The pear tree (Pyrus spp.) is a temperate-climate fruit species, and its cultivation in subtropical regions was made possible by hybrid cultivars obtained from the cross Pyrus communis × Pyrus pyrifolia (Curi et al., 2017). This cross combines the quality of European pear trees (P. communis) with the low number of chill hours required by the Asian pear tree (P. pyrifolia) (Chagas et al., 2008).
Low fruit set is one of the limiting factors in the expansion of pear tree crops in subtropical regions (Bettiol Neto et al., 2014). The fact that no pollinizer cultivars have been reported for these hybrids in subtropical regions might be the reason for their low effective fruiting.
Most pear tree cultivars have gametophytic self-incompatibility, which causes a plant to reject its own pollen. Therefore, pear trees depend on cross-pollination for fruit production (Franklin-Tong and Franklin, 2003). In general, the use of two to three pear cultivars with a coincident flowering period is recommended for commercial crops. Thus, identifying compatibility between cultivars is of economic importance because partial compatibility may reduce yield (Goldway et al., 1999; Tatari et al., 2017).
Several methods can be applied to the study of the compatibility/incompatibility between cultivars and the determination of suitable pollinizers (Ortega and Dicenta, 2004). Field-controlled pollination allows the performance of several cultivars in the orchard to be estimated and is suggested for determining appropriate pollinizer groups (Mahmoudi et al., 2007). However, the use of this method alone in the determination of the incompatibility between cultivars may be misleading due to environmental and physiological effects that hinder differentiation between fully compatible and semicompatible crosses. Therefore, the use of another method to increase the reliability of the evaluation is crucial; such a method includes the analysis of genes encoding for S-RNase to identify the S-loci in cultivars, which can define the compatibility level between cultivars, complementing and corroborating the results observed in the field (Jacquemart, 2007).
Self-incompatibility based on S-RNase occurs in Rosaceae species. Compatibility is controlled by the polymorphic S-locus, which encodes at least two genes. S-RNases determine the specificity of pollen rejection in the pistil, and the F-locus and F-box proteins fulfill this function in pollen. S-RNase is believed to function as a specific S cytotoxin and as a recognition protein. Thus, the incompatibility is a consequence of the cytotoxic activity of S-RNase. Conversely, S-RNase cytotoxicity does not occur in compatible pollen tubes (McClure et al., 2011).
Pear breeding programs are carried out in cold regions and seek to develop cultivars adapted to these climatic conditions, with high-yield performance, which fit in the fresh fruit chain. However, pear tree exploitation in subtropical (Bettiol Neto et al., 2014) and tropical regions (Oliveira et al., 2015) has increased. In this sense, breeding programs for cultivars adapted to regions with high temperatures must be intensified.
This study aimed to characterize S-alleles in hybrid pear cultivars (P. communis × P. pyrifolia) adapted to subtropical climates and evaluate the effective fruiting from the cross between these cultivars.
Bandeira, J.M., Thurow, L.B., Peters, J.A., Raseira, M.C.B. & Bianchi, V.J. 2011 Physiological characterization of reproductive compatibility of Japanese plum Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 46 860 867
Bettiol Neto, J.E., Chagas, E.A., Sanches, J., Pio, R., Antoniali, S. & Cia, P. 2014 Production and postharvest quality of pear tree cultivars in subtropical conditions at eastern of São Paulo state, Brazil Cienc. Rural 44 1740 1746
Cachi, A.M. & Wünsch, A. 2011 Characterization and mapping of non-S gametophytic self-compatibility in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) J. Expt. Bot. 62 1847 1856
Callen, D.F., Thompson, A.D., Shen, Y., Phillips, H.A., Richards, R.I., Mulley, J.C. & Sutherland, G.R. 1993 Incidence and origin of “null” alleles in the (AC) in microsatellite markers Amer. J. Hum. Genet. 52 922 927
Castro, D.C., Cerino, M.C., Gariglio, N. & Radice, S. 2016 Study of reproductive behaviour in low-chill apples in warmer zones of Argentina Scientia Hort. 199 124 132
Chagas, E.A., Campo Dall’Orto, F.A., Ojima, M., Barbosa, W. & Pio, R. 2008 Pear ‘IAC Princesinha’: New European type cultivar for subtropical climate Acta Hort. 800 507 510
Curi, P.N., Bisi, R.B., Salgado, D.L., Barbosa, C.M.A., Pio, R. & Souza, V.R. 2017 Hybrid cultivars of pear in subtropics regions: Processing ability in the form of jelly Cienc. Rural 47 1 7
Franklin-Tong, N.V. & Franklin, F.C. 2003 Gametophytic self-incompatibility inhibits pollen tube growth using different mechanisms Trends Plant Sci. 8 598 600
Goldway, M., Shai, O., Yehuda, H., Matityahu, A. & Stern, R.A. 1999 ‘Jonathan’ apple is a lower-potency pollenizer of ‘Topred’ than ‘Golden Delicious’ due to partial S-allele incompatibility J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 74 381 385
Hiratsuka, S. & Tomita, A. 1989 Incompatible pollen tube growth and protein composition in styles of Japanese pear following high temperature treatments Euphytica 43 191 196
Hiratsuka, S. & Zhang, S.L. 2002 Relationships between fruit set, pollen-tube growth, and S.RNase concentration in the self-incompatible Japanese pear Scientia Hort. 95 309 318
Ishimizu, T., Sato, Y., Saito, T., Yoshimura, Y., Norioka, S., Nakanishi, T. & Sakiyama, F. 1998 Identification and partial amino acid sequences of seven S-RNases associated with self-incompatibility of japanese pear, Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai J. Biochem. 120 326 334
Jackson, J.E. 2005 Biology of apples and pears. Cambridge University, Cambridge
Jacquemart, A.L. 2007 Methods for determining compatibility and pollinator efficiency in temperate fruit species. Fruit Vegetable and Cereal Science and Biotechnology. 1 26 38
Jalili Marandi, R. 2002 Pomology. Jahad Daneshgahi, Oromiye, Iran
Kozma, P., Nyéki, J., Soltész, M. & Szabó, Z. 2003 Floral biology, pollination and fertilisation in temperate zone fruit and grape. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest
Mase, N., Sawamura, Y., Yamamoto, T., Takada, N., Nishio, S., Saito, T. & Iketani, H. 2014 A segmental duplication encompassing S-haplotype triggers pollen-part self-compatibility in Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) Mol. Breed. 33 117 128
Mahmoudi, M., Arzani, K. & Bouzari, N. 2007 Pollination, pollen tube growth and determination of suitable pollinizer for sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivar Ghermez Rezaeieh Majallah-i Bih/Nizhadi-i Nahal va Bazr 23 571 585
Moriya, Y., Takai, Y., Okada, K., Ito, D., Shiozaki, Y., Nakanishi, T. & Takasaki, T. 2005 Parthenocarpy and self- and cross-incompatibility in ten European pear cultivars J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 74 424 430
Mota, M.S., Bianchi, V.J., Carvalho, A.Z., Braga, E.J.B. & Peters, J.A. 2010 Molecular identification of s-alleles of gametophytic incompatibility in Prunus salicina Lindl Rev. Bras. Frutic. 32 798 807
Nishitani, C., Yamaguchi-Nakamura, A., Hosaka, F., Terakami, S., Shimizu, T., Yano, K. & Yamamoto, T. 2012 Parthenocarpic genetic resources and gene expression related to parthenocarpy among four species in pear (Pyrus spp.) Scientia Hort. 136 101 109
Nyéki, J. 1996 Fertilization conditions, p. 185–256. In: J. Nyéki and M. Soltész (eds.). Floral biology of temperate zone fruit trees and small fruits. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary
Oliveira, I.V.M., Matos, S., Salustriano, R.R. & Lopes, P.R.C. 2015 Phenology evaluation of ‘triumph’ pear trees grown in semi-arid climate in the northeast Brazil in 2012 season Rev. Bras. Frutic. 37 261 266
Ortega, E. & Dicenta, F. 2004 Suitability of four different methods to identify self-compatible seedlings in an almond breeding programme J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 79 747 753
Pancaldi, M. 1995 Aspects of the genetics of the gametophytic incompatibility in the sterility of fruit plants Rivista di Frutticoltura e di Ortofloricoltura. 58 70 75
Sanzol, J. & Herrero, M. 2002 Identification of self-incompatibility alleles in pear (Pyrus communis L.) cultivars Euphytica 128 325 331
Sanzol, J., Sutherland, B.G. & Robbins, T.P. 2006 Identification and characterization of genomic DNA sequences of the S-ribonuclease gene associated with self-incompatibility alleles S1 to S5 in European pear Plant Breed. 125 513 518
Sanzol, J. & Robbins, T.P. 2008 Combined analysis of S-alleles in European pear by pollinations and PCR-based S-genotyping; correlation between S-phenotypes and S-RNase genotypes J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 133 213 224
Sassa, H. 2016 Molecular mechanism of the S-RNase-based gametophytic selfincompatibility in fruit trees of Rosaceae Breed. Sci. 66 116 121
Souza, F.B.M., Pio, R., Barbosa, J.P.R.A.D., Reighard, G.L., Tadeu, M.H. & Curi, P.N. 2017 Adaptability and stability of reproductive and vegetative phases of peach trees in subtropical climate Acta Sci. Agron. 39 427 435
Soltész, M. 2003 Apple [Malus sylvestris L. Mill.], p. 237–316. In: P. Kozma, J. Nyéki, M. Soltész, and Z. Szabó (eds.). Floral biology, pollination in temperate zone fruit species and grape. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary
Tatari, M., Ghasemi, A., Mousavi, A. & Bahrami, H. 2017 Study on pollination and selection of the most suitable pollinizers for commercial pear cultivars (Pyrus communis L.) in Iran J. Hort. Res. 25 49 57
Tomimoto, Y., Nakazaki, T., Ikehashi, H., Ueno, H. & Hayashi, R. 1996 Analysis of self-incompatibility-related ribonucleases (S-RNases) in two species of pears, Pyrus communis and Pyrus ussuriensis Scientia Hort. 66 159 167
Wojciechowski, A. & Antkowiak, W. 2009 Selection of pollinators for particular pear cultivars (Pyrus communis L.) based on the observation of the pollen tubes Herba Polonica Journal 55 257 265
Yamane, H., Ikeda, K., Ushijima, K., Sassa, H. & Tao, R. 2003 Self-incompatibility (S) locus region of the mutated S6-haplotype of sour cherry (Prunus cerasus) contains a functional pollen S allele and a non-functional pistil S allele J. Expt. Bot. 54 2431 2437
Zhang, S.L. & Hiratsuka, S. 1999 Variations in S-protein levels in styles of Japanese pears and the expression of self-incompatibility J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 68 911 918