Advertisement
Plant Health 2023

 

Chrysanthemum ×hybridum MN 98-89-7 Shrub Garden Chrysanthemum

Authors:
Neil O. AndersonDepartment of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

Search for other papers by Neil O. Anderson in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Peter D. AscherDepartment of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

Search for other papers by Peter D. Ascher in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Vincent FritzSouthern Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Waseca, MN 56093

Search for other papers by Vincent Fritz in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Charlie RohwerSouthern Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Waseca, MN 56093

Search for other papers by Charlie Rohwer in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Steven PoppeWest Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267

Search for other papers by Steven Poppe in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Shengrui YaoNorth Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Grand Rapids, MN 55744

Search for other papers by Shengrui Yao in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Patricia JohnsonNorth Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Grand Rapids, MN 55744

Search for other papers by Patricia Johnson in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Lee KlossnerSouthwest Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Lamberton, MN 56162

Search for other papers by Lee Klossner in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Neal S. EashSouthwest Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Lamberton, MN 56162

Search for other papers by Neal S. Eash in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Barbara E. LiedlDepartment of Biology, Agricultural and Environmental Research Station, West Virginia State University, Institute, WV 25112

Search for other papers by Barbara E. Liedl in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Judith Reith-RozelleWest Madison Agricultural Research Station, Verona, WI 53593

Search for other papers by Judith Reith-Rozelle in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close

Abstract

A new garden chrysanthemum with a shrub plant habit is released as a descendent of a cross involving two hexaploid species: Chrysanthemum weyrichii (Maxim.) Tzvelv. (female) × C. ×grandiflorum Tzvelv. (male). Chrysanthemum ×hybridum Anderson MN 98-89-7 [U.S. Plant Patent (PP) 14,495] is a vigorously growing shrub chrysanthemum for garden culture, exhibiting extreme hybrid vigor. Single daisy reddish-purple flowers cover the foliage in the fall, numbering >3000 on second-year plants. This selection displays excellent winterhardiness in U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Z3b+ (–34.4 to –37.2 °C) as well as frost-tolerant flowers. In its second and subsequent years of growth after planting, MN 98-89-7 grows into a fall flowering (August–October), herbaceous shrub ranging in plant height from 61.0 to 91.4 cm with a diameter of 76.2 to 152.4 cm. Its spherical plant shape is achieved naturally with self-pinching, creating a highly manicured appearance; it also attracts honey bees and butterflies as pollinators. MN 98-89-7 is a vegetative product and this unnamed selection is being released for germplasm purposes as well as for potential licensing and naming.

A new garden chrysanthemum with the shrub plant habit has been developed by the public sector University of Minnesota Flower Breeding and Genetics program. The program is well known for introducing trendsetting plant traits (winterhardiness, frost tolerance, butterfly and bee attractants) or habits (upright, cushion, shrub, groundcover) that dominate market share in the United States as well as globally. This program is also the oldest, continuously operating garden chrysanthemum breeding program (Anderson, 2015; Anderson et al., 2001). Since the 1950s, cushion plant habits are the most popular garden types, retaining dominant market share in the United States and the globe (Anderson, 2004, 2006; Anderson and Gesick, 2003, 2004; Anderson et al., 2015; Kim and Anderson, 2006). More recent breeding program innovations include the shrub chrysanthemum that is coupled with the cushion plant habit, e.g., C. ×hybridum ‘Mammoth™’ series (nine cultivars to date). This reignited interest in garden mums, catapulting the garden chrysanthemum market share from the No. 2 or 3 herbaceous perennial (behind Hosta and Hemerocallis, respectively) to No. 1 ranking (Anderson et al., 2015). Garden chrysanthemums, Chrysanthemum ×grandiflorum (=Dendranthema ×grandiflora Tzvelv.; =C. ×morifolium Ramatuelle) and C. ×hybridum, are the No. 1 herbaceous perennial in the top 15 U.S. producing states with a wholesale (w) farm gate value of $123.7 million (M) in 2015 (USDA NASS, 2016) from selling 47.211 M pots (all sizes). These figures are ×2.6 greater than No. 2 Hosta at $34.9 M (w) sales (USDA NASS, 2016). For numerous decades, garden chrysanthemum sales have exceeded the sum of florist’s potted [$16.7 M (w)] and pompon cut flower chrysanthemums [$11.5 M (w)] (USDA NASS, 2016) due to their predominantly offshore production. This trend will likely continue since, unlike cut flowers, garden chrysanthemums cannot be imported with a root system and so they are produced onshore.

Origin

The pedigree of MN 98-89-7 (Fig. 1) is the result of a series of outcrosses of hybrid descendants of the original cross in 1989 between two allohexaploid (2n = 6x = 54) species, C. weyrichii (Maxi.) Miyabe ‘Pink Bomb’ (http://davesgarden.com/guides/pf/go/164055/#b) × [C. ×grandiflorum ‘Adorn’ (PP 6059) or ‘Crusdaor’ (PP 6531)] (Anderson et al., 2008). The resulting hybrid cross, MN 90-287, produced hundreds of viable seed in 1990 and hybrid MN 90-287-326 was selected and hybridized in 1991 as a male parent with MN 89-409-19 as the female inbred parent. This resulted in the hybrid seed of MN 92-321 and the 19th plant in this seed lot (MN 92-321-19) was clonally propagated and allowed to open pollinate in the St. Paul, MN, breeding fields (45°N lat.) during 1997. Open-pollinated seed from this outcross was harvested and identified as MN 98-89. When the seedlings were germinated the following year, the selected ortet (original seedling from which clonal ramats are derived) was the seventh plant in this cross of grow-outs in 1999 by the inventors (Anderson et al., 2004), i.e., MN 98-89-7, and was selected for further evaluations. The original ortet had reddish-purple daisy flowers with an “eye” in the golden center of disc florets; it flowered in the field starting in week 37 during 1998. Clonal ramats from terminal stem cuttings were taken from the ortet and rooted for subsequent trials that began in St. Paul, MN, in 1998 and elsewhere in North America by 2001.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Pedigree of Chrysanthemum ×hybridum MN 98-89-7 (Anderson et al., 2004). The female (seed) parents are listed first, followed by the male (pollen) parent.

Citation: HortScience horts 52, 2; 10.21273/HORTSCI11203-16

The shrub phenotype, a salient feature of MN 98-89-7, occurred in the 1999 field trials and distinguished it from upright and cushion plant habits of garden chrysanthemums. Hybrid MN 98-89-7 was approved for release in 2001, by the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, Horticultural Variety Release Committee and is now protected by a U.S. PP (14,495; Anderson et al., 2004). This cultivar is taxonomically designated as Chrysanthemum ×hybridum Anderson (=Dendranthema ×hybrida Anderson) MN 98-89-7.

Description

After the selection of the ortet, MN 98-89-7, one-half of the crown was dug from the breeding field (St. Paul, MN; 45°N lat.) in Oct. 1998 (the first year of growth). This crown segment was potted into a peat-based substrate (Sunshine #8/LC8 Professional Growing Mix; Sun Gro Horticulture Inc., Bellevue, WA) and kept at 4 °C for 1000 h (6 weeks; darkness). Subsequently, it was greenhouse forced to prompt vegetative shoots from rhizomes (long days, 0800–1600 hr + 2200–0200 hr night interruption supplemental lighting at 150 μmol·m−2·sec−1, 400-W high-pressure sodium lamps; 18.5/22.0 °C day/night).

Clonal ramets were taken via stem cuttings in St. Paul, MN, in Spring 1999. The characteristics were stable, being firmly fixed as well as true to type, retained through multiple generations of asexual propagation (ramets) during 1999–2000 (Anderson et al., 2004). Stem tip cuttings were rooted by dipping the cut distal ends in 1000 ppm indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) in 50% ethanol (EtOH), anchored in Oasis wedges (Smithers-Oasis, Kent, OH) under intermittent mist at 21 °C day/night (soil). Cuttings were rooted ≈1 week later (100%). They were subsequently transplanted and grown in greenhouses (45°N lat.; St. Paul, MN) for vegetative growth (4 weeks of long days, 0800–1600 hr supplied by 400-W high-pressure sodium lamps + 2200–0200 hr night interruption; 22.0 °C day/18.5 °C night), followed by annual field trials in 2000–08 at various sites in North America for field testing (see Performance).

Detailed botanical description for the U.S. PP filings (Anderson et al., 2004) was derived from clonal ramets flowered in greenhouse conditions, comparable to those used in commercial practice (Langevin, 1992), with 6.5 weeks of short days for flower bud initiation and development [8 h (0800–1600 hr; 150 μmol·m−2·s−1) supplied by 400-W high-pressure sodium lamps; black cloth pulled closed at 1600 hr and opened at 0800 hr; 22.2 °C day/18.3 °C night]. Identification of all colors described herein was derived from the RHS Color Chart (Royal Horticultural Society, 1995) and determined in week 3 (18 Jan. 2001) in St. Paul, MN (45°N lat.); readings were taken between 1300 and 1500 hr under ≈2500 foot candles (500 μmol·m−2·s−1) of light.

MN 98-89-7 is a rhizomatous herbaceous perennial and the aboveground vertical stems do not root in situ (Anderson et al., 2004). This selection has a mounded, spherical shape or cushion plant habit after planting in landscapes, field trials, or containers; such a habit is maintained for the entire life of each clonal ramet (Anderson et al., 2004). Similar to the Mammoth™ cultivars after establishment (Year 2 onward), MN 98-89-7 possesses vigorous growth, achieving a shrub plant habit range of 61.0 to 91.4 cm vs. a Year 1 plant height of 45.7 cm (Table 1). Lateral branches (1/node) range in length from 15.2 to 27.9 cm with a stem color of RHS Yellow Green Group 148B (Anderson et al., 2004).

Table 1.

Comparative plant traits of Chrysanthemum ×hybridum MN 98-89-7 (PP 14,495) grown in field trials with C. ×hybridum ‘Emily’ (PP 7754; VandenBerg, 1991) at St. Paul, MN [U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Z4a; Anderson et al., 2004]. Quantitative traits are mean values, based on 10 replications.

Table 1.

Numbers of leaves/lateral branch in MN 98-89-7 vary from 5 to 20 arranged in alternate phyllotaxy (one leaf/node). The total number of leaves/plant in Year 2 exceeds 3000 (based on actual counts; Anderson et al., 2004). Length × width of fully expanded leaves are 7.2 cm × 5.3 cm, respectively, with rounded tips, truncated side edges, and Mulberry-like incisions on the leaf margins (Fig. 2). Leaf bases are truncate with glaucous leaf textures and petioles averaging 2.7 cm in length (Fig. 2). Young foliage coloration is RHS Green Group 137A and RHS Yellow-Green Group 148B on the adaxial and abaxial surfaces, respectively. A color change to RHS Green Group 139A occurs on adaxial leaf surfaces in mature, fully expanded leaves, while the abaxial leaf coloration remains the same on young and mature foliage. Leaf venation colors vary from RHS Yellow-Green Group 147BC to 147B for adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces, respectively, while the petioles are RHS Yellow-Green Group 148C (Anderson et al., 2004).

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Adaxial (above surface; left) and abaxial (below surface; right) leaf profiles of MN 98-89-7. Bar = 1 cm. Photo: Neil Anderson.

Citation: HortScience horts 52, 2; 10.21273/HORTSCI11203-16

The phyllaries (involucral bracts) at the base of MN 98-89-7 flowers are crenulate with entire margins and a RHS Green Group 138C color (Anderson et al., 2004). Phyllaries range from 0.2 to 0.4 cm in length and are glabrous. The Asteraceae diagnostic trait of composite inflorescences is possessed by MN 98-89-7 with occasionally simplex (single) to predominantly duplex daisy flowers with a small “eye” in the center of the disc florets (Fig. 3). MN 98-89-7 is in the 6.5-week short-day response group (Table 1), producing as many as 500 flowers/plant in the Year 1 field trials and increasing to >3000 in Year 2. Flower longevity is temperature dependent. Under normal field conditions during the fall season, frost-tolerant flowers will typically last ≈2–4 weeks. Flowering commences (first flower date) outdoors under natural daylenths during weeks 31–38 (mean = week 37) and reaches 100% flowering in weeks 39–40 (mean = week 39.7), depending on year, location, age of plants (first or second year), and occurrence of the first freeze.

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Year 1 plant phenotype of MN 98-89-7 displaying the cushion plant habit and close-up of flowers showing the occasionally simplex (single) to duplex daisy flowers with a small “eye” in the center of the disc florets. Bar = 5.0 cm. Photo: Neil Anderson.

Citation: HortScience horts 52, 2; 10.21273/HORTSCI11203-16

Each composite inflorescence of ray and disc florets averages 5.2 cm in diameter with the mature disc florets comprising 1.4 cm (diameter) and a depth of 0.8 cm (Anderson et al., 2004). The opening flower bud shape is upright and conical with a size of 1.9 cm × 1.0 cm (length × width); the bud coloration is RHS Red-Purple Group 59A. Each inflorescence of MN 98-89-7 averages 25 ray petals (gynoecious; cuneate at the base) and 144 center disc florets (hermaphroditic, perfect). The ray florets are spatulate shaped with a mean length × width of 2.4 cm × 0.5 cm, respectively. Each ray floret apex is rounded with entire margins, glabrous texture, and positioned horizontally or recurved downward slights with reference to the stem axis. Opening ray florets are colored RHS Red-Purple Group 71A and 69C-71C on the adaxial and abaxial petal surfaces, respectively. When the ray florets mature, the adaxial and abaxial petal coloration respectively changes to RHS Red-Purple Group 70A and 69D-70D (Table 1). As the ray florets fade due to aging, the petal (on both sides) changes to RHS Red-Purple Group 70C. Perfect, carpellate disc florets are tubular and rounded at the tip. The mean length and width dimensions of each ray floret are 0.6 cm × 0.1 cm. Coloration of immature disc florets is RHS Yellow Green Group 150A, maturing to RHS Yellow Group 3A.

Peduncles of MN 98-89-7 are stiffly held at a 45° angle on the stems with a hirsute texture (Anderson et al., 2004). The first and fourth peduncles average 3.0 and 2.0 cm (length), respectively, both with RHS Green Group 138B coloration. Trinucleate pollen is abundantly produced and colored RHS Yellow Group 4A.

The fruits of MN 98-89-7 are dry, dehiscent achenes from a single locule producing one seed each. Each achene lacks a pappus of awns or bristles and is generally shaped as a half-inflated football oval with pointed ends; the surface texture is ridged. There is an average of 169 ovules/flower as the sum total of ray and disc florets (Anderson et al., 2004). Mature seeds are colored RHS Brown Group 200D and 0.2–0.5 cm × 0.1–0.2 cm (length × width, respectively).

Performance

In landscapes or as a field-grown plant, MN 98-89-7 has a cushion phenotype in Year 1 (Table 1; Fig. 3) and, in subsequent years, it achieves a shrub habit while maintaining the cushion phenotype (Year 2 onward). Comparison trials of MN 98-89-7 and ‘Emily’ (PP 7754) showed no difference in the cushion plant habit (Year 1; Table 1) and the mean plant heights overlapped: ‘Emily’ attained a height of 30.5–45.7 cm while MN 98-89-7 was 45.7 cm tall. However, due to the lack of winter survival of ‘Emily’ in USDA Z4a, Year 2 plant height comparisons were not possible. MN 98-89-7 survived, growing to a height of 61.0–91.4 cm. Both cultivars have a similar flowering response, differing by only 0.5 weeks (‘Emily’ is earlier than MN 98-89-7) and flower diameters also overlap (Table 1). However, flower types vary significantly with a duplex daisy type for MN 98-89-7 and a decorative type for ‘Emily’. The coloration of ray florets also differs between the two genotypes for the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of the petals (Table 1).

The highest levels of winterhardiness in northern latitudes for MN 98-89-7 occur with snow cover, as is the case with other winter-hardy garden chrysanthemums (Anderson et al., 2012a). Without snow cover, soil surface mulch may substitute for additional crown protection (Anderson et al., 2012b). Winter survivorship was determined at five locations in Minnesota [USDA Z3b (Grand Rapids, MN), 3b/4a (Morris, MN), 4a (St. Paul, MN), 4b (Lamberton, MN; Waseca, MN)] and years (2000–08), as well as Verona, WI (USDA Z5a) and Institute, WV (USDA Z6a; Table 2), although MN 98-89-7 was not planted and overwintered at each site every year in field trials or garden plots without protective mulch or covering. Mean percent winter survival ranged from 0.0% (2007, Grand Rapids, MN) to 100% (2000 and 2004, Grand Rapids, MN; 2000–01, Morris, MN; 2000, St. Paul, MN; 2001–05 and 2008, Waseca, MN; 2001, Verona, WI) with an overall grand arithmetic mean of 87.1% for the tested years and locations (Table 2). The range of annual arithmetic means was 46.6% in 2007 to 100% in 2000, 2005, and 2008 (Table 2). Occasional low (0.0, 50.0) percent winter survival in 2007 was most likely due to low amounts of snow cover in Grand Rapids and Morris, MN, respectively.

Table 2.

Test sites, geographic locations, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) plant hardiness zones, and mean percent winter survival of MN 98-89-7 over multiple trial locations in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and West Virginiaz.

Table 2.
Geometric means for winterhardiness in garden chrysanthemums were first employed by Anderson et al. (2012b) as a more accurate gauge than arithmetic means such that no data points dominate the mean (Ouellet, 1976). Geometric means (G) for winter survival at l (locations) in y (years) formula are calculated as:
UNDE1
where n representing the number of replications at each ly site. Annual geometric means (Gly) for years and locations ranged from 65.4% (2002) to 100.0% (2000; Table 2); Gly were consistently lower than corresponding arithmetic means. Gly could not be calculated in 2007 as there was at least one case of 0.0% winter survival (Table 2) and Gly must include only positive numbers (Ouellet, 1976). In 2006, the Gly arithmetic mean could not be calculated since there was only one data point (Table 2). The grand Gly for all years and locations could not be calculated for MN 98-89-7 due to 0% winterhardiness at one location and year (2007; Table 2). In summary, the winterhardiness level of MN 98-89-7 is USDA Z3b+ (–34.4 to –37.2 °C; Table 2).

Propagation and Production

Asexual propagation has firmly fixed all morphological traits in the clonal ramets. Herbaceous stem tip cuttings root in ≈1 week under intermittent mist or fog systems, after basipetal cut ends are dipped into 1000 ppm IBA in 50% EtOH (Anderson et al., 2004). Rooted cuttings are first grown for 3–4 weeks in long-day photoperiods (0800–1600 hr + 2200–0200 hr night interruption lighting) at 18.5 °C day/22.0 °C night for vegetative growth (Dole and Wilkins, 2005). They can then be programmed to flower for Mother’s Day or fall sales when followed with 6.5 weeks of short-day photoperiods [8 h (0800–1600 hr)]; black cloth pulled closed at 1600 hr and opened at 0800 hr at 18.5 °C day/22.0 °C night with 1361 g 5N–8.7P–16.6K (5–20–20; Peters Professional, Everris Na Inc., Marysville, OH) preplant fertilizer or 300 ppm using 20N–4.4P–16.6K (20–10–20, Peat-Lite Special; The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, Marysville, OH) weekly liquid feed (Langevin, 1992). MN 98-89-7 is a facultative short-day plant (Anderson et al., 2004) and may be produced for Mother’s Day and spring bedding plant sales in packs or liners for direct planting in gardens, containers, or fields for growth and fall flowering.

Use

MN 98-89-7 is a winter-hardy herbaceous perennial that attracts honey bees and butterflies during the flowering period, similar to all Mammoth™ cultivars (Anderson et al., 2008). It is a low-maintenance plant that does not require pinching the terminal meristem before July 4 to induce lateral branching (Langevin, 1992; Widmer, 1980). It will reach the shrub growth habit after the second season of growth and thereafter (Anderson et al., 2004) and displays flower petal frost tolerance to extend the flowering season. To obtain individual flowering specimens of MN 98-89-7, plant spacing should be at least 1 m on center (OC). If a continuous flowering hedge is desired, decrease the plant spacing to 0.3–0.6 m OC.

Availability

Chrysanthemum ×hybridum MN 98-89-7 (U.S. PP 14,495) is available for commercialization or germplasm development. Please contact the primary author to negotiate a Material Transfer Agreement and arrange for unrooted or rooted cuttings for trialing. Exclusive or nonexclusive licensing is available through the Office of Technology Transfer, University of Minnesota for North America and the rest of the world.

Literature Cited

  • Anderson, N.O. 2004 Breeding flower seed crops, p. 53–86. In: M. McDonald and F. Kwong (eds.). Flower seeds. CABI

  • Anderson, N.O. 2006 Chrysanthemum. Dendranthema x grandiflora Tzvelv, p. 389–437. In: N.O. Anderson (ed.). Flower breeding and genetics: Issues, challenges, and opportunities for the 21st century. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

  • Anderson, N.O. 2015 From lilies to gladiolus: Flower power. 1 Sept. 2016. <http://eorganic.info/sites/pbgworks.org/files/user/73/From%20lilies%20to%20gladiolus%20Flower%20Power.pdf>.

  • Anderson, N.O. & Gesick, E. 2003 Container production of prostrate garden chrysanthemums HortScience 38 1344 1348

  • Anderson, N.O. & Gesick, E. 2004 Phenotypic markers for selection of winter hardy garden chrysanthemum (Dendranthema x grandiflora Tzvelv.) genotypes Sci. Hort. 101 1–2 153 167

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, N.O., Ascher, P.D., Gesick, E., Walvatne, B., Eash, N., Fritz, V., Hebel, J., Poppe, S., Wagner, R. & Wildung, D. 2001 Garden chrysanthemums ‘Peach Centerpiece’ and ‘Sesquicentennial Sun’ HortScience 36 1349 1351

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, N.O., Ascher, P. & Gesick, E. 2004 Chrysanthemum plant named ‘MN98-89-7’. U.S. Plant Patent No. 14,495. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Washington, DC

  • Anderson, N.O., Ascher, P., Gesick, E., Klossner, L., Eash, N., Fritz, V., Hebel, J., Poppe, S., Reith-Rozelle, J., Wagner, R., Jacobson, S., Wildung, D. & Johnson, P. 2008 Winter hardy Mammoth™ series garden chrysanthemums ‘Red Daisy’, ‘White Daisy’, and ‘Coral Daisy’ sporting a shrub plant habit HortScience 43 648 654

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, N.O., Gesick, E., Ascher, P.D., Poppe, S., Yao, S., Wildung, D., Johnson, P., Fritz, V., Rohwer, C., Klossner, L., Eash, N., Liedl, B.E. & Reith-Rozelle, J. 2012a Mammoth™ ‘Twilight Pink Daisy’ garden chrysanthemum HortScience 47 1 5

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, N.O., Poppe, S., Ascher, P.D., Gesick, E., Yao, S., Wildung, D., Johnson, P., Fritz, V., Hebel, J., Klossner, L., Eash, N., Liedl, B.E. & Reith-Rozelle, J. 2012b Mammoth™ ‘Yellow Quill’ garden chrysanthemum HortScience 47 285 288

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, N.O., Ascher, P.D., Fritz, V., Rohwer, C., Poppe, S., Yao, S., Johnson, P., Liedl, B.E., Reith-Rozelle, J., Klossner, L. & Eash, N. 2015 Chrysanthemum xhybridum MammothTM ‘Dark Bronze Daisy’ garden chrysanthemum HortScience 50 1260 1264

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dole, J. & Wilkins, H.F. 2005 Floriculture: Principles and species. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

  • Kim, D.-C. & Anderson, N.O. 2006 Comparative analysis of laboratory freezing methods to establish cold tolerance of detached rhizomes and intact crowns in garden chrysanthemums Sci. Hort. 109 345 352

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Langevin, D. 1992 The growing and marketing of fall mums: How you can turn your backyard into a money-making, growing machine! Annedawn Publishing, Norton, MA

  • Ouellet, C.E. 1976 Winter hardiness and survival of forage crops in Canada Can. J. Plant Sci. 56 679 689

  • Royal Horticultural Society 1995 RHS colour chart. 3rd ed. The Royal Horticultural Society, London, UK

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA NASS) 2016 Floriculture crops, 2014 summary. 22 June 2016. <http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/FlorCrop/FlorCrop-04-26-2016.pdf>.

  • VandenBerg, C.P. 1991 Chrysanthemum plant named Emily. Yoder Brothers, Barberton, OH. U.S. Plant Patent, No. 7,754. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC

  • Widmer, R.E. 1980 Garden chrysanthemums. Horticulture Fact Sheet No. 38, 2nd ed. Agricultural Extension Service, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN

  • View in gallery

    Pedigree of Chrysanthemum ×hybridum MN 98-89-7 (Anderson et al., 2004). The female (seed) parents are listed first, followed by the male (pollen) parent.

  • View in gallery

    Adaxial (above surface; left) and abaxial (below surface; right) leaf profiles of MN 98-89-7. Bar = 1 cm. Photo: Neil Anderson.

  • View in gallery

    Year 1 plant phenotype of MN 98-89-7 displaying the cushion plant habit and close-up of flowers showing the occasionally simplex (single) to duplex daisy flowers with a small “eye” in the center of the disc florets. Bar = 5.0 cm. Photo: Neil Anderson.

  • Anderson, N.O. 2004 Breeding flower seed crops, p. 53–86. In: M. McDonald and F. Kwong (eds.). Flower seeds. CABI

  • Anderson, N.O. 2006 Chrysanthemum. Dendranthema x grandiflora Tzvelv, p. 389–437. In: N.O. Anderson (ed.). Flower breeding and genetics: Issues, challenges, and opportunities for the 21st century. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

  • Anderson, N.O. 2015 From lilies to gladiolus: Flower power. 1 Sept. 2016. <http://eorganic.info/sites/pbgworks.org/files/user/73/From%20lilies%20to%20gladiolus%20Flower%20Power.pdf>.

  • Anderson, N.O. & Gesick, E. 2003 Container production of prostrate garden chrysanthemums HortScience 38 1344 1348

  • Anderson, N.O. & Gesick, E. 2004 Phenotypic markers for selection of winter hardy garden chrysanthemum (Dendranthema x grandiflora Tzvelv.) genotypes Sci. Hort. 101 1–2 153 167

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, N.O., Ascher, P.D., Gesick, E., Walvatne, B., Eash, N., Fritz, V., Hebel, J., Poppe, S., Wagner, R. & Wildung, D. 2001 Garden chrysanthemums ‘Peach Centerpiece’ and ‘Sesquicentennial Sun’ HortScience 36 1349 1351

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, N.O., Ascher, P. & Gesick, E. 2004 Chrysanthemum plant named ‘MN98-89-7’. U.S. Plant Patent No. 14,495. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Washington, DC

  • Anderson, N.O., Ascher, P., Gesick, E., Klossner, L., Eash, N., Fritz, V., Hebel, J., Poppe, S., Reith-Rozelle, J., Wagner, R., Jacobson, S., Wildung, D. & Johnson, P. 2008 Winter hardy Mammoth™ series garden chrysanthemums ‘Red Daisy’, ‘White Daisy’, and ‘Coral Daisy’ sporting a shrub plant habit HortScience 43 648 654

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, N.O., Gesick, E., Ascher, P.D., Poppe, S., Yao, S., Wildung, D., Johnson, P., Fritz, V., Rohwer, C., Klossner, L., Eash, N., Liedl, B.E. & Reith-Rozelle, J. 2012a Mammoth™ ‘Twilight Pink Daisy’ garden chrysanthemum HortScience 47 1 5

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, N.O., Poppe, S., Ascher, P.D., Gesick, E., Yao, S., Wildung, D., Johnson, P., Fritz, V., Hebel, J., Klossner, L., Eash, N., Liedl, B.E. & Reith-Rozelle, J. 2012b Mammoth™ ‘Yellow Quill’ garden chrysanthemum HortScience 47 285 288

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, N.O., Ascher, P.D., Fritz, V., Rohwer, C., Poppe, S., Yao, S., Johnson, P., Liedl, B.E., Reith-Rozelle, J., Klossner, L. & Eash, N. 2015 Chrysanthemum xhybridum MammothTM ‘Dark Bronze Daisy’ garden chrysanthemum HortScience 50 1260 1264

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dole, J. & Wilkins, H.F. 2005 Floriculture: Principles and species. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

  • Kim, D.-C. & Anderson, N.O. 2006 Comparative analysis of laboratory freezing methods to establish cold tolerance of detached rhizomes and intact crowns in garden chrysanthemums Sci. Hort. 109 345 352

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Langevin, D. 1992 The growing and marketing of fall mums: How you can turn your backyard into a money-making, growing machine! Annedawn Publishing, Norton, MA

  • Ouellet, C.E. 1976 Winter hardiness and survival of forage crops in Canada Can. J. Plant Sci. 56 679 689

  • Royal Horticultural Society 1995 RHS colour chart. 3rd ed. The Royal Horticultural Society, London, UK

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA NASS) 2016 Floriculture crops, 2014 summary. 22 June 2016. <http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/FlorCrop/FlorCrop-04-26-2016.pdf>.

  • VandenBerg, C.P. 1991 Chrysanthemum plant named Emily. Yoder Brothers, Barberton, OH. U.S. Plant Patent, No. 7,754. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC

  • Widmer, R.E. 1980 Garden chrysanthemums. Horticulture Fact Sheet No. 38, 2nd ed. Agricultural Extension Service, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN

Neil O. AndersonDepartment of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

Search for other papers by Neil O. Anderson in
Google Scholar
Close
,
Peter D. AscherDepartment of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

Search for other papers by Peter D. Ascher in
Google Scholar
Close
,
Vincent FritzSouthern Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Waseca, MN 56093

Search for other papers by Vincent Fritz in
Google Scholar
Close
,
Charlie RohwerSouthern Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Waseca, MN 56093

Search for other papers by Charlie Rohwer in
Google Scholar
Close
,
Steven PoppeWest Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267

Search for other papers by Steven Poppe in
Google Scholar
Close
,
Shengrui YaoNorth Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Grand Rapids, MN 55744

Search for other papers by Shengrui Yao in
Google Scholar
Close
,
Patricia JohnsonNorth Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Grand Rapids, MN 55744

Search for other papers by Patricia Johnson in
Google Scholar
Close
,
Lee KlossnerSouthwest Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Lamberton, MN 56162

Search for other papers by Lee Klossner in
Google Scholar
Close
,
Neal S. EashSouthwest Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Lamberton, MN 56162

Search for other papers by Neal S. Eash in
Google Scholar
Close
,
Barbara E. LiedlDepartment of Biology, Agricultural and Environmental Research Station, West Virginia State University, Institute, WV 25112

Search for other papers by Barbara E. Liedl in
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Judith Reith-RozelleWest Madison Agricultural Research Station, Verona, WI 53593

Search for other papers by Judith Reith-Rozelle in
Google Scholar
Close

Contributor Notes

This research has been supported by the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and a grant from the Ball Horticultural Company, West Chicago, IL.

Professor.

Professor Emeritus.

Scientist.

Senior Scientist (Poppe); Associate Professor/Fruit Specialist, Sustainable Agriculture Science Center, New Mexico State University, Alcalde, NM (Yao); Non/Exempt Temporary or Casual Scientist (Johnson).

Senior Research Fellow.

Professor, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.

Associate Professor.

Emeritus Assistant Superintendent.

Corresponding author. E-mail: ander044@umn.edu.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 194 175 13
PDF Downloads 166 145 7
Save