Yield stability (simply “stability”) is a crop genotype’s performance over a range of environmental conditions, such that a specific genotype may be less sensitive to environmental change (i.e., above-average stability) or more sensitive to environmental change (i.e., below-average stability) relative to other genotypes. The ideal genotype for most crops is believed to have both above-average yield and above-average stability. The objective of the study was to determine the pattern of genotype adoption and use of processing sweet corn in relation to yield and stability. I hypothesized that if yield and stability influence decision-making on genotype choice, then differences among commercial genotypes in such traits would relate to the pattern of adoption and use of those genotypes. Stability analyses of ear mass and case production were conducted on processing sweet corn genotypes grown in varied environments of the United States’ Upper Midwest and Pacific Northwest. Yield and stability of the 12 most tested genotypes were then related to the extent of their adoption and use by a sweet corn processing company over a 20-year period. Although some genotypes exhibited above-average yield or above-average stability, data revealed there was no evidence of both traits in individual genotypes currently used in processing sweet corn. Adoption of genotypes with below-average yield or stability was less than other genotypes. Genotype adoption pattern of case production showed the greatest proportion of adoption of above-average stability genotypes. Stable case production across all environments is a more important trait in a genotype to the sweet corn processor than a genotype with record yields under favorable conditions. This conclusion is consistent with the industry’s need to have a predictable level of performance in the processing facility, through which all raw product must flow, on a daily basis for the about three-month window of harvest in the northern United States.
I express sincere gratitude to the anonymous processing company for providing the datasets used in this research.
Mention of a trademark, proprietary product, or vendor does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products or vendors that also may be suitable.
DiaM.WehnerT.C.HassellR.PriceD.S.BoyhanG.E.OlsonS.KingS.DavisA.R.TollaG.E.2016Genotype × environment interaction and stability analysis for watermelon fruit yield in the United StatesCrop Sci.5616451661
Lu’quezJ.E.Aguirreza’balL.A.N.AgueroM.E.PereyraV.R.2002Stability and adaptability of cultivars in non-balanced yield trials: Comparison of methods for selecting ‘high oleic’ sunflower hybrids for grain yield and qualityJ. Agron. Crop Sci.188225234
MarshallS.W.TracyW.F.2003Sweet corn p. 537–569. In: P.J. White and L.A. Johnson (eds.). Corn – Chemistry and technology. 2nd ed. Amer. Assn. Cereal Chemists Inc. St. Paul MN
MohammedY.A.ChenC.McPheeK.MillerP.McVayK.EckhoffJ.LambP.MillerJ.KhanQ.BohannonB.KnoxM.HolmesJ.2016Yield performance and stability of dry pea and lentil genotypes in semi-arid cereal dominated cropping systemsField Crops Res.1883140