‘PP-1’ Ornamental Perennial Arachis

Authors:
Wayne W. Hanna Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton Campus, 2360 Rainwater Road, Tifton, GA 31793

Search for other papers by Wayne W. Hanna in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Brian M. Schwartz Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton Campus, 2360 Rainwater Road, Tifton, GA 31793

Search for other papers by Brian M. Schwartz in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Ann R. Blount North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 155 Research Road, Quincy, FL 32351

Search for other papers by Ann R. Blount in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Gary Knox North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 155 Research Road, Quincy, FL 32351

Search for other papers by Gary Knox in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Cheryl Mackowiak North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 155 Research Road, Quincy, FL 32351

Search for other papers by Cheryl Mackowiak in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close

Click on author name to view affiliation information

‘PP-1’ (PP27536) ornamental perennial Arachis was approved for release by the University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences in 2012. We established ‘PP-1’ in a test at Tifton, GA, with five perennial peanut cultivars, Ecoturf and Arblick, Florigraze, and Arbrook from the University of Florida. Genotypes were evaluated for flower number, plant color, plant height, turf quality, percent groundcover, canopy density, pepper spot and leaf scorch [both caused by Leptosphaerulina crassiasca (Sechet) C.R. Jackson and D.K. Bell], leaf length, leaf width, leaf area, spring green-up, freeze damage, and Peanut stunt virus. ‘PP-1’ reaches a height of about 20 cm; produces dense, dark-green leaves; and produces an abundance of flowers. Wing petals are Yellow-Orange Group 14D, and standard petals transition from Orange Group 24C in the center to Yellow-Orange Group 14 toward the margins. Data for each variable were analyzed statistically by analyses of variance. Least significance differences at P ≤ 0.05 were used for mean separation.

Origin

‘PP-1’ is a vigorous Arachis glabrata Benth. clone (Supplemental Fig. 1) volunteering for more than 50 years on the University of Georgia, Tifton Campus, Tifton, GA, next to a field used during the 1940s to test perennial peanut introductions. It has developed (under no cultivation) a natural uniform stand 7 m wide between U.S. Route 41 (limited on the west side by Department of Transportation herbicides) and a University of Georgia field (limited on the east side by herbicides and cultivation) that is 123 m long. Pictures of ‘PP-1’ were sent to Dr. Charles Simpson (an expert on Arachis germplasm) at Texas A&M University to help with identification. He indicated that he received an introduction (labeled A42) from Dr. Ray Hammons in 1969 that appeared to have narrow leaves similar to ‘PP-1’. Dr. Simpson sent a sample of A42, which we included in a comparison test with ‘PP-1’. A42 has wider leaves (Table 1) and more leaf area per leaf (Table 2) than ‘PP-1’. Leaf lengths were similar for the two genotypes (Table 3).

Table 1.

Leaf width on individual leaves of seven Arachis glabrata perennial peanut genotypes planted at Tifton, GA, and Quincy, FL.

Table 1.
Table 2.

Leaf area on individual leaves of seven Arachis glabrata genotypes planted at Tifton, GA, and Quincy, FL.

Table 2.
Table 3.

Leaf length on individual leaves of seven Arachis glabrata genotypes planted on 18 May 2006 and 2010 at Tifton, GA, and Quincy, FL.

Table 3.

An amplified fragment length polymorphism study titled “Genetic Variability of Cultivated Rhizome Peanut” (Maas et al., 2010) showed ‘PP-1’ most related to ‘Florigraze’ (Prine et al., 1986), a broadleaf type. Morphologically, ‘PP-1’ is most similar to Natural Resources Conservation Service ‘Brooksville 68’ (Anonymous, 2006), commonly referred to as ‘Pointed Leaf’, for which planting stock was not available when we established the 2006 test at Tifton.

‘PP-1’ produces infrequent viable seed. Forty plants produced from seed of ‘PP-1’ showed a wide range of morphologic types, none with the vigor and persistence of ‘PP-1’ (data not reported). Therefore, vegetative propagation is the means for establishing this cultivar to maintain its purity. ‘PP-1’ probably arose from either an outcross or a superior genetic recombination from an Arachis glabrata Benth. introduction.

Description and Performance

‘PP-1’ is a perennial, vegetatively propagated dark-green narrow-leaf perennial peanut recommended for use as an ornamental in U.S. Department of Agriculture zones 8b and 9. In 2006, ‘PP-1” was established in a test at Tifton, GA (3.7 × 3.7-m plots, four replications) with the released or soon-to-be released perennial peanut cultivars from University of Florida. Dr. Kevin Kenworthy provided us planting materials of ‘Ecoturf’, ‘Arblick’ (Prine et al., 2010), ‘Florigraze’, and ‘Arbrook’ (Prine et al., 1990). Tests (1.5 × 3.1-m plots) were established at Quincy, FL (five replications), and at Gainesville, FL (four replications), with the same cultivars plus ‘Pointed Leaf’ at Quincy, FL (10 Apr. 2009) and at Gainesville, FL (28 June 2010). Dr. Mimi Williams, breeder of ‘Pointed Leaf’, provided us planting material of this cultivar in 2010. Eight replications of ‘Pointed Leaf’ and ‘PP-1’ were established as single-plant propagules on 14 June 2011 at Tifton, GA. Each test was planted in a randomized complete block design. Plots at Tifton, GA, were established by planting 25 established plants on 0.61-m centers in the center of the plot. Plots at Quincy and Gainesville were established by planting eight established plants on 0.61-m centers within a 5.11-m2 plot. Plots at Tifton received 560 kg·ha−1 5N–4.3P–12.4K preplant and 280 kg·ha−1 5N–4.3P–12.4K yearly in April after establishment. Plots in Florida did not receive any fertilizer. Soil types for Tifton, Quincy, and Gainesville were Tifton loamy sand, Norfolk loamy fine sand, and Chipley sand, respectively.

‘PP-1’ was the top statistical group for flower number on 12 of the 13 rating dates during 2008 to 2011 at Tifton (Table 4); in four of five rating dates at Quincy, FL, in 2010 and 2011 (Table 5); and in two of five rating dates at Gainesville, FL, in 2011 and 2012 (data not reported). ‘PP-1’ had a significantly darker green color than the other cultivars at Tifton in 12 of 13 tests (Table 6). ‘PP-1’ was in the top statistical group for color at all rating dates in the Florida tests (data not reported). Mature leaf color was classified as Green 144A according to the Royal Horticultural Society color index, fifth edition (Royal Horticultural Society , 2007).

Table 4.

Flower number ratings on five Arachis glabrata perennial peanut genotypes planted at Tifton, GA, on 18 May 2006.

Table 4.
Table 5.

Flower number ratings on six Arachis glabrata perennial peanut genotypes planted at Quincy, FL, on 10 Apr. 2009.

Table 5.
Table 6.

Plant color ratings on five Arachis glabrata perennial peanut genotypes planted at Tifton, GA, 18 May 2006.

Table 6.

Height of ‘PP-1’ was similar to ‘Ecoturf’ on five of six measuring dates in 3 years at Tifton, GA (Table 7). At most measuring dates it was shorter than ‘Arblick’ and ‘Arbrook’, and at two of five dates it was taller than ‘Florigraze’. At Quincy, FL, ‘PP-1’, ‘Pointed Leaf’, and ‘Arblick’ were similar in height and shorter than ‘Ecoturf’, ‘Florigraze’, and ‘Arbrook’ (data not reported). At Gainesville, FL, ‘PP-1’ was similar in height to ‘Pointed Leaf’, ‘Ecoturf’, and ‘Arblick’ on two of four measuring dates; shorter than ‘Florigraze’ on three of four dates; and shorter than ‘Arbrook’ on all dates (Table 8). ‘PP-1’ was rated in the top statistical group in four of five tests for turf quality (overall rating for density, texture, and color) (Table 9).

Table 7.

Height of five Arachis glabrata perennial peanut genotypes planted at Tifton, GA, on 18 May 2006.

Table 7.
Table 8.

Height of six Arachis glabrata perennial peanut genotypes planted at Gainesville, FL, on 28 June 2010.

Table 8.
Table 9.

Turf quality of five Arachis glabrata perennial peanut genotypes planted at Tifton, GA, on 18 May 2006.

Table 9.

In the establishment year (2006) at Tifton, GA, ‘PP-1’ and ‘Ecoturf’ were slower to establish than the other cultivars (Table 10). Anderson et al. (2015) showed a similar slower rate of establishment for ‘PP-1’ (referred to as EX5 in the study). However, in subsequent years, ‘PP-1’ was in the top statistical group for maintaining dense groundcover. Canopy density at Tifton, GA (Table 11), was similar for ‘PP-1’, ‘Ecoturf’, and ‘Arblick’; and greater than ‘Florigraze’ and ‘Arbrook’ at most rating dates. Canopy density at Quincy, FL (data not reported), was similar to ‘Pointed Leaf’, ‘Arblick’, and ‘Florigraze’ at early and midseason dates, but had less density than the other cultivars except for ‘Pointed Leaf’ in October as a result of to pepper spot disease [Leptosphaerulina crassiasca (Sechet) C.R. Jackson and D.K. Bell].

Table 10.

Percent groundcover of five Arachis glabrata perennial peanut genotypes planted at Tifton, GA, on 18 May 2006.

Table 10.
Table 11.

Canopy density ratings on five Arachis glabrata perennial peanut genotypes planted at Tifton, GA, 18 May 2006.

Table 11.

Spring green-up at Gainesville, FL, was similar for all cultivars except for ‘Florigraze’, which showed a slower green-up (Table 12). ‘PP-1’ showed better freeze tolerance than ‘Ecoturf’ and ‘Arblick’ at Gainesville, FL, and all of the cultivars tested at Quincy, FL (Table 12).

Table 12.

Ratings for spring green-up and freeze damage on six Arachis glabrata perennial peanut genotypes planted at Gainesville, FL, on 28 June 2010 and at Quincy, FL, on 10 Apr. 2009.

Table 12.

At Tifton, GA, ‘PP-1’ had low pepper spot ratings at the October and November rating dates (Table 13) regardless of year. The disease rating was greater at a December date in 2009, but less than the disease on ‘Florigraze’ and ‘Arbrook’. Pepper spot ratings for ‘PP-1’ were low for ‘PP-1’ and similar to ‘Pointed Leaf’ at Quincy, FL (data not reported). Leaf scorch caused by the same organism as pepper spot was greater for ‘PP-1’ (and similar to ‘Pointed Leaf’) at Quincy, FL (data not reported), and at Gainesville, FL (Table 14), than for the other cultivars in the test. On 7 Oct. 2012, the ‘PP-1’ growing in the original collection area next to U.S. Route 41 showed high pepper spot infection whereas the adjacent, fertilized 14 June 2011 test and the foundation planting showed no disease symptoms (personal observation). Similar leaf spot symptoms are observed on bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] in the fall as a result of the soil being depleted of potassium. No Peanut stunt virus, also known as Cucumber mosaic virus genus Cucumovirus, was detected in ‘PP-1’ growing at Gainesville, FL, in 2010, 2011, and 2012 (Table 14).

Table 13.

Pepper spot ratings on five Arachis glabrata perennial peanut genotypes planted at Tifton, GA, on 18 May 2006.

Table 13.
Table 14.

Peanut stunt virus ratings and leaf scorch ratings on six Arachis glabrata perennial peanut genotypes planted at Gainesville, FL, on 28 June 2010.

Table 14.

A number of propagation studies (not reported here) have been conducted using rhizomes as sod (using a peanut inverter to dig the sod) and dug sprigs (using a traditional bermudagrass sprig harvester). Both propagation materials work well, but sprigs are easier to plant and handle. Best establishment takes place when sprigs are planted in furrows (continuous row of rhizomes with an average density of two to four sprigs side by side), covered with 2.5 cm of soil. Rhizomes planted in 1-m-wide rows establish in 1 year. Closer row spacings speed up establishment. A layer of rhizomes with 80% surface coverage planted in 23 × 46-cm flats or pots establish as a marketable product in 5 to 6 weeks in the greenhouse.

Morphologically, ‘PP-1’ is most similar to ‘Pointed Leaf’. However ‘PP-1’ has narrower leaves (Table 1) than ‘Pointed Leaf’, A42, and all the cultivars tested. ‘PP-1’ and most of the cultivars tested have similar leaf lengths (Table 3). ‘PP-1’ had smaller leaves than all the other cultivars except for ‘Florigraze’ on 25 July 2011 at Tifton, GA, and ‘Pointed Leaf’ on 21 Aug. 2010 at Quincy, FL (Table 2).

‘PP-1’ is a dark-green, narrow-leaf plant that produces an abundance of yellow-orange flowers in the spring, summer, and fall. It has performed as well or better in Georgia and Florida than most released cultivars. It has performed well in Poteet, TX, and Lake City, FL, in nonreplicated tests, and in yards at private residences where it has been established for 2 to 6 years. A study by Anderson et al. (2015) indicated that ‘PP-1’ did not perform well in their shade study. ‘PP-1’ produces a low-maintenance, low-input ornamental and colorful groundcover. General observations have been that PP-1 will not tolerate as much traffic as most grasses used for turf. Preliminary studies (not reported here) show that it can be used in combination with lawn grasses to furnish nitrogen for the grass. Although deer are located on the UGA Tifton Campus, we have never seen them grazing PP-1.

Availability

‘PP-1’ is a patented cultivar by the University of Georgia. A field planting of breeder material for ‘PP-1’ is maintained at the University of Georgia, Tifton Campus. As a protected cultivar, PP-1 can only be produced by nurseries licensed by the Georgia Research Foundation. ‘PP-1’ has a number of licensees and will be marketed as Cowboy.

Literature Cited

  • Anderson, D.A., Knox, G.W., Blount, A.R., Mackowiak, C.L. & Gilman, E.F. 2015 Ornamental groundcovers characteristics of rhizome peanut (Arachis glabrata Benth.): Shade affects height but not cover HortScience 50 952 956

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anonymous, 2006 Brooksville 68 germplasm perennial peanut. U.S. Department of Agriculture/National Resource Conservation Service fact sheet

  • Maas, A.L., Anderson, W.F. & Quesenberry, K.H. 2010 Genetic variability of cultivated rhizome peanut Crop Sci. 50 1908 1914

  • Prine, G.M., Dunavin, L.S., Glennon, R.J. & Roush, R.D. 1990 Registration of ‘Arbrook’ rhizome peanut Crop Sci. 30 743 744

  • Prine, G.M., Dunavin, L.S., Moore, J.E. & Roush, R.D. 1986 Registration of ‘Florigraze’ rhizome peanut Crop Sci. 26 1084 1085

  • Prine, G.M., French, E.C., Blount, A.R., Williams, M.J. & Quesenberry, K.H. 2010 Registration of Arblick and Ecoturf rhizome germplasms for ornamental or forage use J. Plant Regist. 4 145 148

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Royal Horticultural Society 2007 RHS color chart. 5th dd. Royal Horticultural Society, London, UK

Supplemental Fig. 1.
Supplemental Fig. 1.

Three-year-old foundation field of ‘PP-1’ at the University of Georgia, Tifton Campus.

Citation: HortScience horts 53, 11; 10.21273/HORTSCI13402-18

  • Three-year-old foundation field of ‘PP-1’ at the University of Georgia, Tifton Campus.

  • Anderson, D.A., Knox, G.W., Blount, A.R., Mackowiak, C.L. & Gilman, E.F. 2015 Ornamental groundcovers characteristics of rhizome peanut (Arachis glabrata Benth.): Shade affects height but not cover HortScience 50 952 956

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anonymous, 2006 Brooksville 68 germplasm perennial peanut. U.S. Department of Agriculture/National Resource Conservation Service fact sheet

  • Maas, A.L., Anderson, W.F. & Quesenberry, K.H. 2010 Genetic variability of cultivated rhizome peanut Crop Sci. 50 1908 1914

  • Prine, G.M., Dunavin, L.S., Glennon, R.J. & Roush, R.D. 1990 Registration of ‘Arbrook’ rhizome peanut Crop Sci. 30 743 744

  • Prine, G.M., Dunavin, L.S., Moore, J.E. & Roush, R.D. 1986 Registration of ‘Florigraze’ rhizome peanut Crop Sci. 26 1084 1085

  • Prine, G.M., French, E.C., Blount, A.R., Williams, M.J. & Quesenberry, K.H. 2010 Registration of Arblick and Ecoturf rhizome germplasms for ornamental or forage use J. Plant Regist. 4 145 148

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Royal Horticultural Society 2007 RHS color chart. 5th dd. Royal Horticultural Society, London, UK

Wayne W. Hanna Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton Campus, 2360 Rainwater Road, Tifton, GA 31793

Search for other papers by Wayne W. Hanna in
Google Scholar
Close
,
Brian M. Schwartz Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton Campus, 2360 Rainwater Road, Tifton, GA 31793

Search for other papers by Brian M. Schwartz in
Google Scholar
Close
,
Ann R. Blount North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 155 Research Road, Quincy, FL 32351

Search for other papers by Ann R. Blount in
Google Scholar
Close
,
Gary Knox North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 155 Research Road, Quincy, FL 32351

Search for other papers by Gary Knox in
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Cheryl Mackowiak North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 155 Research Road, Quincy, FL 32351

Search for other papers by Cheryl Mackowiak in
Google Scholar
Close

Contributor Notes

We express our appreciation to the University of Georgia Research Foundation and the Georgia Seed Development Commission for financial support.

The senior author acknowledges the many discussions he had with Myron Parker (deceased) regarding the ornamental potential of ‘PP-1’. We appreciate the cooperation and/or assistance of Larry Baldree, Leanna Leach, Ken Quesenberry, Mimi Williams, and Kevin Kenworthy. We also express our thanks to Scott Tubbs and Nino Brown for editorial suggestions.

Corresponding author. E-mail: whanna@uga.edu.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 306 62 0
PDF Downloads 184 45 0
  • Three-year-old foundation field of ‘PP-1’ at the University of Georgia, Tifton Campus.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Save