Strawberry is an important fruit crop to the U.S. economy, and the United States is the largest producer of strawberry worldwide. During the past 10 years, U.S. strawberry production averaged 1.24 million metric tons and was worth $2.12 billion dollars annually. Most of the strawberries were consumed fresh (80.8%) and 19.2% were processed (USDA, 2015a). The top production states were California, Florida, Oregon, North Carolina, Washington, and Michigan (USDA, 2015b). The production and value of strawberries has steadily increased since 2001. In 2005, U.S. strawberry production was at 1.05 million metric tons valued at $1.39 billion dollars, whereas in 2014, production was at 1.37 million metric tons valued at $2.86 billion dollars, deflated as the 2005 value (USDA, 2015a). The per capita consumption of strawberries has also been increasing steadily. In 2005, the per capita consumption was 5.83 pounds, and in 2014, the per capita consumption was 7.96 pounds. The per capita consumption growth has stagnated since 2009 (USDA, 2015c). New cultivar development and commercialization are essential to promote the industry’s long-term economic viability. In fact, since 2006, 81 new strawberry cultivars have been released in the United States (U.S. Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark Office, 2015).
Rosaceous fruit breeders have been breeding new strawberry cultivars for decades. Strawberries are herbaceous perennials, grown in many production regions as an annual crop, with a short reproductive cycle, which is different from other commercially produced rosaceous fruits (Qin et al., 2008). Previous studies have shown that the trait targets of strawberry breeding programs are highly influenced by geographical location and end market needs (Capocasa et al., 2008; Hancock et al., 2008; Khanizadeh et al., 1992; Whitaker et al., 2011). Although these studies provided insight into breeders’ trait prioritization decisions, a systematic investigation that includes consumers’ and producers’ values of strawberry traits would assist breeders to further improve the efficiency of breeding programs.
The following studies have investigated consumer preferences for strawberry attributes. Ford et al. (1996) and Safley et al. (1999) concluded that strawberry flavor, sweetness, juiciness, freshness, and firmness are the most important attributes compared with color and size for consumers. More recently, Colquhoun et al. (2012) found that consumers preferred strawberries that are sweet and with rich and complex flavors, and He et al. (2015) found that freshness and color of strawberries have significant impacts on WTP before consumers taste them, and flavor and texture become the dominant attributes after they taste them. Other than fruit quality attributes, Darby et al. (2008) found that consumers prefer strawberries that are locally produced, and this preference is independent of other attributes that are often naturally associated with locally produced foods, such as greater freshness. In addition to U.S. consumers, it was found that German consumers prefer strawberries with lower sugar content, and Uruguay consumers prefer sweeter and firmer strawberry cultivars (Keutgen and Pawelzik, 2007; Lado et al., 2010). Even fewer studies have focused on investigating strawberry producers’ preferences for strawberry traits. Yue et al. (2014) conducted audience surveys at several U.S. strawberry grower meetings and concluded that growers consider flavor, firmness, and shelf life at retail as the most important strawberry attributes compared with color and size. However, Yue et al. (2014) did not obtain growers’ values for these attributes.
To our knowledge, no study has compared producers’ and consumers’ values of strawberry traits and synthesized these values into a market equilibrium analysis. This study will fill this knowledge gap and assist strawberry breeders in setting attributes and breeding priorities to efficiently meet market needs.
Bhat, C.R. 2001 Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 35 677 693
Capocasa, F., Scalzo, J., Mezzetti, B. & Battino, M. 2008 Combining quality and antioxidant attributes in the strawberry. The role of genotype Food Chem. 111 872 878
Colquhoun, T.A., Levin, L.A., Moskowitz, H.R., Whitaker, V.M., Clark, D.G. & Folta, K.M. 2012 Framing the perfect strawberry: An exercise in consumer-assisted selection of fruit crops Journal of Berry Research 2 45 61
Darby, K., Batte, M.T., Ernst, S. & Roe, B. 2008 Decomposing local: A conjoint analysis of locally produced foods Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 90 2 476 486
Ford, A., Hansen, K., Herrington, M., Moisander, J., Nottingham, S., Prytz, S. & Zorin, M. 1996 Subjective and objective determination of strawberry quality Acta Hort. 439 319 323
Gallardo, R.K., Li, H., McCracken, V., Yue, C., Luby, J. & McFerson, J. 2014 Market intermediaries’ willingness to pay for apple, peach, cherry, and strawberry quality traits Agribusiness 31 2 259 280
Gallardo, R.K., Nguyen, D., McCracken, V., Yue, C.Y., Luby, J. & McFerson, J.R. 2012 An investigation of trait prioritization in rosaceous fruit breeding programs HortScience 47 771 776
Hancock, J.F., Sjulin, T.M. & Lobos, G.A. 2008 Strawberries, p. 393–438. In: J.F. Hancock (ed.). Temperate fruit crop breeding: Germplasm to genomics. Springer, New York, NY
He, C., Gao, Z., Sims, C.A. & Zhao, X. 2015 Does local label bias consumer taste bud and preference: Evidence of a strawberry sensory experiment. 2015 Annu. Mtg., Atlanta, GA, Jan. 31–Feb. 3 2015. (Southern Agricultural Economics Association)
Jacobs, H.L., Khan, H.D., Stralka, K.A. & Phan, D.B. 1998 Estimates of per capita fish consumption in the U.S. based on the continuing survey of food intake by individuals (CSF2) Risk Analysis 18 3 283 291
Keutgen, A. & Pawelzik, E. 2007 Modifications of taste-relevant compounds in strawberry fruit under NaCl salinity Food Chem. 105 1487 1494
Lado, J., Vicente, E., Manzzioini, A. & Ares, G. 2010 Application of a check-all-that-apply question for the evaluation of strawberry cultivars from a breeding program J. Sci. Food Agr. 90 2268 2275
Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A. & Swait, J.D. 2000 Stated choice methods: Analysis and application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lusk, J.L. & Hudson, D. 2004 Willingness-to-pay estimates and their relevance to agribusiness decision making Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 26 2 152 169
Lusk, J.L. & Schroeder, T.C. 2004 Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 86 2 467 482
Qin, Y., Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Zhang, L. & Zhang, S. 2008 Transgenic strawberry: State of the art for improved traits Biotechnol. Adv. 26 3 219 232
Safley, C.D., Wohlgenant, M.K. & Suter, R.E. 1999 Factors affecting consumers purchases direct market strawberries, ARE Report 22. North Carolina State Unviersity
Stewart, J. 2008 Single variable calculus. vol. 1, 6th ed. Cengage Learning, Boston, MA
Tonsor, G.T., Olynk, N. & Wolf, C. 2009 Consumer preferences for animal welfare attributes: The case of gestation crates J. Agr. Appl. Econ. 41 3 713 730
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2013 Retail Price [Data file]. 26 June 2015. <http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/fruit-and-tree-nut-data/yearbook-tables.aspx#.UqPUU_RDvNc>
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2015a Fruit and Tree Nut Yearbook [Data file]. 26 June 2015. <http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/ers/89022/2015-FruitandTreeNutYearbook.pdf>
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2015b U.S. strawberry harvested acreage, yield per acre, and production, 13 states. [Data file]. 26 June 2015. <http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1381>
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2015c Fruit and tree nuts outlook. [Data file]. 26 June 2015. <http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/FTS/FTS-03-27-2015.pdf>
U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau 2014 National Characteristics: Vintage 2013. [Data file]. 15 July 2015. <http://www.census.gov/popest/data/national/asrh/2013/index.html>
U.S. Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark Office 2015 Patent full text-and image database [Data file]. 26 June 2015. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html>
Wang, Q., Sun, J. & Parsons, R. 2010 Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for locally grown organic apples: Evidence from a conjoint study HortScience 45 376 381
Whitaker, V., Hasing, T. & Chandler, C.K. 2011 Historical Trends in strawberry fruit quality revealed by a trial of University of Florida Cultivars and advanced selections HortScience 46 553 557
Yue, C., Gallardo, R.K., Luby, J., Rihn, A., McFerson, J.R., McCracken, V., Whitaker, V.M., Finn, C.E., Hancock, J.F., Weebadde, C., Sebolt, A. & Iezzoni, A. 2014 An evaluation of U.S. strawberry producers’ trait prioritization: Evidence from audience surveys HortScience 49 188 193