtained in this study are consistent with those of other studies. Hredoy et al. (2022) found concentrations of Cr of 2.26 mg/kg and Co of 1.72 mg/kg in all tested plant samples and determined that these values are higher than the allowable limit. Barasarathi et al. (2022) planted Cordyline fruticosa, Duranta variegated, Tradescantia spathacea, and Chlorophylum comosum species at landfill sites They found that they accumulated Cu, Mn, Cr, Zn, Fe, and Ni metals at rates higher than the prescribed limits and found that Mn was the highest element removed by plants. Marañón et al. (2020) reported a significantly higher accumulation of trace elements in the roots than in the shoots of native shrubs in Spain (Populus alba L., Celtis australis L., Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl, and Pinus pinea L.). Banerjee et al. (2020) found that the accumulation of Zn, lead (Pb), Cu, Ni, and Cd in Saccharum spontaneum was higher in the roots than in the shoots. Pathak et al. (2019) found that heavy metals accumulated in the roots of indigenous plants Prosopis juliflora, Ipomea carnea, and Calotropis procana at a higher rate than that in shoots. Aggarwal and Goyal (2007) planted Rephamus sativus, Amaranth sp. Zey mays, Cucurbita pepo, and Brassica juncea Oleiformis in a landfill area, resulting in Oleiformis accumulating high concentrations of Cd, Ni, Cu, Cr, and Zn. Al-Solaimani et al. (2024) planted lemongrass and common sage plants under HOFA landfill soil and found that the two species accumulated heavy metals in their roots at a higher rate than that in shoots. Moreover, an extensive analysis of heavy metal concentrations and translocation in Avicennia marina mangroves grown in the Red Sea has been performed, and the results of studies in the Yanbu region showed that Fe, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn concentrations were highest in fine roots and lowest in aboveground biomass (Abohassan 2013; Al-Solaimani et al. 2022). Rainfall penetrates the deposited HOFA waste, causing decomposition and degradation and releasing many elements, particularly heavy metals. These harmful and toxic elements are high inside the landfill soil, and through their distribution and movement, rainwater decreases gradually with increasing distance from the landfill. This explains the reduction in Z. coccineum and L. pyrotechnica growing away from the landfill. Z. coccineum was able to absorb these 10 studied heavy metals from the soil of the HOFA landfill in its roots and shoots at a rate higher than that of L. pyrotechnica. According to Vargas et al. (2016), the naturally growing plant species Z. coccineum and L. pyrotechnica are phytoremediators and stabilizers.
Conclusion
Often high in toxic metal content and acidic, HOFA is generated from power stations and water desalination plants and is deposited in landfills. In the current study, the bioaccumulation ability of two naturally growing plants, Zygophyllum coccineum and Leptadenia pyrotechnica, inside a HOFA landfill was proven, indicating the future potential to exploit such plants in environmental remediation. Growth and metal accumulation by the plants were significantly affected by the distance from the landfill and location. The weakest plant growth rate correlated with the highest metal accumulation by those plants collected from the northern location, which were those with the least accumulation, whereas the opposite was correct for those at the southern location. The highest heavy metal accumulation occurred in plants growing inside the landfill, then it gradually decreased with increasing distance from the landfill at all locations, with S, Al, and Fe being the metals with the highest accumulation. This negatively correlated with the plant growth, whereby the weakest plant growth was recorded inside the landfill and gradually improved with a progressive increase in distances (250, 500, and 1000 m) away from the landfill. The heavy metals accumulated in plant roots at a significantly higher rate than that in the shoots, resulting in a translocation factor of less than one. This indicates that plants use mechanisms of phytoremediation and phytostabilization and can be considered effective in these roles.
References Cited
Abohassan RA. 2013. Heavy metal pollution in Avicennia marina mangrove systems on the Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabia. JKAU: Met, Env & Arid Land Agric Sci. 24(1):35–53.
Aggarwal H, Goyal D. 2007. Chapter 5: Phytoremediation of some heavy metals by agronomic crops. Deve Environ Sci. 5:79–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-8177(07)05005-X.
Ahmad K, Bhatti IA, Muneer M, Iqbal M, Iqbal Z. 2012. Removal of heavy metals (Zn, Cr, Pb, Cd, Cu and Fe) in aqueous media by calcium carbonate as an adsorbent. Int J Chem Biochem Sci. 2:48–53.
Alkorta I, Hernandez-Allica J, Becerril JM, Amezaga I, Albizu I, Garbisu C. 2004. Recent findings on the phytoremediation of soils contaminated with environmentally toxic heavy metals and metalloids such as zinc, cadmium, lead, and arsenic. Re/Views in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology. 3(1):71–90. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RESB.0000040059.70899.3d.
Al-Malack MH, Bukhari AA, Al-Muhanna HH. 2016. Integrated disposal scheme of heavy fuel oil flyash in Saudi Arabia. Arab J Sci Eng. 41(10):3911–3921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2037-2.
Al-Malack MH, Bukhari AA, Al-Amoudi OS, AlMuhanna HH, Zaidi TH. 2013. Characteristics of fly ash produced at power and water desalination plants firing fuel oil. Int J Environ Res. 7(2):455–466.
Al-Salihi KA, Al-Rammahi HM. 2014. Diarrhea associated with ingestion of Zygophyllum coccineum (Tartir) in camels in the Al-Najaf desert in Iraq. Int J Poisonous Plant Res. 3(1):1–6.
Al-Solaimani SG, Abohassan RA, Alamri DA, Yang X, Rinklebe J, Shaheen SM. 2022. Assessing the risk of toxic metals contamination and phytoremediation potential of mangrove in three coastal sites along the Red Sea. Mar Pollut Bull. 176:113412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113412.
Al-Solaimani SG, Al-Qureshi A, Hindi SS, Ibrahim OH, Mousa MAA, Cho Y-L, Hassan NEE, Liu Y-T, Wang S-L, Antoniadis V, Rinklebe J, Shaheen SM. 2024. Speciation, phytoavailability, and accumulation of toxic elements and sulfur by humic acid-fertilized lemongrass and common sage in a sandy soil treated with heavy oil fly ash: A trial for management of power stations wastes. Sci Total Environ. 945:173998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173998.
Amen R, Bashir H, Bibi I, Shaheen SM, Niazi NK, Shahid M, Hussain MM, Antoniadis V, Shakoor MB, Al-Solaimani SG, Wang H, Bundschuh J, Rinklebe J. 2020. A critical review on arsenic removal from water using biochar-based sorbents: The significance of modification and redox reactions. Chem Eng J. 396:125195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125195.
Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA. 2010. Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: A review. Plant Soil. 337(1-2):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0464-5.
Attalage DS, Hettiaratchi JP, Chu A, Pokhrel D, Jayasinghe PA. 2023. Impact of landfill gas exposure on vegetation in engineered landfill biocover systems implemented to minimize fugitive methane emissions from landfills. IJERPH. 20(5):4448. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054448.
Awashthi SK. 2000. Prevention of food adulteration act no. 37 of 1954. Central and State Rules as Amended for 1999. Ashoka Law House, New Delhi, India.
Bakkar A, Seleman MM, Ahmed MM, Harb S, Goren S, Howsawi E. 2023. Recovery of vanadium and nickel from heavy oil fly ash (HOFA): A critical review. RSC Adv. 13(10):6327–6345. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ra00289f.
Banerjee R, Jana A, De A, Mukherjee A. 2020. Phytoextraction of heavy metals from coal fly ash for restoration of fly ash dumpsites. Bioremediat J. 24(1):41–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10889868.2020.1720590.
Barasarathi J, Auwal H, Pariatamby A, Hamid FS, Uche EC. 2022. Phytoremediation of leachate contaminated soil: A biotechnical option for the bioreduction of heavy metals induced pollution in tropical landfill. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 29(15):22069–22081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17389-3.
Bhalla B, Saini M, Jha M. 2013. Effect of age and seasonal variations on leachate characteristics of municipal solid waste landfill. IJRET. 02(08):223–232. https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2013.0208037.
Choudhary P, Jhajharia A, Singh D. 2014. In vitro approach for callus induction in kheemp [Leptadenia pyrotechnica (Forssk.) Decne]: A multipurpose plant. Int J Agric Sci. 10(2):726–729.
Costa AM, Alfaia RG, Campos JC. 2019. Landfill leachate treatment in Brazil–An overview. J Environ Manage. 232:110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.006.
Dobson MC, Moffat AJ. 1999. Examination of tree and root performance on closed landfills in Merseyside. Arboric J. 23(3):261–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.1999.9747244.
European Union. 2002. Heavy metals in wastes. European Commission on Environment. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/studies/pdf/heavy_metalsreport.pdf. [accessed Mar 2024].
Hredoy RH, Siddique MAB, Akbor MA, Shaikh MAA, Rahman MM. 2022. Impacts of landfill leachate on the surrounding environment: A case study on amin bazar landfill, Dhaka (Bangladesh). Soil Syst. 6(4):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems6040090.
Ibrahim OH, Ali EF, Eissa MA. 2022. Jasmonic acid and EDTA-enhanced Cd and Pb phytoextraction by the halophytic plants quail bush [Atriplex lentiformis (Torr.) S. Wats]. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 22(2):1434–1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00743-2.
Islam EU, Yang XE, He ZL, Mahmood Q. 2007. Assessing potential dietary toxicity of heavy metals in selected vegetables and food crops. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 8(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2007.B0001.
Jones JJ, Wolf B, Mills HA. 1991. Plant analysis handbook: A practical sampling, preparation, analysis, and interpretation guide. Micro-Macro Publishing, Inc., Athens, GA, USA.
Kamnev AA, Van der Lelie D. 2000. Chemical and biological parameters as tools to evaluate and improve heavy metal phytoremediation. Biosci Rep. 20(4):239–258. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026436806319.
Kumari M, Ghosh P, Thakur IS. 2016. Landfill leachate treatment using bacto-algal co-culture: An integrated approach using chemical analyses and toxicological assessment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 128:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.02.009.
Macnair MR. 2003. The hyperaccumulation of metals by plants. Adv Bot Res. 40:63–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2296(05)40002-6.
Marañón T, Navarro-Fernández CM, Gil-Martínez M, Domínguez MT, Madejón P, Villar R. 2020. Variation in morphological and chemical traits of Mediterranean tree roots: Linkage with leaf traits and soil conditions. Plant Soil. 449(1–2):389–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04485-5.
Meagher RB. 2000. Phytoremediation of toxic elemental and organic pollutants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 3(2):153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-5266(99)00054-0.
Mudgal V, Madaan N, Mudgal A. 2010. Heavy metals in plants: Phytoremediation: Plants used to remediate heavy metal pollution. Agric Biol J N Am. 1(1):40–46. http://scihub.org/ABJNA/PDF/2010/1/40-46.pdf.
Pathak B, Rawat K, Fulekar MH. 2019. Heavy metal accumulation by plant species at fly-ash dumpsites: Thermal power plant, Gandhinagar, Gujarat. IJPE. 5(02):111–116. https://doi.org/10.18811/ijpen.v5i02.7.
Ram LC, Jha SK, Tripathi RC, Masto RE, Selvi VA. 2008. Remediation of fly ash landfills through plantation. Remediation. 18(4):71–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.20184.
Reed JD. 1997. Ecological biochemistry of secondary plant compounds in herbivore nutrition, p 8-19. Constraints on animal production from forages and grasslands. Canada. XVIII International Grassland Congress. http://www.internationalgrasslands.org/ files/igc/publications/1997/iii-221.pdf.
Vargas C, Pérez-Esteban J, Escolástico C, Masaguer A, Moliner A. 2016. Phytoremediation of Cu and Zn by vetiver grass in mine soils amended with humic acids. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 23(13):13521–13530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6430-x.
Wong MH. 1995. Growing trees on landfills,p 63–77. In: Moo-Young M, Anderson WA, Chakrabarty AM (eds). Environmental biotechnology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1435-8_6.
Wong MH, Yu CT. 1989. Monitoring of Gin Drinkers’ Bay Landfill, Hong Kong. I. Landfill gas on top of the landfill. Environ Manage. 13(6):743–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01868313.
World Health Organization/Food and Agriculture Organization. 2023. In codex alimentarius international food standards: General standard for contaminants and toxins in food and feed. CXS 193-1995.