Cultivar and Maternal Plant Environment Influence Cold Stratification Requirements and Germination Rates of Vitis Species

Authors:
Safa A. Alzohairy Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; and Agricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza 12619, Egypt

Search for other papers by Safa A. Alzohairy in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Jason P. Londo School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456, USA

Search for other papers by Jason P. Londo in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Claire Heinitz US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Clonal Germplasm Repository, Davis, CA 95616, USA

Search for other papers by Claire Heinitz in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Rachel P. Naegele US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Sugarbeet Research Unit, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA

Search for other papers by Rachel P. Naegele in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close

Click on author name to view affiliation information

Abstract

Open-pollinated seeds from grapevines in Parlier and Davis (in California) and Geneva (in New York) were collected in 2016, 2017, and 2018. Seeds were subjected to a series of cold stratification treatments of varying lengths and germinated in incubators to compare germination rates. Two V. vinifera cultivars (Chardonnay and Cabernet Sauvignon) and three other cultivars (V. labrusca hybrids) with a similar genetic background were compared across three locations to test for maternal environmental effects on germination rates under different cold stratification durations. Two interspecific hybrids (‘Salamander’ and ‘Sovereign Rose’) and three genotypes each from two species, V. riparia and V. cinerea, were evaluated to compare germination rate variability at different cold stratification durations among and within species and hybrids. Large variability in germination rates was evident among and within grape species, with some accessions requiring little to no cold stratification, and others requiring 10 to 12 weeks. These differences could be useful for breeding grapevines with high or low dormancy requirements. The maternal plant environment impacted the seed weight and total seed germination across years and locations.

Keywords: chill; dormancy; grapes

Dormancy, the state in which a tissue or organism is in a temporary state of minimal metabolic activity, can occur as a result of external factors (eco-dormancy) or internal cues (endo-dormancy) in plants. In seeds of some perennial plants, endo-dormancy is used to regulate the timing of germination and may also moderate the spatial distribution of a species (Schutz and Milberg 1997; Van Klinken et al. 2008). Endo-dormancy strength is mediated by both environmental cues experienced by the mother plant (e.g., environmental conditions during seed development) and genetics (Penfield and MacGregor 2017). The genetic mechanisms and environmental factors affecting seed dormancy have been extensively studied in annual model organisms such as Arabidopsis; less is known about the effects of those same factors on seed dormancy in perennial species (Graeber et al. 2012; Leida et al. 2012).

Maternal parent genetics and age of the plant can influence seed endo-dormancy and seedling fitness (Chettoor et al. 2016; Ellner 1986; Miller et al. 2012; Rees 1996; Singh et al. 2017). Paternal effects have a role, but they are less impactful than maternal effects because the tissues surrounding the embryo of the seed are maternally derived, with the exception of some hybrid species (Andersson et al. 2008; Pieskurewicz et al. 2016). In seeds, the maternal environment has been shown to have an important role in seed dormancy affecting germination and seedling vigor (Auge et al. 2017; Bischoff and Muller-Scharer 2010; Cendan et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2014; Fenner 1991; Grass and Burris 1995; Kolodziejek and Patykowaski 2015; Nguyen et al. 2021; Penfield and MacGregor 2017; Roach and Wulff 1987; Sawhney et al. 1984; Seglias et al. 2018). The severity of these effects vary among locations and years (Andersson and Milberg 1998; Hoyle et al. 2014). For some perennial species, lower dormancy is associated with high temperatures, short days, drought, and high nitrogen levels experienced by the maternal parent during seed development (Fenner 1991). These types of environmental conditions can result in physical changes, such as a reduced seedcoat thickness, or epigenetic changes (Iwaski et al. 2019; Penfield and MacGregor 2017).

When comparing dormancy requirements and germination rates among different environments, many studies have relied on populations of perennial or annual plants (Andersson and Milberg 1998; Hoyle et al. 2014; Seglias et al. 2018). For annual plants, environmental conditions can select favorable heritable changes that can be passed to subsequent generations (Piskurewicz et al. 2016). Because each plant has only one opportunity to reproduce, these changes are necessary for the population to survive. For perennials, each plant typically has multiple opportunities to reproduce. This multiyear fertile life span allows more attempts for an individual to create successful progeny. Perennial plants with short seed dispersal ranges were found to preferentially use dormancy to stagger seed germination to increase the likelihood of successful germination and development and minimize competition with the mother plant (Penfield and MacGregor 2017).

Grape, Vitis sp., is a perennial vine that includes more than 80 different species distributed worldwide. European grape (Vitis vinifera), used for raisin and table grape production, is the most important fruit crop in the world; it is valued at $4.7 billion (USD) in the United States and $189 billion globally in 2020 (Statista.com). European grape is clonally propagated and cultivars that are decades to thousands of years old are grown across the world in climates from New York to South Africa. In northern climates, grape vines are subjected to short growing seasons with long days and cool nights; however, in southern climates, the same grapevine cultivars may be exposed to long growing seasons and intense prolonged heat. These divergent environments could have large effects on the rate of germination and seed viability within a cultivar. Low temperatures during anthesis or bloom have been shown to improve germination; however, low temperatures during fruit ripening can reduce germination in some species (Chen et al. 2014). For grape, it is expected that seed dormancy is predominantly controlled by maternal genetics, but the role of maternal environment on cold stratification requirements for germination has not been explored. Even viticulture practices can affect seed development, with one study showing that seed weight could be reduced using minimal pruning systems (Hardie and Aggenbach 1996). Clonally propagated perennial agricultural crops, like grape, provide a unique opportunity to study the effects of the environment and maternal parent on the rate of germination (e.g., loss of endo-dormancy) in a perennial woody species. Improving germination rates and reducing cold stratification requirements can be useful for breeding within different grape classes and may be predictive of bud dormancy requirements, an important consideration for grape cultivar grown in northern regions (Vahdati et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2016).

Grape seed is primarily animal-dispersed, and endo-dormancy is well-documented, with most V. vinifera cultivars requiring a 2- to 3-month stratification period at 4 °C for uniform germination (Wang et al. 2009). Studies have evaluated stratification requirements (time and temperature) for different Vitis species, as well as the effects of water content, phenolic compounds, and treatment with gibberellic acid and hydrogen peroxide. Reports of the stratification (cold treatment) times needed to break dormancy have varied from 8 to 12 weeks (Chohan and Dhillon 1976; Flemion 1937; Kang et al. 1968; Orru et al. 2012; Scott and Ink 1950), depending on the temperature and species evaluated. Treatment with hydrogen peroxide and gibberellic acid was found to improve the percentage of normal germination of Vitis vinifera after only 21 d of cold stratification (Ellis et al. 1983). An inconsistent, but trending, improvement in germination was also observed in muscadine grapes (Vitis rotundifolia) treated with hydrogen peroxide and/or gibberellic acid (Conner 2008). Other studies have determined that oscillating temperatures can break seed endo-dormancy more rapidly than a constant temperature, and that species variability exists (Wang et al. 2009, 2011). However, evaluations of the genetically induced and environment-induced variations in stratification time needed to reduce endo-dormancy within Vitis vinifera and other related Vitis sp. have not been performed.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the variability in seed germination rates for Vitis sp. after exposure to varying cold stratification durations and assess changes in germination rates based on maternal parent location (e.g., environment). These data will provide useful information to improve breeding strategies for selecting grapevines without dormancy requirements and are the first steps in separating genomic from environmental effects surrounding seed dormancy and germination in grape.

Materials and Methods

Seed material and germination experiments.

Mature grape clusters from multiple cultivars were harvested from the US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service of San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center (Parlier, CA), National Clonal Germplasm Repository at University of California Davis Wolfkskill Experimental Orchard (Winters, CA, referred to as Davis for clarity) and the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service Plant Genetics Resources Unit (hybrid genotypes) or Ravines Vineyard (V. vinifera cultivars) (Geneva, NY) (Table 1). For maternal environment comparisons, ‘Chardonnay’ and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ representatives from Geneva, Davis, and Parlier were selected. Vines grown at the Davis repository received minimal care including a single systemic pesticide for phylloxera and other insect management at the beginning of the season, sulfur sprays for powdery mildew management, and cane-pruning to reduce crop load. Vines received no fertilizer. At the Parlier location, vines were treated with synthetic fungicides as needed to manage powdery mildew (approximately every 10 d). No fertilizer was applied, and the crop load was not managed. In Geneva, ‘Iona’ received no nutrients or crop load management. Vines received synthetic fungicides as needed for disease management. Commercially grown vines (‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ and ‘Chardonnay’) collected in Geneva received standard grower practices for fertilizer, crop load, and disease management. The V. labrusca × V. vinifera hybrid cultivars were not replicated across locations, and cultivars with a similar genetic background were used instead. Cultivar Isabel mulata (Davis) is believed to be a sport of Isabella, whereas Iona (Geneva) is an open-pollinated seedling of a V. labrusca × V. vinifera hybrid with features and a flavor profile similar to that of Isabella. ‘Isabella’+ indicates ‘Isabella’-like genotypes and includes ‘Isabella’, ‘Iona’, and ‘Isabel mulata’. Grapes were harvested for seed collection from September to October each year in all locations.

Table 1.

Mature grape cultivars and germplasm materials used in germination experiments.

Table 1.

Clusters were returned to the laboratory and seeds were manually extracted, rinsed, and allowed to air-dry. Seeds with a hard brown seedcoat were considered “ripe”; the surface was disinfested with a 10% bleach solution (0.0825% sodium hypochlorite) for 1 min, rinsed with de-ionized water, and allowed to air-dry for 6 weeks to 2 months, depending on the harvest date. For weeks 10 to 12 in 2018, seeds received an extra 2 to 3 months of maturation time because of disruptions caused by the United States federal government shutdown.

Seed weight was calculated based on the total weight of 50 bulked randomly selected seeds. Fifty seeds from each genotype were placed onto moistened blue blotter seed germination paper (Anchor Paper Co., St. Paul, MN) in clear plastic germination boxes that were placed in a cold room (4 °C) in the dark for one of the 13 predetermined cold stratification durations (Supplemental Table S1). The approximate cold stratification hours were calculated based on the total number of hours that each box was left in the cold room at a constant 4 °C based on the Utah chilling model (Luedeling and Brown 2011; Richardson et al. 1974). Three individual boxes or replicates were used for each genotype and treatment, unless otherwise noted. After the predetermined amount of cold stratification, germination boxes were moved to a growth chamber [16 h light (28 °C) and 8 h dark (20 °C)] according to recommendations by the Association of Seed Analysts (Wiersema and Waibel 2013). Water was added to boxes as needed to maintain moisture, and Pageant® Intrinsic® fungicide (BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany) was applied weekly to minimize fungal growth. Seed germination, defined as radical emergence, for each replicate and genotype was evaluated weekly for 8 weeks. Germinated seeds were removed from each box during evaluation each week and counted. Seeds were evaluated for location effects (Expt. 1), variability among V. vinifera and hybrids (Expt. 2), or within-species variability for non-V. vinifera (V. cinerea and V. riparia) (Expt. 3) (Table 1). Each experiment was performed with seed collected in 2 or 3 years from 2016 to 2018.

Data collection and statistical analyses.

Cumulative counts of germinated seeds over 8 weeks of incubation (woi) for each cold stratification treatment were used to calculate the total percentage of seed germination (out of 50) and germination rate. The germination rate was calculated using the area under germination progress curve (AUGPC) based on the area under the disease progress curve equation developed by Shaner and Finney (1977) to measure progression in relation to time (Campbell and Madden 1990). The AUGPC was calculated using the function area under the disease progress curve in R statistical free software (R Core Team 2021). Similar to the mean germination time described by Ellis, the AUGPC accounts for the number of seeds and speed of germination across multiple evaluations (Ellis and Roberts 1981). However, in contrast, the AUGPC averages across timepoints and accounts for low germination percentages. For example, a seed lot with low total germination would result in a low AUGPC, whereas the mean germination time would be unaffected by low total germination. A high AUGPC value means a greater number of seeds germinating more quickly, whereas a low AUGPC value means a lower number of seeds germinating over time. Based on previous studies, the seed germination percentage after 8 woi for genotypes with 12 weeks of cold stratification (woc) was used as the baseline for comparison of genotypes within a location (Wang et al. 2009). Two or three runs of data were used for each genotype, depending on seed availability.

During the first experiment, a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the effect of cold stratification duration, location, and year on total seed germination and rate of germination (AUGPC) within each of the three genotypes, ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’, ‘Chardonnay’, and ‘Isabella’+, represented at more than one location (Table 1). The AUGPC values (12 woc only) were used in the two-way ANOVA to determine the effect of year and location on the total germination percentage within each of the three cultivars (Cabernet Sauvignon, Chardonnay, and Isabella+). During the second experiment, a one-way ANOVA with AUGPC values of five Davis-grown genotypes (‘Cabernet Sauvignon’, ‘Chardonnay’, ‘Sovereign Rose’, ‘Isabel mulata’, and ‘Salamander’) was performed to compare the effect of cold stratification time (0–11 woc) on germination rates compared with 12 woc within each cultivar. During the third experiment, the AUGPC values for three genotypes of V. riparia and V. cinerea were compared within and between species using a two-way ANOVA.

All statistical analyses were conducted using R statistical software (R Core Team 2021). Genotypes that had significant ANOVA results (P < 0.05) between runs/years were analyzed separately, whereas genotypes that had no significance difference between runs were combined. Tukey’s honestly significant difference test was used to detect significance among treatments and compare individual woc stratification to 12 woc stratification. Differences between means were considered significant at P < 0.05. Weather data were collected from nearby stations through the California Irrigation Management Information System (https://cimis.water.ca.gov/WSNReportCriteria.aspx) for Parlier and Davis locations and from NEWA (https://newa.cornell.edu/) for Geneva (Supplemental Table S2).

Results

Environment effect on seed germination of three V. vinifera cultivar and variation across years and locations.

Germination, total percentage, and AUGPC varied greatly among cultivars, locations, and cold stratification treatments. The effects of location, year, and/or their interactions on seed germination of ‘Cabernet’, ‘Chardonnay’, and ‘Isabella’+ were significant (ANOVA; P ≤ 0.05) (Table 2). However, the response to location and year variability was cultivar-dependent, with some cultivars showing greater fluctuation in total germination and AUGPC than others. Year, cold stratification, and the interaction effect were significant when comparing the AUGPC values for all cultivars (Cabernet, Chardonnay, and Isabella+) after 12 woc (ANOVA; P ≤ 0.05) (Tables 3 and 4). Location was only significant for cultivars Chardonnay and Isabella+. Temperature, bloom period, and precipitation varied widely among years and locations (Table 5, Supplemental Table S2). Seed weight did not vary among locations for seed collected from ‘Chardonnay’ or ‘Cabernet’ vines, but it showed a significant difference among genotypes for Isabella+. Isabella+ seed collected from Parlier (‘Isabella’) and Geneva (‘Iona’) locations were not significantly different from each other (P > 0.05), whereas seed collected from Davis (‘Isabel mulata’) were significantly larger (P ≤ 0.01).

Table 2.

Two-way ANOVA of the effect of location (L) and year (Y) of study and their interaction on total seed germination after 12 weeks of cold stratification within cultivars. Area under the germination progress curve (AUGPC) values of three replicates of grape cultivars at 12 weeks of cold stratification and 8 weeks of incubation were used in the analyses.

Table 2.
Table 3.

Pairwise comparisons (ANOVA) between the effects of different locations (P = Parlier, G = Geneva, D = Davis) and years of study and the rate of germination area under the germination progress curve (AUGPC) at week 12 of cold stratification within each V. vinifera cultivar. AUGPC values of week 12 of cold stratification and 8 weeks of incubation for three replicates were used in the analyses. The values presented in the table are P values.

Table 3.
Table 4.

Three-way ANOVA of cold stratification (C), location (L), and year (Y) effects and their interactions on the rate of seed germination within each V. vinifera cultivar based on area under the germination progress curve (AUGPC) values for each cold stratification treatment (0 to 12 weeks) after 8 weeks of incubation.

Table 4.
Table 5.

Average weather conditions experienced by grapevines from 2016 to 2018 for Parlier, Geneva, and Davis. Average temperature and precipitation from each region’s respective bloom time to harvest.

Table 5.

Cabernet Sauvignon.

For ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’, significant differences in AUGPC were detected among years (locations combined), but not locations (years combined) (Table 3). The AUGPCs for seed collected in 2018 and 2016 were higher than that for seed collected in 2017. Pairwise comparisons between locations in the same year showed that in 2016, Davis and Geneva were significantly different from Parlier, but not from each other in terms of total germination and AUGPC. Seed weights (years combined) did not significantly vary by location for ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’, although the AUGPC and germination percentage did (Tables 1 and 3, Supplemental Fig S1). Seed collected from both Davis and Geneva had a higher AUGPC at 6 to 12 woc than Parlier at the same cold stratification duration points in 2016 (Fig. 1A). Because of limited seed, data were not collected for 1, 3, and 8 woc for seed collected from Geneva in 2016, and for 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 woc in 2017. In 2017, seed collected from Geneva had a significantly higher AUGPC compared with that collected from Parlier and Davis at 6 woc, but it showed no significant difference from Parlier or Davis with any of the other shared cold stratification treatments (Fig. 1B). In 2018, the only difference in the AUGPC among locations and cold stratification time was detected from 10 to 12 woc, when seed collected had been allowed more maturation time (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Germination progression curve as a line with error bars indicating the SD of the mean area under the germination progress curve (AUGPC). (A) ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (B) 2017, and (C) 2018. (D) ‘Chardonnay’ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (E) 2017, and (F) 2018. (G) ‘Isabella’+ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (H) 2017, and (I) 2018.

Citation: HortScience 58, 5; 10.21273/HORTSCI17002-22

Within a location, pairwise comparisons among the cold stratification durations in Davis in 2016 showed significant differences between the first 0 to 5, 7, and 9 woc (Fig. 1A) compared with 12 woc. For seed collected from Davis in 2017, the AUGPC increased gradually with the increased cold stratification duration (Fig. 1B). Starting at 4 woc, the AUGPC was not significantly different from that at 12 woc, although germination was low (mean germination across replicates was 34%) overall. For seed collected in 2018, little to no germination was observed until 10 woc.

In Parlier in 2016 and 2017, germination was low and slowly increased as seeds received more cold stratification hours. However, germination was low even at 12 woc, with mean germinations of 20% and 40% in 2016 and 2017, respectively (Supplemental Fig. 1). Starting at 4 woc, no significance differences in the AUGPC was observed compared with that at 12 woc (Fig. 1A and 1B). However, in 2018, the germination percentage was high (>75%) and AUGPC increased at 10 woc, which coincided with extra seed maturation time.

In Geneva, the AUGPC increased significantly from 5 to 6 woc (2016) or 4 to 6 woc (2017), and it was consistently high through 12 woc (Fig. 1A and 1B). Similar to Parlier and Davis, germination for seed collected from Geneva in 2018 had an increased AUGPC at 10 woc (Fig. 1C). No significant differences were detected in seed weight across years grouped by location.

Chardonnay.

For ‘Chardonnay’, when years were combined, the pairwise comparison detected significant differences in AUGPC at 12 woc between both California sites (Parlier and Davis) and Geneva, with Geneva having significantly higher germination than either California site (Table 3). However, seed weights (years combined) did not significantly vary by location. When comparing AUGPCs among years (combined locations), seed collected in 2017 had a significantly lower germination rate than seed collected in 2016 or 2018 for ‘Chardonnay’. The pairwise comparison between locations in the same year showed that in 2016, the AUGPC was not significantly different after 2 woc (Fig. 1D). In 2017, Geneva was not represented in the comparison because of insufficient seeds available for replicates at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 woc. However, at 10 woc, the germination of seed collected from Geneva had significantly higher germination than that from Davis, but not from Parlier (Fig. 1E). In general, seed collected from Davis and Parlier were not significantly different in terms of seed germination in 2017 (Fig. 1E). In 2018, no significant differences in seed germination were detected between the three locations, except at 9 woc, when seed collected from Geneva had significantly higher seed germination than that from Davis and Parlier (Fig. 1F).

The pairwise comparison among woc in Davis in 2016 showed that cold stratification had no significant effect on seed germination and overall germination was high (∼80%) (Fig. 1D, Supplemental Fig. S1). For seed collected from Davis in 2017, germination gradually increased with the cold stratification duration (Fig. 1E). For seed collected from Geneva in 2016, a stable significant increase in the AUGPC was observed at 8 woc compared with that at earlier weeks, which was consistent through 12 woc (Fig. 1D). For seed collected from Geneva in 2017, a significant increase in germination was detected from 10 woc to 12 woc (Fig. 1E). For seed collected from Parlier in 2017, germination increased significantly starting at 6 woc (Fig. 1E). In 2018, in Davis, Parlier, and Geneva, germination increased significantly at 10 woc (Fig. 1F).

For seed collected from ‘Chardonnay’ grown in Davis, germination in 2016 was significantly different from that in 2017 and 2018 at all cold stratification weeks, except 10 to 12; that in 2016 was not significantly different from that in 2018. Germination rates for seed collected in 2017 and 2018 were not significantly different from each other, except from 10 to 12 woc (Fig. 1D, 1E, 1F). For seed collected from Geneva, the AUGPCs for seed collected in 2016 and 2017 were significantly different from that in 2018 at 6 and 8 woc (Fig. 1D, 1E, 1F). In Parlier, seed germination in 2017 was significantly higher at cold stratification weeks 6, 7, 8, and 9 than in 2018; however, at week 10 and week 11, seed germination in 2018, which had longer maturation times, was higher than that in 2017 (Fig. 1E and 1F).

Isabella+.

When comparing AUGPCs among years (combined locations) and locations (years combined), significant differences were detected. Seed collected from Geneva had a significantly lower AUGPC than seed collected from Davis or Parlier. ‘Isabella’+ seed collected in 2016 had a significantly lower AUGPC and total germination percentage than seed collected in 2017 and 2018. Pairwise comparisons between locations in the same year showed no significant differences in 2016 or 2018 between locations (Fig. 1H and 1I). A significant increase in seed germination was detected between seed collected in Geneva (‘Iona’) and seed collected in Parlier (‘Isabella’) or Davis (‘Isabel mulata’) in 2017 at 4 and 6 woc (Fig. 1G). However, overall germination percentages varied widely among all three cultivars at 12 woc, depending on the year (2016: 3% to 6%; 2017: 43% to 58%; 2018: 0% to 66%). ‘Isabella’+ had a significantly higher seed weight for seed collected from Davis (‘Isabel mulata’) than that from Parlier (‘Isabella’) and Geneva (‘Iona’) (P = 0.006).

The pairwise comparison among cold stratification weeks of seed collected from Davis in 2017 showed a significant increase in germination at 6 woc and continued to increase significantly compared with 0 woc (Fig. 1H). For seed collected from Davis in 2018, no significant increase from 0 to 9 woc was observed. No data were collected after 9 woc because of insufficient seed quantities (Fig. 1I). Comparisons of germination rates for seed collected from Geneva in 2016, 2017, and 2018 could not be made for most cold stratification time points because of few shared treatments (Fig. 1G, 1H, 1I). For seed collected from Parlier in 2016, no effect of cold stratification on germination was detected (Fig. 1G). In 2017, germination gradually increased with the cold stratification period, and a significant increase in germination was observed at 6 woc, which continued to increase significantly after 8 woc (Fig. 1H). In 2018, germination only significantly increased after 10 woc in seed from Parlier (Fig. 1I).

Effect of the cold stratification duration on seed germination of V. vinifera and hybrids collected from Davis.

The percentage of seeds germinated from 0 to 12 woc was the highest for genotype Salamander compared with the other Davis-grown genotypes. The seed germination percentage of ‘Salamander’ was highest at 10 woc (>85%). ‘Isabel mulata’ had the second highest germination percentage (60%) at 10 woc. Chardonnay had the third highest total seed germination, followed by cultivars Cabernet Sauvignon and Sovereign Rose (>52%, 46%, and 33%, respectively) at 12 woc (Fig. 2). The AUGPC values from 0 to 12 woc were used for pairwise comparisons within genotypes. Significant differences among runs for genotypes ‘Salamander’, ‘Sovereign Rose’, ‘Chardonnay’, and ‘Isabel mulata’ were not detected, but significant differences between runs of data for Cabernet Sauvignon were detected (ANOVA; P < 0.05). The AUGPC for the four genotypes that had no run effect was averaged, and data of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ were analyzed separately in the pairwise comparison between woc to determine cold stratification hours needed to reach the same level of seed germination as 12 woc with 8 woi (Fig. 3). For ‘Salamander’, the AUGPC and germination percentage at 2 woc were not significantly different from those at 12 woc; however, a trending increase in the AUGPC was observed (Fig. 3). For ‘Sovereign Rose’, the AUGPC was significantly different between all woc in relation to 12 woc until 9 woc (Fig. 3). For ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’, total germination was significantly different for seeds chilled between 0 and 2 woc and 0 to 7 woc in relation to 12 woc for run 1 and 2, respectively (Table 2, Fig. 3). For ‘Chardonnay’, the cold stratification duration was not significantly different from 12 woc after 10 woc (Fig. 3). Finally, ‘Isabel mulata’, had no significant difference in the germination percentage and AUGPC compared with 12 woc after 6 woc (Figs. 2 and 3).

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Total seed germination percentages of Davis-grown cultivars subjected to chilling from 0 to 12 weeks. Seeds were counted as a cumulative after 8 weeks of incubation for three replicates. The seed germination percentage was calculated as the number of germinated seeds to the total number of tested seeds (50). Data are an average of two runs.

Citation: HortScience 58, 5; 10.21273/HORTSCI17002-22

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Averaged area under the germination progress curve (AUGPC) values of two runs of seed germination of Davis-grown cultivars that were subjected to chilling from 0 to 12 weeks. Data are an average of two runs.

Citation: HortScience 58, 5; 10.21273/HORTSCI17002-22

Cold stratification effect and variability in V. riparia versus V. cinerea.

The cold stratification effect within accessions of V. riparia and V. cinerea showed that there were significant differences in the seed germination rate (AUGPC) and percentage among stratification weeks (P ≤ 0.05) (Table 6, Fig. 4). A pairwise comparison of 0 to 11 woc for V. riparia and V. cinerea with germination at 12 woc among genotypes of the same species showed species variability similar to that observed within and among V. vinifera genotypes and hybrids (Table 7). At 9 or 10 woc, seed germination of the three accessions of V. cinerea were consistently not significantly different from germination at 12 woc (Table 7). For V. riparia, germination at 6 or 7 woc was not significantly different from 12 woc (Table 7). A pairwise comparison of the germination percentage across accessions of V. riparia and V. cinerea showed that across 0 to 9 woc (Table 8, Fig. 4), there were significant differences in the germination percentage. However, at 10 to 12 woc, there were no significant differences in the percentage of germination with the exception of V. riparia accession R711, which had significantly lower germination than the others (Table 8).

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Germination percentage from 0 to 12 weeks of chilling for accessions of V. riparia (R275, R054, R711) and V. cinerea (C208, C218, C221) seed collected from Geneva, NY, after 8 weeks of incubation. Data are an average of two runs. Error bars indicate SD.

Citation: HortScience 58, 5; 10.21273/HORTSCI17002-22

Table 6.

Two-way ANOVA of cold stratification effect (area under the germination progress curve at 12 woc) within Vitis cinerea (C) and V. riparia (R) grape accessions from Geneva, NY.

Table 6.
Table 7.

Average area under the germination progress curve (AUGPC) values across 0 to 12 weeks of cold stratification of germination 8 weeks of incubation for three genotypes of V. riparia (R275, R054, R771) and V. cinerea (C208, C218, C221) compared with 12 weeks of cold stratification for the same genotype using ANOVA.

Table 7.
Table 8.

Pairwise comparison (ANOVA) of the percentage of germination at each week of cold stratification treatment (0–12) and 8 weeks of incubation across three genotypes of V. riparia (R275, R054, R771) and V. cinerea (C208, C218, C221). Values in the table are the mean.

Table 8.

Discussion

Seed dormancy is the suspension of germination until suitable growing conditions are met or internal germination inhibitors have degraded (Hartmann et al. 1997; Hilhorst 1995; Li and Foley 1997). Requirements for temperature, a main factor that regulates seed dormancy and germination, can vary widely among species (Baskin and Baskin 1998; Baskin and Baskin 2004; Fenner and Thompson 2005; Penfield and MacGregor 2017). For Vitis, cold stratification for 12 weeks at 3 to 5 °C is considered effective for seed dormancy release of Vitis vinifera, although individual seeds may germinate with fewer weeks of cold stratification (Ellis et al. 1983; Singh 1961; Wang et al. 2011). Because 12 woc is considered sufficient for most grape cultivars, we used this as our baseline for maximal germination for each seed lot. In our study, we observed large variations in time to germination and total germination based on cold stratification hours ranging from 0 to 12 weeks both among and within Vitis species, indicating that large variability exists among germplasm and could be targeted for selection. ‘Salamander’, an American hybrid from Missouri with V. labrusca, V. champinii, V. vinifera, and other unknown American species in its background, consistently required the least amount of cold stratification hours (0 weeks) for more than 40% germination to reliably occur compared with other accessions evaluated. In comparison, ‘Isabel mulata’, a V. labrusca × V. vinifera hybrid from the same location, did not reach more than 40% germination until 3 woc. Whereas ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’, a pure V. vinifera cultivar, required at least 10 woc to achieve more than 40% germination. This large variability in germination among cultivars, even after 12 woc, could be because of cultivar-specific or cultivar × environment interaction differences in seed viability and maturation. Seed maturation or ripening can also have a role in dormancy release, although the importance and variability of this factor in grape have yet to be explored (Ali et al. 2022; Eckpong 2009; Holdsworth et al. 2008; Thomas et al. 1973). Grape seeds used in this study were allowed to air-dry for up to 2 months, which is unlikely to be sufficient time for seed maturation to occur. This was likely the cause of the increased/more consistent germination speeds and percentages for seed collected in 2018 that received an additional 2 to 3 months of maturation time. The low germination rates observed for some cultivars, particularly those from the same location, could be caused by differences in seed maturation requirements or mother vine resiliency to environmental stressors such as heat and drought. Additional work is needed to determine the time and variability for seed maturation among and within Vitis species.

Vivipary, germination of the seed within the berry while on the vine, is not common for grape; however, ‘Salamander’ has been observed to exhibit this phenotype, suggesting that dormancy or a seed maturation period is not required. This could be, in part, why germination rates and total germination were so much higher for ‘Salamander’ than for other Vitis species evaluated. In this study, differences in seed weight and germination were evident within and among locations and cultivars. For location, germination differences were cultivar-specific, indicating that environmental effects can have a role in germination but are superseded by genotype. Seed weight did not significantly vary among locations or years for ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ or ‘Chardonnay’ despite the differences in growing conditions. Isabella+ exhibited differences in seed weight based on location; however, each location represented a related individual and not a clonal cultivar. Isabel mulata, the cultivar grown at the Davis location, is believed to be a sport of Isabella, but it has larger and darker fruit. For some species, seed quality traits such as weight, longevity, and leachate are poor when maternal plants are grown under high temperatures during seed development, but viability is unaffected (Li et al. 2017). Although we did not test leachate or longevity, these factors could be interesting to compare among maternal plants from separate locations in future studies.

For some perennial species, correlations between budbreak and seed dormancy have been found (Vahdati et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2016). It is known that chilling requirements for budbreak have both a genetic and environmental component (Kovaleski and Londo 2019; Mathiason et al. 2009; Min et al. 2017). Vitis vinifera L. is a cold-sensitive woody perennial that uses dormancy to avoid freezing injury (Keller 2015). Generally, for perennial plants, bud dormancy is an essential mechanism to survive harsh winter conditions using para-dormancy, endo-dormancy, or ecto-dormancy (Beauvieux et al. 2018; Lang et al. 1987). Endo-dormant buds require exposure to chilling to transit to ecto-dormancy, where they can resume growth under suitable environmental conditions (Fennell 2004; Ferguson et al. 2014). For walnut (Juglans regia L.), 6 to 8 weeks of cold were required for seed dormancy break and the best seed germination percentage; a strong correlation was detected between chilling (or cold stratification) requirements for seed and budbreak for different genotypes of walnut (Vahdati et al. 2012). This was similar for peach (Prunus persica), where pathway overlap was demonstrated in bud and seed dormancy breaking (Wang et al. 2016). Numerous studies have shown that grape (cultivated V. vinifera and native American species) requires different chilling durations to break bud dormancy (Cragin et al. 2017; Ferguson et al. 2014). Historically, cultivated V. vinifera was known as a low-chill species requiring 50 to 400 h at ≤7 °C to complete bud dormancy (Dokoozlian 1999; Magoon and Dix 1943; Weaver and Iwasaki 1977). However, cultivars such as Chardonnay and Cabernet Sauvignon can require up to 750 h and 1250 h at 0 to 7 °C to fulfill chilling requirements, respectively (Anzanello et al. 2018; Cragin et al. 2017; Londo and Johnson 2014). This type of cultivar variability was similar for some of the grape cultivars evaluated in this study. ‘Chardonnay’, which has a lower bud chill requirement, frequently had a higher AUGPC (faster rate of germination) and shorter stratification requirement than ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’, which has a higher chill requirement for bud dormancy, across locations. Within wild grape species, studies have shown that variability in chilling requirements for bud dormancy can, but does not always, occur (Londo and Johnson 2014; Londo and Kovaleski 2019). Northern wild grape species, such as V. riparia, require a short chilling duration to complete endo-dormancy and transit to ecto-dormancy, and they typically achieve budburst within a short period (7 d) under warm conditions. Southern species, including V. cinerea, required longer chilling durations and typically have slower budburst rates (Londo and Johnson 2014). V. riparia and V. cinerea are both used by northern grape breeding programs to incorporate cold tolerance into commercial grape cultivars. For example, V. riparia was shown to have large variability in chilling hours required for budbreak (250–1000 h), whereas V. cinerea showed less variability (Londo and Johnson 2014). However, for seed dormancy, both V. riparia and V. cinerea accessions evaluated showed intraspecies variability in cold stratification requirements. Similar to bud dormancy, V. riparia accessions were consistently not significantly different in germination from the maximum at 12 weeks after cold stratification starting at 6 to 7 woc. For V. cinerea, germination did not significantly improve after 8 to 9 woc in our study. Although these are, for now, untested associations, it is suggested that bud and seed dormancy may have overlapping pathways similar to other perennial species.

Although breeding cold-hardy grapes is a major focus for northern grape-growing breeding programs, grapes with low chilling requirements are becoming essential for more southern regions as climates change. Cultivars with low cold stratification requirements for germination such as Chardonnay and Salamander could be useful sources for breeding low-chill grapes, whereas cultivars like Cabernet Sauvignon may be useful for breeding higher fruit quality into cold-tolerant grapes. Although further evaluation of the overlap between seed and bud dormancy is needed, using germination assays under little to no chilling may be useful as a phenotypic assay to select individuals with reduced chilling requirements.

Conclusion

In summary, cold stratification requirements for successful germination varied greatly within and among Vitis species and hybrids, with some cultivars requiring less than 3 weeks of stratification and others requiring more than 10 weeks to attain substantial germination (>40%). Vitis vinifera cultivars with low chilling requirements for budbreak often required fewer hours of cold stratification for seed germination to occur than cultivars with high chilling requirements. However, this was dependent on the year the seed was collected and maternal parent environmental conditions during seed development. Variability within and among cultivars was detected and could be useful for breeding low-chill grape cultivars in changing climates.

References Cited

  • Ali F, Qanmber G, Li F & Wang Z. 2022 Updated role of ABA in seed maturation, dormancy, and germination J Adv Res. 35 199 214

  • Andersson S, Mansby E & Prentice HC. 2008 Paternal effects of seed germination: A barrier to the genetic assimilation of an endemic plant taxon? Evol Biol. 21 1408 1417

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Andersson L & Milberg P. 1998 Variation in seed dormancy among mother plants, populations and years of seed collection Seed Sci Res. 8 29 38

  • Anzanello R, Fialho FB & Santos HPD. 2018 Chilling requirements and dormancy evolution in grapevine buds Cienc Agrotec. 42 364 371

  • Auge G, Blair LK, Neville H & Donohue K. 2017 Maternal vernalization and vernalization-pathway genes influence progeny seed germination New Phytol. 216 388 400 https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14520

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baskin CC & Baskin JM. 1998 Seeds: Ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination Academic Press San Diego, CA, USA

  • Baskin JM & Baskin CC. 2004 A classification system for seed dormancy Seed Sci Res. 14 1 16

  • Beauvieux R, Wenden B & Dirlewanger E. 2018 Bud dormancy in perennial fruit tree species: A pivotal role for oxidative cues Front Plant Sci. 9 2018 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00657

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bischoff A & Muller-Scharer H. 2010 Testing population differentiation in plant species – how important are environmental maternal effects Oikos. 119 445 454

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Campbell CL & Madden LV. 1990 Introduction to plant disease epidemiology John Wiley & Sons New York, NY, USA

  • Cendan C, Sampredro L & Zas R. 2013 The maternal environment determines the timing of germination in Pinus pinaster Environ Exp Bot. 94 66 72

  • Chen M, MacGregor DR, Dave A, Florance H, Moore K, Paskiewicz K, Smirnoff N, Graham IA & Penfield S. 2014 Maternal temperature history activates Flowering Locus T in fruits to control progeny dormancy according to time of year PNAS52 18787 18792

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chettoor AM, Phillips AR, Coker CT, Dilkes B & Evans MMS. 2016 Maternal gametophyte effects on seed development in maize Genetics. 204 233 248

  • Chohan GS & Dhillon BS. 1976 Effect of giberellic acid, thiourea and stratification on the germination of grape seeds Indian J of Hort. 33 212 215

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Conner PJ. 2008 Effects of stratification, germination temperature, and pretreatment with gibberellic acid and hydrogen peroxide on germination of ‘Fry’ muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia) seed Amer Soc Hort Sci. 43 853 856

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cragin J, Serpe M, Keller M & Shellie K. 2017 Dormancy and cold hardiness transitions in winegrape cultivars Chardonnay and Cabernet Sauvignon Amer J Enol Vit. 68 195 202

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dokoozlian NK. 1999 Chilling temperature and duration interact on the budbreak of ‘Perlette’ grapevine cuttings HortScience. 34 6 1 3 https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.34.6.1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eckpong B. 2009 Effects of seed maturity, seed storage and pre-germination treatments on seed germination of cleome (Cleome gynandra L.) Scientia Hortic. 119 236 240

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ellis RH & Roberts EH. 1981 The quantification of ageing and survival in orthodox seeds Seed Sci and Tech. 9 373 409

  • Ellis RH, Hong TD & Roberts EH. 1983 A note on the development of a practical procedure for promoting the germination of dormant seed of grape (Vitis spp.) Vitis. 22 211 219

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ellner S. 1986 Germination dimorphisms and parent-offspring conflict in seed germination J Theor Biol. 123 173 185

  • Fennel A. 2004 Freezing tolerance and injury in grapevines J Crop Improv. 10 1 2 201 235

  • Fenner M. 1991 The effects of the parent environment on seed germinability Seed Sci Res. 1 75 84

  • Fenner M & Thompson K. 2005 The ecology of seeds University Press Cambridge

  • Ferguson JC, Moyer MM, Mills LJ, Hoogenboom G & Keller M. 2014 Modeling dormant bud cold hardiness and budbreak in twenty-three Vitis genotypes reveals variation by region of origin Amer J Enol Vit. 65 59 71

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Flemion F. 1937 After ripening at 5° C favours germination of grape seeds Contr Boyce Thompson Inst. 9 7 15

  • Graeber K, Nakabayashi K, Miatton E, Leubner-Metzger G & Soppe WJJ. 2012 Molecular mechanisms of seed dormancy Plant Cell Environ. 35 1769 1786

  • Grass L & Burris JS. 1995 Effect of heat stress during seed development and maturation on wheat (Triticum durum) seed quality. I. Seed germination and seedling vigor Can J Plant Sci. 75 821 829

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hardie WJ & Aggenbach SJ. 1996 Effects of site, season, and viticultural practices on grape seed development Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2 1 4

  • Hartmann HT, Kester DE, Davies F Jr & Geneve RL. 1997 Plant propagation principles and practices (6th ed) Prentice Hall Hoboken, NJ, USA

  • Hilhorst HWM. 1995 A critical update on seed dormancy. I. Primary Dormancy Seed Science Res. 5 61 73

  • Holdsworth MJ, Bentsink L & Soppe WJJ. 2008 Molecular networks regulating Arabidopsis seed maturation, after-ripening, dormancy and germination New Phytol. 179 33 54

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoyle GL, Cordiner H, Good RB & Nicotra AB. 2014 Effects of reduced winter duration on seed dormancy and germination in six populations of the alpine herb Aciphyllya glacialis (Apiaceae) Physiology (Bethesda). 2 1 cou015 https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cou015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Iwaski M, Hyvarinen L, Piskurewicz U & Lopez-Molina L. 2019 Non-canonical RNA-directed DNA methylation participates in maternal and environmental control of seed dormancy Plant Biol eLife 8 e37434 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37434

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kang YD, Weaver RJ & Pool RM. 1968 Effect of low temperature and growth regulators on germination of ‘Tokay’ grapes Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci. 92 323 330

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keller M. 2015 The science of grapevines: anatomy and physiology (2nd ed) Elsevier Academic Press London

  • Kolodziejek J & Patykowaski P. 2015 Effect of environmental factors on germination and emergence of invasive Rumex confertus in Central Europe ScientificWorldJournal. 2015 170176

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kovaleski AP & Londo JP. 2019 Tempo of gene regulation in wild and cultivated Vitis species shows coordination between cold deacclimation and budbreak Plant Sci. 287 110178

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lang GA. 1987 Dormancy: A new universal terminology HortScience. 22 817 820

  • Leida C, Conejero A, Arbona V, Gomez-Cadenas A, Llacer G, Badenes ML & Rios G. 2012 Chilling-dependent release of seed and bud dormancy in peach associates to common changes in gene expression PLoS One. 7 e35777

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li BL & Foley ME. 1997 Genetic and molecular control of seed dormancy Trends Plant Sci. 2 384 389

  • Li R, Chen L, Wu Y, Zhang R, Baskin CC, Baskin JM & Hu X. 2017 Effects of cultivar and maternal environment on seed quality in Vicia sativa Front Plant Sci. 17 1411

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Londo JP & Johnson LM. 2014 Variation in the chilling requirement and budburst rate of wild Vitis species Environ Exp Bot. 106 138 147 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.12.012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Londo JP & Kovaleski AP. 2019 Deconstructing cold hardiness: Variation in supercooling ability and chilling requirements in the wild grapevine Vitis riparia Aust J Grape Wine Res. 25 276 285

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Luedeling E & Brown PH. 2011 A global analysis of the comparability of winter chill models for fruit and nut trees Int J Biometeorol. 55 411 421

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Magoon CA & Dix IW. 1943 Observations on the response of grapevines to winter temperatures as related to their dormancy requirements Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci. 42 407 412

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mathiason K, Dong H, Grimplet J, Venkateswari J, Galbraith D, Or E & Fennell A. 2009 Transcript profiling in Vitis riparia during chilling requirement fulfillment reveals coordination of gene expression patterns with optimized bud break Func & Int Genom. 9 81 96

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller M, Zhang C & Chen ZJ. 2012 Ploidy and hybridity effects on growth vigor and gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana hybrids and their parents G3 Genes Genomes Genetics. 2 505 513 https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.112.002162

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Min Z, Zhao X, Li R, Yang B, Liu M & Fang Y. 2017 Comparative transcriptome analysis provides insight into differentially expressed genes related to bud dormancy in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) Scientia Hortic. 225 213 220

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nguyen CD, Chen J, Clark D, Perez H & Huo H. 2021 Effects of maternal environment on seed germination and seedling vigor of Petunia x hybrida under different abiotic stresses Plants. 10 581

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Orru M, Mattana E, Pritchard HW & Bacchetta G. 2012 Thermal thresholds as predictors of seed dormancy release and germination timing: Altitude-related risks from climate warming for the wild grapevine Vitis vinifera subps. sylvestris Ann Bot. 110 1651 1660

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Penfield S & MacGregor DR. 2017 Effects of environmental variation during seed production on seed dormancy and germination J Expt Bot. 68 819 825

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Piskurewicz U, Iwasaki M, Susaki D, Megies C, Kinoshita T & Lopez-Molina L. 2016 Dormancy-specific imprinting underlies maternal inheritance of seed dormancy in Arabidopsis thaliana eLife. 5 e19573 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • R Core Team 2021 R: A language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria https://www.R-project.org/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rees M. 1996 Evolutionary ecology of seed dormancy and seed size Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 351 1299 1308 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1996.0113

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Richardson EA, Seeley SD & Walker DR. 1974 A model for estimating the completion of rest for ‘Redhaven’ and ‘Elberta’ peach trees HortScience. 9 331 332 https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.9.4.331

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roach DA & Wulff RD. 1987 Maternal effects in plants Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 18 209 235

  • Sawhney R, Quick WA & Hsiao A. 1984 The effect of temperature during parental vegetative growth on seed germination of wild oats (Avena fatua L.) Ann Bot (Lond). 55 25 28

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schutz W & Milberg P. 1997 Seed dormancy in Crex canescens: Regional differences and ecological consequences Oikos. 78 420 428

  • Scott DH & Ink DP. 1950 Grape seed germination experiments Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci. 56 134 139

  • Seglias AE, Williams E, Bilge A & Kramer AT. 2018 Phylogeny and source climate impact seed dormancy and germination of restorationrelevant forb species PLoS One. 13 e0191931

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shaner G & Finney RE. 1977 The effect of nitrogen fertilizer in the expression of slow-mildewing resistance in Knox wheat Phytopathology. 67 1051 1056

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Singh SN. 1961 Germination of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) hybrid seeds by chilling Curr Sci. 30 62

  • Singh J, Clavijo Michelangeli JA, Gezan SA, Lee H & Vallejos CE. 2017 Maternal effects on seed and seedling phenotypes in reciprocal F1 hybrids of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Front. Plant Sci. 8 2017 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00042

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomas H, Webb DP & Wareing PF. 1973 Seed dormancy in Acer: Maturation in relation to dormancy in Acer pseudoplatanus L J Expt Bot. 24 https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/24.5.958

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vahdati K, Aslamarz AA, Rahemi M, Hassani D & Leslie C. 2012 Mechanism of seed dormancy and its relationship to bud dormancy in Persian walnut Environ Exp Bot. 75 74 82

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Klinken RD, Lukitsch B & Cook C. 2008 Interaction between seed dormancy – release mechanism, environment and seed bank strategy for a widely distributed perennial legume, Parkinsonia aculeata (Caesalpinaceae) Ann Bot. 102 255 264

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang D, Gao Z, Du P, Xiao W, Tan Q, Chen X, Li L & Gao D. 2016 Expression of ABA metabolism-related genes suggests similarities and differences between seed dormancy and bud dormancy of peach (Prunus persica) Front Plant Sci. 6 2015 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01248

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang WQ, Song SQ, Li SH, Gan YY, Wu JH & Cheng HY. 2009 Quantitative description of the effect of stratification on dormancy release of grape seeds in response to various temperatures and water contents J Expt Bot. 60 3397 3406

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang WQ, Song SQ, Li SH, Gan YY, Wu JH & Cheng HY. 2011 Seed dormancy and germination in Vitis amurensis and its variation Seed Sci Res. 21 255 265

  • Weaver RJ & Iwasaki K. 1977 Effect of temperature and length of storage, root growth and termination of bud rest in ‘Zinfandel’ grapes Am J Enol Viticult. 28 149 151

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wiersema J & Waibel G. 2013 Section 6: Germination tests Principles and procedures. 6 61 Association of Official Seed Analysts Moline, IL, USA

Supplemental Fig. S1.
Supplemental Fig. S1.

Total seed germination percentage based on location by cultivar by year is shown as a line graph with error bars indicating the standard deviation of the mean. (A) ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (B) 2017 and (C) 2018, (D) ‘Chardonnay’ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (E) 2017, and (F) 2018, (G) ‘Isabella’+ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (H) 2017, and (I) 2018. The seed germination percentage was calculated as the number of germinated seeds to the total number of tested seeds (50). Data is an average of three replicates.

Citation: HortScience 58, 5; 10.21273/HORTSCI17002-22

Supplemental Table S1.

Weeks of chilling and approximate hours of chilling each week.

Supplemental Table S1.
Supplemental Table S2.

Average air temperature and total precipitation for three seed collection locations (Parlier, CA, Davis, CA, and Geneva, NY).

Supplemental Table S2.
  • Fig. 1.

    Germination progression curve as a line with error bars indicating the SD of the mean area under the germination progress curve (AUGPC). (A) ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (B) 2017, and (C) 2018. (D) ‘Chardonnay’ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (E) 2017, and (F) 2018. (G) ‘Isabella’+ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (H) 2017, and (I) 2018.

  • Fig. 2.

    Total seed germination percentages of Davis-grown cultivars subjected to chilling from 0 to 12 weeks. Seeds were counted as a cumulative after 8 weeks of incubation for three replicates. The seed germination percentage was calculated as the number of germinated seeds to the total number of tested seeds (50). Data are an average of two runs.

  • Fig. 3.

    Averaged area under the germination progress curve (AUGPC) values of two runs of seed germination of Davis-grown cultivars that were subjected to chilling from 0 to 12 weeks. Data are an average of two runs.

  • Fig. 4.

    Germination percentage from 0 to 12 weeks of chilling for accessions of V. riparia (R275, R054, R711) and V. cinerea (C208, C218, C221) seed collected from Geneva, NY, after 8 weeks of incubation. Data are an average of two runs. Error bars indicate SD.

  • Supplemental Fig. S1.

    Total seed germination percentage based on location by cultivar by year is shown as a line graph with error bars indicating the standard deviation of the mean. (A) ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (B) 2017 and (C) 2018, (D) ‘Chardonnay’ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (E) 2017, and (F) 2018, (G) ‘Isabella’+ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (H) 2017, and (I) 2018. The seed germination percentage was calculated as the number of germinated seeds to the total number of tested seeds (50). Data is an average of three replicates.

  • Ali F, Qanmber G, Li F & Wang Z. 2022 Updated role of ABA in seed maturation, dormancy, and germination J Adv Res. 35 199 214

  • Andersson S, Mansby E & Prentice HC. 2008 Paternal effects of seed germination: A barrier to the genetic assimilation of an endemic plant taxon? Evol Biol. 21 1408 1417

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Andersson L & Milberg P. 1998 Variation in seed dormancy among mother plants, populations and years of seed collection Seed Sci Res. 8 29 38

  • Anzanello R, Fialho FB & Santos HPD. 2018 Chilling requirements and dormancy evolution in grapevine buds Cienc Agrotec. 42 364 371

  • Auge G, Blair LK, Neville H & Donohue K. 2017 Maternal vernalization and vernalization-pathway genes influence progeny seed germination New Phytol. 216 388 400 https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14520

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baskin CC & Baskin JM. 1998 Seeds: Ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination Academic Press San Diego, CA, USA

  • Baskin JM & Baskin CC. 2004 A classification system for seed dormancy Seed Sci Res. 14 1 16

  • Beauvieux R, Wenden B & Dirlewanger E. 2018 Bud dormancy in perennial fruit tree species: A pivotal role for oxidative cues Front Plant Sci. 9 2018 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00657

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bischoff A & Muller-Scharer H. 2010 Testing population differentiation in plant species – how important are environmental maternal effects Oikos. 119 445 454

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Campbell CL & Madden LV. 1990 Introduction to plant disease epidemiology John Wiley & Sons New York, NY, USA

  • Cendan C, Sampredro L & Zas R. 2013 The maternal environment determines the timing of germination in Pinus pinaster Environ Exp Bot. 94 66 72

  • Chen M, MacGregor DR, Dave A, Florance H, Moore K, Paskiewicz K, Smirnoff N, Graham IA & Penfield S. 2014 Maternal temperature history activates Flowering Locus T in fruits to control progeny dormancy according to time of year PNAS52 18787 18792

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chettoor AM, Phillips AR, Coker CT, Dilkes B & Evans MMS. 2016 Maternal gametophyte effects on seed development in maize Genetics. 204 233 248

  • Chohan GS & Dhillon BS. 1976 Effect of giberellic acid, thiourea and stratification on the germination of grape seeds Indian J of Hort. 33 212 215

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Conner PJ. 2008 Effects of stratification, germination temperature, and pretreatment with gibberellic acid and hydrogen peroxide on germination of ‘Fry’ muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia) seed Amer Soc Hort Sci. 43 853 856

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cragin J, Serpe M, Keller M & Shellie K. 2017 Dormancy and cold hardiness transitions in winegrape cultivars Chardonnay and Cabernet Sauvignon Amer J Enol Vit. 68 195 202

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dokoozlian NK. 1999 Chilling temperature and duration interact on the budbreak of ‘Perlette’ grapevine cuttings HortScience. 34 6 1 3 https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.34.6.1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eckpong B. 2009 Effects of seed maturity, seed storage and pre-germination treatments on seed germination of cleome (Cleome gynandra L.) Scientia Hortic. 119 236 240

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ellis RH & Roberts EH. 1981 The quantification of ageing and survival in orthodox seeds Seed Sci and Tech. 9 373 409

  • Ellis RH, Hong TD & Roberts EH. 1983 A note on the development of a practical procedure for promoting the germination of dormant seed of grape (Vitis spp.) Vitis. 22 211 219

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ellner S. 1986 Germination dimorphisms and parent-offspring conflict in seed germination J Theor Biol. 123 173 185

  • Fennel A. 2004 Freezing tolerance and injury in grapevines J Crop Improv. 10 1 2 201 235

  • Fenner M. 1991 The effects of the parent environment on seed germinability Seed Sci Res. 1 75 84

  • Fenner M & Thompson K. 2005 The ecology of seeds University Press Cambridge

  • Ferguson JC, Moyer MM, Mills LJ, Hoogenboom G & Keller M. 2014 Modeling dormant bud cold hardiness and budbreak in twenty-three Vitis genotypes reveals variation by region of origin Amer J Enol Vit. 65 59 71

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Flemion F. 1937 After ripening at 5° C favours germination of grape seeds Contr Boyce Thompson Inst. 9 7 15

  • Graeber K, Nakabayashi K, Miatton E, Leubner-Metzger G & Soppe WJJ. 2012 Molecular mechanisms of seed dormancy Plant Cell Environ. 35 1769 1786

  • Grass L & Burris JS. 1995 Effect of heat stress during seed development and maturation on wheat (Triticum durum) seed quality. I. Seed germination and seedling vigor Can J Plant Sci. 75 821 829

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hardie WJ & Aggenbach SJ. 1996 Effects of site, season, and viticultural practices on grape seed development Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2 1 4

  • Hartmann HT, Kester DE, Davies F Jr & Geneve RL. 1997 Plant propagation principles and practices (6th ed) Prentice Hall Hoboken, NJ, USA

  • Hilhorst HWM. 1995 A critical update on seed dormancy. I. Primary Dormancy Seed Science Res. 5 61 73

  • Holdsworth MJ, Bentsink L & Soppe WJJ. 2008 Molecular networks regulating Arabidopsis seed maturation, after-ripening, dormancy and germination New Phytol. 179 33 54

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoyle GL, Cordiner H, Good RB & Nicotra AB. 2014 Effects of reduced winter duration on seed dormancy and germination in six populations of the alpine herb Aciphyllya glacialis (Apiaceae) Physiology (Bethesda). 2 1 cou015 https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cou015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Iwaski M, Hyvarinen L, Piskurewicz U & Lopez-Molina L. 2019 Non-canonical RNA-directed DNA methylation participates in maternal and environmental control of seed dormancy Plant Biol eLife 8 e37434 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37434

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kang YD, Weaver RJ & Pool RM. 1968 Effect of low temperature and growth regulators on germination of ‘Tokay’ grapes Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci. 92 323 330

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keller M. 2015 The science of grapevines: anatomy and physiology (2nd ed) Elsevier Academic Press London

  • Kolodziejek J & Patykowaski P. 2015 Effect of environmental factors on germination and emergence of invasive Rumex confertus in Central Europe ScientificWorldJournal. 2015 170176

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kovaleski AP & Londo JP. 2019 Tempo of gene regulation in wild and cultivated Vitis species shows coordination between cold deacclimation and budbreak Plant Sci. 287 110178

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lang GA. 1987 Dormancy: A new universal terminology HortScience. 22 817 820

  • Leida C, Conejero A, Arbona V, Gomez-Cadenas A, Llacer G, Badenes ML & Rios G. 2012 Chilling-dependent release of seed and bud dormancy in peach associates to common changes in gene expression PLoS One. 7 e35777

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li BL & Foley ME. 1997 Genetic and molecular control of seed dormancy Trends Plant Sci. 2 384 389

  • Li R, Chen L, Wu Y, Zhang R, Baskin CC, Baskin JM & Hu X. 2017 Effects of cultivar and maternal environment on seed quality in Vicia sativa Front Plant Sci. 17 1411

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Londo JP & Johnson LM. 2014 Variation in the chilling requirement and budburst rate of wild Vitis species Environ Exp Bot. 106 138 147 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.12.012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Londo JP & Kovaleski AP. 2019 Deconstructing cold hardiness: Variation in supercooling ability and chilling requirements in the wild grapevine Vitis riparia Aust J Grape Wine Res. 25 276 285

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Luedeling E & Brown PH. 2011 A global analysis of the comparability of winter chill models for fruit and nut trees Int J Biometeorol. 55 411 421

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Magoon CA & Dix IW. 1943 Observations on the response of grapevines to winter temperatures as related to their dormancy requirements Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci. 42 407 412

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mathiason K, Dong H, Grimplet J, Venkateswari J, Galbraith D, Or E & Fennell A. 2009 Transcript profiling in Vitis riparia during chilling requirement fulfillment reveals coordination of gene expression patterns with optimized bud break Func & Int Genom. 9 81 96

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller M, Zhang C & Chen ZJ. 2012 Ploidy and hybridity effects on growth vigor and gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana hybrids and their parents G3 Genes Genomes Genetics. 2 505 513 https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.112.002162

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Min Z, Zhao X, Li R, Yang B, Liu M & Fang Y. 2017 Comparative transcriptome analysis provides insight into differentially expressed genes related to bud dormancy in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) Scientia Hortic. 225 213 220

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nguyen CD, Chen J, Clark D, Perez H & Huo H. 2021 Effects of maternal environment on seed germination and seedling vigor of Petunia x hybrida under different abiotic stresses Plants. 10 581

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Orru M, Mattana E, Pritchard HW & Bacchetta G. 2012 Thermal thresholds as predictors of seed dormancy release and germination timing: Altitude-related risks from climate warming for the wild grapevine Vitis vinifera subps. sylvestris Ann Bot. 110 1651 1660

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Penfield S & MacGregor DR. 2017 Effects of environmental variation during seed production on seed dormancy and germination J Expt Bot. 68 819 825

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Piskurewicz U, Iwasaki M, Susaki D, Megies C, Kinoshita T & Lopez-Molina L. 2016 Dormancy-specific imprinting underlies maternal inheritance of seed dormancy in Arabidopsis thaliana eLife. 5 e19573 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • R Core Team 2021 R: A language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria https://www.R-project.org/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rees M. 1996 Evolutionary ecology of seed dormancy and seed size Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 351 1299 1308 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1996.0113

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Richardson EA, Seeley SD & Walker DR. 1974 A model for estimating the completion of rest for ‘Redhaven’ and ‘Elberta’ peach trees HortScience. 9 331 332 https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.9.4.331

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roach DA & Wulff RD. 1987 Maternal effects in plants Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 18 209 235

  • Sawhney R, Quick WA & Hsiao A. 1984 The effect of temperature during parental vegetative growth on seed germination of wild oats (Avena fatua L.) Ann Bot (Lond). 55 25 28

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schutz W & Milberg P. 1997 Seed dormancy in Crex canescens: Regional differences and ecological consequences Oikos. 78 420 428

  • Scott DH & Ink DP. 1950 Grape seed germination experiments Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci. 56 134 139

  • Seglias AE, Williams E, Bilge A & Kramer AT. 2018 Phylogeny and source climate impact seed dormancy and germination of restorationrelevant forb species PLoS One. 13 e0191931

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shaner G & Finney RE. 1977 The effect of nitrogen fertilizer in the expression of slow-mildewing resistance in Knox wheat Phytopathology. 67 1051 1056

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Singh SN. 1961 Germination of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) hybrid seeds by chilling Curr Sci. 30 62

  • Singh J, Clavijo Michelangeli JA, Gezan SA, Lee H & Vallejos CE. 2017 Maternal effects on seed and seedling phenotypes in reciprocal F1 hybrids of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Front. Plant Sci. 8 2017 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00042

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomas H, Webb DP & Wareing PF. 1973 Seed dormancy in Acer: Maturation in relation to dormancy in Acer pseudoplatanus L J Expt Bot. 24 https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/24.5.958

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vahdati K, Aslamarz AA, Rahemi M, Hassani D & Leslie C. 2012 Mechanism of seed dormancy and its relationship to bud dormancy in Persian walnut Environ Exp Bot. 75 74 82

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Klinken RD, Lukitsch B & Cook C. 2008 Interaction between seed dormancy – release mechanism, environment and seed bank strategy for a widely distributed perennial legume, Parkinsonia aculeata (Caesalpinaceae) Ann Bot. 102 255 264

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang D, Gao Z, Du P, Xiao W, Tan Q, Chen X, Li L & Gao D. 2016 Expression of ABA metabolism-related genes suggests similarities and differences between seed dormancy and bud dormancy of peach (Prunus persica) Front Plant Sci. 6 2015 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01248

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang WQ, Song SQ, Li SH, Gan YY, Wu JH & Cheng HY. 2009 Quantitative description of the effect of stratification on dormancy release of grape seeds in response to various temperatures and water contents J Expt Bot. 60 3397 3406

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang WQ, Song SQ, Li SH, Gan YY, Wu JH & Cheng HY. 2011 Seed dormancy and germination in Vitis amurensis and its variation Seed Sci Res. 21 255 265

  • Weaver RJ & Iwasaki K. 1977 Effect of temperature and length of storage, root growth and termination of bud rest in ‘Zinfandel’ grapes Am J Enol Viticult. 28 149 151

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wiersema J & Waibel G. 2013 Section 6: Germination tests Principles and procedures. 6 61 Association of Official Seed Analysts Moline, IL, USA

Safa A. Alzohairy Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; and Agricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza 12619, Egypt

Search for other papers by Safa A. Alzohairy in
Google Scholar
Close
,
Jason P. Londo School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456, USA

Search for other papers by Jason P. Londo in
Google Scholar
Close
,
Claire Heinitz US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Clonal Germplasm Repository, Davis, CA 95616, USA

Search for other papers by Claire Heinitz in
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Rachel P. Naegele US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Sugarbeet Research Unit, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA

Search for other papers by Rachel P. Naegele in
Google Scholar
Close

Contributor Notes

Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

We thank Cameron Saunders, Marcos Alvarez, Rachel Navarro, Kern Vasquez, Lex Pike, and Hanna Martens for technical assistance.

R.P.N. is the corresponding author. E-mail: Rachel.naegele@usda.gov.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 771 437 10
PDF Downloads 543 251 7
  • Fig. 1.

    Germination progression curve as a line with error bars indicating the SD of the mean area under the germination progress curve (AUGPC). (A) ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (B) 2017, and (C) 2018. (D) ‘Chardonnay’ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (E) 2017, and (F) 2018. (G) ‘Isabella’+ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (H) 2017, and (I) 2018.

  • Fig. 2.

    Total seed germination percentages of Davis-grown cultivars subjected to chilling from 0 to 12 weeks. Seeds were counted as a cumulative after 8 weeks of incubation for three replicates. The seed germination percentage was calculated as the number of germinated seeds to the total number of tested seeds (50). Data are an average of two runs.

  • Fig. 3.

    Averaged area under the germination progress curve (AUGPC) values of two runs of seed germination of Davis-grown cultivars that were subjected to chilling from 0 to 12 weeks. Data are an average of two runs.

  • Fig. 4.

    Germination percentage from 0 to 12 weeks of chilling for accessions of V. riparia (R275, R054, R711) and V. cinerea (C208, C218, C221) seed collected from Geneva, NY, after 8 weeks of incubation. Data are an average of two runs. Error bars indicate SD.

  • Supplemental Fig. S1.

    Total seed germination percentage based on location by cultivar by year is shown as a line graph with error bars indicating the standard deviation of the mean. (A) ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (B) 2017 and (C) 2018, (D) ‘Chardonnay’ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (E) 2017, and (F) 2018, (G) ‘Isabella’+ seed germination experiment at three locations in 2016, (H) 2017, and (I) 2018. The seed germination percentage was calculated as the number of germinated seeds to the total number of tested seeds (50). Data is an average of three replicates.

Advertisement
PP Systems Measuring Far Red Advert

 

Advertisement
Save