Abstract
Soil disinfestation with steam has potential to partially replace fumigants such as methyl bromide, chloropicrin, and 1,3-dichloropropene because it is effective, safer to apply, and has less negative impact on the environment. Here, we compared the efficacy of steam and steam + mustard seed meal (MSM) to chloropicrin on soil disinfection, plant growth, and fruit yield in a strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa) fruiting field. The MSM was applied at 3368 kg·ha−1 before the steam application. Steam was injected into a 3-m-wide reverse tiller that was set to till 30 to 40 cm deep. Soil temperatures at depths of 10, 20, 25, and 35 cm were monitored. Steam and steam + MSM treatments reduced the viability of purslane seeds and nutsedge tubers, microsclerotia density of Verticillium dahliae, propagule density of Pythium ultimum, cumulative weed densities, and biomass compared with the nontreated control. Moreover, the steam application was as efficacious as chloropicrin on these pests. The growth and fruit yield of strawberries grown on soils previously treated with the steam and steam + MSM treatments were similar to those in the chloropicrin treatment and were higher than those in the nontreated control. Our study indicated that steam, steam + MSM, and chloropicrin are equally effective at suppressing weeds and soilborne pathogens. These results suggest that the steam and steam + MSM treatment can be a practical alternative for soil disinfestation in conventional and organic strawberry fields.
Methyl bromide (MB) has been widely used for decades as a soil fumigant in conventional strawberry fields (Fennimore and Goodhue, 2016). But MB has been linked to depletion of the atmospheric ozone layer and its use has largely been phased out (Sen et al., 2010). Chloropicrin alone and in combination with 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) serves as the primary replacement for MB (Moldenke and Thies, 1996; South et al., 1997). Fumigant use regulations in California, however, require buffer zones near sensitive sites like hospitals and schools, which complicates the fumigation of agricultural fields (Goodhue et al., 2016). Beauvais (2012) and Lewis (2012) reported that chloropicrin causes transient mucous membrane and eye irritation at relatively low concentrations, and every effort is made to reduce bystander exposure to fumigants. Therefore, there is much interest in fumigant alternatives for use in areas that cannot be fumigated, such as sensitive sites or organic fields.
Among the nonfumigant alternatives, anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) is the most promising so far (Shennan et al., 2018), but ASD requires used of plastic film, which creates solid waste and high nitrogen carbon sources like rice bran, which can pollute groundwater (Messiha et al., 2007). In contrast, soils disinfestation with steam has less impact on the environment and is safer to applicators and bystanders than chemical fumigants, which pose risk of exposure (Fennimore and Goodhue, 2016; Kim et al., 2020). Moreover, Fennimore et al. (2014) reported steam to be a dependable nonfumigant method of soil disinfestation for control of pathogens and weeds with similar efficacy as MB in strawberry fruit production fields.
Steam coapplication with MSM may be a means to enhance performance so that the application can be made faster and more efficiently than steam alone. MSM may reduce infection by plant pathogens such as Rhizoctonia solani (Mazzola et al., 2007), Pythium abappressorium (Weerakoon et al., 2012), and Cylindrocarpon and Rhizoctonia spp. (Mazzola and Brown, 2010), and may control weeds like Lolium multiflorum and Stellaria media (Boydston and Anderson, 2008; Handiseni et al., 2011). Borek and Morra (2005) and Brown et al. (1991) found that MSM contains glucosinolates that undergo enzymatic hydrolysis to thiocyanates, isothiocyanates, nitriles, and other compounds in moist soil. Among the hydrolyzed compounds, radial growth suppression of Helminthosporium solani and Verticillium dahliae were correlated to allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) concentration, which is a form of volatile isothiocyanate (Olivier et al., 1999; Petersen et al., 2001). According to Dai and Lim (2014), AITC was released from MSM up to 13 mg·g−1. AITC is available as a natural product in MSM or in synthetic form as Dominus (99.8% AITC; Isagro USA Inc., Morrisville, NC) (Kim et al., 2019, 2020). Previous works have shown that Brassicas incorporated into soil can enhance efficacy of solarization (Stapleton et al., 2000). Our hypothesis is that steam plus MSM would improve pest control efficacy compared with either treatment alone.
Steam kills weed seeds and pathogens with high temperature. Previous studies indicated that steam application must raise soil temperatures to 60 °C in the 0 to 15-cm layer for most vegetables to control weeds and 60 °C to a depth of 35 cm for strawberry to control weeds and pathogens (Baker, 1962; Fennimore et al., 2014). Steam efficacy on soil pests has been typically evaluated by weed densities and biomass, the pathogen propagule viability, diseased plant counts, plant size, and fruit yield (Fennimore et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2020; Samtani et al., 2012).
The objectives of this project were to evaluate efficacy of steam and steam + MSM applications for soil disinfestation, plant growth enhancement, and fruit production.
Materials and Methods
Steam application.
Field trials were established at the Spence U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service research farm near Salinas, CA, on a sandy loam soil. Treatments included 1) nontreated control, 2) MSM (Farm Fuel, Watsonville, CA) alone 3368 kg·ha−1, 3) steam alone, 4) steam + MSM 3368 kg·ha−1, and 5) chloropicrin (Trical, Hollister, CA). The MSM was applied before the steam application with a fertilizer spreader. HOBO data loggers (U12 Outdoor; Onset Computer Corp., Pocasset, MA) were used to monitor soil temperatures at depths of 10, 20, 25, and 35 cm in the nontreated control, steam, and steam + MSM treatments. Treatments were replicated four times and arranged in a randomized complete block design. Steam was applied on 14 Sept. 2018 and 6 Sept. 2019. The field-scale steam applicator (Southern Turf Nurseries, STN, Elberta, AL) was equipped with a 300-hp diesel-fueled Cleaver Brooks steam generator mounted on a trailer towed by a tractor (Fig. 1). Steam was injected into a 3-m-wide reverse tiller (Northwest Tillers, Yakima, WA) that was set to till 30 to 40 cm deep immediately blending steam into the soil. Following steam application, beds were shaped and mulched with plastic film, and chloropicrin was applied through the drip irrigation system on 18 Oct. 2018 at a rate of 28.2 g·m−2 and on 17 Oct. 2019 at a rate of 24.2 g·m−2. Strawberry plants (Fragaria ×ananassa cv. Cabrillo) were transplanted 7 Nov. 2018 and 15 Nov. 2019. Fertilizer containing nitrogen, phosphate, potash, and micronutrient was applied via the drip system 11 times from Mar. to Aug. 2019 and 12 times from Feb. to Sept. 2020. The insect and phytopathogen management after transplanting was conducted by suction devices (bug-vacs); dust control and hand weeding; removal of ripe and decayed fruits, infected and dead plants, and plant debris; and proper irrigation to prevent water stress.
Measurement of plant growth and fruit yield.
The plant vigor was scored from 0 (dead) to 10 (vigorous) per each plant (n = 50). The plant diameters were measured in two dimensions (n = 10). The plant vigor and diameters were measured three times from January to April. Strawberry fruit was harvested 31 times from Apr. to Aug. 2019 and 36 times from Apr. to Sept. 2020 from four replications of 26 to 30 plants in 1.2 m × 6 m (width × length) sample areas. Fruit fresh weight was measured by commercial harvest crews once or twice weekly. Marketable fruit had the following characteristics: more than 10 g in weight; free of mechanical, insect, or disease damage; a minimum of 80% red surface; and attached calyx.
Bioassay.
Verticillium dahliae samples of 25 g of infected soil and 100 common purslane (Portulaca oleraceae L.) seeds and 25 yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) tubers were contained in nylon mesh bags. The bags were buried 15 mm deep and HOBO data loggers were installed next to the bags immediately after the steam applicator passed. Samples and data loggers were collected after 2 weeks and 3 d, respectively. Following sample retrieval, V. dahliae samples were air-dried, hand crushed, and the number of microsclerotia per gram of soil was assessed via the dry plating method on NP-10 semiselective medium according to Kabir et al. (2004). Pythium ultimum levels were assessed in pre- and posttreatment soil samples using a wet plating method on semiselective medium (Klose et al., 2007). The soil samples of pre- and posttreatment were collected 3 d before and after the treatment, respectively. The purslane seed samples were tested for viability using the methods described by Cottrell (1947). A 0.1% (v/v) solution of 2,3,5-triphenyl-tetrazoilum chloride (Sigma, St Louis, MO) was used to stain the seeds from the recovered containers and probes. The purslane seed samples were plated on germination paper in petri dishes, cut in half, stained, and kept in the dark at 24 °C for 24 h. The viability of the individual seeds was evaluated under a microscope, according to their staining intensity. Seeds with little or no stain were counted as dead and seeds with obvious stain intensity were counted as live. Weed densities and biomass of resident field weeds in season were assessed at monthly intervals between January and April.
Statistical analyses.
To compare the treatment effects on viability of purslane seeds, nutsedge tubers, V. dahliae, and P. ultimum levels, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to avoid the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance. For pairwise comparisons, the pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum tests were implemented (Hollander and Wolfe, 1973). To respect a fixed significance level in the multiple comparisons (α = 0.05), P values were adjusted using the correction method suggested by Benjamini and Hochberg (1995). Similar analyses were performed for cumulative weed density and biomass. To compare plant vigor and plant canopy, the mean separation was performed using Duncan’s multiple range test, and their estimated mean was graphically presented. These analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and R version 4.0.2 (R Core Team, 2019).
The marketable fruit yield was compared among treatments using a mixed-effect model. The mixed-effect model considered both random effects due to observing the same experimental unit over time and fixed effects due to treatment effects. Under the model the rate of expected cumulative yield of each treatment was compared with the nontreated control and among the treatments. For a graphical demonstration, the cumulative total and marketable fruit yield were plotted with respect to the time since the beginning of harvest season (15 Apr. 2019 for the first season and 27 Apr. 2020 for the second season). These analyses were performed by R version 4.0.2 (R Core Team, 2019).
Results
Soil temperature.
Time above 60 °C during the first hour in both steam treatments in the 2018–19 trial was 58.5, 58.5, and 59.5 min at the 10, 20, and 25 cm depths, respectively (Table 1). Time above 60 °C during the first hour in the steam-alone treatment in the 2019–20 trial was 59.5, 59.5, and 60.0 min at 10, 20, and 25 cm depths, respectively. Time above 60 °C at 10- and 20-cm depths in steam + MSM treatment was almost the same as that in the steam-alone treatment except at 25-cm depth where time above 60 °C was 30.5 min (Table 1).
The duration of the soil temperature for the first hour after steam application.
Pest control.
Steam, steam + MSM, and chloropicrin reduced viability of purslane seed, nutsedge tubers, and V. dahliae (Table 2) compared with the nontreated control and MSM alone. Similar patterns were shown for P. ultimum levels (Table 3); however, steam, steam + MSM, and chloropicrin were not different because P. ultimum levels were low in the nontreated control and MSM alone in the 2019–20 trial. The pest control efficacy of the steam treatment was similar to chloropicrin.
Viability of purslane seeds and nutsedge tubers and microsclerotia density of Verticillium dahliae.
Propagule density of Pythium ultimum before and a week after treatment.
Weeds present were California burclover (Medicago polymorpha) and common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris) in the 2018–19 trial and burning nettle (Urtica urens), chickweed (Stellaria media), henbit (Lamium amplexicaule), lesser swinecress (Lepidium didymum), and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) in the 2019–20 trial. The multiple comparisons in the 2018–19 trial showed that there was no significant difference between treatments at α = 0.05. The multiple comparisons in the 2019–20 trial showed that the effects of the steam alone, steam + MSM, and chloropicrin had lower weed densities and fresh weights compared with the nontreated control and MSM alone (Table 4).
The cumulative season-long weed densities and biomass.
Plant growth.
The vigor estimates and plant diameter measurements indicated that strawberry plants in the steam + MSM treatment in the 2018–19 trial were larger and more vigorous than those in the other treatments. Strawberry plants in the steam alone, steam + MSM, and chloropicrin treatments in the 2019–20 trial were greater than those in the nontreated control and MSM alone (Figs. 2 and 3). Strawberry plants in all treatments grew rapidly between March and April of the 2018–19 trial and February and March of the 2019–20 trial (Fig. 3). The plant diameter in the steam and steam + MSM treatments in the 2019–20 trial, especially, grew faster than the nontreated control and MSM treatment. The plants in the steam, steam + MSM, and chloropicrin treatments were larger than the nontreated control and MSM alone treatment during both seasons.
Fruit yield.
Marketable fruit yield in the steam, steam + MSM, and chloropicrin treatments was higher than that in the nontreated control (Table 5). The table provides the rate of cumulative fruit yield (grams per plant) over time as estimated by the mixed-effect model for each treatment relative to the nontreated control (i.e., “+” means a faster rate of cumulative yield relative to the nontreated control). Marketable yield in MSM alone was as effective as steam alone during the 2018–19 season, but the MSM alone application was not as effective as steam alone in the 2019–20 season. Moreover, the yield in the steam + MSM was similar to that in the chloropicrin treatment during both seasons (Table 5, Fig. 4). The estimated rate of cumulative fruit yield was similar among the steam alone, steam + MSM, and chloropicrin in the 2019–20 season.
The estimated slopes in Fig. 3 and P values calculated under the mixed effects models (“+” means relative to the nontreated control).
Discussion
Soil disinfestation with steam raises fewer concerns about exposure to fumigants (Fennimore et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2019, 2020; Samtani et al., 2012). van Loenen et al. (2003) and Melander and Jørgensen (2005) demonstrated that steam applied to the soil raising temperatures to 60 °C for 3 min, reduced V. dahliae and P. ultimum and weed emergence in the laboratory. Steam injected and mixed with soil reaching 70 °C for 20 min controlled soilborne pathogens and weeds in California strawberry fields (Fennimore et al., 2014; Samtani et al., 2012). Most weeds that emerge are from the shallow layers of the soil. Benvenuti et al. (2001) found that weeds did not emerge from more than 12 cm deep and Pullman et al. (1981) found that most viable propagules of V. dahliae and Pythium spp. were in the upper soil layer with fewer propagules at 15 to 30 cm soil depths. Successful field steam application requires an understanding of two important factors: 1) steam does not disperse far from the injection point in soil, steam only goes where placed, and thus, placement of steam is very important; and 2) soil temperatures following steam application can vary depending on soil humidity, air temperature, and soil compaction (Kim et al., 2020). Steam was injected into soil at temperatures of 120 °C and depth of tillage was 40 cm. Soil temperatures remained above 60 °C for about 1 h following steam application and penetrated to 25 cm deep (Table 1). The soil temperatures observed in this research, therefore, were adequate to reduce phytopathogens and weed seed viability as well as to protect the crop rooting zone (Fennimore et al., 2014; Samtani et al., 2011).
Applications of steam alone and steam + MSM decreased the viability of purslane seeds, nutsedge tubers, and V. dahliae, P. ultimum levels, and cumulative weed densities and biomass comparable to chloropicrin (Tables 2–4). However, MSM did not control soil pathogens as well as steam alone and steam + MSM. Angus et al. (1994) reported that pest control by glucosinolate containing shoot and root tissues of Brassica species resulted from isothiocyanates (ITCs). Among the ITCs, AITC, biologically active hydrolysis products of glucosinolates, was effective in reducing soil pests (Bangarwa et al., 2011; Brown and Morra, 1997). The volatile nature of AITC aids in its uniform distribution in soil. Moreover, Kim et al. (2020) found that steam + AITC has a complementary effect on pests because steam application increases the mobility of AITC. Therefore, to boost the pesticidal activity of MSM, it is necessary to find methods to increase hydrolysis of glucosinolates (Olivier et al., 1999). On the other hand, the addition of MSM improved growth (Figs. 2 and 3) and fruit yield (Table 5, Fig. 3) of the strawberry plants. This growth may be due to the 4.5% nitrogen contained in MSM (www.farmfuelinc.com/products/). Fennimore et al. (2014) found that ammonium and nitrate level in the soil of steam + MSM treatment was higher than that in nontreated and steam-alone treatments due to the nitrogen in MSM. Dai and Lim (2014) found that MSM contained 33.6% protein, 16.6% lipid, and 5.5% carbohydrate. The nitrogen could be absorbed by plants in the form of ammonium and nitrate to promote the growth and development. Although MSM increased the plant growth and fruit yield of strawberry due to the nutrients, our data may suggest that MSM alone can be a problem (Tables 2–4).
Fennimore et al. (2014) and Samtani et al. (2011) found that strawberry fruit yields in soils treated with steam were higher than those of nontreated control. Our results also showed that plants grown on soils previously treated with steam produced yields similar to chloropicrin and greater than those of the nontreated controls (Table 5, Fig. 4). The vigor of strawberry plants, moreover, are important because it is linked to fruit yield (Fennimore et al., 2014; Singh et al., 2008). Salamé-Donoso et al. (2010) reported that the diameter of strawberry plants displayed a positive correlation with fruit production regardless of cultivars and production system. The results demonstrated that the strawberry plants in the steam and steam + MSM treatments produced similar quantities of fruit as plants grown in soils previously treated with chloropicrin.
Conclusion
The finds here suggest the following: 1) pest suppression by steam was similar to that of chloropicrin, 2) MSM did not improve performance of the steam application because steam alone is very effective, 3) strawberry plant vigor and yield responses to the steam application were similar to those to chloropicrin, and 4) MSM might provide nitrogen, although fertilizer benefits from MSM were not directly evaluated in this study. However, despite a decade of favorable data with soil steaming on open field applications, a commercially available technology for 35-cm-deep soil steaming has not been developed yet. There are small or shallow steaming machines on the market. The challenge is to find an economic method of steam application at field scale that can treat large acreages in a timely and cost-effective manner. Cooperative efforts are needed to bring together interested parties that seek to develop soil steaming technologies for use in conventional and organic fields (e.g., Agricultural Soil Steaming Association, USA, www.soilsteamingassociation.org/).
Literature Cited
Angus, J.F., Gardner, P.A., Kirkegaard, J.A. & Desmarchelier, J.M. 1994 Biofumigation: Isothiocyanates released from Brassica roots inhibit the growth of the take-all fungus Plant Soil 162 107 112 doi: 10.1007/BF01416095
Baker, K.F. 1962 Principles of heat treatment of soils and planting material J. Austral. Inst. Agr. Sci. 28 118 126
Bangarwa, S.K., Norsworthy, J.K., Gbur, E.E., Zhang, J. & Habtom, T. 2011 Allyl isothiocyanate: A methyl bromide replacement in polyethylene-mulched bell pepper Weed Technol. 25 90 96 doi: 10.1614/WT-D-10-00076.1
Beauvais, S. 2012 Estimation of exposure of persons in California to pesticide products that contain chloropicrin. California Dept. Pest Reg., Sacramento, CA
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. 1995 Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57 289 300 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101>
Benvenuti, S., Macchia, M. & Miele, S. 2001 Quantitative analysis of emergence of seedlings from buried weed seeds with increasing soil depth Weed Sci. 49 528 535 doi: 10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0528:qaoeos]2.0.co;2
Borek, V. & Morra, M.J. 2005 Ionic thiocyanate (SCN−) production from 4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate contained in Sinapis alba seed meal J. Agr. Food Chem. 53 8650 8654 doi: 10.1021/jf051570r
Boydston, R.A. & Anderson, T. 2008 Mustard (Sinapis alba) seed meal suppresses weeds in container-grown ornamentals HortScience 43 800 803 doi: 10.21273/hortsci.43.3.800
Brown, P.C. & Morra, M.J. 1997 Control of soil-borne plant pests using glucosinolate-containing plants Adv. Agron. 61 167 231 doi: 10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60664-1
Brown, P.C., Morra, M.J., McCaffrey, J.P., Auld, D.L. & Williams, J. III 1991 Allelochemicals produced during glucosinolate degradation in soil J. Chem. Ecol. 17 2021 2034 doi: 10.1021/jf00045a037
Cottrell, H.J. 1947 Tetrazolium salt as a seed germination indicator Nature 159 748 doi: 10.1038/159748a0
Dai, R. & Lim, L.T. 2014 Release of allyl isothiocyanate from mustard seed meal powder J. Food Sci. 79 E47 E53 doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12322
Fennimore, S.A., Martin, F.N., Miller, T.C., Broome, J.C., Dorn, N. & Greene, I. 2014 Evaluation of a mobile steam applicator for soil disinfestation in California strawberry HortScience 49 1542 1549 doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.49.12.1542
Fennimore, S.A. & Goodhue, R.E. 2016 Soil disinfestation with steam: A review of economics, engineering, and soil pest control in California strawberry Intl. J. Fruit Sci. 16 71 83 doi: 10.1080/15538362.2016.1195312
Goodhue, R., Schweisguth, M. & Klonsky, K. 2016 Revised chloropicrin use requirements impact strawberry growers unequally Calif. Agr. 70 116 123 doi: 10.3733/ca.2016a0002
Handiseni, M., Brown, J., Zemetra, R. & Mazzola, M. 2011 Herbicidal activity of Brassicaceae seed meal on wild oat (Avena fatua), Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), and prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola) Weed Technol. 25 127 134 doi: 10.1614/wt-d-10-00068.1
Hollander, M. & Wolfe, D.A. 1973 Nonparametric statistical methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Kabir, Z., Bhat, R.G. & Subbarao, K.V. 2004 Comparison of media for recovery of Verticillium dahliae from soil Plant Dis. 88 49 55 doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.1.49
Kim, D.S., Hoffmann, M., Kim, S.B., Scholler, B.A. & Fennimore, S.A. 2020 Integration of steam with allyl-isothiocyanate for soil disinfestation HortScience 55 920 925 doi: 10.21273/hortsci14600-20
Kim, D.S., Kim, S.B. & Fennimore, S.A. 2019 Incorporating statistical strategy into image analysis to estimate effects of steam and allyl isocyanate on weed control PLoS One 14 1 14 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222695
Klose, S., Ajwa, H.A., Fennimore, S.A., Martin, F.N., Browne, G.T. & Subbarao, K.V. 2007 Dose response of weed seeds and soilborne pathogens to 1,3-D and chloropicrin Crop Prot. 26 535 542
Lewis, M.S. 2012 Chloropicrin risk characterization document. California Dept. Pest Reg., Sacramento, CA
Mazzola, M. & Brown, J. 2010 Efficacy of brassicaceous seed meal formulations for the control of apple replant disease in conventional and organic production systems Plant Dis. 94 835 842 doi: 10.1094/pdis-94-7-0835
Mazzola, M., Brown, J., Izzo, A.D. & Cohen, M.F. 2007 Mechanism of action and efficacy of seed meal-induced pathogen suppression differ in a Brassicaceae species and time-dependent manner Phytopathology 97 454 460 doi: 10.1094/phyto-97-4-0454
Melander, B. & Jørgensen, M.H. 2005 Soil steaming to reduce intrarow weed seedling emergence Weed Res. 45 202 211 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2005.00449.x
Messiha, N., van Diepeningen, A., Wenneker, M., van Beuningen, A., Janse, J., Coenen, T., Termorshuizen, A., van Bruggen, A. & Blok, W. 2007 Biological soil disinfestation (BSD), a new control method for potato brown rot, caused by Ralstonia solanacearumrace 3 biovar 2 Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 117 403 415 doi: 10.1007/s10658-007-9109-9
Moldenke, A.R. & Thies, W.G. 1996 Application of chloropicrin to control laminated root rot: Research design and seasonal dynamics of control populations of soil arthropods Environ. Entomol. 25 925 932 doi: 10.1093/ee/25.5.925
Olivier, C., Vaughn, S.F., Mizubuti, E.S.G. & Loria, R. 1999 Variation in allyl isothiocyanate production within Brassica species and correlation with fungicidal activity J. Chem. Ecol. 25 2687 2701 doi: 10.1023/A:1020895306588
Petersen, J., Belz, R., Walker, F. & Hurle, K. 2001 Weed suppression by release of isothiocyanates from turnip-rape mulch Agron. J. 93 37 43 doi: 10.2134/agronj2001.93137x
Pullman, G.S., DeVay, J.E., Garber, R.H. & Weinhold, A.R. 1981 Soil solarization: Effects on Verticillium wilt of cotton and soilborne populations of Verticillium dahliae, Pythium spp., Rhizoctonia solani, and Thielaviopsis basicola Phytopathology 71 954 959 doi: 10.1094/phyto-71-954
R Core Team 2019 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <https://www.R-project.org/>
Salamé-Donoso, T.P., Santos, B.M., Chandler, C.K. & Sargent, S.A. 2010 Effect of high tunnels on the growth, yields, and soluble solids of strawberry cultivars in Florida Intl. J. Fruit Sci. 10 249 263 doi: 10.1080/15538362.2010.510420
Samtani, J.B., Ajwa, H.A., Weber, J.B., Browne, G.T., Klose, S., Hunzie, J. & Fennimore, S.A. 2011 Evaluation of non-fumigant alternatives to methyl bromide for weed control and crop yield in California strawberries (Fragaria ananassa L.) Crop Prot. 30 45 51 doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2010.08.023
Samtani, J.B., Gilbert, C., Weber, J.B., Subbarao, K.V., Goodhue, R.E. & Fennimore, S.A. 2012 Effect of steam and solarization treatments on pest control, strawberry yield and economic returns relative to methyl bromide HortScience 47 64 70 doi: 10.21273/hortsci.47.1.64
Samtani, J.B., Rom, C.R., Friedrich, H., Fennimore, S.A., Finn, C.E., Petran, A., Wallace, R.W., Pritts, M.P., Fernandez, G., Chase, C.A., Kubota, C. & Bergefurd, B. 2019 The status and future of the strawberry industry in the United States HortTechnology 29 11 24 doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH04135-18
Sen, F., Meyvaci, K.B., Turanli, F. & Aksoy, U. 2010 Effects of short-term controlled atmosphere treatment at elevated temperature on dried fig fruit J. Stored Prod. Res. 46 28 33 doi: 10.1016/j.jspr.2009.07.005
Shennan, C., Muramoto, J., Koike, S., Baird, G., Fennimore, S., Samtani, J., Bolda, M., Dara, S., Daugovish, O., Lazarovits, G., Butler, D., Rosskopf, E., Kokalis-Burelle, N., Klonsky, K. & Mazzola, M. 2018 Anaerobic soil disinfestation is an alternative to soil fumigation for control of some soilborne pathogens in strawberry production Plant Pathol. 67 51 66 doi: 10.1111/ppa.12721
Singh, R., Sharma, R.R., Kumar, S., Gupta, R.K. & Patila, R.T. 2008 Vermicompost substitution influences growth, physiological disorders, fruit yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) Bioresour. Technol. 99 8507 8511 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.034
South, D.B., Carey, W.A. & Enebak, S.A. 1997 Chloropicrin as a soil fumigant in forest nurseries For. Chron. 73 489 494 doi: 10.5558/tfc73489-4
Stapleton, J.J., Elmore, C.E. & DeVay, J.E. 2000 Solarization and biofumigation help disinfest soil Calif. Agr. 54 42 45 doi: 10.3733/ca.v054n06p42
van Loenen, M.C.A., Turbett, Y., Mullins, C.E., Feilden, N.E.H., Wilson, M.J., Leifert, C. & Seel, W.E. 2003 Low temperature–short duration steaming of soil kills soil-borne pathogens, nematode pests and weeds Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 109 993 1002 doi: 10.1023/B:EJPP.0000003830.49949.34
Weerakoon, D.M.N., Reardon, C.L., Paulitz, T.C., Izzo, A.D. & Mazzola, M. 2012 Long-term suppression of Pythium abappressorium induced by Brassica juncea seed meal amendment is biologically mediated Soil Biol. Biochem. 51 44 52 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.027