Controlling pH in soilless substrate is critical to managing nutrient availability in container production (Peterson, 1981). This can be a challenge considering that several factors interact and affect pH over time, including substrate components, limestone type and rate, applied nutrients and concentration, irrigation water alkalinity, and plant species (Argo and Biernbaum, 1996, 1997; Johnson et al., 2013). Floriculture species also differ in susceptibility to developing iron or manganese toxicity or deficiency symptoms if substrate-pH drifts too low or high during production (Argo and Fisher, 2002). A key grower decision is the selection of a water-soluble fertilizer formulation and concentration that stabilizes pH over time.
Fertilizer effects on substrate-pH are dominated by nitrogen form and concentration applied (Argo and Biernbaum, 1996; Barnes et al., 2014; Haynes, 1990; Huang et al., 2001; Johnson et al., 2013; Marschner, 2012). Fertilization with ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) produces an acidic reaction that decreases pH as a result of H+ efflux from roots during uptake and from nitrification. Nitrification can occur rapidly in container substrate above pH 5.5 and depends on factors that affect microbial activity such as pH, temperature, oxygen, moisture, crop duration, substrate components, nitrogen form, and concentration (Argo and Biernbaum, 1997; Lang and Elliot, 1991). Fertilization with nitrate nitrogen (NO3−-N) usually produces a basic reaction that increases pH, resulting from the efflux of hydroxyl (OH−) or bicarbonate (HCO3−) ions from roots (Haynes, 1990; Marschner, 2012). Ammonium typically has a greater impact on substrate-pH compared with NO3−-N when both forms are applied because NH4+-N uptake is energetically favored over NO3−-N uptake (Engels and Marschner, 1995; von Wiren et al., 2001). The effect of urea nitrogen (urea-N) on substrate-pH varies depending on the state of hydrolysis, nitrification, and the subsequent uptake of NH4+-N vs. NO3−-N (Verburg et al., 2003).
Floriculture species differ in their effect on substrate-pH, even when supplied with the same water-soluble fertilizer (Huang et al., 2001; Johnson et al., 2013). Huang et al. (2001) showed that seedlings of pansy (Viola ×wittrockiana Gams.), petunia (Petunia ×hybrid Vilm.-Andr.), and vinca (Catharanthus roseus G. Don.) increased the pH whereas celosia (Celosia cristata L.) and zinnia (Zinnia elegans Jacq.) decreased the pH in peat: perlite substrate. In both substrate (Johnson et al., 2013) and hydroponic nutrient solution (Dickson et al., 2016), geranium (Pelargonium ×hortorum Bailey L.H.) was acidic and decreased the pH compared with petunia which was basic and increased the pH, whereas impatiens (Impatiens wallerana Hook. F.) had intermediate effects to geranium and petunia.
A major process by which plants affect root zone pH is through imbalanced uptake of cation and anion nutrients (Haynes, 1990; Lea-Cox et al., 1996; Marschner, 2012; Rengel, 2003). Roots maintain charge balance either by equal uptake of cations and anions or by the efflux of ions equal to the net charge taken up by roots. Net cation uptake is balanced by efflux of H+ ions whereas net anion uptake is balanced by efflux of OH− or HCO3− from roots (Kirkby and Knight, 1977; Lea-Cox et al., 1996; Marschner, 2012).
Some agronomic crop species that are labeled “iron-efficient” acidify the root zone as a strategy to improve iron solubility and uptake when grown in calcareous soil (Marschner, 2012). Geranium is a floriculture species that is referred to as “iron-efficient” because of high susceptibility to iron or manganese toxicity at low pH and also has the tendency to decrease substrate-pH over time (Argo and Fisher, 2002; Johnson et al., 2013). Other floriculture species susceptible to iron or manganese toxicity may also decrease pH, possibly as a means to increase iron uptake.
Johnson et al. (2013) modeled the interaction between three floriculture species (geranium, impatiens, and petunia) fertilized with 18 water-soluble fertilizers differing in applied nitrogen forms (NH4+-N, NO3−-N, and urea-N) and concentration. The acidity or basicity of a fertilizer could be manipulated by adjusting nitrogen forms and concentrations to balance species root zone effects and stabilize pH. For example, the model predicted that geranium, impatiens, and petunia would require 0%, 10%, and 31% of total N as NH4+-N, respectively, with the remainder of N as NO3−-N. This ratio would be expected to maintain a stable pH over time when these species were grown with zero alkalinity irrigation water and without residual lime in the substrate.
Commercial bedding plant operations typically grow a wide range of plant species, often in the same greenhouse, that may differ in effects on substrate-pH. Species diversity is therefore an important consideration in pH management. However, it is also not feasible to provide separate fertilizer regimes to hundreds of cultivars grown at a single location, and grouping of plants is necessary. The objective was to quantify the effects of plant species on substrate-pH for floriculture species fertilized with different NH4:NO3 nitrogen ratios. Floriculture species common in container production were selected, where species also differed in reported susceptibility to iron or manganese deficiency or toxicity and optimum pH (Argo and Fisher, 2002; Whipker et al., 2003).
The objective of this study was to quantify effects of floriculture plant species on substrate-pH. In a factorial experiment conducted in a controlled environment growth chamber, 15 floriculture species were grown in peat:perlite substrate and were irrigated with modified 0.5× Hoagland’s nutrient solutions with NH4+:NO3− nitrogen ratios of 0:100, 20:80, and 40:60. After 33 d, substrate-pH was measured and meq of acid or base produced per L of substrate was estimated using an acid–base substrate titration (Johnson et al., 2010). Nitrogen is taken up in different forms that vary in their charge (including NH4+ and NO3−), and without isotope labeling (which was not used in this study), total N level in tissue cannot distinguish between the original fertilizer nutrient form. Dry tissue was harvested from plants irrigated with the 0:100 solution, and tissue nutrient data were used to estimate net uptake of anions minus cations, and cation or anion uptake ratio, assuming that all N was taken up in the anionic NO3− form. Species and solution NH4+:NO3− ratio were evaluated for effects on substrate-pH and meq of acid or base produced per L of substrate. Species were separated into clusters that corresponded to species overall acidic, intermediate, and basic effects on substrate-pH, and linear regression was used to predict species-specific NH4+:NO3− ratios expected to result in a stable pH. We hypothesized that species fertilized with 100% NO3−-N that had greater net anion minus cation uptake would result in greater basicity than species that favored cation uptake. We also hypothesized that floriculture species that are reportedly susceptible to iron or manganese toxicity at low pH may tend to decrease substrate-pH, possibly acidifying the root zone as an iron-efficiency mechanism (Marschner, 2012).
AlbanoJ.P.MillerW.B.1996Iron deficiency stress influences physiology of iron acquisition in marigold (Tagetes erecta L.)J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.121438441
AlbanoJ.P.MillerW.B.HalbrooksM.C.1996Iron toxicity stress causes bronze speckle, a specific physiological disorder of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.)J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.121430437
ArgoW.R.BiernbaumJ.A.1996The effect of lime, irrigation-water source, and water-soluble fertilizer on root-zone pH, electrical conductivity, and macronutrient management of container root media with impatiensJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.121442452
ArgoW.R.BiernbaumJ.A.1997Lime, water source, and fertilizer nitrogen form affect medium pH and nitrogen accumulation and uptakeHortScience327174
ArgoW.R.FisherP.R.2002Understanding pH management for container-grown crops. Meister Publishing Willoughby OH
BarnesJ.NelsonP.WhipkerB.E.DickeyD.A.HesterbergD.ShiW.2014Statistical model for describing macronutrient impacts on container substrate pH over timeHortScience49207214
BekeleT.CinoB.J.EhlertP.A.I.van der MassA.A.van DiestA.1983An evaluation of plant-borne factors promoting the solubilization of alkaline rock phosphatesPlant Soil75361378
CavinsT.J.WhipkerB.E.FontenoW.C.HardenB.McCallI.GibsonJ.L.2000Monitoring and managing pH and EC using the PourThru extraction method. North Carolina State Univ. Hort. Info. Lflt. 590
DicksonR.W.FisherP.R.ArgoW.R.JacquesD.J.SartainJ.B.TrenholmL.E.YeagerT.H.2016Solution ammonium:nitrate ratio and cation/anion uptake affect acidity or basicity with floriculture species in hydroponicsSci. Hort.2003644
EngelsC.MarschnerH.1995Plant uptake and utilization of nitrogen p. 41–82. In: P.E. Bacon (ed.). Nitrogen fertilization in the environment. Marcel Dekker Inc. New York NY
GibsonJ.L.PitchayD.S.Williams-RhodesA.L.WhipkerB.E.NelsonP.V.DoleJ.M.2007Nutrient deficiencies in bedding plants: A pictorial guide for identification and correction. Ball Publishing. Batavia IL
HaynesR.J.1990Active ion uptake and maintenance of cation-anion balance: A critical examination of their role in regulating rhizosphere pHPlant Soil126247264
HoaglandD.R.ArnonD.I.1950The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta. Circ. 347
JohnsonC.N.FisherP.R.HuangJ.VetanovetzR.P.ArgoW.R.2010Quantifying the acidity of an ammonium-based fertilizer in containerized productionHortScience4510991105
JohnsonC.N.FisherP.R.HuangJ.YeagerT.H.ObrezaT.A.VetanovetzR.P.ArgoW.R.BishkoA.J.2013Effect of fertilizer potential acidity and nitrogen form on the pH response in a peat-based substrate with three floriculture speciesSci. Hort.162135143
KirkbyE.A.KnightA.H.1977Influence of the level of nitrate nutrition on ion uptake and assimilation, organic acid accumulation, and cation-anion balance in whole tomato plantsPlant Physiol.60349353
LangH.J.ElliotG.C.1991Influence of ammonium:nitrate ratio and nitrogen concentration on nitrification activity in soilless potting mediaJ. Soc. Hort. Sci.116642645
Lea-CoxJ.D.StutteG.W.BerryW.L.WheelerR.M.1996Charge balance—A theoretical basis for modulating pH fluctuations in plant nutrient delivery systemsLife Support Biosph. Sci.35359
LindsayW.L.1979Chemical equilibria in soils. The Blackburn Press Caldwell NJ
MarschnerP.2012Mineral nutrition of higher plants. 3rd ed. Academic Press San Diego CA
PuustjarviV.RobertsonR.A.1975Physical and chemical properties p. 23–38. In: D.W. Robinson and J.G.D. Lamb (eds.). Peat in horticulture. Academic Press London
RengelZ.2003Handbook of soil acidity. Vol. 94. CRC Press London
ScogginsH.L.BaileyD.A.NelsonP.V.2002Efficacy of the press extraction method for bedding plant plug nutrient monitoringHortScience37108112
SonneveldC.VoogtW.2009Plant nutrition of greenhouse crops. Springer Dordrecht The Netherlands
VerburgK.BraschkatJ.HockmanZ.MooreA.D.HelyarK.R.ProbertM.E.HargravesJ.N.G.SimpsonR.J.2003Modeling acidification processes in agricultural systems p. 135–187. In: Z. Rengel (ed.). Handbook of soil acidity. Marcel Dekker Inc. New York NY
VetanovetzR.P.1996Tissue analyses and interpretation p. 197–220. In: D.W. Reed (ed.). Water media and nutrition for greenhouse crops. Ball Publishing Batavia IL
von WirenN.GojonA.ChaillouS.RaperD.2001Mechanisms and regulation of ammonium uptake in higher plants p. 61–77. In: P.J. Lea and J.F. Morot-Gaudry (eds.). Plant nitrogen. Springer New York NY
WhipkerB.E.CavinsT.J.GibsonJ.L.DoleJ.M.NelsonP.V.FontenoW.2003Plant nutrition p. 29–46. In: D. Hamrick (ed.). Ball redbook. Vol. 2. Ball Publishing Batavia IL