Potted poinsettias are one of the most important greenhouse ornamental crops in the United States, with wholesale value of $140 million in the top 15 states. The potted poinsettia was ranked number two among potted plants for its economic value and ranked number one for total amount of potted plants sold (32 million pots) (USDA, 2016).
The greenhouse production process of poinsettias could have an influence on its economic value, especially when the poinsettia production margin is low due to competitive pricing (Barnes et al., 2014). One strategy for increasing profits is to reduce production inputs, such as irrigation water, fertilizer, plant growth regulators (PGR), overhead (i.e., bench space), and labor. Applying liquid fertilizer with each irrigation is a common practice for poinsettia production (Ecke et al., 2004). Traditionally, water deficit was considered detrimental during greenhouse poinsettia production because wilting between watering decreased plant quality by causing lower leaf drop. Additionally, using water deficit as a plant height control was reported ineffective (Dole and Wilkins, 1999; Schuch et al., 1996). However, more recent studies reported that a constant 20% substrate moisture content (SMC) could be used as a replacement for PGR (daminozide) applications to produce more compact plants (Alem et al., 2015a). Plant growth regulator application may reduce bract size in poinsettia, which is detrimental to plant quality (Meijón et al., 2009).
Poinsettia is an obligate short day/long night photoperiodic plant and therefore has distinct vegetative growth and reproductive development stages during greenhouse production. The timing of application of water deficit affected poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima ‘Classic Red’) stem elongation depending on growth and development stage (Alem et al., 2015a, 2015b). Periods of 20% SMC application were used for height control when plant height exceeded the target height using graphical tracking. Applied water deficit during the vegetative growth stage of poinsettia reduced transpiration rate (E) and net photosynthetic rate (Pn), but not during the flowering and bract coloring development stage (Nowak, 2002).
Grower profits are increased when overhead and labor costs and postharvest shrinkage are reduced. Poinsettia postproduction disorders include stem breakage, bract fading, leaf yellowing, bract edge burn (BEB, also known as bract necrosis), and bract bruising (Ranch, 2012). Frequent irrigation with fertilization throughout the production cycle increased botrytis infection, weak lateral stems, and late stretch, resulting in postproduction stem breakage and BEB (Barrett et al., 1995; Ecke et al., 2004; Islam and Joyce, 2015; Nell and Barrett, 1986). Postproduction environment temperature, humidity, and irregular irrigation were believed to cause leaf yellowing and leaf drop (Islam and Joyce, 2015). Meanwhile, despite the nearly four decades of research, the effect of production water usage on poinsettia postproduction longevity was still unclear (Islam and Joyce, 2015; Nell et al., 1995).
The objectives of the current study were to a) ascertain the effects of lowering SMC to conserve water during production on plant quality; b) determine if plants produced at lower SMC will acclimate to suboptimum irrigation conditions during shelf life; c) analyze the economic dimensions of traditional well-irrigated vs. water-conserving alternative irrigation methods considering production inputs and reduction in shrinkage through the market channels; and d) quantify plant quality during shelf life in a simulated retail environment.
Alem, P., Thomas, P.A. & van Iersel, M.W. 2015a Controlled water deficit as an alternative to plant growth retardants for regulation of poinsettia stem elongation HortScience 50 565 569
Alem, P., Thomas, P.A. & van Iersel, M.W. 2015b Use of controlled water deficit to regulate poinsettia stem elongation HortScience 50 234 239
Álvarez, S., Navarro, A., Nicolás, E. & Sánchez-Blanco, M.J. 2011 Transpiration, photosynthetic responses, tissue water relations and dry mass partitioning in Callistemon plants during drought conditions Scientia Hort. 129 306 312
Barnes, L., Drees, B. & Hall, C. 2014 The Texas poinsettia producers guide. Texas Agr. Ext. Serv. Texas A&M Univ. 27 June 2018. <https://aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu/ornamental/the-texas-poinsettia-producers-guide/economics-marketing/>.
Barrett, J., Nell, T., Blom, T. & Hammer, P. 1995 Poinsettia bract edge burn: Potential causes and role of calcium sprays and Botrytis HortScience 30 771
Basyouni, R., Dunn, B.L. & Goad, C. 2015 Use of nondestructive sensors to assess nitrogen status in potted poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima L. (Willd. ex Klotzsch)) production Scientia Hort. 192 47 53
Bayer, A., Mahbub, I., Chappell, M., Ruter, J. & van Iersel, M.W. 2013 Water use and growth of hibiscus acetosella ‘Panama Red’ grown with a soil moisture sensor-controlled irrigation system HortScience 48 980 987
Burnett, S.E. & van Iersel, M.W. 2008 Morphology and irrigation efficiency of gaura lindheimeri grown with capacitance sensor-controlled irrigation HortScience 43 1555 1560
Cai, X., Starman, T., Niu, G., Hall, C. & Lombardini, L. 2012 Response of selected garden roses to drought stress HortScience 47 1050 1055
Cai, X., Starman, T., Niu, G. & Hall, C. 2014 The effect of substrate moisture content on growth and physiological responses of two landscape roses (Rosa hybrida L.) HortScience 49 741 745
Caser, M., Ruffoni, B. & Scariot, V. 2012 Screening for drought tolerance in Salvia spp. and Helichrysum petiolare: A way to select low maintenance ornamental plants Acta Hort. 953 240 246
Cavins, T.J., Whipker, B.E., Fonteno, W.C., Harden, B., McCall, I. & Gibson, J.L. 2000 Monitoring and managing pH and EC using the PourThru extraction method Hort. Information Leaflet 590 1 17
Chiatante, D., Di Iorio, A., Maiuro, L. & Scippa, S.G. 1999 Effect of water stress on root meristems in woody and herbaceous plants during the first stage of development Plant Soil 217 1 159 172
Dietrich, K., Weltmeier, F., Ehlert, A., Weiste, C., Stahl, M., Harter, K. & Dröge-Laser, W. 2011 Heterodimers of the Arabidopsis transcription factors bZIP1 and bZIP53 reprogram amino acid metabolism during low energy stress Plant Cell 23 381 395
Dole, J.M. & Wilkins, H.F. 1999 Floriculture: Principles and species. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ
Ecke, P., Faust, J.E., Higgins, A. & Williams, J. 2004 The Ecke poinsettia manual. Ball Publ., Batavia, IL
Fonteno, W., Hardin, C. & Brewster, J. 1995 Procedures for determining physical properties of horticultural substrates using the NCSU Porometer. Hort. Substrates Lab., N. C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC
González-Villagra, J., Kurepin, L.V. & Reyes-Díaz, M.M. 2017 Evaluating the involvement and interaction of abscisic acid and miRNA156 in the induction of anthocyanin biosynthesis in drought-stressed plants Planta 246 2 299 312
Guo, Y., Starman, T. & Hall, C. 2018 Reducing substrate moisture content (SMC) during greenhouse production and postproduction of angelonia and heliotrope improves crop quality and economic value HortScience 53 1006 1011
Harbaugh, B. & Woltz, S. 1989 Fertilization practice and foliar-bract calcium sprays reduce incidence of marginal bract necrosis of poinsettia HortScience 24 465 468
Hsiao, T.C. & Xu, L.K. 2000 Sensitivity of growth of roots versus leaves to water stress: Biophysical analysis and relation to water transport J. Expt. Bot. 51 1595 1616
Islam, M.A. & Joyce, D.C. 2015 Postharvest behavior and keeping quality of potted poinsettia: A review Res. Agr. Livestock and Fisheries 2 2 185 196
Jacobson, A.B., Starman, T.W. & Lombardini, L. 2015 Substrate moisture content effects on growth and shelf life of Angelonia angustifolia HortScience 50 272 278
Liebsch, D. & Keech, O. 2016 Dark-induced leaf senescence: New insights into a complex light-dependent regulatory pathway New Phytol. 212 3 563 570
Markwell, J., Osterman, J.C. & Mitchell, J.L. 1995 Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter Photosynth. Res. 46 467 472
Martínez, D. & Guiamet, J. 2004 Distortion of the SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter readings by changes in irradiance and leaf water status Agronomie 24 41 46
Meijón, M., Rodríguez, R., Cañal, M.J. & Feito, I. 2009 Improvement of compactness and floral quality in azalea by means of application of plant growth regulators Scientia Hort. 119 2 169 176
Nell, T. & Barrett, J. 1986 Growth and incidence of bract necrosis in ‘Gutbier V-14 Glory’ poinsettia J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111 266 269
Nell, T.A., Leonard, R.T. & Barrett, J.E. 1995 Production factors affect the postproduction performance of Poinsettia - A review. VI International Symposium on Postharvest Physiology of Ornamental Plants 405:132–137
Nemali, K.S. & van Iersel, M.W. 2006 An automated system for controlling drought stress and irrigation in potted plants Scientia Hort. 110 292 297
Niu, G., Rodriguez, D.S. & Mackay, W. 2008 Growth and physiological responses to drought stress in four oleander clones J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 133 188 196
Niu, G., Rodriguez, D.S., Rodriguez, L. & Mackay, W. 2007 Effect of water stress on growth and flower yield of big bend bluebonnet HortTechnology 17 557 560
Niu, G., Rodriguez, D.S. & Wang, Y.-T. 2006 Impact of drought and temperature on growth and leaf gas exchange of six bedding plant species under greenhouse conditions HortScience 41 1408 1411
Nowak, J.S. 2002 Effect of different soil water potential on leaf transpiration and on stomatal conductance in poinsettia Acta Agrobot. 55 2 27 36
Plummer, J.A., Welsh, T.E. & Armitage, A.M. 1990 Stages of flower development and postproduction longevity of potted Zantedeschia aethiopica ‘Childsiana’ HortScience 25 675 676
Ranch, P.E. 2011 Poinsettia, postproduction issues. University of Florida. Gainesville. 16 June 2018. <http://hort.ifas.ufl.edu/floriculture/poinsettia/beb.shtml>.
Ranch, P.E. 2012 Commercial floriculture: Poinsettia major postproduction issues. University of Florida. Gainesville. 26 Oct. 2018. <https://hort.ifas.ufl.edu/floriculture/poinsettia/postproduction.shtml>.
Saab, I.N., Sharp, R.E., Pritchard, J. & Voetberg, G.S. 1990 Increased endogenous abscisic acid maintains primary root growth and inhibits shoot growth of maize seedlings at low water potentials Plant Physiol. 93 4 1329 1336
Sánchez-Blanco, M.J., Álvarez, S., Navarro, A. & Bañón, S. 2009 Changes in leaf water relations, gas exchange, growth and flowering quality in potted geranium plants irrigated with different water regimes J. Plant Physiol. 166 467 476
Schuch, U., Redak, R.A. & Bethke, J. 1996 Whole-plant response of six poinsettia cultivars to three fertilizer and two irrigation regimes J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121 69 76
Slatnar, A., Mikulic-Petkovsek, M., Veberic, R., Stampar, F. & Schmitzer, V. 2013 Anthocyanin and chlorophyll content during poinsettia bract development Scientia Hort. 150 142 145
Starman, T. & Lombardini, L. 2006 Growth, gas exchange, and chlorophyll fluorescence of four ornamental herbaceous perennials during water deficit conditions J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 131 469 475
Starman, T.W., Beach, S.E. & Eixmann, K.L. 2007 Postharvest decline symptoms after simulated shipping and during shelf life of 21 cultivars of vegetative annuals HortTechnology 17 544 551
Strømme, E., Selmer-Olsen, A., Gislerød, H. & Moe, R. 1994 Cultivar differences in nutrient absorption and susceptibility to bract necrosis in poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd. ex Klotzsch) Gartenbauwissenschaft 59 1 6 12
Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., Møller, I.M. & Murphy, A. 2015 Plant physiology and development. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
USDA 2016 National Agricultural Statistics Service. 26 Apr. 2018. <http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/FlorCrop/FlorCrop-04-26-2016.pdf>.
Wan, J., Griffiths, R., Ying, J., McCourt, P. & Huang, Y. 2009 Development of drought-tolerant canola (L.) through genetic modulation of ABA-mediated stomatal responses Crop Sci. 49 5 1539 1554
Woltz, S. & Harbaugh, B. 1986 Calcium deficiency as the basic cause of marginal bract necrosis of ‘Gutbier V-14 Glory’ poinsettia HortScience 21 1403 1404