Abstract
Plant biostimulants have received increasing attention in recent years because of their positive effects on crop performance and contribution to agro-ecological sustainability. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of betaine and chitin treatments, alone and in combination, on lettuce plants by changes in the morphology and physiology of plants exposed to regulated deficit irrigation (RDI). Plants were subjected to full irrigation (FI; no water deficiency treatment, field capacity >70%) and RDI (field capacity <50%) conditions until the end of each experiment. We recorded plant yield–related traits, net photosynthesis, and water use efficiency (WUE) values weekly for 4 weeks and carried out three individual experiments to assess the efficacy of biostimulant and irrigation treatments. Betaine (0, 50, and 100 mm/plant) was foliar-treated every 2 weeks during Expt. 1, whereas chitin (0, 2, and 4 g/kg) was applied to the soil at the beginning of Expt. 2. We then applied the optimal concentration of each chemical alone or in combination to the plants as Expt. 3. Compared with negative control, the application of 50 mm betaine and 2 g/kg chitin significantly increased leaf area (LA) per plant by 48.5% and 25.6%, respectively. Furthermore, 50 mm betaine and 2 g/kg chitin treatment showed a clearly protective effect in RDI plants, enhancing their total fresh weights by 26.10% and 75.0%, respectively, in comparison with control. Comparing WUEyield and WUEbiomass, chemical-treated plants had higher values than control. Betaine (50 mm) or chitin (2 g/kg) treatments alone significantly elevated LA, fresh shoot weight, total fresh and dry weights, net photosynthesis, and WUE values, and boosted the water stress tolerance of lettuce under RDI compared with controls. However, a combined treatment of 50 mm betaine and 2 g/kg chitin did not increase the levels of all yield traits under RDI compared with individual chemical treatment. Most leaves appeared healthy, green, and had visually less leaf chlorosis when treated with chitin or betaine under RDI compared with untreated plants subjected to RDI. Our study indicates that applying betaine and chitin improves plant performance against water supply limitations and highlights their potential for the sustainable production of lettuce.
Irrigated agriculture currently delivers 40% of the world’s food supply from just 20% of the cultivated land, and provides crucial stability for global food security (Garces-Restrepo and Giovanni, 2008). Using water sparingly can be an efficient way to maintain the sustainability of water resources, increase productivity, and produce yield stability in cropping systems, and thus help face the challenges of expanding human populations and its concomitant increased need for food. Irrigating plants according to their water status can minimize irrigation water waste. WUE can be defined as the ratio of crop yield over the applied water, and crop growth performance is frequently limited by periods of water deficiency and soil water availability (De Pascale et al., 2011). Water shortages are responsible for the greatest crop losses around the world and are expected to worsen (Sahin et al., 2016). Various forms of deficit irrigation management have been suggested for achieving high yields with less water in arid areas where agriculture is dependent on irrigation (Sahin et al., 2016). RDI is an efficient water-saving irrigation technology that tries to ensure an optimal crop water status in the phenological phases most sensitive to water stress and restrict irrigation in the most resistant crop phases (Galindo et al., 2018; Marsal et al., 2016). It is particularly useful in areas where water is drastically restricted during summer months because of severe drought or priorities for urban use (Fereres et al., 2012). RDI has a great impact on the growth, development, yield, and quality of crops, and usually improves WUE in water-stressed areas (Chai et al., 2016; Rop et al., 2016). Understanding and evaluating a plant's ability to cope with water stress in specific/localized environments will lead to better-informed decisions on the suitability of irrigation management practices.
Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata), a member of the Asteraceae family, is cultivated worldwide and is one the most consumed rosette leafy vegetables in the raw form for its taste and high nutritive value. Lettuce is an excellent source of vitamins, iron, folate, caffeic acid, carotenoids, and other antioxidants (Malejane et al., 2018; Sonmez et al., 2017). Different varieties of lettuce are distinguished by their morphology and end users. They grow well both in the open field and under protection and some can adapt well to warm conditions or hot weather (Şenyiğit and Kaplan, 2013). The major problem during lettuce cultivation is the requirement for a large quantity of water, and it is extremely sensitive to deficit irrigation and drought because of its short root system (Malcom et al., 2012; Şenyiğit and Kaplan, 2013). Therefore, new strategies will become critical to enhance productivity under deficit irrigation. Previous studies demonstrated that a water deficit of 30% to ≈40% drastically reduces lettuce fresh weight and final production and increases oxidative damage (Jiménez-Arias et al., 2019; Sayyari et al., 2013). For the past several years, numerous techniques have been applied to overcome water deficit in field crops. Strategies to mitigate losses or damage due to inadequate water allow for the study and development of tolerant genotypes and application of biostimulants that induce water-deficit tolerance in plants (Calvo et al., 2014). Our study investigated the impact of plant biostimulants on the growth of the lettuce during RDI.
Plant biostimulants, such as betaine and chitin, are natural constituents and metabolites of plants and microorganisms that affect the crop itself and do not harm the environment because of their biodegradable and nontoxic nature (Patrick, 2015). The use of small quantities of biostimulants to enhance crop growth and yield and limit the effects of stress on plants has gained considerable momentum for ecological sustainability and consumer health (du Jardin, 2015). Plant biostimulants contain active humic substances and nitrogen compounds of natural origin that also intensify water uptake and nutrient transport and stimulate photosynthesis (Pruszyński, 2008). Chitin is composed of β (1,4)-linked units of N-acetyl-d-glucosamine. Betaine is a fully N-methyl–substituted derivative of glycine that is widely distributed in plants, animals, and microbes (Ahmad et al., 2013). Betaine and chitin have several beneficial roles in different plant species under abiotic stress and can act as elicitors to address stress adaptation (Hidangmayum et al., 2019; Rady et al., 2018). Studies of chitin and its derivatives (i.e., chitosan glycine) that induce resistance mechanisms under stressing have been used in plants to confer resistance against water deficit, salinity, heat stress, and heavy metal toxicity (Sharif et al., 2018). Betaine has multiple biological functions, including the maintenance of cellular water balance via osmotic adjustment (You et al., 2019). Although there is a growing interest and use of biostimulants by growers, research documenting the impacts of biostimulants on lettuce development remain insufficient. No reports have shown that betaine and chitin had protective effects in lettuce under RDI treatments, and the mechanisms of action of these two biostimulants on the growth and physiological processes of RDI lettuce remain unknown. This study assessed the feasibility of using those two biostimulants to save water and increase lettuce yields. We hypothesized that betaine- and chitin-treated plants would be capable of inducing water-deficit tolerance while increasing the yield and WUE of plants under RDI. The objectives of this study were to evaluate and compare the effects of optimal concentrations of betaine and chitin on yield components, net photosynthesis, and WUE values of lettuce under RDI and FI conditions. Our results explore the effects of RDI in combination with two biostimulants to save water while benefiting lettuce production, thus providing fundamental research and a reference point for irrigation management decisions for agriculture in semiarid areas.
Materials and Methods
Plant material and experimental site.
Seeds of lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. capitata cv. Fukuyama) were purchased from Known-You Seed Co. (Taipei, Taiwan) for our experiments. This cultivar is an F1 hybrid, one of the most popular of the lettuces grown in Taiwan in all seasons, and also is the most economically important, abundant, and consumed salad crop in Taiwan as well. Seeds were germinated and grown in 200-cell flats (60 × 30 cm, 3.0 × 3.0 × 3.5 cm each cell) for 1 week. The soil used was a commercial potting mix of peatmoss, perlite, and vermiculite (3:1:1 v/v/v). The seedlings were then transplanted into free-draining polyethylene plastic pots (12 cm diameter, 11 cm depth, one plant per pot), and 165 g of the previously mentioned medium was added to each pot. All seedlings were grown in an environment-controlled greenhouse at National Taiwan University (lat. 25.01°N) for 1 week. All plants were fully watered in the evening, maintaining good soil moisture until RDI and biostimulants were imposed. Those of a relatively uniform size were selected and randomly separated into different groups for the RDI and biostimulant experiments. The growth environment was controlled to a 14/10 h day/night photoperiod at 28/22 °C with a relative humidity of 75% and 300 μmol·m−2·s−1 photosynthetic photon flux.
Irrigation treatments and biostimulant applications.
All plants were irrigated until gravitational water was released before the experiments started. Plants were then subjected to two irrigation levels differentiated by the amount of irrigation water applied over the 30-d experimental period. They included an FI treatment (no water deficiency, field capacity >70%) as the control and RDI treatment (field capacity <50%). After irrigation, a soil moisture sensor (WET Sensor, Type HH2; Delta-T Device, Cambridge, UK) was used to monitor and record the field capacity of all treatments in all pots every day throughout the experiment.
Biostimulants were applied to each plant to study their responses to water stress. Three concentrations of betaine (B2626; Sigma, San Diego, CA) aqueous solutions (dissolved in distilled deionized water) at 0, 50, and 100 mm/plant were sprayed onto plant leaves with a handheld power sprayer until saturated. Betaine was foliar-treated every 2 weeks during Expt. 1 from 21 May to 20 June 2018. Moreover, three concentrations of chitin (C7170; Sigma) at 0, 2, and 4 g/kg were applied to the top 5 cm soil layer of each pot. Chitin was added to the soil once in the beginning of Expt. 2, which ran from 23 May to 22 June 2018. After investigating the differences in the two individual chemical treatments used in Expts. 1 and 2, the optimal concentration of each chemical alone or in combination was also applied to the plants (Expt. 3, 1 July to 30 July 2018). All plants tested in Expt. 3 were subjected to the same experimental procedure as used during Expts. 1 and 2. The concentrations of the chemical solutions were selected based on data from our preliminary study (data not shown). Plants without biostimulant treatment in the FI condition were considered controls to provide a basis for comparison with the effects of the biostimulants under FI and RDI. In each experiment, all plants from FI or RDI were harvested at the same time of day and used for yield components and WUE measurement.
Data collection and analysis.
All plants were manually watered once a day in the late afternoon at 100% of the transpiration rate. Six plants (per replicate) of each irrigation treatment were arranged in a completely randomized design, totaling 36 pots (one plant per pot) each in Expts. 1 and 2 and 30 pots in Expt. 3. We measured the phenotypic traits and WUE of six randomly selected representative plants from each biostimulant treatment in each irrigation treatment. All analyses were performed weekly until the end of the 4-week experimental period:
Healthy, fully expanded mature leaves of each plant were used to determine LA using a portable LAI-3000C Plant Canopy Analyzer (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE).
Plant height, measured as the height (cm) above the soil.
Fresh weight of shoots and roots, measured as green shoots and roots, and clipped at the soil surface to assess biomass accumulation.
Fresh weight and dry weight at harvest, followed by drying in an oven at 70 °C for 6 d.
WUE parameters were calculated per treatment using the following formulae:
(1) Intrinsic WUE (WUEi) (Wakrim et al., 2005) was evaluated by calculating the net photosynthetic rate (µmol·m−2·s−1 CO2) divided by the transpiration rate (mmol·m−2·s−1 H2O). Transpiration and net photosynthetic rate of the third or fourth mature and expanded leaves (with an LA of 1 cm2) were determined using a portable photosynthesis system (GFS-3000;Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) from 1000 to 1600 hr in a typical irrigation period. The measurement was conducted in the previously mentioned environmentally controlled room under 25 °C and 900 µmol·m−2·s−1 with a relative humidity of 70% and CO2 of 400 ppm.
(2) WUEyield was calculated as the fresh weight of shoots (g) per treatment divided by the total irrigation water supplied (m−3).
(3) WUEbiomass was calculated as the total dry weight (g) per treatment divided by the total irrigation water supplied (m−3).
Statistical analysis.
The measurements of phenotypic traits were analyzed by a completely randomized analysis of variance (ANOVA) that compared the different irrigation and biostimulant treatments for each parameter. Two-factor ANOVA was used to analyze growth and yield data and photosynthetic parameters, as well as the WUE data, with biostimulants and irrigation considered as two fixed effects. For significant values, means were separated by the least significant difference test at P ≤ 0.05 using Costat 6.29 (CoHort Software, Berkeley, CA).
Results and Discussion
Comparisons between betaine-treated and -untreated plants under FI and RDI.
Tables 1 and 2 illustrate that applying betaine as a foliar spray alters the morpho-physiological and WUE responses of lettuce under RDI. The effects of betaine concentrations (B) on lettuce growth and yield under irrigation conditions (I) displayed significant differences (P ≤ 0.001, 0.01, and 0.05) by the main effects and the interaction effect (I×B) in LA and shoot and total fresh weight (Table 1). However, there were no significant differences in plant height, fresh root weight, and dry weight in all effects, except for plant height and dry weight, which showed a significant difference in the FI effect. Significantly higher growth trait values were detected (except fresh root weight) in plants subjected to 50 mm betaine compared with 100 mm betaine treatment and its control (no-betaine treatment) under RDI. LA (708.50 cm2) and total fresh weight (35.40 g/plant) of the plants sprayed by 50 mm of betaine under RDI were significantly increased by 48.5% and 26.10%, respectively, compared with no-betaine treatment under RDI (LA 477.24 cm2 and total fresh weight 28.08 g/plant). Betaine appears to promote water stress tolerance effects in RDI lettuce plants. Figure 1A displays that most leaves appeared healthy and green when foliar-treated with 50 mm betaine under RDI compared with betaine-untreated plants. Therefore, adding betaine (50 mm) under RDI promotes lettuce plant growth and yield, and it can be used for the rapid monitoring and early detection of water stress injury in the seedling stage and screening of individual plants that exhibit tolerance to water stress.
Effects of different concentrations of betaine on the yield performance of lettuce under full irrigation (FI) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI).
Effects of different concentrations of betaine on the gas exchange parameters and water use efficiency (WUEi, WUEyield, WUEbiomass) of lettuce under full irrigation (FI) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI).
There were significant differences in net photosynthesis and WUE values for the main and interaction effects, except for transpiration in the B effect and WUEi in the I×B effect (Table 2). There were no marked differences in transpiration (1.03–1.17 mmol·m−2·s−1 H2O) and WUEi (10.34–12.85 mmol CO2/mol H2O) after 4 weeks under FI. However, under RDI, all 50-mm and 100-mm betaine treatments displayed significantly higher transpiration (0.74 and 0.92 mmol·m−2·s−1 H2O) and net photosynthesis (9.42 and 10.89 µmol·m−2·s−1 CO2) values compared with controls (0.31 and 6.80 µmol·m−2·s−1 CO2). It is noteworthy that significantly higher WUEyield (63.68 and 64.87 kg·m−3) and WUEbiomass (4.43 and 4.57 g·km−3) values were detected in betaine treatments under RDI compared with other treatments.
Water performs various functions in plants, including structural support through turgor pressure and as an electron donor in photosynthesis. Its absence has a direct impact on plant production, mainly due to disarrangements in most photosynthetic components. Therefore, the ability of plants to withstand such stress is of utmost importance for agribusiness in any country, and especially in major crops such as lettuce. Water stress is a predominant factor in determining the global geographic distribution of natural vegetation and agricultural crop yields; however, the effective management of cropping systems and irrigation water in the face of limited water resources will pivotally depend on our ability to maximize crop water use rather than simply maximizing yields. The total amount of water applied to lettuce in 4 weeks under FI was 995 to 1140 cm3. Compared with this amount, RDI received remarkably less irrigation water, ranging from 495 to 660 cm3. Total water irrigation decreased under RDI, indicating that lettuce suffered from water stress injury. Betaine was applied two times after planting, and because betaine application to RDI-treated plants improved plant water status, it is reasonable to expect that this in turn led to favorable effects on photosynthesis parameters and WUE values. This implies that betaine treatment increased yield-related traits, photosynthesis parameters, and WUE values under RDI and boosted water stress tolerance.
Deficit irrigation is correctly applied only through an understanding of the yield response to water. The capacity of plants to absorb nutrients is typically weak when antitranspirants are sprayed onto leaves under water-deficit conditions because of the resulting limited transpiration flux (Amor et al., 2010). Osmoregulators (i.e., betaine) are accumulated in plants as versatile instruments to ecological stress, and the foliar application of betaine alleviates drought and salt stress–induced growth inhibition in rice (Wutipraditkul et al., 2015), maize (Hamid and Armin, 2013), pepper (Korkmaz et al., 2015), barley (Wang et al., 2019), cowpea (Manaf, 2016), and cucumber (Estaji et al., 2019). Furthermore, betaine-treated leaves significantly increase the ability of the antioxidant defense system to resist abiotic stresses in different plant species (Osman, 2015; Shams et al., 2016; Yao et al., 2018). Tomato plants could be produced under sandy soil conditions using RDI strategy at transpiration with foliar spraying by betaine to overcome the negative effects of water stress and improve the vegetative growth, fruit yield, and quality (Ragab et al., 2015). Betaine altered hormone levels and antioxidant activity to maintain membrane stability and photosynthetic capability to improve winter wheat WUE and grain yield under RDI conditions (Ahmed et al., 2019). When we applied 50 mm betaine under RDI in this study, plants increased their transpiration capacity without affecting aboveground growth. It is not clear how betaine treatment improves the water status of leaves during water stress, but it might be that water uptake efficiency is improved or that water loss is retarded, or both.
Comparisons between chitin-treated and -untreated plants subjected to FI and RDI conditions.
Tables 3 and 4 present the effects of chitin treatments on yield components, gas exchange parameters, and WUE values of lettuce under FI and RDI. All measured traits appeared to differ significantly in all effects, except that the I×C effect did not significantly affect LA (Table 3) and net photosynthesis (Table 4). There was an increased trend in all measured traits in all plants when chitin application increased from 0 to 4 g/kg under FI (Table 3). However, compared with the no-chitin treatment, when we applied 2 and 4 g/kg of chitin under RDI, each pot exhibited significantly higher levels in all measured traits except plant height. After treatment with 2 g/kg of chitin to plants under RDI, LA (877.46 cm2) was significantly increased by 25.6% compared with the control (480.30 cm2). Moreover, chitin treatment (2 g/kg) showed a clearly protective effect in RDI plants, enhancing their total fresh weight by 75% (41.11 g/plant) in comparison with untreated plants (23.49 g/plant). The total amount of water applied under FI and RDI was 990 to 1085 mL and 560 to 715 mL, respectively. There were significant differences in transpiration, photosynthesis, and WUE values among chitin applications (2 and 4 g/kg), showing significantly higher measured values under all irrigation conditions except transpiration under FI (1.13 mmol·m−2·s−1 H2O) and WUEi under RDI (14.12 µmol CO2/mmol H2O), in comparison with controls (Table 4).
Effects of different concentrations of chitin on the yield performance of lettuce under full irrigation (FI) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI).
Effects of different concentrations of chitin on the gas exchange parameters and water use efficiency (WUEi, WUEyield, WUEbiomass) of lettuce under full irrigation (FI) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI).
We also assessed the effect of chitin treatment on plant growth under RDI. Figure 1B depicts serious epinasty and senescence in the outer leaves of chitin-untreated plants under RDI after 4 weeks of stress; however, most leaves looked green and healthy under chitin applications and RDI conditions. In addition, there was a gradual inhibition in growth over time under RDI without chitin treatments. These observations demonstrated that plants were highly regulated by chitin and all measured traits (except plant height) drastically elevated; thus, treating lettuce with chitin can mitigate the effects of water stress. Water stress had a harmful effect during RDI, the degree of chlorosis being related to a reduction in LA values. Chitin application might reduce or delay water stress, thereby allowing plants to survive and function during stress. This ability perhaps can be attributed to an avoidance of water stress, as indicated by the higher yield components, photosynthesis parameters, and WUE values in chitin-treated plants compared with chitin-untreated plants during RDI conditions. It is also possible that chitin absorbs soil moisture, thus increasing the water-holding capacity of the soil and, consequently, more water being available for plant use (Yu et al., 2011).
Chitin features prominent biochemical similarities in plant cell walls, including neutrally charged linear polysaccharide chains that provide mechanical, physical, and structural stability (Kurita, 2006). Chitin treatment alleviates drought stress and increases plant growth with the production of stress protective metabolites in white clover (Li et al., 2017) and sweet basil (Pirbalouti et al., 2017). Moreover, Bittelli et al. (2001) reported that the foliar application of chitin decreased transpiration in pepper plants and reduced water use while maintaining biomass production and yield. Water stress decreases photosynthesis parameters in maize, but the application of chitin and derivatives increases them (dos Reis et al., 2019). The application of a mixture of chitin derivatives also induces a tolerance to water deficit in maize, improving the antioxidant system and increasing photosynthesis and grain yield (Rabêlo et al., 2019). Chitin has the same effects of salt stress on plants by increasing the key enzymes related to the closure of cucumber stomata, resulting in the reduction of water loss (Song et al., 2006). To date, no studies have been conducted on the effects of chitin treatment on the yield, photosynthesis, and WUE values of lettuce under RDI. Our results demonstrate that RDI affected lettuce yield components, net photosynthesis, and WUE values. In general, plants with higher net photosynthesis and WUE values also had higher total fresh weight and dry weight in the chitin-treated groups, implying that individual plants manifest yield indicators and exhibit greater photosynthesis and WUE. Because of the low cost of chitin available as a shellfish waste from seafood processing, improvements in these parameters under RDI conditions will reduce the cost per plant or per acre of new plantings.
Effects of betaine and chitin treatments on plant physiology and morphology under FI and RDI.
Expt. 3 combined optimized treatments based on Expts. 1 and 2 to test the efficacy of betaine and chitin applications for improving lettuce plant growth by enhancing the tolerance of plants to water stress. We used 50 mm betaine (foliar application) and chitin 2 g/kg (soil solution) alone or in combination in Expt. 3. The synergistic effects of irrigation and chemical treatments on those measurements were analyzed by a three-factor completely randomized ANOVA, and each treatment was assumed to be dependent on the other. Side-by-side comparisons on the impact of chitin and betaine on the yield traits, gas exchange parameters, and WUE values of lettuce under FI and RDI conditions are summarized in Tables 5 and 6. All of the measurements appeared to significantly differ in terms of the main effects (I, B, and C), except for WUEi, WUEyield, and WUEbiomass in B and C effects. Moreover, only those horticultural traits showed significant differences in terms of the interaction effect (I×C). Thus, the measured traits of the plants responded differently to betaine and chitin treatments alone or mixtures under FI and RDI.
Effects of different concentrations of betaine and chitin on the yield performance of lettuce under full irrigation (FI) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI).
Effects of different concentrations of betaine and chitin on the gas exchange parameters and water use efficiency (WUEi, WUEyield, WUEbiomass) of lettuce under full irrigation (FI) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI).
Compared with no chemical treatment, the application of betaine (50 mm) or chitin (2 g/kg) alone and combined to plants under RDI had significantly higher measured values, except for transpiration (1.09 mmol·m−2·s−1 H2O) and WUEi (8.15 µmol CO2/mmol H2O). Moreover, chitin and betaine combined treatment under RDI did not produce significantly higher measured values than those plants treated by chitin and betaine alone under RDI, except for transpiration (1.01 mmol·m−2·s−1 H2O) and net photosynthesis (6.45 mmol·m−2·s−1 H2O). Compared with FI (1095 cm3), RDI plants received remarkably less irrigation water, ranging from 475 to 625 cm3. Figure 1C illustrates that chlorosis and dwarfing in most RDI and chemical-untreated plants was visibly greater than in chemical-treated plants subjected to RDI. These results reveal that treatment with a combination of betaine and chitin did not exhibit a synergistic optimum on yield and WUE values under RDI. Different biostimulants acted differently under RDI treatment; however, each biostimulant is not necessarily equally significant in protecting against water stress. The impacts of changing plant physiology and morphology on water stress tolerance and plant health were affected by betaine and chitin application. Using chitin or betaine alone on plants under RDI significantly increased yield-related traits and WUEyield and WUEbiomass values in lettuce compared with controls, and thus can be applied on a commercial scale for saving water without sacrificing yield.
Water availability is becoming the most critical limiting factor for crop production, and this fact has increased the emphasis that policymakers are placing on both demand and supply options for water management. There is limited information available regarding the physiological development of these plants grown under water stress. The induced water stress tolerance response can be directly linked to the coordinated response of biostimulants to effectively alleviate the inhibitory effects of water stress. Knowledge of water stress–responsive biostimulants is critical for enabling the further understanding of irrigation timing in water stress tolerance. Our results can be used to improve the water stress tolerance of this crop and to develop management practices for field cultivation and enhance cultivation when water resources are limited. In addition, better understanding of the growing characteristics of these plants also would aid in their effective cultivation on arid lands or in extreme climates. Increasing yield and WUE from different biostimulants under RDI provided plants with increased water stress tolerance, playing a key role in providing better adaptation to water stress. The effects of water stress on lettuce can be reduced by treatment with betaine and chitin alone, because these chemicals may protect cell membranes from the adverse effects of water stress. Betaine and chitin act at a convergence point for integrating different signals, minimize cell damage caused by water deficits, and improve the physiological and biochemical condition of plants, thus making plants more tolerant to aridity.
Conclusions
We studied the effects of optimal concentrations of betaine and chitin treatments on the changes in yield and WUE in lettuce under RDI conditions. Biostimulant treatment with betaine and chitin increased the tolerance of lettuce to water stress by exhibiting markedly higher yield-related traits, gas exchange parameters, and WUE values under RDI than control plants. Compared with the mixture treatment and controls, treatments with either 2 g/kg chitin or 50 mm betaine alone improve water stress and can be used as a substitute technology for developing WUE plants and improving plant yields, resulting in increased farm income. These findings may have greater significance for farming in dry lands and offer information for further physiological studies on lettuce WUE and water stress tolerance. Further studies are needed to confirm the specific signal regulation and transduction components or identify water-stressed responsive genes and proteins that are present in chitin- or betaine-mediated improvements of water stress tolerance in lettuce through genetic modification or mutagenesis, and provide better usage of betaine and chitin in water stress management.
Literature Cited
Ahmed, N., Zhang, Y., Li, K., Zhou, Y., Zhang, M. & Li, Z. 2019 Exogenous application of glycine betaine improved water use efficiency in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) via modulating photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidative capacity under conventional and limited irrigation conditions Crop J. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2019.03.004
Ahmad, R., Lim, C.J. & Kwon, S. 2013 Glycine betaine: A versatile compound with great potential for gene pyramiding to improve crop plant performance against environmental stresses Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 7 49 57
Amor, F.M.D., Cuadra-Crespo, P., Walker, D.J., Camara, J.M. & Madrid, R. 2010 Effect of foliar application of antitranspirant on photosynthesis and water relations of pepper plants under different levels of CO2, and water stress J. Plant Physiol. 167 1232 1238
Bittelli, M., Flury, M., Campbell, G.S. & Nichols, E.J. 2001 Reduction of transpiration through foliar application of chitosan Agr. For. Meteorol. 107 167 175
Calvo, P., Nelson, L. & Kloepper, J.W. 2014 Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants Plant Soil 383 31 41
Chai, Q., Gan, Y., Zhai, C., Xu, H.L., Waskom, R.M. & Niu, Y. 2016 Regulated deficit irrigation for crop production under drought stress. A review Agron. Sustain. Dev. 36 3
De Pascale, S., Costa, L. D., Vallone, S., Barbieri, G. & Maggio, A. 2011 Increasing water use efficiency in vegetable crop production: From plant to irrigation systems efficiency HortTechnology 21 301 308
dos Reis, C.O., Magalhaes, P.C., Roniel, G., Lorena, A., Valquiria, M.R. & Diogo, T.C. 2019 Action of N-succinyl and N,O-dicarboxymethyl chitosan derivatives on chlorophyll photosynthesis and fluorescence in drought-sensitive maize J. Plant Growth Regul. 38 619 630
du Jardin, P. 2015 Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation Scientia Hort. 196 3 14
Estaji, A., Kalaji, H.M., Karimi, H.R., Roosta, H.R. & Moosavi-Nezhad, S.M. 2019 How glycine betaine induces tolerance of cucumber plants to salinity stress? Photosynth. 57 3 89 95
Fereres, E., Goldhamer, D.A. & Sadras, V.O. 2012 Yield response to water of fruit trees and vines: Guidelines, p. 246–295. In: P. Steduto, T.C. Hsiao, E. Fereres, and D. Raes (eds.). Crop yield response to water irrigation and drainage paper. 2nd ed. FAO, Rome, Italy
Galindo, A., Collado-Gonzalez, J., Grinan, I., Corell, M., Centeno, A. & Martin-Palomo, M.J. 2018 Deficit irrigation and emerging fruit crops as a strategy to save water in Mediterranean semiarid agrosystems Agr. Water Manage. 202 311 324
Garces-Restrepo, C. & Giovanni, M. 2008 Irrigation management transfer: Worldwide efforts and results. FAO Water Reports, Rome, 32
Hamid, R.M. & Armin, M. 2013 The interaction effect of drought and exogenous application of glycine betaine on corn (Zea mays L.) Eur. J. Exp. Biol. 3 197 206
Hidangmayum, A., Padmanabh, D., Deepmala, K. & Akhouri, H. 2019 Application of chitosan on plant responses with special reference to abiotic stress Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 25 313 326
Jiménez-Arias, D., Francisco, J., García-Machadoa, B., Morales-Sierraa, J.C., Luisb, E., Suarezb, M., Hernándeza, F., Valdésb, F. & Andrés, A.B. 2019 Lettuce plants treated with L-pyroglutamic acid increase yield under water deficit stress Environ. Exp. Bot. 158 215 222
Korkmaz, A., Deger, O. & Kocacinar, F. 2015 Alleviation of water stress effects on pepper seedlings by foliar application of glycine betaine N. Z. J. Crop Hort. Sci. 43 18 31
Kurita, K. 2006 Chitin and chitosan: Functional biopolymers from marine crustaceans Mar. Biotechnol. (NY) 8 203 226
Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhan, X., Merewitz, E., Peng, Y., Ma, X. & Yan, Y. 2017 Metabolic pathways regulated by chitosan contributing to drought resistance in white clover J. Proteome Res. 16 3039 3052
Malcom, S., Marshall, E., Aillery, M., Heisey, P., Livingston, M. & Rubenstein, K. 2012 Agricultural adaptation to a changing climate: Economic and environmental implications vary by U.S region. USDA Economic Res. Service. Economic Res. Rep. No. 136
Malejane, D.N., Tinyani, P., Soundy, P., Sultanbawa, Y. & Sivakumar, D. 2018 Deficit irrigation improves phenolic content and antioxidant activity in leafy lettuce varieties Food Sci. Nutr. 6 334 341
Manaf, H.H. 2016 Beneficial effects of exogenous selenium, glycinebetaine and seaweed extract on salt stressed cowpea plant Ann. Agr. Sci. 61 1 89 95
Marsal, J., Casadesus, J., Lopez, G., Mata, M., Bellvert, J. & Girona, J. 2016 Sustainability of regulated deficit irrigation in a mid-maturing peach cultivar Irr. Sci. 34 201 208
Osman, H. 2015 Enhancing antioxidant–yield relationship of peaplant under drought at different growth stages by exogenously applied glycine betaine and proline Ann. Agr. Sci. 60 2 89 95
Patrick, D.J. 2015 Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation Scientia Hort. 196 3 14
Pirbalouti, A.G., Malekpoor, F., Salimi, A. & Golparvar, A. 2017 Exogenous application of chitosan on biochemical and physiological characteristics, phenolic content and antioxidant activity of two species of basil (Ocimum ciliatum and Ocimum basilicum) under reduced irrigation Scientia Hort. 217 114 122
Pruszyński, S. 2008 Place biostimulators in crop protection and fertilization Wieś Jutra 5 23 25
Rabêlo, V.M., Magalhães, P.C., Bressanin, L.A. & Carvalho, D.T. 2019 The foliar application of a mixture of semisynthetic chitosan derivatives induces tolerance to water deficit in maize, improving the antioxidant system and increasing photosynthesis and grain yield Sci. Rep. 9 8164
Rady, M.O.A., Semida, W.M., Abd El-Mageed, T.A., Hemid, K.A. & Rady, M.M. 2018 Up-regulation of antioxidative defense systems by glycine betaine foliar application in onion plants confer tolerance to salinity stress Scientia Hort. 240 614 622
Ragab, M.E., Nesreen, A.S., Sawan, O.M., Fawzy, Z.F. & El-Sawy, S.M. 2015 Foliar application of glycine betaine for alleviating water stress of tomato plants grown under sandy soil conditions Int. J. Chemtech Res. 8 52 67
Rop, D.K., Kipkorir, E.C. & Taragon, J.K. 2016 Effects of deficit irrigation on yield and quality of onion crop J. Agr. Sci. 8 112 126
Sahin, U., Yasemin, K., Fatih, M. & Talip, C. 2016 Growth, yield, water use and crop quality responses of lettuce to different irrigation quantities in a semi-arid region of high altitude J. Appl. Hort. 18 3 89 95
Sayyari, M., Ghavami, M., Ghanbari, F. & Kordi, S. 2013 Assessment of salicylic acid impacts on growth rate and some physiological parameters of lettuce plants under drought stress conditions IJACS 5 17 89 95
Şenyiğit, U. & Kaplan, D. 2013 Impact of different irrigation water levels on yield and some quality parameters of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Longifolia) under unheated greenhouse condition: Infrastructure and ecology of rural areas Polska Akademia Nauk, Oddział Krakowie 4 97 107
Shams, M., Yildirim, E., Ekinci, M., Turan, M., Dursun, A., Parlakova, F. & Kul, R. 2016 Exogenously applied glycine betaine regulates some chemical characteristics and antioxidative defence systems in lettuce under salt stress Hort. Environ. Biotechnol. 57 225 231
Sharif, R., Mujtaba, M., Rahman, M., Shalmani, A., Ahmad, H., Anwar, T., Tianchan, D. & Wan, X. 2018 The multifunctional role of chitosan in horticultural crops: A review Molecules 23 E872
Sonmez, I., Kalkan, H., Demir, H., Kulcu, R., Yaldiz, O. & Kaplan, M. 2017 Mineral composition and quality parameters of greenhouse grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) depending on fertilization with agricultural waste composts Acta Sci. Polonorum Hortorum. 16 85 95
Song, S.Q., Sang, Q.M. & Guo, S.R. 2006 Physiological synergisms of chitosan on salt resistance of cucumber seedlings Acta Bot. Boreali-Occidentalia Sin. 26 435 441
Wang, N., Cao, F., Eusi, M., Richmond, A., Qiu, C. & Wu, F. 2019 Foliar application of betaine improves water deficit stress tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Plant Growth Regulat. 89 109 118
Wakrim, R., Wahbi, S., Tahi, H., Aganchich, B. & Serraj, R. 2005 Comparative effects of partial root drying (PRD) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) on water relations and water use efficiency in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 106 275 287
Wutipraditkul, N., Wongwean, P. & Buaboocha, T. 2015 Alleviation of salt-induced oxidative stress in rice seedlings by proline and/or glycine betaine Biol. Plant. 59 547 553
Yao, W., Xu, T., Farooq, S.U., Jin, P. & Zheng, Y. 2018 Glycine betaine treatment alleviates chilling injury in zucchini fruit (Cucurbita pepo L.) by modulating antioxidant enzymes and membrane fatty acid metabolism Postharvest Biol. Technol. 144 20 28
You, L., Song, Q., Wu, Y., Li, S., Jiang, C., Chang, L., Yang, X. & Zhang, J. 2019 Accumulation of glycine betaine in transplastomic potato plants expressing choline oxidase confers improved drought tolerance Planta 249 1963 1975
Yu, J., Shainberg, I., Yan, Y.L., Shi, J.G., Levy, G.J. & Mamedov, A.I. 2011 Superabsorbents and semiarid soil properties affecting water absorption Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 75 2305 2313